Solid Bike Computer (Does one exist?)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Solid Bike Computer (Does one exist?)
So I'm thinking about a new bike computer for the new Orca as I'm not so happy with the ROX 9.0 I have on the old Specialized. After doing some reading here and looking at various reviews around the Internet it would seem that a solid reliable wireless bike computer that has both cad and hrm has yet to be built. The ratings on all of them, even those with gps, are average at best. It would seem that if someone came out with a rock solid device, they'd make millions.
#2
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,049
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22596 Post(s)
Liked 8,925 Times
in
4,158 Posts
PS I don't have a vested interest in this because I have no computer and IMO the best computer is no computer. Just ride.
#3
Senior Member
Garmin....excellent product and excellent support just in case....
__________________
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
BMC Roadmachine
Kona Jake the Snake
#5
Fred-ish
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 1,800
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The only issue with wireless tends to be with flashing headlamps - sometimes. I like wireless for ease of setup, but on my fav road bike I use a wired Cateye w/cadence. The sensors are both in the rear, so I can use it when on the trainer as well. Don't over think this, it's only riding.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Solid means one that works well, and continues to work well for an extended period. I have found numerous complaints on all the major brands referring to all sorts of problems including loss of transmission, suspect data, display issues, etc.
I started this thread cause I'm hoping that maybe it's like anything else and folks are only posting reviews when the want to complain. Hopefully BF can change my mind and point me in the direction of a rock solid device.
I started this thread cause I'm hoping that maybe it's like anything else and folks are only posting reviews when the want to complain. Hopefully BF can change my mind and point me in the direction of a rock solid device.
#9
Over the hill
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 24,376
Bikes: Giant Defy, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 998 Post(s)
Liked 1,206 Times
in
692 Posts
Solid means one that works well, and continues to work well for an extended period. I have found numerous complaints on all the major brands referring to all sorts of problems including loss of transmission, suspect data, display issues, etc.
I started this thread cause I'm hoping that maybe it's like anything else and folks are only posting reviews when the want to complain. Hopefully BF can change my mind and point me in the direction of a rock solid device.
I started this thread cause I'm hoping that maybe it's like anything else and folks are only posting reviews when the want to complain. Hopefully BF can change my mind and point me in the direction of a rock solid device.
__________________
It's like riding a bicycle
It's like riding a bicycle
#10
Cat 6
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 219
Bikes: Scott CR-1, Serotta Legend, Serotta CR, Co-Motion Speedster tandem, Masi Nuevo Strada fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In my experiences, Cateye has been the most robust and reliable brand. However the wireless models still have issues, so if you want the most reliable unit, IMO opt for the wired sensor models. I have a wireless Cateye and it is alright but the "max speed" often is 2X 3X or higher than the actual top speed that I know I could have gone.
#12
Old. Slow. Happy.
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
In my experiences, Cateye has been the most robust and reliable brand. However the wireless models still have issues, so if you want the most reliable unit, IMO opt for the wired sensor models. I have a wireless Cateye and it is alright but the "max speed" often is 2X 3X or higher than the actual top speed that I know I could have gone.
#13
Cat 6
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 219
Bikes: Scott CR-1, Serotta Legend, Serotta CR, Co-Motion Speedster tandem, Masi Nuevo Strada fixie
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No matter what the product, be it cycling related or electronics or pretty much anything you can think of, if you search the internet for opinions, you will ALWAYS find complainers about EVERYTHING. If you made a rule to never buy anything that had complaints about it on the internet you would never buy anything! Most of the time you have to look at the general concensus of opinions and ignore the minority. Actually, IMO the complaints are frequently overly represented, as most people who are satisfied with a product don't bother to write about it but the ones who have a beef feel compelled to warn others of their discovery.
#14
still climbing
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Europe
Posts: 279
Bikes: vintage steel bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I am very happy with my Polar CS500. Gives me reliable hrm, cadence and speed data. Everything wireless. I train often in the evening under high tension power lines, with a LED lamp next to the computer and haven't noticed any interference problems. The display is nice, large and very easy to read. If it only had illumination it would be 100% perfect. Still, even in dim conditions the numbers are large enough to be recognized.
In the beginning when I bought it I had a couple of issues that are now solved. Firstly, for the IR data transmission you need to upgrade the software to the newest level. In addition, for the transmission to work perfectly, I found it was better to exit the internet browser, since the Polar wants to open it again itself to get you to the online training analysis webpage. Secondly, it is important to pre-wet the hrm belt to get reliable readings from the very first minute. Both of these were minor issues for me and do not bother me any longer. All in all, I'd recommend it to a friend (but one has to know the limitations for riding in total darkness) ;-)
In the beginning when I bought it I had a couple of issues that are now solved. Firstly, for the IR data transmission you need to upgrade the software to the newest level. In addition, for the transmission to work perfectly, I found it was better to exit the internet browser, since the Polar wants to open it again itself to get you to the online training analysis webpage. Secondly, it is important to pre-wet the hrm belt to get reliable readings from the very first minute. Both of these were minor issues for me and do not bother me any longer. All in all, I'd recommend it to a friend (but one has to know the limitations for riding in total darkness) ;-)
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 900
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Which is, like I said, why I started this thread. Good input so far. Makes me think what you say is on the money.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 71
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use a Polar HRM that uses the same strap as the CS500 and I have found one issue, BT headsets(Motorola S9-HD) that can use A2DP function buttons interfere with each other, hitting the play/pause button resulted in my HR being displayed at 300 something for a second and every once in a while the HR will bleed over into the headset and cause a BEEP BEEP BEEP in sync with my pulse.
#17
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
The only issue with wireless tends to be with flashing headlamps - sometimes. I like wireless for ease of setup, but on my fav road bike I use a wired Cateye w/cadence. The sensors are both in the rear, so I can use it when on the trainer as well. Don't over think this, it's only riding.
But, I hated the display on the Neuro, which would get washed out if I used the backlight, and the LCD's preferred viewing angle made it hard to see if my head was even a bit forward of perpendicular. Cateye has their own 2.4 GHz models, so that's what I'd consider if I got another wireless 'puter with cadence and HR.
Still, a wired version with cadence would be cool, too.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 479
Bikes: 14 Ridely Noah RS, 09 Trek 2.1, 10 Trek 7.1 FX
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have had the Bontrager Node 2 for almost a year. It has been very reliable. It comes with a HRM strap and you add a speed or cadence sensor to fit your bike. Since it is ANT+ you can use other sensors if you choose. I used a Garmin combined speed/cadence sensor for a while. It will also read power meters that output ANT+. I have ~4K miles on mine and just replaced the battery. If you do not require down-loadable data nor GPS this is the best bang for your buck.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 73
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anybody using any of the Iphone cycling apps? I really don't want to shell out for the mount ($30), if its not worth it. Might be nice to have GPS/Pandora/Phone all in one spot.
#22
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
I'd only use one if I could plug it into a dyno charger. Any ride long enough for me to want GPS is long enough to suck down most of the battery.
#24
I like beans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meffa, MA
Posts: 3,336
Bikes: Tarmac Pro, Bianchi Zurigo, Raleigh Gran Sport, Fuji Del Rey, Ironman Centurion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I use the Cateye V3. Have had no problems with the Dinotte on strobe and never any crosstalk or interference with the HRM, cadence or speed. I'd say that's pretty solid.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts