![]() |
Interesting
|
Sorry, not that interesting...
|
Originally Posted by sd790
(Post 12148571)
Sorry, not that interesting...
|
Took too long to load I closed the window.
|
I thought the taller HT option of the current Madone line would have been enough. I hadn't realised that the wheelbase was such a factor. The roubaix has a 13mm longer wheelbase than the same sized (49) tarmac. Is that a significant? I guess so. The HT has a 25mm difference.
What I find interesting is the r&d they seem to be putting in or maybe I'm just falling for the PR. It will be good to have choices in this segment - they're far more suited to real world applications. I wonder what mystical marketing material will be used to compete against zertz :rolleyes: |
now it says explorer can't display, what is it about?
|
Spartacus wants his Roubaix back NAO!!
|
Originally Posted by Adrianinkc
(Post 12147869)
;) |
Oh that sounds promising.
|
Originally Posted by rollin
(Post 12149000)
I wonder what mystical marketing material will be used to compete against zertz :rolleyes:
Maybe PEDALS (poly-elastic dampening absorption limiting system)... Whatever, you can bet some Trek think-tank and focus-groupery is going on |
Originally Posted by Makel
(Post 12149096)
now it says explorer can't display, what is it about?
|
Originally Posted by Makel
(Post 12149096)
now it says explorer can't display, what is it about?
|
I've always wondered why Trek let this segment go, that and high end CX bikes until very recently. I'm looking forward to seeing what they come up with.
|
Originally Posted by patentcad
(Post 12149439)
That's a Windows issue.
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 12149459)
Works Ok on mine.
If that is Treks response I think they are going to fail, I could be wrong but that was ugly IMO. Maybe a good paint job will turn it around, who knows. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.