![]() |
Titanflex
Anyone? Experiences? Yes/no?
|
weak
|
Originally Posted by icedmocha
(Post 12209362)
weak
|
Originally Posted by Phantoj
(Post 12219155)
what is Titanflex?
|
|
Originally Posted by Steev
(Post 12219178)
Kinda figured the google bit was the OP's job but you picked up the slack. Not a new idea. Trek has done it. Ultimately, it's a bike. You turn the pedals, it moves. |
oh look, the y-foil/softride design is back again.
|
They sure make a big thing of not being UCI legal on their website.
|
Originally Posted by Steev
(Post 12221896)
They sure make a big thing of not being UCI legal on their website.
|
Originally Posted by Steev
(Post 12219178)
|
Originally Posted by halfspeed
(Post 12221990)
404.
|
I don't think it's a new concept and the company has been around for a while. They are popular in RAAM.
|
Originally Posted by Andy Somnifac
(Post 12222024)
Not for me.
|
ugleee....
|
Originally Posted by fishymamba
(Post 12231026)
ugleee....
|
Any opinons beside aesthetics? Specifically the "terminator".
|
Very interesting. Very much like the Softride bikes that gained poplularity quick until the UCI banned boom type bikes. Watching one of the videos on their website, I noticed the rider bobbing up and down as he pedaled. I wonder how much does that affect the efficiency of the pedal stroke. Kinda like full suspension mountain bikes that have a rear lockout for climbing to help improve power transfer to the rear wheels without the power loss due to bobbing up and down. Although Softride and Titanflex are very similar looking, I find the softride more aesthetically pleasing with quality in mind and the Titanflex looking like a walmart special or a bike built in someones back yard.
|
Originally Posted by icedmocha
(Post 12296967)
Any opinons beside aesthetics? Specifically the "terminator".
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.c...x&sb=post_time http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.c...nflex;#3022688 There is a lot of yammering on this forum about ride quality, but when someone designs a bike that actually has a bump-absorbing feature -- i.e. something that works on a principle other than the placebo effect -- it's generally dismissed and ignored. See the Klein/Trek SPA and the Cannondale Headshok road bikes... also Softride... |
Originally Posted by Phantoj
(Post 12298112)
It's more of a triathlon bike; I assume you've gone over to the slowtwitch forum and read some of the comments from the tri guys there:
http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.c...x&sb=post_time http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.c...nflex;#3022688 There is a lot of yammering on this forum about ride quality, but when someone designs a bike that actually has a bump-absorbing feature -- i.e. something that works on a principle other than the placebo effect -- it's generally dismissed and ignored. See the Klein/Trek SPA and the Cannondale Headshok road bikes... also Softride... |
The aero position is generally not more comfortable than an upright position. People seem to think that elbow pads and extensions equates to comfort. Getting a comfortable and efficient aero position costs the top dogs lots of money. Spending hours in the aero position requires a lot of practice and adaptation. The purpose of the position is increased efficiency, not increased comfort.
|
Originally Posted by jwible
(Post 12303168)
The aero position is generally not more comfortable than an upright position. People seem to think that elbow pads and extensions equates to comfort. Getting a comfortable and efficient aero position costs the top dogs lots of money. Spending hours in the aero position requires a lot of practice and adaptation. The purpose of the position is increased efficiency, not increased comfort.
|
The review on slowtwitch said that it might not be a good fit if you're really tall. I think you can get the contact points wherever you want, relative to each other, but the weight distribution and handling gets wonky for taller people.
|
Originally Posted by Steev
(Post 12221896)
They sure make a big thing of not being UCI legal on their website.
|
Originally Posted by chado445510
(Post 12304201)
Yeah it doesn't make much sense. I don't know about a performance advantage, all i know is it doesn't have a down-tube, and that is the problem.
|
Originally Posted by icedmocha
(Post 12304915)
Why is that a problem?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.