Which Wheelset? Dura-Ace 7900 VS Reynolds Attack
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 31
Bikes: 2011 S-Works Tarmac SL3, 2011 Trek/Fischer X-Caliber, 2010 Bruce Gordon BLT, 1990 Trek 950 Urban Assualt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Which Wheelset? Dura-Ace 7900 VS Reynolds Attack
I'm in the market for a new racing wheelset (clinchers only) in the $850-$1150 range. I weigh 190-200lbs and am a climber. I'm 6'4" so stiffness is important. I've narrowed my options down to two wheelsets:
2011 Reynolds Attack Carbon Clincher ($1179)
Shimano Dura-Ace WH-7900-C24-CL ($1100)
Any input? Are there better options? Thanks in advance!
2011 Reynolds Attack Carbon Clincher ($1179)
Shimano Dura-Ace WH-7900-C24-CL ($1100)
Any input? Are there better options? Thanks in advance!
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
For that much money, and at your size, you should probably also look into some good handbuilts.
But between those two, I'd go with the Reynolds - lighter and a higher spoke count on the rear. FWIW, I wouldn't want to ride a 20-spoke rear wheel at your size and weight. I'm 200-210, and I've gone through a few 20-spoke rear wheels rather quickly.
But between those two, I'd go with the Reynolds - lighter and a higher spoke count on the rear. FWIW, I wouldn't want to ride a 20-spoke rear wheel at your size and weight. I'm 200-210, and I've gone through a few 20-spoke rear wheels rather quickly.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 324
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I agree that you probably want more spokes, and the number will depend partly on the rims and hubs used on the wheels. If you will only use them for racing the long term durability of a lower spoke count may not be as important, but they will definitely not be as stiff as the same wheels with more spokes.
Since you say you are a climber, if you want to get the weight really low you can use Stan's Alpha 340 rims. They weigh 350 grams each, but are fairly stiff for their weight. To get the maximum stiffness out of the wheels you can go with Alchemy hubs, or alternatively use White Industries or Shimano Dura-Ace hubs. Thinner spokes like CX-Ray will also not be as stiff as thicker spokes like DT Competition or Wheelsmith DB-14. A good compromise would be to use CX-Ray spokes (or non-bladed Laser spokes) everywhere and DB-14 spokes on the rear drive side. You probably want 24f/28r spokes with those. Or you can use Kinlin XR-270 rims which will give you a stiffer, more aerodynamic wheelset with a weight penalty. But even that wheelset will not be heavier than the ones you are currently considering.
Since you say you are a climber, if you want to get the weight really low you can use Stan's Alpha 340 rims. They weigh 350 grams each, but are fairly stiff for their weight. To get the maximum stiffness out of the wheels you can go with Alchemy hubs, or alternatively use White Industries or Shimano Dura-Ace hubs. Thinner spokes like CX-Ray will also not be as stiff as thicker spokes like DT Competition or Wheelsmith DB-14. A good compromise would be to use CX-Ray spokes (or non-bladed Laser spokes) everywhere and DB-14 spokes on the rear drive side. You probably want 24f/28r spokes with those. Or you can use Kinlin XR-270 rims which will give you a stiffer, more aerodynamic wheelset with a weight penalty. But even that wheelset will not be heavier than the ones you are currently considering.
Last edited by valleycyclist; 06-07-11 at 07:40 PM.
#5
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 30,994
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1276 Post(s)
Liked 447 Times
in
238 Posts
yes. https://www.boydcycling.com/clinchers/c50.html
And a couple of questions 1) why limit yourself to clinchers for a set of racing wheels?
and 2) why does anyone pay $1100 for a 1400 gram wheelset that is as aero as a brick?
And a couple of questions 1) why limit yourself to clinchers for a set of racing wheels?
and 2) why does anyone pay $1100 for a 1400 gram wheelset that is as aero as a brick?
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 31
Bikes: 2011 S-Works Tarmac SL3, 2011 Trek/Fischer X-Caliber, 2010 Bruce Gordon BLT, 1990 Trek 950 Urban Assualt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks everyone for your help! Here are my observations.
The Dura-Ace is actually significantly lighter than the Reynolds (1395g vs 1498g).
I limit myself to clinchers because I don't want to blow the bank on tires and seem to have terrible luck with blowouts, and also because I frequently get deals on clinchers but not tubulars.
I'd rather not go too deep/aero because it is often very windy where I live and I don't want to suffer more than I already do in crosswinds.
I don't know anything about handbuilt wheels, but I'd be willing to look into that.
Neither the Dura-Ace nor the Reynolds have weight limits. The Zipp 101s sketch me out with the 205lb weight limit. I've heard rumors of Zipp wheels not being particularly durable.
That said, I think I might be able to get a super good deal on a set of the Reynolds, so I might just go that way anyways. Those Boyd wheels look very promising, but again the 205lb limit is a little concerning.
The Dura-Ace is actually significantly lighter than the Reynolds (1395g vs 1498g).
I limit myself to clinchers because I don't want to blow the bank on tires and seem to have terrible luck with blowouts, and also because I frequently get deals on clinchers but not tubulars.
I'd rather not go too deep/aero because it is often very windy where I live and I don't want to suffer more than I already do in crosswinds.
I don't know anything about handbuilt wheels, but I'd be willing to look into that.
Neither the Dura-Ace nor the Reynolds have weight limits. The Zipp 101s sketch me out with the 205lb weight limit. I've heard rumors of Zipp wheels not being particularly durable.
That said, I think I might be able to get a super good deal on a set of the Reynolds, so I might just go that way anyways. Those Boyd wheels look very promising, but again the 205lb limit is a little concerning.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
My 2010 Reynolds attacks ($720 after tax/shipping during the xmas sales) came in around 1450g if I recall. Their quoted weight seemed to include 30-40g worth of rim tape (which came included in the box), and I used 2g worth of veloplugs. 2011's could be similarly high on the 1498 number, so the weight difference might not be as big as you think.
2011 Reynolds are redesigned a bit, 15g heavier, with new decals than previous years....and of course back at full price.
Anyway, as you alluded to, deals can be had on Reynolds stuff since its sold at Performance Bike.
2011 Reynolds are redesigned a bit, 15g heavier, with new decals than previous years....and of course back at full price.

Anyway, as you alluded to, deals can be had on Reynolds stuff since its sold at Performance Bike.
#9
John Wayne Toilet Paper
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: BH carbon, Ritchey steel, Kona aluminum
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You know, despite appearances, the Shimano wheels are probably more aerodynamic than those particular Reynolds wheels. The Attacks use butted but not aero spokes and that is not a very deep section anyway so you're just not getting much benefit there. Also, the Attacks have 20/24 spokes vs the Shimano's 16/20. FWIW, I am loving my 7850-C24-CL wheels and I'm the same weight as you and also enjoy climbing.
I am personally in the market for something like the Reynolds ThirtyTwo or FortySix.
I am personally in the market for something like the Reynolds ThirtyTwo or FortySix.
Last edited by nhluhr; 06-08-11 at 09:16 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 142
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Portland, Oregon, USA
Posts: 31
Bikes: 2011 S-Works Tarmac SL3, 2011 Trek/Fischer X-Caliber, 2010 Bruce Gordon BLT, 1990 Trek 950 Urban Assualt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Oh wow, those November wheels look like they may just take the cake. I notice on the order form there is a collegiate discount... Almost $100! I wonder if this applies to all collegiate racers as I am one. Thanks again for everyone's valuable input.
#13
Cookies!
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 629
Bikes: Red Huffy, CAAD10 Rival
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You know, I'd never heard of November Bicycles, but I just read through their website and they seem like a pretty interesting business. They've been added to my list of wheel considerations (for the far off future) although those decals need an update ASAP.