My Sub 170 pound body, no lightweight carbon or Ti parts (No Photos)
#52
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 366
Bikes: '03 Trek Fuel 100, '09 Fuji Cross Comp, '09 Fuji Team Issue/RC
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Just to be a pedant: Actually, you are about 30 lbs of carbon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composi...the_human_body
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composi...the_human_body
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I have a carbon fiber tripod. With long exposures ( like at night ), I get sharper photos when I use it than with an aluminum tripod, given the same longish lens. Vibration is a ***** and telephoto lenses magnify it.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 210
Bikes: 2009 Felt B2 Pro, 2009 Trek 1.2, '80s Hercules beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Remember the Blade Runner?
I've been thinking lately about a new bike, and wondered. I weigh around 64kg (140lbs for the non-metric), and at 1.87m in height, there's no weight to lose. Absolutely none. Now, I'm still a weak newcomer to cycling, but I was at the sharp end of every group and training ride I had a chance to join (not many - mostly do solo/pair climbing in the mountains) on my humble Trek 1.2. In a draft-legal tri, I was in the breakaway of every peloton I came across (though was slow out of the water), so the potential is definitely there. If it keeps doing this well, I'll probably snag a '11 model next winter once the discounts roll it. Is it justified to get a light frame if you yourself are as light as it gets?
I've been thinking lately about a new bike, and wondered. I weigh around 64kg (140lbs for the non-metric), and at 1.87m in height, there's no weight to lose. Absolutely none. Now, I'm still a weak newcomer to cycling, but I was at the sharp end of every group and training ride I had a chance to join (not many - mostly do solo/pair climbing in the mountains) on my humble Trek 1.2. In a draft-legal tri, I was in the breakaway of every peloton I came across (though was slow out of the water), so the potential is definitely there. If it keeps doing this well, I'll probably snag a '11 model next winter once the discounts roll it. Is it justified to get a light frame if you yourself are as light as it gets?
Last edited by tessartype; 06-22-11 at 01:49 PM.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't understand how cycling a bunch relates to weight loss. I ride my ass off all the time and my weight doesn't move. If anything, it creeps up and then I have to avoid snacks and do portion control to get it slowly under control.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 210
Bikes: 2009 Felt B2 Pro, 2009 Trek 1.2, '80s Hercules beater
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well, my weight has been as stable as a rock for the last three years at 64kg, barring six months of malnutrition when I couldn't properly afford food and lost a bunch. Regained that within a month of work as cook, though.
But when the mother-and-son hobby is climbing mountain roads, I guess weight matters. We're both skinny, but my bike isn't!
But when the mother-and-son hobby is climbing mountain roads, I guess weight matters. We're both skinny, but my bike isn't!
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 782
Bikes: 73 Raleigh Supercourse, 99 Specialized Stumpjumer, 08 LeMond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5' 11' and went from 176 to 155. My bike hasn't changed all season, but I have a beautiful new daughter! I figure she cost about the same as a new bike and wheels but she'll actually support me when I'm old. (i hope.)
#59
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 17
Bikes: Trek something-or-other, steel singlesteed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Too fat to be competitive on hilly courses? Probably. Too fat to be competitive at the higher levels? I should think so. But too fat for the SPORT? Whatever.
At my absolutely chiseled 6-pack skinniest I weigh more than 180# - I'm 6'2" with big bones and actual muscles in my upper body, and there's not much I can do about it short of cutting off an arm.
Maybe I should call Bradley Wiggins...?
Screw it, I give up. Anyone wanna buy my bikes?
#61
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 812
Bikes: Caad9, Fixed gear, Hardrock beater, 3 speed cruiser
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sounds like someone wants to start a "Show off your cycling body" thread.
#62
Space for rent
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South East
Posts: 278
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ouch.
Too fat to be competitive on hilly courses? Probably. Too fat to be competitive at the higher levels? I should think so. But too fat for the SPORT? Whatever.
At my absolutely chiseled 6-pack skinniest I weigh more than 180# - I'm 6'2" with big bones and actual muscles in my upper body, and there's not much I can do about it short of cutting off an arm.
Maybe I should call Bradley Wiggins...?
Screw it, I give up. Anyone wanna buy my bikes?
Too fat to be competitive on hilly courses? Probably. Too fat to be competitive at the higher levels? I should think so. But too fat for the SPORT? Whatever.
At my absolutely chiseled 6-pack skinniest I weigh more than 180# - I'm 6'2" with big bones and actual muscles in my upper body, and there's not much I can do about it short of cutting off an arm.
Maybe I should call Bradley Wiggins...?
Screw it, I give up. Anyone wanna buy my bikes?
#63
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,468
Bikes: 2011 Cervelo S2, 2001Trek USPS 5200, 06 Cervelo P3 Alum, 1999 Schwinn Pro Stock BMX, 1987 Schwinn Traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ouch.
Too fat to be competitive on hilly courses? Probably. Too fat to be competitive at the higher levels? I should think so. But too fat for the SPORT? Whatever.
At my absolutely chiseled 6-pack skinniest I weigh more than 180# - I'm 6'2" with big bones and actual muscles in my upper body, and there's not much I can do about it short of cutting off an arm.
Maybe I should call Bradley Wiggins...?
Screw it, I give up. Anyone wanna buy my bikes?
Too fat to be competitive on hilly courses? Probably. Too fat to be competitive at the higher levels? I should think so. But too fat for the SPORT? Whatever.
At my absolutely chiseled 6-pack skinniest I weigh more than 180# - I'm 6'2" with big bones and actual muscles in my upper body, and there's not much I can do about it short of cutting off an arm.
Maybe I should call Bradley Wiggins...?
Screw it, I give up. Anyone wanna buy my bikes?
#64
Senior Member
that guy must have the best cycling body in the world, how come I never hear about him?
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Sunny SoOnt
Posts: 64
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts