Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Am I using my shifters correctly?

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Am I using my shifters correctly?

Old 09-03-11, 02:44 PM
  #1  
Marto32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Am I using my shifters correctly?

So I'm fairly new to road biking, ~2 months, and I ride 20 - 30 miles on Saturdays and Sundays. I've noticed that I primarily use my big rings and switch between my back rings to 'fine tune' the resistance.

For example, If I'm climbing I'll shift to the smaller of the big rings and if it's still tough I'll use the back rings to make it easier. As I reach the top I'll shift the back rings to a middle gear and then switch to the big ring in the front on the descent and fine tune as needed.

So I would say I switch between the front big/small rings 80% of the time and use the back rings the other 20%. Someone at the LBS said that I should use the front rings 10% of the time and the back ones 90%. My question is; which way is correct?

Today I primarily tried to use the back rings but in order for me to maintain an 80rpm cadence I end up nearly cross-chaining...
Marto32 is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 02:53 PM
  #2  
Jed19
Senior Member
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Yep, the back cogs are meant for fine tuning. That is where most of your shifting should be at.
Jed19 is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 03:35 PM
  #3  
nathan.johnson
Senior Member
 
nathan.johnson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tucson
Posts: 273

Bikes: 2010 Specialized Allez Elite

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How you shift is up to you, but there is less of a jump between changes when you use the back versus the front. And there is a lot of overlap between gear combinations. For instance my front chain rings have 52 and 34 teeth and my back cassette has 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-24-27 teeth. Using https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ I can find that being in the 34/12 is about the same as being in the 50/17. And being in the 50/21 is about the same as the 34/14. And the 50/27 is about the same as the 34/19.

So the best thing for me, and I think a lot of other people, is to pick the front chainring based on the terrain and then change the rear gears to maintain your preferred cadence. Then if you get a point where the terrain changes drastically, like going from flat to a 10 mile long 7 percent grade, then switch to a different chainring in front. If you're puttering along on a flat in the big chain ring and come to a small hill, you probably don't want to switch to the small ring. Instead, change to a higher-toothed gear (easier) in the rear and just pedal harder until you make it over the top. Then you'll still be in the big ring for the descent.
nathan.johnson is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 04:21 PM
  #4  
Marto32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nathan.johnson
How you shift is up to you, but there is less of a jump between changes when you use the back versus the front. And there is a lot of overlap between gear combinations. For instance my front chain rings have 52 and 34 teeth and my back cassette has 12-13-14-15-16-17-19-21-24-27 teeth. Using https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/ I can find that being in the 34/12 is about the same as being in the 50/17. And being in the 50/21 is about the same as the 34/14. And the 50/27 is about the same as the 34/19.

So the best thing for me, and I think a lot of other people, is to pick the front chainring based on the terrain and then change the rear gears to maintain your preferred cadence. Then if you get a point where the terrain changes drastically, like going from flat to a 10 mile long 7 percent grade, then switch to a different chainring in front. If you're puttering along on a flat in the big chain ring and come to a small hill, you probably don't want to switch to the small ring. Instead, change to a higher-toothed gear (easier) in the rear and just pedal harder until you make it over the top. Then you'll still be in the big ring for the descent.
Going by this I would choose the larger chainring except I think it would still be difficult to keep an 80 rpm cadence without cross-chaining.
Marto32 is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 05:03 PM
  #5  
travelerman
Full Member
 
travelerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 334
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 44 Times in 23 Posts
You're going to find that, the more you ride, the higher your cadence rpm; I try to pedal out a consistent cadence (usually in the 90's), while maintaining roughly the same resistance. This is when I shift; when changes in resistance (usually due to elevation changes) begins to affect my cadence. Obviously, very steep elevations are going to slow your cadence on the climb, while speeding it up on the descent. There are times when I shift to a higher gear just to gain more speed, and once I retain my preferred cadence - barring any severe elevation changes - the resistance evens when as my speed increases.
travelerman is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 05:39 PM
  #6  
Mithrandir
Senior Member
 
Mithrandir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,399

Bikes: 2012 Surly LHT, 1995 GT Outpost Trail

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's up to you, but most people typically use the rear shifter a lot more often, because the jumps are smaller and less jarring. I personally like to keep my cadence as steady as possible, so I typically only shift up or down on the front when I reach a limit on the back.


So I go from 2-7 to 2-8 to 3-3 to 3-4 when shifting up, and 2-3 to 2-2 to 1-7 to 1-6 when shifting down (triple chainring). I customized my gearing so that the three ranges of gears don't overlap too much, so I just avoid 1-8, 1-9, 2-1, 2-9, 3-1, and 3-2 to avoid cross-chaining, and the rest of my gears provide a continual range. The jumps between my front chainrings are rather large and it's unpleasant to switch between them all the time.
Mithrandir is offline  
Old 09-03-11, 06:39 PM
  #7  
mkadam68
Senior Member
 
mkadam68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Eastern Tennessee.
Posts: 3,694

Bikes: 2012 MotorHouse road bike. No. You can't get one.

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Jed19
Yep, the back cogs are meant for fine tuning. That is where most of your shifting should be at.
+1

In any event, try to aim for a fast cadence (how fast your feet go around). The starting point is considered 90rpm's. Some people higher, some people lower. Adjust your gearing so that you can maintain this 90rpm's.
mkadam68 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kpp80202
Bicycle Mechanics
8
04-19-13 12:02 PM
Bahnzo
Classic & Vintage
4
08-30-12 07:09 PM
skeem
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
08-16-12 08:17 AM
szewczykm
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
6
07-02-12 01:33 PM
Handelfan
Bicycle Mechanics
2
12-09-10 01:23 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.