to go aero or not for a crit.
#1
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
to go aero or not for a crit.
So I usually I race with 420 aeros for crits, but don't have acess to them this week. So my choices are to use my bontrager race wheelset which is about the same rim depth as some 202s or a set of zipp 404 with the aluminum brake area. That are 58mm. I weighted them both and the zipps are just a few tenth of a ounces lighter than the bontragers. It just seems its harder to spin those 404s up. So here's the question, what wheels would you use. Is it gonna be more difficult to spin up the 404s or is it gonna be bettter to use them for aero advantages? It is a crit so I guess spinning them up contsantly would be of importance.
The course is 4 corners, flat with long straight aways
The course is 4 corners, flat with long straight aways
#2
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
will you be in the breaks, or will you ride around in the back. if you're sticking your nose in the wind, get aero, if not don't worry about it.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
....and don't race anything you can't afford to replace. I'm just sayin.......
#5
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well it is Cat 5 so there probally wont be any breaks. looking at a smallish field maybe 20 riders. i get on the 404s they seem harder to accelerate with but you guys know better than i do
#7
Senior Member
So I usually I race with 420 aeros for crits, but don't have acess to them this week. So my choices are to use my bontrager race wheelset which is about the same rim depth as some 202s or a set of zipp 404 with the aluminum brake area. That are 58mm. I weighted them both and the zipps are just a few tenth of a ounces lighter than the bontragers. It just seems its harder to spin those 404s up. So here's the question, what wheels would you use. Is it gonna be more difficult to spin up the 404s or is it gonna be bettter to use them for aero advantages? It is a crit so I guess spinning them up contsantly would be of importance.
The course is 4 corners, flat with long straight aways
The course is 4 corners, flat with long straight aways
#8
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
lol. thats funny. They feel so hard to spin up. a couple more races and im outta 5s anyways.. was really wierd when i seen zipp 404s i though okay the rim depth will be in the 40mm range. hell no their 58 mm. cant be good for crits can they
#9
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
It's the 5's, I'd be more concerned with other things than what wheels to ride.
edit: what race are you doing?
edit: what race are you doing?
#11
Senior Member
Lighter and more aero wheels - I'd select the set that has both, the 404s (based on your initial post).
In general if your avg speed is under 25 mph or so, or you have to accelerate a lot in a race, lighter wheels are better. If you spend a lot of time at speed (30-35 mph), even just a minute or two at a time, then aero becomes pretty significant.
In races I generally use aero wheels (60mm/tubular); the wheels happen to be the lightest wheels I own.
In training I generally ride best with light but non-aero wheels, since avg speeds are down 5-7 mph and since I actually have to climb more than 20 seconds at a time. For training purposes I'll use heavier aero wheels (clinchers), but I get shelled easily on hills and after repeated accelerations.
I've been destroyed by Cat 1s on 18 pound bikes with non-aero aluminum clinchers. I've also shelled riders with lighter bikes, faster wheels. Ultimately it's up to the rider; equipment helps only slightly.
In general if your avg speed is under 25 mph or so, or you have to accelerate a lot in a race, lighter wheels are better. If you spend a lot of time at speed (30-35 mph), even just a minute or two at a time, then aero becomes pretty significant.
In races I generally use aero wheels (60mm/tubular); the wheels happen to be the lightest wheels I own.
In training I generally ride best with light but non-aero wheels, since avg speeds are down 5-7 mph and since I actually have to climb more than 20 seconds at a time. For training purposes I'll use heavier aero wheels (clinchers), but I get shelled easily on hills and after repeated accelerations.
I've been destroyed by Cat 1s on 18 pound bikes with non-aero aluminum clinchers. I've also shelled riders with lighter bikes, faster wheels. Ultimately it's up to the rider; equipment helps only slightly.
#12
Banned.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Okay so my training wheels and the zipp 404s weight the same. Because the 404s are 58mm with aluminum frame clinchers am I gonna get shelled trying to spi. Them up or should I go with ny training wheels.
Lighter and more aero wheels - I'd select the set that has both, the 404s (based on your initial post).
In general if your avg speed is under 25 mph or so, or you have to accelerate a lot in a race, lighter wheels are better. If you spend a lot of time at speed (30-35 mph), even just a minute or two at a time, then aero becomes pretty significant.
In races I generally use aero wheels (60mm/tubular); the wheels happen to be the lightest wheels I own.
In training I generally ride best with light but non-aero wheels, since avg speeds are down 5-7 mph and since I actually have to climb more than 20 seconds at a time. For training purposes I'll use heavier aero wheels (clinchers), but I get shelled easily on hills and after repeated accelerations.
I've been destroyed by Cat 1s on 18 pound bikes with non-aero aluminum clinchers. I've also shelled riders with lighter bikes, faster wheels. Ultimately it's up to the rider; equipment helps only slightly.
In general if your avg speed is under 25 mph or so, or you have to accelerate a lot in a race, lighter wheels are better. If you spend a lot of time at speed (30-35 mph), even just a minute or two at a time, then aero becomes pretty significant.
In races I generally use aero wheels (60mm/tubular); the wheels happen to be the lightest wheels I own.
In training I generally ride best with light but non-aero wheels, since avg speeds are down 5-7 mph and since I actually have to climb more than 20 seconds at a time. For training purposes I'll use heavier aero wheels (clinchers), but I get shelled easily on hills and after repeated accelerations.
I've been destroyed by Cat 1s on 18 pound bikes with non-aero aluminum clinchers. I've also shelled riders with lighter bikes, faster wheels. Ultimately it's up to the rider; equipment helps only slightly.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
If you were racing the Pro/1/2, I would say aero. But for a true Cat 5 in Florida, assuming Bartow today, I wouldn't worry about it. Wheels aren't going to make a bit of difference.
Oh, and you think nobody is going to break away, Florida always have people that are sandbaggers, or just "passing through" the ranks on up. Since this is the Bill Bones series, I am going out on a limb and thinking there are going to be 4-5 guys that are real strong, and probably will be in Cat 3 in the next year or so in that group..haha.
Good luck, just go ride and stay out of trouble.
Oh...and if you choose the Zipps, either remove the decals, or you better finish top 3.
Oh, and you think nobody is going to break away, Florida always have people that are sandbaggers, or just "passing through" the ranks on up. Since this is the Bill Bones series, I am going out on a limb and thinking there are going to be 4-5 guys that are real strong, and probably will be in Cat 3 in the next year or so in that group..haha.
Good luck, just go ride and stay out of trouble.
Oh...and if you choose the Zipps, either remove the decals, or you better finish top 3.
Last edited by zigmeister; 09-24-11 at 07:57 AM.
#16
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,801
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1159 Post(s)
Liked 834 Times
in
554 Posts
If the Zipps weigh the same, and are more aero, how could they possibly be slower to accelerate ? Unless the bearings are shot.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#17
Senior Member
#18
Senior Member
In theory perhaps, but in practice what kind of times or distances are we talking about? Nanoseconds? Microns? We know that a 50% change in moment of inertia, results in only a 0.019% change in power for a crit. Again, that's 50 compared to 0.019, a factor of less than 1/1000th.
#19
Senior Member
think about it this way:
M = I*A
M = the moment (Torque) applied to the wheel.
I = moment of inertia
A = angular acceleration.
The moment of inertia is defined by the square of the distance of the mass from the center. So if both wheels are the same weight they can still have a wildy different I depending on the way the weight is distributed. the weight of the hub is important here, for a very similar hub weight and size the zipps should have a lower I. That is because if the hubs are similar together with the spokes the rims are the same weight but the zipps are higher and will thus have a lower radius.
M = I*A
M = the moment (Torque) applied to the wheel.
I = moment of inertia
A = angular acceleration.
The moment of inertia is defined by the square of the distance of the mass from the center. So if both wheels are the same weight they can still have a wildy different I depending on the way the weight is distributed. the weight of the hub is important here, for a very similar hub weight and size the zipps should have a lower I. That is because if the hubs are similar together with the spokes the rims are the same weight but the zipps are higher and will thus have a lower radius.
#20
Senior Member
think about it this way:
M = I*A
M = the moment (Torque) applied to the wheel.
I = moment of inertia
A = angular acceleration.
The moment of inertia is defined by the square of the distance of the mass from the center. So if both wheels are the same weight they can still have a wildy different I depending on the way the weight is distributed. the weight of the hub is important here, for a very similar hub weight and size the zipps should have a lower I. That is because if the hubs are similar together with the spokes the rims are the same weight but the zipps are higher and will thus have a lower radius.
M = I*A
M = the moment (Torque) applied to the wheel.
I = moment of inertia
A = angular acceleration.
The moment of inertia is defined by the square of the distance of the mass from the center. So if both wheels are the same weight they can still have a wildy different I depending on the way the weight is distributed. the weight of the hub is important here, for a very similar hub weight and size the zipps should have a lower I. That is because if the hubs are similar together with the spokes the rims are the same weight but the zipps are higher and will thus have a lower radius.
#21
Senior Member
In theory perhaps, but in practice what kind of times or distances are we talking about? Nanoseconds? Microns? We know that a 50% change in moment of inertia, results in only a 0.019% change in power for a crit. Again, that's 50 compared to 0.019, a factor of less than 1/1000th.
Unfortunately racing is not just about average power. It's also tactical/situational. If I have to do an extra downstroke to get to speed, or the extra 800 grams of rim/tire weight forces a rider to leave an extra foot or two gap, it costs precious reserves to get back into the draft. If a racer has to average just a watt over their exploding point for that race (whatever that is on that day etc), they're out of the race.
At the same time, as I pointed out earlier, equipment only helps a little. The engine (and its brain) is more important.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745
Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This must be an important crit with a lot on the line to be considering running a set of Zipps over a set of Bontragers.
Last edited by svtmike; 09-24-11 at 02:17 PM.
#25
Senior Member
All i was trying to say with that post is that if you have about equal hub size that aero wheels probably have smaller moment of inertia making them easier to spin up.