Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Difference/Effects of Low/Mid/High Profile Wheelsets?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Difference/Effects of Low/Mid/High Profile Wheelsets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-28-12, 12:54 PM
  #1  
1337
Thread Starter
 
FPSDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 858

Bikes: CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Difference/Effects of Low/Mid/High Profile Wheelsets?

What's the practical riding difference between a wheelset that is 20mm deep vs 30mm deep vs 40mm deep?

e.g. Soul S2.0 vs Soul S3.0 vs Soul S4.0
FPSDavid is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 12:56 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Jed19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,224
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Aerodynamics is the short answer.
Jed19 is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 12:58 PM
  #3  
Descends like a rock
 
pallen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 4,034

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 8 Posts
nothing - its all in your head
pallen is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 01:01 PM
  #4  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times in 371 Posts
about 10-15 seconds in a 40k tt.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 03:02 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
And to make things much, much more complicated when it comes to aerodynamics of wheels: whether a 20 v. 40mm wheel is more or less aero depends on about 5 other factors (tire selection, rim shape, rim width, spoke count, spoke selection, hub flange width).

As an example the 23mm deep Corima Winium+ was more aerodynamic than the 52mm deep Mavic Cosmic Carbone SLR in the recent Tour Aero tests with a 23mm Conti clincher tire.

In general a well designed set of aero wheels can save up to 2 minutes in a 40k tt for someone riding about 20mph. Those time savings are for a disc and 808 front though. Something more reasonable, say the difference between a set of Ksyriums and a Hed Jet 5 or Zipp 303 firecrest or Bontrager D3 Aura 5 is more likely 60-70 seconds in a 40k tt.

Soul, even by their own admission, has done no aerodynamic designing, so I would expect the savings to be a bit less than the 60-70 seconds quoted above for 50ishmm wheels from data driven manufacturers.

Velonews has been running a lot of tire aerodynamics v. rolling resistance articles lately and this has something that has been well known to some of us for years but I'm glad it's getting more light. But the importance can't be stressed enough in aero wheel discussions. It's really quite worthless to buy most "aero wheels" and put 23mm tires on them, except companies that really design for such a tire. In the end though you'll pay a premium for such design emphasis.
Triguy is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 08:38 PM
  #6  
Serious Cyclist
 
Dan333SP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: RVA
Posts: 9,308

Bikes: Emonda SL6

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5721 Post(s)
Liked 261 Times in 99 Posts
Ignorant question- what tire width do pro riders use when they have deep rims on TT bikes, if 23mm isn't effective? 19?
Dan333SP is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 08:39 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
tagaproject6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,550

Bikes: Wilier Izoard XP (Record);Cinelli Xperience (Force);Specialized Allez (Rival);Bianchi Via Nirone 7 (Centaur); Colnago AC-R Disc;Colnago V1r Limited Edition;De Rosa King 3 Limited(Force 22);DeRosa Merak(Red):Pinarello Dogma 65.1 Hydro(Di2)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 145 Posts
Depends on the crosswinds...
tagaproject6 is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 08:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
To me 20, 30, and 40mm rims are virtually identical. I haven't ridden the new wide shallow rims (Zipp 303 etc) but I went from Reynolds 46mm to Stinger 6s because I felt the Reynolds, although light, didn't give me much aero benefit.

Tires make a huge difference in aero, as pointed out above. The Stinger 6s and other wide rims (typically 28mm wide rim at max) are usually designed for a particular width tire. The Stingers are made for a 23 tire.

Faired tires make a huge difference I think. I know that there are mechanics that put clear caulk along the seam of the rim and tire, to smooth out air flow there. The further out on the wheel the more important the aerodynamics. Hubs don't count for much.

My understanding, based on talks with a wind tunnel person, is that a narrow rim and narrow tire would be fastest, but since most people won't run an 18 or 19mm tire, designers have gone to wider rims to properly "fair" the wider 21-22-23mm tires.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 08:59 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,419
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Headwind they all suck. Crosswind deepest profile is the worst. Tailwind they all jolly. Wind in any direction from 90 degrees on backwards the deeper the wheel the faster you go. 50mm is pretty much the best compromise.
UCIMBZ is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 09:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan333SP
Ignorant question- what tire width do pro riders use when they have deep rims on TT bikes, if 23mm isn't effective? 19?
23mm and thats why Hed, Zipp, Enve, Bontrager, etc have all started designing their wheels around 23mm tires. When I said "aero wheels" I meant a 19mm wide, 50mm deep v rim. But to that end, pros keep using 23mm tires and that why Mavic and others are finally starting to go wide ~3 years after Hed and Zipp.

Lets face it, pros and consumers are in a tough spot. 20mm tires don't feel as fast and they aren't produced by many companies. Even Vittoria, which makes a narrow version of their Corsa CX, isn't a great option because the narrow tire uses the same tire on a smaller casing making it a poor rolling tire.

However, smart pro riders do tend to go narrower. Jordan Rapp, is an engineer by education but a triathlete by profession, and he runs a 21mm tire up front even on his Firecrests. Tony Martin was running a 22mm Conti on his front wheel at the world champs TT if I'm not mistaken.

When I had the privilege to be provided wheels (and subsequently a tire) by Hed, they gave me the new at the time 19-20mm Bontrager Aerowing TT tire. Apparently, it was a combination of the narrowness, shape and filling in the rim/tire gap that made it a spectacularly fast tire; particularly on a wheel like the Hed 3 which features a 20mm wide rim. However, they admitted at the time that their big time pros weren't riding it due to sponsorship obligations and general distrust of such narrow tires.

There is a very old adage which is not necessarily outdated that the best tire width for aerodynamics is one which is no wider than your brake tracks.
Triguy is offline  
Old 03-28-12, 09:25 PM
  #11  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times in 1,464 Posts
Triguy,

Thanks for the information and insight. Your posts are really helpful.
StanSeven is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
curbowman
Framebuilders
6
12-08-17 04:05 PM
domnit
Fitting Your Bike
0
05-20-15 10:36 PM
AKang269
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
61
02-01-12 05:46 PM
dafadda
Road Cycling
0
06-13-10 08:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.