Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Cross training for cyclists? (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/807693-cross-training-cyclists.html)

dalava 03-29-12 07:53 AM

Cross training for cyclists?
 
Just wondering how many of you cross train with running and how often. I am not interested in tri or anything, just want to see if you are seeing any benefits of doing that. At present, I run between 3-5 miles once a week or so, and pretty much ride 5-6 days per wee. Every time after I run, I feel my legs are dead, and I almost have to take the subsequent ride as recovery ride. So besides the conditioning benefit in general, I am not sure if running is really helping me as a cyclist.

BTW, I am not training to race or anything, just like to go faster and ride harder.

gsteinb 03-29-12 07:59 AM

if you're looking for general fitness, cross train.

if you want to ride faster and harder train faster and harder.

blcknspo0ln 03-29-12 08:00 AM

Yes, yes and yes. Cross training in any other physical capacity will always increase your ability in another. They are all mutually beneficial. I'd also look into strength training for your core and legs, as well.

gsteinb 03-29-12 08:04 AM

you must realize there are studies that disprove all of that, yes?

BartJ 03-29-12 08:15 AM

I am a runner. I honestly feel the cross training for tri's, particularly the cycling, has helped me with my running. I have posted faster running times with less training miles running, than before I started biking and swimming.

blcknspo0ln 03-29-12 08:16 AM

You know, rereading the OP's original question of if cross training benefits him exclusively as a cyclist, I will take my comment back. Although I do stand adamant that cross-training in multiple fitness realms adds value to the healthiness of an individual overall vs. strictly cycling.

telebianchi 03-29-12 08:26 AM


Originally Posted by BartJ (Post 14030739)
I am a runner. I honestly feel the cross training for tri's, particularly the cycling, has helped me with my running. I have posted faster running times with less training miles running, than before I started biking and swimming.

Maybe your faster running times were because you were doing fewer but better focused running training miles and not because of the added swimming/cycling. Maybe you could have worked out a different running training plan (no swimming/cycling) and have even better running times than you have now.

I don't doubt that you are now a faster runner, but your single anecdotal results provide very little, if any, proof that cross-training made you a faster runner.

Looigi 03-29-12 10:13 AM

I do some leg plyometrics...which I think is beneficial for riding. Jumping, foot sprinting, running up stairs.

mmmdonuts 03-29-12 10:21 AM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 14030671)
if you're looking for general fitness, cross train.

if you want to ride faster and harder train faster and harder.

This.

If you are riding 5-6 days per week then running an additional day will not improve your cycling.

eugenek 03-29-12 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by blcknspo0ln (Post 14030746)
You know, rereading the OP's original question of if cross training benefits him exclusively as a cyclist, I will take my comment back. Although I do stand adamant that cross-training in multiple fitness realms adds value to the healthiness of an individual overall vs. strictly cycling.

I would put emphasis on "in multiple fitness realms." Running and cycling are not multiple fitness realms. Cycling and strength training for your legs are, but there are many studies showing that trying to cross-train the same muscle group for strength and endurance at the same time is very tricky and potentially futile (there is a substantial risk of "interference" where different types of training inhibit each other).

The best and safest kind of cross training is endurance cycling and core & upper body strength training.

LowCel 03-29-12 10:35 AM

I cut grass, it doesn't make me any faster. :o

gsteinb 03-29-12 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by eugenek (Post 14031300)
I would put emphasis on "in multiple fitness realms." Running and cycling are not multiple fitness realms. Cycling and strength training for your legs are, but there are many studies showing that trying to cross-train the same muscle group for strength and endurance at the same time is very tricky and potentially futile (there is a substantial risk of "interference" where different types of training inhibit each other).

The best and safest kind of cross training is endurance cycling and core & upper body strength training.


and there are no indications that having a stronger core makes you a faster cyclist. in fact in recent studies regarding weight lifting and cyclists (with the exception of track sprint specialists) indications are that at best it doesn't hurt (ones cycling) and at worst it actually makes one slower.

eugenek 03-29-12 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 14031324)
and there are no indications that having a stronger core makes you a faster cyclist. in fact in recent studies regarding weight lifting and cyclists (with the exception of track sprint specialists) indications are that at best it doesn't hurt (ones cycling) and at worst it actually makes one slower.

That's a question of priorities. Having a stronger core and upper body makes you a healthier person.

Gege-Bubu 03-29-12 10:49 AM


Originally Posted by LowCel (Post 14031305)
I cut grass, it doesn't make me any faster. :o

hahahahahaha

gsteinb 03-29-12 10:50 AM

that's seems irrelevant to the question. the OP's question appears to be 'how to improve as a cyclist.'

eugenek 03-29-12 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 14031400)
that's seems irrelevant to the question. the OP's question appears to be 'how to improve as a cyclist.'

Is it possible to improve as a cyclist without getting faster?

LowCel 03-29-12 11:12 AM


Originally Posted by eugenek (Post 14031452)
Is it possible to improve as a cyclist without getting faster?

Yes. For some people improving means being able to ride further and couldn't care less about speed.

gsteinb 03-29-12 11:51 AM

all of it goes back to my first post and ascertaining the OP's goals.

dalava 03-29-12 11:55 AM

For me, I am mostly interested in improving my average speed over any given ride, regardless of distance. I started running a couple of years ago thinking the cross training may help (and it's also a lot easier when traveling). I mostly just jog at 8 min-mile pace for 3-5 miles but can certainly go further and run harder. So far, I haven't seen any improvement in my cycling performance, and in fact, the day after I run, some of my leg muscles are so tired that I feel like they are impeding my riding.

RUOkie 03-29-12 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 14031708)
all of it goes back to my first post and ascertaining the OP's goals.

you are more patient than I. I got frustrated just reading the above posts.

gsteinb knows what he is talking about.

DGlenday 03-29-12 12:09 PM


Originally Posted by gsteinb (Post 14030693)
said many things...


Here we go again - same old argument.

Ask any professional cycling coach (you know - people who have actually trained people to actually win huge races) - and they swear by core-strength training and cross-training.

For just one example - read this book:
http://www.coach-hughes.com/text/book.html

Add to that - my personal experience tells me that they are right.

gsteinb 03-29-12 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by DGlenday (Post 14031794)
Here we go again - same old argument.

Ask any professional cycling coach (you know - people who have actually trained people to actually win huge races) - and they swear by core-strength training and cross-training.

yeah, umm no. They suggest it in the off season to help balance muscle groups in order to stave off injury and prevent boredom. Actual science suggests that in many applications, weight lifting, to take one example, actually makes you slower. Which in the winter tends not to matter to guys because they're building a fitness base.

Again, it depends on what one's goals and baseline fitness are. If you're looking to get faster during the cycling season weight lifting isn't going to do it. Running isn't going to do it. If you're looking for overall physical fitness any number of things will accomplish that.

StanSeven 03-29-12 01:02 PM

Again, gsteinb is correct. He's the only person here that consistently is right and knows what he is talking about.

Munk69 03-29-12 01:09 PM


Originally Posted by StanSeven (Post 14032029)
Again, gsteinb is correct. He's the only person here that consistently is right and knows what he is talking about.

You are wrong! This is the internetz... Everyone is 100% right about everything!

rpeterson 03-29-12 01:10 PM


Originally Posted by DGlenday (Post 14031794)
Here we go again - same old argument.

Ask any professional cycling coach (you know - people who have actually trained people to actually win huge races) - and they swear by core-strength training and cross-training.

For just one example - read this book:
http://www.coach-hughes.com/text/book.html

Add to that - my personal experience tells me that they are right.

I'm primarily a triathlete, but during the Fall and Winter I stopped nearly all my cross-training and started cycling hard exclusively. Guess what happened? My FTP jumped 50 watts and I started riding Cat 2s off my wheel in group rides. Now I'm back to tri training and getting my ass kicked by the 3s in the local hammerfest.

If you want to ride better, you need to ride more and skip all the extra crap.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.