![]() |
I guess you're using 'hammering' in a very specific way, then. I use it any effort that feels pretty dang hard. I think you're using it more like an all out final sprint - I'd rather call those sprints as opposed to hammering, since you can definitely hammer for an hour, whereas you can't sprint for an hour.
Either way, you gotta ride hard and feel the hurt to get better. Even the pros acknowledge that cycling is largely about taking the suffering on the bike, both in practice, and then in the races. You can do all the technique drills you want in cycling, but you're not going to get any faster unless you work harder, and usually a lot harder. On the bike, you can hammer at any level - it's just relative. This guy might only be able to hammer a few miles of a measly 10 mile ride, but it'll yield more benefit than riding easy for those 10 miles. |
Originally Posted by Erzulis Boat
(Post 14120850)
Just got back from a ride, and I have a Firestone Double Jack in the system, so fair warning.
I have been biking a long time, and the speed thing has a lot to do with acceleration. Maintaining speed is the product of getting to speed. I swear the biggest obstacle is getting the desired speed initially. I will try to explain. You are cruising at 16. You want to bang 19 and hold it. You increase the effort until you are hitting 19, but you took a while to do it. 19 is kicking your ass, and you start to drop back down. You jam the pedals, get rockin' on 19 quick and hold on to that ***** for dear life. Maintaining it doesn't seem so bad. I think the issue is not taking the step to jam the speed and hold. How many times have you rolled down some chimpy hill at 24, and held it for a long time on the flat afterward? Anyway, this is half the battle IMO. Exponential is a word we love to hear when it comes to investing, but it is every cyclists worst nightmare when it comes to speed. I am not a wordy guy, but you got to bang the speed before you can maintain, and this is the hardest part. |
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
(Post 14121132)
Damn bro, I gotta git me summa dat stuff !! Sounds kick-ass
|
Originally Posted by Erzulis Boat
(Post 14121156)
10% alc. and you only have to drink one...........no guilt!
|
Protip: Stoplights/signs hurt your average speed.
|
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14121061)
I guess you're using 'hammering' in a very specific way, then. I use it any effort that feels pretty dang hard. I think you're using it more like an all out final sprint - I'd rather call those sprints as opposed to hammering, since you can definitely hammer for an hour, whereas you can't sprint for an hour.
Either way, you gotta ride hard and feel the hurt to get better. Even the pros acknowledge that cycling is largely about taking the suffering on the bike, both in practice, and then in the races. You can do all the technique drills you want in cycling, but you're not going to get any faster unless you work harder, and usually a lot harder. On the bike, you can hammer at any level - it's just relative. This guy might only be able to hammer a few miles of a measly 10 mile ride, but it'll yield more benefit than riding easy for those 10 miles. this is the ride at the hammerfest...pretty much getting dropped. http://connect.garmin.com/activity/166903658 this is the ride at the hammerfest without getting dropped. http://connect.garmin.com/activity/169228564 they are a week apart. The ride is actually 23 miles but the first bit starts out with a slow 13mph pace with all 3 groups as a warm up which i dont start my garmin until we take off with the A group. I did 3 solo rides on this same route with 18 avg in the week between with good rest and only spun a 12 miler the day before just to keep loose but not tire myself out. heres the comparison... http://connect.garmin.com/activity/c...yId2=166903658 I got pretty much gained 3.1 mph average with the same effort. |
Only a valid comparison if you're drafting on both or not drafting on both. If you got dropped, you lose the draft, and there's pretty much most of the missing 2-3mph.
My drafted rides which are not even as hard as my solo efforts typically average 2mph faster than my solo rides, which are actually done at a harder overall effort. |
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14121373)
Only a valid comparison if you're drafting on both or not drafting on both. If you got dropped, you lose the draft, and there's pretty much most of the missing 2-3mph.
My drafted rides which are not even as hard as my solo efforts typically average 2mph faster than my solo rides, which are actually done at a harder overall effort. sorry, i was going back to edit. I drafted on both, I wasn't strong enough to even pull on the first by a long shot. Like I said, I've been out for awhile and really working on getting my conditioning up, with good conditioning comes good averages, or consistent averages. I can do that same route solo at at least a 19 or close to 20 if I give it a good solid pull, but thats about all I got right now, give it another month and I will be doing it at 21 solo, which is my personal best, 21.1 on that particular route, the climb at the end, or middle is what kills the average. Regardless of how I got to these figures, the OP just wants a higher avg. Him hammering for long periods of time will ultimately result in a lower avg. if he doesn't have the conditioning to sustain it, which goes back to the "it doesn't get easier, you just get faster" saying. Even drafting, if he rides with a group that only keeps the effort at a slightly elevated level, hit fitness and his average will increase over time. If they hammer away from him he will get burn out and get dropped, slowing the group or finishing alone...either way slower. |
and I did say that hammering under the right conditions is ok, like doing intervals twice a week. Thats my next step, now that my endurance is returning, I need to work more on strength. Hill repeats and intervals are in my near future, twice a week.
|
sometimes i feel like i push too hard towards the end of the ride and i get this chill feeling running down my back like im really cold, is that bad?
|
Originally Posted by Velo Vol
(Post 14121235)
Protip: Stoplights/signs hurt your average speed.
|
Originally Posted by DropDeadFred
(Post 14121419)
and I did say that hammering under the right conditions is ok, like doing intervals twice a week. Thats my next step, now that my endurance is returning, I need to work more on strength. Hill repeats and intervals are in my near future, twice a week.
You're really talking about sprinting or all out efforts, which can be sustained for short periods, like 5 minutes or less. That's hammering too, but a very specific part of it. Obviously OP should do a range of training, but riding fairly hard should be a big part of it if he wants to get faster. Doing sprints all-out is part of that, but obviously cannot be even close to a majority of it - even a professional cannot train at zone5 HR all the time, or even close to it. |
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14121723)
I still think your definition of hammering as strictly zone5 stuff is wayyy too narrow. Most cyclists don't limit hammering to max-HR zone5 work. My zone4 and even upper zone3 stuff is hard (and fast) enough that I and most nonelite riders would consider it hammering, but I can hold that zone4 for a good 45-60 minutes.
You're really talking about sprinting or all out efforts, which can be sustained for short periods, like 5 minutes or less. That's hammering too, but a very specific part of it. Obviously OP should do a range of training, but riding fairly hard should be a big part of it if he wants to get faster. Doing sprints all-out is part of that, but obviously cannot be even close to a majority of it - even a professional cannot train at zone5 HR all the time, or even close to it. I could easily discern that the guys I ride with might not feel like they are hammering when I'm trying to keep up with them on tuesdays and I"M hammering. |
I wouldnt worry about average speed, but if you want to get faster, yes, you will get faster just by riding more if you've just started out. Eventually, you will plateau. If you still want to get faster, you have to push yourself more. Do that a while and you will plateau again. If you continue to want to get faster, you will eventually need a deliberate training program. Eventually, genetics will become your limit and you wont be able to do any better.
|
Tips my old coach (a former European pro) taught me to get a faster avg. speed:
1. Ride more in the drops. Most of the guys I ride with are rarely if ever in the drops. I try to spend at least half of every ride in the drops. Get used to it and stay low, it reduces wind resistance and optimizes hip angle. 2. Learn to ride "smoothly". Constant acceleration/deceleration is exhausting and counter-productive. Stay seated as much as possible, don't stomp on the pedals. Think "circles" as you pedal. Use the terrain: work the hills and then get rest on descents. 3. Use your gears. I see a lot of guys who never shift. In rolling terrain, you should be constantly shifting to optimize cadence and keep things efficient. 4. Intervals are the best way to train yourself to go faster. I do sets of 90 seconds on, 30 seconds off. Really work them. Do both hill and flat intervals. "Fartlek"-style training is also hugely helpful in training yourself to effectively bridge gaps and deal with pace changes. 5. Ride with people who are slightly faster than you or more experienced. Shift when they do, note the details of how they pedal and their positioning and copy them. |
just letting you guys know i can barely keep 19mph over a 6 mile stretch, thats me trying. so how will i do in a collegiate men's D class even with drafting? i can see getting drop after a few laps
|
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 14122349)
Tips my old coach (a former European pro) taught me to get a faster avg. speed:
1. Ride more in the drops. Most of the guys I ride with are rarely if ever in the drops. I try to spend at least half of every ride in the drops. Get used to it and stay low, it reduces wind resistance and optimizes hip angle. 2. Learn to ride "smoothly". Constant acceleration/deceleration is exhausting and counter-productive. Stay seated as much as possible, don't stomp on the pedals. Think "circles" as you pedal. Use the terrain: work the hills and then get rest on descents. 3. Use your gears. I see a lot of guys who never shift. In rolling terrain, you should be constantly shifting to optimize cadence and keep things efficient. 4. Intervals are the best way to train yourself to go faster. I do sets of 90 seconds on, 30 seconds off. Really work them. Do both hill and flat intervals. "Fartlek"-style training is also hugely helpful in training yourself to effectively bridge gaps and deal with pace changes. 5. Ride with people who are slightly faster than you or more experienced. Shift when they do, note the details of how they pedal and their positioning and copy them. 2. ive been noticing that little thing about smoother pedaling from the 1 o clock to the 7 o clock position of the cranks and i hope thats helping my form. 3. it seems that i'm always stuck on my 50x19 or 50x21. is it good to train in a lower gear at a lower cadence so your muscle will get used to more resistance? 4. 90 seconds of effort or 30 seconds of effort and for how many sets of those do you do of those? |
Originally Posted by DropDeadFred
(Post 14122046)
absolutely, hammering is subjective to each rider, anything in my zone 4 for me is just barely pushing it and doesn't tire me too bad, its my zone 5 that tends to make me feel like I'm giving a maximum effort (as it should) and am hammering.
I could easily discern that the guys I ride with might not feel like they are hammering when I'm trying to keep up with them on tuesdays and I"M hammering. Zone 2-3 is the 'aerobic' zone, and the upper end of zone3 should actually feel pretty tough for anything over 30 minutes. My Zone4 hurts pretty bad within 5 minutes, and my 2 x 20 minute power is nearly 300 watts. |
Originally Posted by datlas
(Post 14120582)
Get a book from the bookstore or library on bicycle training.
I personally like Chris Carmichael's, but any one will do. The short answer is that if you just keep riding you will get a little bit faster and be able to ride a lot longer. In other words, improved endurance is easy, but improved speed is not so easy. If your goal is to get faster, you will have to train more seriously, that includes intervals/speedwork etc. |
Originally Posted by Reynolds
(Post 14120559)
Or you could try aerobars. :innocent:
|
Originally Posted by pallen
(Post 14122309)
I wouldnt worry about average speed, but if you want to get faster, yes, you will get faster just by riding more if you've just started out. Eventually, you will plateau. If you still want to get faster, you have to push yourself more. Do that a while and you will plateau again. If you continue to want to get faster, you will eventually need a deliberate training program. Eventually, genetics will become your limit and you wont be able to do any better.
|
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 14122349)
Tips my old coach (a former European pro) taught me to get a faster avg. speed:
1. Ride more in the drops. Most of the guys I ride with are rarely if ever in the drops. I try to spend at least half of every ride in the drops. Get used to it and stay low, it reduces wind resistance and optimizes hip angle. 2. Learn to ride "smoothly". Constant acceleration/deceleration is exhausting and counter-productive. Stay seated as much as possible, don't stomp on the pedals. Think "circles" as you pedal. Use the terrain: work the hills and then get rest on descents. 3. Use your gears. I see a lot of guys who never shift. In rolling terrain, you should be constantly shifting to optimize cadence and keep things efficient. 4. Intervals are the best way to train yourself to go faster. I do sets of 90 seconds on, 30 seconds off. Really work them. Do both hill and flat intervals. "Fartlek"-style training is also hugely helpful in training yourself to effectively bridge gaps and deal with pace changes. 5. Ride with people who are slightly faster than you or more experienced. Shift when they do, note the details of how they pedal and their positioning and copy them.
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14122552)
You almost certainly have your Zone4 HR wrong, then. Zone 4 should NEVER feel that easy. Redo your HR testing (if you've done it at all) - you're definitely misinterpreting your HRs.
Zone 2-3 is the 'aerobic' zone, and the upper end of zone3 should actually feel pretty tough for anything over 30 minutes. My Zone4 hurts pretty bad within 5 minutes, and my 2 x 20 minute power is nearly 300 watts. my zone 4 is super easy, i meant 6 not 5 earlier as far as hammering, even my zone 5 isn't that exhausting for over long stretches, especially if I'm in a paceline. |
then it is likely that your max HR is higher than 199.
there are a few highly efficient people out there who don't conform to the chart you embedded, but for most, when zone 4 & 5 are easy that means the HR you are computing from is too low. |
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
(Post 14122598)
Screw that! Just put a second magnet on your wheel.
|
is riding 32 miles and maintaining speeds of 20+ mph impossible? with or w/o genetics should be doable right?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.