![]() |
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14156370)
Op - forget all the advice to spend more if you cant.
I am for real. I own both a hi end cervelo as well as a entry level sora giant defy3 purchased 3.5 trs ago at lbs for $650. I ride both now so unlike most of the folks commenting, actually can comment on what is lost with an entry lvl bike. My message- you lose very little except for slightly crisper shifting. My speed is the same on borh bikes and ride quality is just subjectively different but not inferior on the giant. I actually ride my giant way more now due to its replacability, and have NEVER thought dang my cervelo is such a faster or lighter bike. The dura ace is obviously better than sora but lets be real - $1000 for slightly crisper shifting is pretty low bang for buck. Sora works fine and the chains and parts cost 50% of the 105-da line parts. They also dont wear quickly . Shimano actually doesnt sell sora or 2200 gruppos because they want you to upgrade to their hi margin groupsets. Sora is good enough to race and win with. I honestly would have a hard time justifying the cost of a nonsora group on a future bike given how solid it works for me. Your choice of a triple vs double will affect your shifting far more than your groupset (double being cleaner on the extremes.) |
Originally Posted by Peiper1
(Post 14157231)
SlimRider is absolutely correct. My first road bike was a crappy old 1970's Peugeot that I picked up for $20 at a garage sale about 25 years ago. The bike was in such terrible shape that, in order to be able to ride it, I had to learn to do most repairs/maintenance myself. I joined a local bike club and was fortunate enough that a couple of the guys were willing to take the time to teach me how to do most things. Over the years I have probably saved untold thousands of dollars by not relying on LBS's to do most repairs.
If you want to ride then ride. Dont spend hours buying a beater and fixing it. A recent gen derailleur is cakewalk to adjust. A old overused one is often impossible. I thought id save a ton by learning basic bike repair but honestly my recent gen bikes are so problem free in 5 yrs of riding that i dont think its necessary to own more than the basicest tools. I actually regret the hours i wasted learning to remove parts wtc since i fo it sp onfrequently that it is a waste of my time . |
Originally Posted by hhnngg1
(Post 14157551)
Sorry but if you get a new entry lvl bike you wont even need repairs for many years. The cable adjustments dont even need tools and cleaning needs minimal tools.
If you want to ride then ride. Dont spend hours buying a beater and fixing it. A recent gen derailleur is cakewalk to adjust. A old overused one is often impossible. I thought id save a ton by learning basic bike repair but honestly my recent gen bikes are so problem free in 5 yrs of riding that i dont think its necessary to own more than the basicest tools. I actually regret the hours i wasted learning to remove parts wtc since i fo it sp onfrequently that it is a waste of my time . Depending upon how future cards may fall, learning bike mechanics, just may have been one the smartest things you've ever done in life... Who knows, maybe the OP will possess similar bicycle mechanics skills in the future, that you now have... |
Originally Posted by Igo
(Post 14157318)
Telling everybody that steel is the only way to go is rubbish and you just keep running this gibberish into the ground. Don't you get tired? Are you interested in anything else? You should expand your horizons. Grow.
Where did I even come close to stating that steel is the ONLY way to go? If someone can't recognize the significance of chromoly steel and the role that it has played in both the development and advancement of the world's societies, then that's a pretty sad state of affairs. Chromoly steel just happened to have been the primary material that almost all bikes were made of at one time in the history of cycling. Of course, it was for good reason, too! It still remains the favored bicycle material of many cyclists, today. However, today we have primarily two other options, found in most local bicycle shops. Carbon is great for road bikes and racing, but so is aluminum and chromoly steel! Both aluminum and carbon are now used for MTN bikes, but so is steel! So there's nothing wrong with carbon or aluminum. It's just that aluminum is more likely to fail due to stress than steel. That's just a fact of science. However, today's aluminum bicycle frames have been overbuilt and engineered to the point of lasting much longer than in the past. That said, aluminum cannot escape its natural tendencies, characteristics, and properties. When it comes to steel, aluminum has a shorter fatigue life and a smaller yield capacity. Just because I think that steel is better, doesn't mean that I dislike aluminum. Aluminum has its place in the cycling world, just as much as carbon has its place! :thumb: |
We are both entitled to our opinions. I insist on mine and you certainly insist on yours.
|
Originally Posted by Igo
(Post 14157653)
We are both entitled to our opinions. I insist on mine and you certainly insist on yours.
|
Originally Posted by SlimRider
(Post 14157622)
If I were you, I would never regret any part of aMn education where specific skills were acquired. That's especially so, when that education is directly linked to a specific activity in which I'm currently involved, and most likely will be, for my entire life. Who knows when you basic mechanical skills will be called upon for your own personal needs?
Depending upon how future cards may fall, learning bike mechanics, just may have been one the smartest things you've ever done in life... I adjust my bikes once per year and have no intention of doing it much more than that. If my bike needs more maintenance than that a part needs to be replaced. All that time spent on bb headset and driverrain adjustment i will never do agdin as thr lbs does is so much faster and better given how rarely i do it. If bikes needed a lot more care sure id master it. (am quite good at tire changes and cleaning since i do it regularly) but telling a newb that wants to ride to delve into bike repair is way overkill imo. Basic adjustments yes but you dont even need tool for most of those. |
Originally Posted by mprelaw
(Post 14155065)
You have to buy the Allez Apex mid-comp to get the E5 frame, at least in 2012 models. The Elite downwards have the A1 frame which is comparable to the Trek 1 series frame. However, I think the Allez Elite from 2011, with a 9 speed Tiagra group, still was made on the E5 frame. He might be able to find one of them for under a grand.
And in point of fact, at least in the shops around me, comparing apples to apples, Trek is priced lower than Specialized. ;) However, CAADs are priced below both. For $1000-$1200, I'd certainly go with CAAD. :thumb: I must agree on the CAAD bikes though. Far better than either in quality of design and value in price. Even the 'basic' CAAD 8 is great. Wouldn't a frame raced on a professional level awhile ago be good enough for you? |
Thanks for all your advice people. I think I am going to finally do it tomorrow. It's funny, I still don't know which one I am going to end up with. It may depend on which color and which price finally speaks to me. I realize a $500 2011 1.1 is not going to set many hearts a flutter here but I am drawn to spending the least and enjoying it the most. The 2012 model looks sweet too. Maybe I will just flip a coin
|
Originally Posted by KT043:14238668
Thanks for all your advice people. I think I am going to finally do it tomorrow. It's funny, I still don't know which one I am going to end up with. It may depend on which color and which price finally speaks to me. I realize a $500 2011 1.1 is not going to set many hearts a flutter here but I am drawn to spending the least and enjoying it the most. The 2012 model looks sweet too. Maybe I will just flip a coin
Once you start riding your new bike, I think you will find that the particular bike makes less difference than where or who you ride with when it comes to road riding. Good luck and enjoy it! |
Originally Posted by KT043
(Post 14154113)
Hi all, I am ready to make the jump from old 90s MTB to a real drop bar roadie. I want to buy new since I am not a fan of the eBay/Craigslist stuff. I'd rather know it's coming from my local bike shop without any hidden surprises. I'd also count on the LBS for service, etc. I want a bike for fitness and casual weekend rides of 20-30 miles. I have no desire to race or awaken my "inner Lance". Are the entry level Trek or Specialized models worth considering? I am talking the $500 - $700 range of the 1.1 or 1.2 Trek for example. Is the 1 series frame worthy of maybe upgrading the components later if I choose or should I wait until the end of summer when I might have enough to look at $1000 to $1200 range? If this is all new to me, will I even know that my bike is junk or will I just be happy to be faster than my mountain bike? When they say "better" components, does that mean lighter? smoother? more durable? more delicate? If I am not racing, does that really matter? Any thoughts?
|
Originally Posted by KT043
(Post 14238668)
Thanks for all your advice people. I think I am going to finally do it tomorrow. It's funny, I still don't know which one I am going to end up with. It may depend on which color and which price finally speaks to me. I realize a $500 2011 1.1 is not going to set many hearts a flutter here but I am drawn to spending the least and enjoying it the most. The 2012 model looks sweet too. Maybe I will just flip a coin
|
I recently helped a friend shop for a new bike. His budget was “under $1000” and of course we spent like $1100! Anyway, I think I would check the different LBS in your area and see what brand each shop offers in your price range. What you will find is that some brands offer a little more bike for the money than others. Also most important is to take them for test rides. Nothing beats seat time when deciding which bike to buy.
Also, you are already talking upgrades. The cost to move up a model or two now is MUCH cheaper than what it will cost to upgrade later. I can’t stress that enough. The flip side of that is a lot of people rush out and buy a really nice bike only to find that cycling isn’t their thing and then the bike either sits in the garage or heads to Craigslist. My advice is to test ride several bikes and then spend what you feel comfortable spending and ride the heck out of the bike. When you’re ready to upgrade, sell your starter bike and then buy enough bike to keep you happy for a while. By then you’ll know what you want, what you need, what is important, etc. |
I bought a 2010 Trek 1.2 around 2 years ago. I had a very limited budget and my LBS made me a great offer. Since then, I have put thousands of trouble free miles on it. Insofar as I have the original tubes and tires. I look around at the group rides and see a lot more expensive bikes. Those guys are riding the same roads I am and I don't see them riding "better" than me. Maybe one day I'll upgrade to a nicer bike but I don't see it happening any time soon. My point is that you can by an "entry level" bike and get years of enjoyment out of it.
|
Originally Posted by SlimRider
(Post 14155107)
Welcome To Bike Forums, KT043!
My advice to you, would be to look for a used 80's chromoly steel road bike, that's in fair to good condition. Join a bicycle co-op, so that you can learn basic bicycle mechanics. Upgrade your newly acquired road bike right there, under the watchful eyes of veteran bicycle mechanics. You might even have the desire to disassemble your bike and have it powder-coated by a professional paint company first. After the upgrade, your bike will both look and perform like a brand new bicycle. When you're done, you most likely would've spent considerably less than seven hundred dollars. Estimated costs: Bike - $150 Powdercoating - $100 Upgrades - $150 Bicycle Mechanics Education (Co-op membership fee) - $50 Total = $450 I spent my college days working on and riding my old bicycles, but also bought a new one for the first time about halfway through, and another at the end. The experience of learning the skills to keep my own bicycles in repair was nice and all, and still comes in handy, but at the end of day what I want to do is ride. And new bikes and new components simply don't need to be fixed or adjusted as often. I don't see being forced to do repair work constantly as a positive, and even gaining some skills for life doesn't offset the fact that fixing a bike takes time that would be better spent riding it. There will still be plenty of opportunities to learn how to work on bicycles, and working on modern parts will have a much gentler learning curve than balky old stuff. The skills will also transfer better to future bikes. These days, I don't have so much time to work on my bikes, and I am in fact just as happy to let my trusty shop mechanic handle most things. Sure, I know how to do it (I've wrenched bikes to earn a paycheck), but he's better at it and I have better things to do with my time. Money isn't everything. The time saved by letting a pro do most of the wrenching on my bike is well worth the expense. And that said, the new bikes are better than what you can get used on Craigslist for $150. Full stop, period, end of discussion. I've been down this road. If the OP is interested in riding, the best bet is to buy a good bike and go ride it. |
Order a bike from Bikes Direct. Anything from the Motobecane Grand Record to the Windsor Knight are great for new riders, MUCH nicer than an Allez or Trek 1 series, albeit without the nice paint and fancy brand name.
One day when I have money, I'd love to have a Trek, Specialized, or Giant. Until then, my bikes don't have brand names on them, nor fancy paint, but they do have good components and seem to perform just fine. Where else can you find an aluminum bike with Shimano Ultegra under $1000? BD is great. |
you can find good deals used....If you look hard.....I bought a carbon framed Trek that had been ridden to the end of the driveway and back,then picked up some Dura Ace carbon tubeless with new Atoms w/ 1,000 miles on wheels for less than half price. On the other hand,if you are not careful it can be a nightmare.
|
AS much as you can afford
|
Or this bike if you can afford it and it fits you. Ridley sizing run larger. This extra small frame has a 52.5 top tube. I'm pretty sure I can make this bike fit me and I'm 5'9. It's only $979 with full sram apex.
http://www.competitivecyclist.com/za...RODUCT.ID=8380 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.