Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

shortened my cranks and raised the seat, now bouncing at high cadence

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

shortened my cranks and raised the seat, now bouncing at high cadence

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-12, 10:29 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
shortened my cranks and raised the seat, now bouncing at high cadence

I've been using the same bicycle and fit for about 4 years. After switching from 172.5 to 170 cranks, I raised my seat height by a little under a centimeter a couple of weeks ago and, 200 miles later, I'm still bouncing at RPMs above 120 (which didn't happen before). Tried single leg pedaling and focusing on forward-backward instead of up-down on the pedal stroke; these have helped slightly, but I still bounce. My hips don't rock at lower cadences. My legs feel like they're extending more fully than with my previous fit, but definitely don't feel like they're over-extending.

Lowered seat by 5 mm this morning, rode for 25 mi, and my stroke was smoother. Legs felt under-extended, though.

Do I need to spend more time on re-learning my stroke, or did I set the seat too high after changing crank length?
sqroot3 is offline  
Old 05-31-12, 10:30 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,055

Bikes: Lynskey R230 DA DI2 ENVE 3.4 SES, 6KU Fixie, Cheap Aluminum Slapstick Trainer only bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Why did you change crank length?
bored117 is offline  
Old 05-31-12, 10:35 AM
  #3  
yada yada
 
Urban Turkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Decatur, GA
Posts: 130

Bikes: Felt F5, Surly CrossCheck

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You shortened the cranks by 2.5mm, but raised the seat about a cm (10mm) effectively raising the seat height 7.5mm. If it was perfect before, then it's too high now.
Urban Turkey is offline  
Old 05-31-12, 10:36 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 177
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
bored--
- threads on this forum and other bf.net forums discussing crank length for various rider heights--i'm 5'10" with shorter legs than average for my height (30" pants inseam)
- online formulas to calculate crank length, which routinely put me in the 160s?!
- wanted to see how shorter cranks felt

turkey--
yes, i realize that. wanted to increase height more than the decrease in crank length to see if my legs would feel more fully extended at the knee, which they admittedly do. the knee extension feels good, just not the bouncing.

but i see what you're getting at...fixing something that ain't broke?
sqroot3 is offline  
Old 05-31-12, 11:20 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm not sure if you can feel any effects from changing the crank length by 2.5 mm. When I shortened my crank by 15 mm, my cadence went up 15 rpm. Your change by itself would be almost undetectable. Things you're seeing are principally the effect of the higher seat.
hamster is offline  
Old 05-31-12, 06:49 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
rdtompki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 3,957

Bikes: Volagi, daVinci Joint Venture

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
"fully extended" sounds very much like "over extended".
rdtompki is offline  
Old 06-01-12, 05:12 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Urban Turkey
You shortened the cranks by 2.5mm, but raised the seat about a cm (10mm) effectively raising the seat height 7.5mm. If it was perfect before, then it's too high now.
+1

When I change cranks (I go from 175 to 170 and back again it seems) I'll change my saddle height by the crank length difference. 175 to 170, raise the saddle 5 mm.

There's debate on if you should change saddle by the whole difference (5mm in my case) or half (2.5mm). I find that my leg extension needs to be constant, and how far I bring my foot up is less important. So I change my saddle height by the full crank length difference (5mm).

Incidentally it's easier to go to a shorter crank length than a longer one. Shorter crank lengths decrease range of motion. Increasing your range of motion is more difficult so a longer crank arm takes some adjusting.

Hope this helps.
carpediemracing is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vfates
Fitting Your Bike
3
05-03-17 03:05 PM
mtnbud
Touring
34
02-06-13 08:30 AM
jim p
Fifty Plus (50+)
10
11-17-12 07:30 PM
bluefoxicy
Bicycle Mechanics
7
05-25-11 09:51 AM
PartyPack
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
17
07-24-10 01:29 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.