Trainer "miles"?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: campbellsport,WI
Posts: 62
Bikes: Cervelo R3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trainer "miles"?
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question, but I've noticed a lot of people keep track of yearly miles. Does anyone count trainer miles in their yearly total?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 496
Bikes: Yes, I ride an aluminum Trek!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Some do, some don't. I dislike the trainer VERY much and live in WI as well were it's a necessity in Winter.
#4
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Miles don't count, only time.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: New York metro area
Posts: 458
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, but they must be done at an acceptably high wattage/effort and you should really only look at time on the trainer. You do need to de-rate the speed and hence the miles as they will be overstated versus what is done on the road with wind resistance.
#6
Despite all my rage, I am
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2,613
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Further North than U
Posts: 2,000
Bikes: Spec Roubaix, three Fisher Montare, two Pugs
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
If people ask me about miles I often quote my mileage and then may toss in hours on the trainer. Like, "14,600 miles this year and 640 hours on the spinning bike". Yeah..that sounds about right.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 663
Bikes: 2011 Neuvation FC100, 2013 Mercier Kilo TT Pro, 1984 Peugeot SV-L
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I count my yearly miles... but just so I can keep track of maintenance. 3000 trainer miles still means I should check my chain and cassette.
Otherwise, what the others have said. Time is more important than miles.
Otherwise, what the others have said. Time is more important than miles.
#9
Throw the stick!!!!
Ever ridden a computrainer? Every mile on that thing is more work than an "equivelant" mile on the road.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
#10
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,845
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 924 Times
in
610 Posts
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#12
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
No.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#13
Senior Member
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,567
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
427 Posts
The time response is the correct answer for all riding.
I spend a lot of time on the trainer in the fall and winter - sometimes as much as 20 hours a week depending on the weather and my needs. How far I go is really irrelevant compared to how much time I spend pedaling and whether I am getting the proper workout in during that time. The same goes for my summer, outdoor riding.
That said, I do have a Garmin, and I always get a kick out of the map from my trainer rid; it looks like I have been zigzagging all over my house.
I spend a lot of time on the trainer in the fall and winter - sometimes as much as 20 hours a week depending on the weather and my needs. How far I go is really irrelevant compared to how much time I spend pedaling and whether I am getting the proper workout in during that time. The same goes for my summer, outdoor riding.
That said, I do have a Garmin, and I always get a kick out of the map from my trainer rid; it looks like I have been zigzagging all over my house.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I count mine. Over half the year is spent indoors on a trainer where I live. And I defy you to ride a Trutrainer and say that the miles travelled on that bloody thing are easy miles.
#16
your god hates me
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,580
Bikes: 2016 Richard Sachs, 2010 Carl Strong, 2006 Cannondale Synapse
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1233 Post(s)
Liked 1,241 Times
in
689 Posts
Well...
The time response is the correct answer for "How much time did you spend on your bike?"
It's also valuable if you are trying to document physical efforts as part of a training regime, because (among other things) it allows you to count hours spent on the trainer.
But the time response is a red herring if the question is "How many miles did you ride?"
There's no such thing as Trainer Miles (sic) because miles is a unit of distance, and a trainer covers no distance no matter how many hours you sit on the thing spinning furiously.
The time response is the correct answer for "How much time did you spend on your bike?"
It's also valuable if you are trying to document physical efforts as part of a training regime, because (among other things) it allows you to count hours spent on the trainer.
But the time response is a red herring if the question is "How many miles did you ride?"
There's no such thing as Trainer Miles (sic) because miles is a unit of distance, and a trainer covers no distance no matter how many hours you sit on the thing spinning furiously.
#18
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,275
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
Plus intensity for the given time.
Last week, I spent 17 hours focusing on climbing in WV, but only covered 210 miles. Same time, with less effort, in Florida would have been over 350 miles.
Miles ridden is not a very useful measure.
Last week, I spent 17 hours focusing on climbing in WV, but only covered 210 miles. Same time, with less effort, in Florida would have been over 350 miles.
Miles ridden is not a very useful measure.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times
in
177 Posts
Over the course of a year tracking time and/or mileage is a useful metric for volume. My trainer miles are harder than outdoor miles so I count them. They only represent about 3% of my riding so it's not a big deal either way.
#24
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,275
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1428 Post(s)
Liked 697 Times
in
353 Posts
Given the variabilities of group versus solo, flat versus climbing, wind speed and direction, the same amount of time, even for a given effort, will produce wide swings in mileage.
Thus time is a more workable measure, and the reason training plans are almost always done on time rather than mileage.
Add in intensity, with either an hrm, or a power meter, and miles become pretty irrelevant.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#25
Hogosha Sekai
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STS
Posts: 6,672
Bikes: Leader 725, Centurion Turbo, Scwhinn Peloton, Schwinn Premis, GT Tequesta, Bridgestone CB-2,72' Centurion Lemans, 72 Raleigh Competition
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
15 Posts
I count miles on the road, and the burn in my legs over time for the trainer.