Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

The imaginary benefits of modern race equipment

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

The imaginary benefits of modern race equipment

Old 03-09-13, 07:39 AM
  #176  
Senior Member
 
DaveWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
If modern bikes are so much better than old ones, why was last year's average speed in Milan-San Remo almost exactly the same as the one in 1960?
Then it's pointed out that TDF average speeds have been increasing throughout the history of the ride...

Originally Posted by Six jours
As for the point that the TdF has been getting gradually faster, that's true. ~ I think it's likely that improvements in sports physiology and training techniques (and perhaps doping, the existence about which I have no idea in marathoning) are much more responsible for increased speeds (in the instances where speeds have actually gone up) than brifters and ceramic bearings.
So when the actual overall results don't provide the conclusion that a comparison of two single races do, attribute the increase in speed to training & conditioning. In the end the OP has just acknowledged that his overall conclusion, that speeds have not increased over the years, is wrong. Now he's hunting for a reason for that speed increase.
DaveWC is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 10:14 AM
  #177  
Senior Member
 
loky1179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 979

Bikes: 2x Bianchi, 2x Specialized, 3x Schwinns

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by StanSeven
Why again? It's to let the jealous people that can't afford/don't want to spend the money to tell everyone else what to buy and not buy.
Why again? Its to let the people who have spent thousands $$$ on the latest and greatest tell the people that can't/don't want to spend the money why they HAVE to buy a new bike.
loky1179 is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 10:20 AM
  #178  
Middle-Aged Member
 
MikeyBoyAz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
8 pages in 1.5 days. Awesome. I like my new fan-dangled bike. [That's all I can think to say for now]
MikeyBoyAz is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 10:43 AM
  #179  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I agree. I am seriously lusting after one of the English Cycles steel frames and would enjoy the hell out of it

I'm a firm believer in the right tool for the job and if I'm racing I choose equipment accordingly.
Would you race the English? Rob does, and wins quite a bit. An English frame is my planned gift to myself upon graduating and getting a job. He does some really amazing work.

According to Alexi Grewal, the only difference between racing in the '80s and today is it is more surge-y.
DerHoggz is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 10:56 AM
  #180  
Senior Member
 
robbyville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504

Bikes: Speedvagen Steel

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times in 156 Posts
[QUOTE=Six jours;15363600]Fair enough. When I was racing I usually had my straps loose for most of the day, and cranked them down just for the finish. I initially figured the new-fangled clipless stuff was for tourists, because the only real advantage was comfort and convenience. In a way that's still true, but of course clipless works just fine for pretty much any kind of racing. I won't argue that clips and straps are better in any way. I just point out that they aren't actually slower in a competitive situation.

SJ, welcome back and thanks for the best thread in a while. I agree with good natured ribbing.

FWIW, toe clips and straps caused me to become egotistical and broke my collar bone. One day back in 1987 I had been sitting on a patio drinking too many sangrias and eating $1 tacos, got on my bike to ride home, had some diadora cleats at the time, cinched down tight and was showing off my track stand skills to my friends, tipped over snapped my collar bone. Never would have happened with clipless
robbyville is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:24 AM
  #181  
Senior Member
 
caloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur

Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,101 Times in 1,415 Posts
Can't believe no one has mentioned power meters. That has been the greatest innovation for me, an aging self-supported racer.
caloso is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:43 AM
  #182  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveWC
So when the actual overall results don't provide the conclusion that a comparison of two single races do, attribute the increase in speed to training & conditioning. In the end the OP has just acknowledged that his overall conclusion, that speeds have not increased over the years, is wrong. Now he's hunting for a reason for that speed increase.
No. I'm pointing out that there is no clear-cut increase in overall speeds attributable to new tech. If the new tech did produce "clear and distinct" increases in speed then it would clearly and distinctly show up in race results. It doesn't: some races, like the TdF, have been getting gradually faster, but they've been doing it at a pretty steady rate regardless of technology. Other races have been stagnant, speed-wise, for decades, again regardless of technology.

That leaves folks to argue that faster bikes don't make for faster races. We can all decide for ourselves on the validity of that one...
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:45 AM
  #183  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
No. I'm pointing out that there is no clear-cut increase in overall speeds attributable to new tech. If the new tech did produce "clear and distinct" increases in speed then it would clearly and distinctly show up in race results. It doesn't: some races, like the TdF, have been getting gradually faster, but they've been doing it at a pretty steady rate regardless of technology. Other races have been stagnant, speed-wise, for decades, again regardless of technology.
How are you isolating the effect of equipment technology (which marches on every year just like training technology) such that you can conclude that it is not contributing to the gradual increase in speed?
svtmike is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:48 AM
  #184  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by svtmike
How are you isolating the effect of equipment technology (which marches on every year just like training technology) such that you can conclude that it is not contributing to the gradual increase in speed?
Technology really has not "marched on every year". Technology was actually pretty stagnant throughout much of cycling history. Campy drop-parallelogram derailleurs, Reynolds 531, cotton tubulars, aluminum rims... that was pretty much state of the art for several decades prior to the mid-1980s.
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 02:33 PM
  #185  
he said member
 
ls01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 12,966

Bikes: yes please

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2399 Post(s)
Liked 1,677 Times in 1,010 Posts
Originally Posted by BigJeff
Manufactured obsolescence, designed to fail, quality created in Japan by a (commie) American who didn't fit in here...

How the heck did poor craftsmanship become an American trait, thus assuring repair shops and spare parts were everywhere?

Only Maytag had a reputation for not breaking. Then Japan crushed the USA on quality for generations, and only recently have US companies strived to acheive.

Yes. We do things different now. We can make composite bikes that are stronger and lighter than the steel ones... generally speaking, better in every way. Unless you still think "wet noodle" is a ride "quality".

We? What we are you reffering to? not many carbon bikes are made here any more.
ls01 is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 03:02 PM
  #186  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745

Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
Technology really has not "marched on every year". Technology was actually pretty stagnant throughout much of cycling history. Campy drop-parallelogram derailleurs, Reynolds 531, cotton tubulars, aluminum rims... that was pretty much state of the art for several decades prior to the mid-1980s.
And what about the nearly 30 years that coincide with your OP?
svtmike is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 03:49 PM
  #187  
I eat carbide.
 
Psimet2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,620

Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1322 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 555 Posts
Originally Posted by caloso
Can't believe no one has mentioned power meters. That has been the greatest innovation for me, an aging self-supported racer.
If we can't even agree that integrated levers, nice frames, and clip less pedals are better than what came before I'm afraid that bringing up powermeters over the tried an true raw egg diet, no sex before a race, and RPE training system...some heads might begin to explode. But if you're going to bring it up I suggest we do it now. These guys have to be getting close to bed time.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 04:34 PM
  #188  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,725

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3483 Post(s)
Liked 3,134 Times in 1,800 Posts
Originally Posted by robbyville
FWIW, toe clips and straps caused me to become egotistical and broke my collar bone. One day back in 1987 I had been sitting on a patio drinking too many sangrias and eating $1 tacos, got on my bike to ride home, had some diadora cleats at the time, cinched down tight and was showing off my track stand skills to my friends, tipped over snapped my collar bone. Never would have happened with clipless
Seems to me the Sangria was probably more to blame than the toeclips.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 04:56 PM
  #189  
Banned.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,041

Bikes: something

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I remember reading somewhere that Racers in the TdF disliked the fact that they were racing on re-purposed touring machines. THen those guys ended up making their own bike companies that gave us the fancy bikes.

Well At the very least we can agree that Dual pivot was a huge step over single pivot.......wait....that is going backwards now.
dnuzzomueller is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 05:06 PM
  #190  
Senior Member
 
oldbobcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,239

Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Liked 380 Times in 297 Posts
Originally Posted by loky1179
Why again? Its to let the people who have spent thousands $$$ on the latest and greatest tell the people that can't/don't want to spend the money why they HAVE to buy a new bike.
Nobody needs to have a new bike. Nobody needs to tell everybody else they can't have a new bike. Ride what ya' brung, smile, and quit complainin'.
oldbobcat is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 05:16 PM
  #191  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by DerHoggz
Would you race the English? Rob does, and wins quite a bit. An English frame is my planned gift to myself upon graduating and getting a job. He does some really amazing work.

According to Alexi Grewal, the only difference between racing in the '80s and today is it is more surge-y.
No, it would be a sunny Sunday going to meeting bike. I think I'd build it with Athena and some not so deep hoops.

Constant surges are easier handled with STI, non?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 05:32 PM
  #192  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
No. I'm pointing out that there is no clear-cut increase in overall speeds attributable to new tech. If the new tech did produce "clear and distinct" increases in speed then it would clearly and distinctly show up in race results.

That leaves folks to argue that faster bikes don't make for faster races. We can all decide for ourselves on the validity of that one...
Don't misquote or misrepresent my meaning. A "clear and distinct advantage" don't automatically mean races will be faster and using ave speed as a metric is ridiculous as there are far too many other factors involved. Your incorrect claim about Paris-Roubaix being run at nearly constant averages over the years should have pretty much ended the use of ave speed as ANY kind of metric.

How about addressing the specific points being made?

Are you asserting that a rider on DT shifters can match surges and constant tempo changes on a climb with riders using STI?

Are you asserting that clipless is neither safer nor more comfortable that clips and straps? Don't wander off into how secure clips and straps can be because it's been agreed that they can be very, very secure.

Are you asserting that all the wind tunnel work done over the last few decades clearly showing decreases in drag directly related to equipment are incorrect?

Seriously?
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 07:46 PM
  #193  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Don't misquote or misrepresent my meaning. A "clear and distinct advantage" don't automatically mean races will be faster and using ave speed as a metric is ridiculous as there are far too many other factors involved. Your incorrect claim about Paris-Roubaix being run at nearly constant averages over the years should have pretty much ended the use of ave speed as ANY kind of metric.
Your meaning was pretty clear and distinct. I don't see how I'm misrepresenting or misquoting you. And I can't begin to understand how folks can argue that faster bicycles don't make for faster races. Moreover, the quote about Paris-Roubaix was not incorrect. Again, folks are free to follow the links and look for themselves.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Are you asserting that a rider on DT shifters can match surges and constant tempo changes on a climb with riders using STI?
Yes. I was there when STI came out, and I raced against people using it. They didn't go any faster than they had with DT shifters.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Are you asserting that clipless is neither safer nor more comfortable that clips and straps? Don't wander off into how secure clips and straps can be because it's been agreed that they can be very, very secure.
I'm talking about speed.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Are you asserting that all the wind tunnel work done over the last few decades clearly showing decreases in drag directly related to equipment are incorrect?
TT bikes are definitely faster, no question. But that's mostly due to aero bars and disk wheels - I specifically exempted TT bikes in the OP. I'm discussing road bikes, as ridden by racers and weekend warriors.
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 07:51 PM
  #194  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by dnuzzomueller
I remember reading somewhere that Racers in the TdF disliked the fact that they were racing on re-purposed touring machines. THen those guys ended up making their own bike companies that gave us the fancy bikes.
Actually, racing bikes were slower than touring bikes up through 1935 or so, because the tourists were using derailleurs and the racers were using flip-flop hubs. As soon as racers started using derailleurs, they had their frames made for them to their specifications.
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 08:03 PM
  #195  
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 228 Posts
I don't know how imaginary it is, but on pure whim I replaced my downtube shifters with integrated brake levers today and I have to confess that I liked it. You guys probably don't think of used Sora eight speed shifters as "modern race equipment". But these things are relative.

I'll let you know if they result in some Strava KOMs on my commute.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 08:11 PM
  #196  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
For whatever it's worth, I'm not saying that old bikes are better than new ones. In fact, I'm not necessarily even saying that new bikes aren't better than old ones, depending upon a person's definition of "better". I ride and enjoy modern bikes myself.

What I am saying is that modern road bikes are not significantly faster than road bikes from about 1960 onward, and that claims of dramatically increased speed on the latest road bikes stem more from hopes and dreams than from anything actually measurable.

I know this thread is still going to result in me being "the guy who thinks clipless sucks" no matter how much I deny it, but I'm going to try anyway.
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 08:15 PM
  #197  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681

Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
If we can't even agree that integrated levers, nice frames, and clip less pedals are better than what came before I'm afraid that bringing up powermeters over the tried an true raw egg diet, no sex before a race, and RPE training system...some heads might begin to explode. But if you're going to bring it up I suggest we do it now. These guys have to be getting close to bed time.

Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 03-09-13 at 08:18 PM.
hueyhoolihan is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:07 PM
  #198  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
Your meaning was pretty clear and distinct. I don't see how I'm misrepresenting or misquoting you. And I can't begin to understand how folks can argue that faster bicycles don't make for faster races. Moreover, the quote about Paris-Roubaix was not incorrect. Again, folks are free to follow the links and look for themselves.
I posted the times for PR. You are incorrect. Very, very incorrect. The times are all over the place because weather is such a critical factor. Scroll back and look for yourself.

The fastest race in 1964 had a strong tailwind and only 22km of cobbles. I posted a link to this as well. So that would be another fact you've gotten wrong.

Faster bikes don't guarantee faster races because they don't exist in a vacuum. Race radios have altered racing and, I believe, slowed them down in many cases until critical points in the race. The dynamics or racing have changed as well with no rider or team dominating like has happened in the past.

This would affect ave spd, non? And what does ave spd have to do with anything? It is a useless metric.

I also notice how you conveniently ignore any of the very specific questions I have asked you to comment on which show just how silly some of your assertions are.

Originally Posted by Six jours
Yes. I was there when STI came out, and I raced against people using it. They didn't go any faster than they had with DT shifters.
Incorrect. Davis Phinney was an early adopter and claimed it was an unfair advantage - his words.

I ALSO started racing with DT shifters and continue to race (albiet much slower and much less frequently) and you couldn't pay me enough to give up STI, Ergo or the like.

Originally Posted by Six jours
I'm talking about speed.
No, you have been talking about a lot of other things as well. If it was all about speed it could be settled in a wind tunnel. Oh wait, it already was.

Originally Posted by Six jours
TT bikes are definitely faster, no question. But that's mostly due to aero bars and disk wheels - I specifically exempted TT bikes in the OP. I'm discussing road bikes, as ridden by racers and weekend warriors.
See the above.

One more question for you to not answer: Was was typical RR gearing for a five or even six spd freewheel, for a flat race, and what is it now?

I'd appreciate your thoughts as to why they are different.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 03-09-13, 11:43 PM
  #199  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I posted the times for PR. You are incorrect. Very, very incorrect. The times are all over the place because weather is such a critical factor. Scroll back and look for yourself.
I think I see the problem. When I say "consistent", I mean consistent over a period of time, not that each year is consistent with the next.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
The fastest race in 1964 had a strong tailwind and only 22km of cobbles. I posted a link to this as well. So that would be another fact you've gotten wrong.
I posted that 1964 was the fastest Paris-Roubaix and to prove me wrong you post that 1964 was the fastest Paris-Roubaix?

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Faster bikes don't guarantee faster races because they don't exist in a vacuum. Race radios have altered racing and, I believe, slowed them down in many cases until critical points in the race. The dynamics or racing have changed as well with no rider or team dominating like has happened in the past.
As I've written repeatedly, "faster bikes don't make faster bike races" is nonsensical.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
This would affect ave spd, non? And what does ave spd have to do with anything? It is a useless metric.
Seriously? What does average speed have to do with how fast bicycles are?

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I also notice how you conveniently ignore any of the very specific questions I have asked you to comment on which show just how silly some of your assertions are.
I've tried to answer all your questions. I think you just don't like the answers.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Davis Phinney was an early adopter and claimed it was an unfair advantage - his words.
Can you name any race he won with STI against riders using DT shifters?

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I ALSO started racing with DT shifters and continue to race (albiet much slower and much less frequently) and you couldn't pay me enough to give up STI, Ergo or the like.
How did your results change once you went to STI?

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
No, you have been talking about a lot of other things as well. If it was all about speed it could be settled in a wind tunnel. Oh wait, it already was.
Read my OP again. It's all about speed.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
One more question for you to not answer: Was was typical RR gearing for a five or even six spd freewheel, for a flat race, and what is it now?
Straight block with a thirteen on the bottom, and later a twelve. I assume it's the same now, albeit with an eleven.

Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I'd appreciate your thoughts as to why they are different.
Because spinters stand and hammer a big gear at relatively low cadence now, whereas they used to sit and spin a smaller one.
Six jours is offline  
Old 03-10-13, 12:39 AM
  #200  
Senior Member
 
Gladius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 210

Bikes: '86 Centurion Elite RS '17 Trek Domane SLR6 Disc '16 Trek Boone 5 '15 Trek Fuel EX 9 '20 Trek Checkpoint SL6

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Reminds me of the 6-speed vs DCT/PDK and normally aspirated vs turbo threads on my car forums...
Gladius is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.