The imaginary benefits of modern race equipment
#176
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
As for the point that the TdF has been getting gradually faster, that's true. ~ I think it's likely that improvements in sports physiology and training techniques (and perhaps doping, the existence about which I have no idea in marathoning) are much more responsible for increased speeds (in the instances where speeds have actually gone up) than brifters and ceramic bearings.

#177
Senior Member
Why again? Its to let the people who have spent thousands $$$ on the latest and greatest tell the people that can't/don't want to spend the money why they HAVE to buy a new bike.

#178
Middle-Aged Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,276
Bikes: Bianchi Infinito CV 2014, TREK HIFI 2011, Argon18 E-116 2013
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
8 pages in 1.5 days. Awesome. I like my new fan-dangled bike. [That's all I can think to say for now]

#179
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Posts: 140
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
According to Alexi Grewal, the only difference between racing in the '80s and today is it is more surge-y.

#180
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Palm Desert, CA
Posts: 2,504
Bikes: Speedvagen Steel
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 429 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
156 Posts
[QUOTE=Six jours;15363600]Fair enough. When I was racing I usually had my straps loose for most of the day, and cranked them down just for the finish. I initially figured the new-fangled clipless stuff was for tourists, because the only real advantage was comfort and convenience. In a way that's still true, but of course clipless works just fine for pretty much any kind of racing. I won't argue that clips and straps are better in any way. I just point out that they aren't actually slower in a competitive situation.
SJ, welcome back and thanks for the best thread in a while. I agree with good natured ribbing.
FWIW, toe clips and straps caused me to become egotistical and broke my collar bone. One day back in 1987 I had been sitting on a patio drinking too many sangrias and eating $1 tacos, got on my bike to ride home, had some diadora cleats at the time, cinched down tight and was showing off my track stand skills to my friends, tipped over snapped my collar bone. Never would have happened with clipless
SJ, welcome back and thanks for the best thread in a while. I agree with good natured ribbing.
FWIW, toe clips and straps caused me to become egotistical and broke my collar bone. One day back in 1987 I had been sitting on a patio drinking too many sangrias and eating $1 tacos, got on my bike to ride home, had some diadora cleats at the time, cinched down tight and was showing off my track stand skills to my friends, tipped over snapped my collar bone. Never would have happened with clipless


#181
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,101 Times
in
1,415 Posts
Can't believe no one has mentioned power meters. That has been the greatest innovation for me, an aging self-supported racer.

#182
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
So when the actual overall results don't provide the conclusion that a comparison of two single races do, attribute the increase in speed to training & conditioning. In the end the OP has just acknowledged that his overall conclusion, that speeds have not increased over the years, is wrong. Now he's hunting for a reason for that speed increase.
That leaves folks to argue that faster bikes don't make for faster races. We can all decide for ourselves on the validity of that one...

#183
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745
Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No. I'm pointing out that there is no clear-cut increase in overall speeds attributable to new tech. If the new tech did produce "clear and distinct" increases in speed then it would clearly and distinctly show up in race results. It doesn't: some races, like the TdF, have been getting gradually faster, but they've been doing it at a pretty steady rate regardless of technology. Other races have been stagnant, speed-wise, for decades, again regardless of technology.

#184
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Technology really has not "marched on every year". Technology was actually pretty stagnant throughout much of cycling history. Campy drop-parallelogram derailleurs, Reynolds 531, cotton tubulars, aluminum rims... that was pretty much state of the art for several decades prior to the mid-1980s.

#185
he said member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: is everything
Posts: 12,966
Bikes: yes please
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2399 Post(s)
Liked 1,677 Times
in
1,010 Posts
Manufactured obsolescence, designed to fail, quality created in Japan by a (commie) American who didn't fit in here...
How the heck did poor craftsmanship become an American trait, thus assuring repair shops and spare parts were everywhere?
Only Maytag had a reputation for not breaking. Then Japan crushed the USA on quality for generations, and only recently have US companies strived to acheive.
Yes. We do things different now. We can make composite bikes that are stronger and lighter than the steel ones... generally speaking, better in every way. Unless you still think "wet noodle" is a ride "quality".
How the heck did poor craftsmanship become an American trait, thus assuring repair shops and spare parts were everywhere?
Only Maytag had a reputation for not breaking. Then Japan crushed the USA on quality for generations, and only recently have US companies strived to acheive.
Yes. We do things different now. We can make composite bikes that are stronger and lighter than the steel ones... generally speaking, better in every way. Unless you still think "wet noodle" is a ride "quality".
We? What we are you reffering to? not many carbon bikes are made here any more.

#186
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,745
Bikes: S-Works Roubaix SL2^H4, Secteur Sport, TriCross, Kaffenback, Lurcher 29er
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Technology really has not "marched on every year". Technology was actually pretty stagnant throughout much of cycling history. Campy drop-parallelogram derailleurs, Reynolds 531, cotton tubulars, aluminum rims... that was pretty much state of the art for several decades prior to the mid-1980s.

#187
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,620
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1322 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times
in
555 Posts
If we can't even agree that integrated levers, nice frames, and clip less pedals are better than what came before I'm afraid that bringing up powermeters over the tried an true raw egg diet, no sex before a race, and RPE training system...some heads might begin to explode. But if you're going to bring it up I suggest we do it now. These guys have to be getting close to bed time.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

#188
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,725
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3483 Post(s)
Liked 3,134 Times
in
1,800 Posts
FWIW, toe clips and straps caused me to become egotistical and broke my collar bone. One day back in 1987 I had been sitting on a patio drinking too many sangrias and eating $1 tacos, got on my bike to ride home, had some diadora cleats at the time, cinched down tight and was showing off my track stand skills to my friends, tipped over snapped my collar bone. Never would have happened with clipless 


#189
Banned.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,041
Bikes: something
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I remember reading somewhere that Racers in the TdF disliked the fact that they were racing on re-purposed touring machines. THen those guys ended up making their own bike companies that gave us the fancy bikes.
Well At the very least we can agree that Dual pivot was a huge step over single pivot.......wait....that is going backwards now.
Well At the very least we can agree that Dual pivot was a huge step over single pivot.......wait....that is going backwards now.

#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,239
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 455 Post(s)
Liked 380 Times
in
297 Posts
Nobody needs to have a new bike. Nobody needs to tell everybody else they can't have a new bike. Ride what ya' brung, smile, and quit complainin'.

#191
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Would you race the English? Rob does, and wins quite a bit. An English frame is my planned gift to myself upon graduating and getting a job. He does some really amazing work.
According to Alexi Grewal, the only difference between racing in the '80s and today is it is more surge-y.
According to Alexi Grewal, the only difference between racing in the '80s and today is it is more surge-y.
Constant surges are easier handled with STI, non?

#192
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
No. I'm pointing out that there is no clear-cut increase in overall speeds attributable to new tech. If the new tech did produce "clear and distinct" increases in speed then it would clearly and distinctly show up in race results.
That leaves folks to argue that faster bikes don't make for faster races. We can all decide for ourselves on the validity of that one...
That leaves folks to argue that faster bikes don't make for faster races. We can all decide for ourselves on the validity of that one...
How about addressing the specific points being made?
Are you asserting that a rider on DT shifters can match surges and constant tempo changes on a climb with riders using STI?
Are you asserting that clipless is neither safer nor more comfortable that clips and straps? Don't wander off into how secure clips and straps can be because it's been agreed that they can be very, very secure.
Are you asserting that all the wind tunnel work done over the last few decades clearly showing decreases in drag directly related to equipment are incorrect?
Seriously?

#193
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Don't misquote or misrepresent my meaning. A "clear and distinct advantage" don't automatically mean races will be faster and using ave speed as a metric is ridiculous as there are far too many other factors involved. Your incorrect claim about Paris-Roubaix being run at nearly constant averages over the years should have pretty much ended the use of ave speed as ANY kind of metric.
TT bikes are definitely faster, no question. But that's mostly due to aero bars and disk wheels - I specifically exempted TT bikes in the OP. I'm discussing road bikes, as ridden by racers and weekend warriors.

#194
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Actually, racing bikes were slower than touring bikes up through 1935 or so, because the tourists were using derailleurs and the racers were using flip-flop hubs. As soon as racers started using derailleurs, they had their frames made for them to their specifications.

#195
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
I don't know how imaginary it is, but on pure whim I replaced my downtube shifters with integrated brake levers today and I have to confess that I liked it. You guys probably don't think of used Sora eight speed shifters as "modern race equipment". But these things are relative.
I'll let you know if they result in some Strava KOMs on my commute.
I'll let you know if they result in some Strava KOMs on my commute.

#196
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
For whatever it's worth, I'm not saying that old bikes are better than new ones. In fact, I'm not necessarily even saying that new bikes aren't better than old ones, depending upon a person's definition of "better". I ride and enjoy modern bikes myself.
What I am saying is that modern road bikes are not significantly faster than road bikes from about 1960 onward, and that claims of dramatically increased speed on the latest road bikes stem more from hopes and dreams than from anything actually measurable.
I know this thread is still going to result in me being "the guy who thinks clipless sucks" no matter how much I deny it, but I'm going to try anyway.
What I am saying is that modern road bikes are not significantly faster than road bikes from about 1960 onward, and that claims of dramatically increased speed on the latest road bikes stem more from hopes and dreams than from anything actually measurable.
I know this thread is still going to result in me being "the guy who thinks clipless sucks" no matter how much I deny it, but I'm going to try anyway.

#197
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
If we can't even agree that integrated levers, nice frames, and clip less pedals are better than what came before I'm afraid that bringing up powermeters over the tried an true raw egg diet, no sex before a race, and RPE training system...some heads might begin to explode. But if you're going to bring it up I suggest we do it now. These guys have to be getting close to bed time.
Last edited by hueyhoolihan; 03-09-13 at 08:18 PM.

#198
Mr. Dopolina
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217
Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times
in
41 Posts
Your meaning was pretty clear and distinct. I don't see how I'm misrepresenting or misquoting you. And I can't begin to understand how folks can argue that faster bicycles don't make for faster races. Moreover, the quote about Paris-Roubaix was not incorrect. Again, folks are free to follow the links and look for themselves.
The fastest race in 1964 had a strong tailwind and only 22km of cobbles. I posted a link to this as well. So that would be another fact you've gotten wrong.
Faster bikes don't guarantee faster races because they don't exist in a vacuum. Race radios have altered racing and, I believe, slowed them down in many cases until critical points in the race. The dynamics or racing have changed as well with no rider or team dominating like has happened in the past.
This would affect ave spd, non? And what does ave spd have to do with anything? It is a useless metric.
I also notice how you conveniently ignore any of the very specific questions I have asked you to comment on which show just how silly some of your assertions are.
I ALSO started racing with DT shifters and continue to race (albiet much slower and much less frequently) and you couldn't pay me enough to give up STI, Ergo or the like.
No, you have been talking about a lot of other things as well. If it was all about speed it could be settled in a wind tunnel. Oh wait, it already was.
One more question for you to not answer: Was was typical RR gearing for a five or even six spd freewheel, for a flat race, and what is it now?
I'd appreciate your thoughts as to why they are different.

#199
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
11 Posts
Faster bikes don't guarantee faster races because they don't exist in a vacuum. Race radios have altered racing and, I believe, slowed them down in many cases until critical points in the race. The dynamics or racing have changed as well with no rider or team dominating like has happened in the past.
Because spinters stand and hammer a big gear at relatively low cadence now, whereas they used to sit and spin a smaller one.

#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Erie, CO
Posts: 210
Bikes: '86 Centurion Elite RS '17 Trek Domane SLR6 Disc '16 Trek Boone 5 '15 Trek Fuel EX 9 '20 Trek Checkpoint SL6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Reminds me of the 6-speed vs DCT/PDK and normally aspirated vs turbo threads on my car forums...
