Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
(Post 15501851)
'Cross is one of the things that doesn't seem to benefit from being 11-speed. Even 10-speed wasn't all that for it, as I understand - I know a lot of people run 9-speed for it. As 11s becomes common, I wonder if anyone will create a dedicated 9-speed CX group.
|
Originally Posted by Andy_K
(Post 15503486)
RetroShift is already available in 9-speed.
I was thinking of under-the-tape style. Shouldn't be THAT hard to just put a different indexing gear in there, I'd think. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 15503219)
I see some pretty good deals on complete bikes with Rival and was wondering if any Rival users could comment.
|
My Tarmac SL2 Comp has Rival on it. I like it a lot. My right hand also has the muscle memory set for non-zero loss shifting. When I ride my Volagi with 2013 Force shifters (which appear to be 2011/12 Red) I'm all hosed up shoving the lever too far. Sram should offer Rival cranks in BB30 instead of the S500 or 900 non-series.
|
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
(Post 15501851)
'Cross is one of the things that doesn't seem to benefit from being 11-speed. Even 10-speed wasn't all that for it, as I understand - I know a lot of people run 9-speed for it. As 11s becomes common, I wonder if anyone will create a dedicated 9-speed CX group.
The bright side, perhaps the current Red would drop in price. |
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
(Post 15503436)
Interesting. I figured 11-speed would be too finicky for those conditions.
Going 1x11 lightens the whole system -dropping the FD, cables, housings, lever internals while only increasing by 1 cog and reduces the chances of a mechanical greatly. |
Should we go over and talk 1x11 in the 1x10 thread and see if that settles all the bickering? I haven't checked it in a few days, but it was a cluster last time.
|
Originally Posted by Bah Humbug
(Post 15504965)
Should we go over and talk 1x11 in the 1x10 thread and see if that settles all the bickering? I haven't checked it in a few days, but it was a cluster last time.
|
Originally Posted by Clipped_in
(Post 15503764)
I have been riding Rival since 2009. I presently have it on two bikes. A friend was asking me yesterday, "So when are you going to be upgrading to Red?" My response was that, "I just don't see it happening." I get all the performance I want and need from Rival, and for the little bit of weight savings with upgrading I can't remotely justify it.
Being logical has no place here. I hate SRAM, but if you are happy with what you have, there's no real reason to change. I bought Di2 Ultegra to replace the SRAM Red on my GFs TT bike, but I ride 6600/7800/6700. I'm happy, and it works well enough for me. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15500985)
SRAM seems to have been raising prices substantially with each revision as though they have gained enough market share to feel comfortable moving up from where they had to come in at to gain market share.
I'm not sure they fully realize that if they get too close to Shimano pricing there will be a substantial exodus back. Absolutely. Been looking at a Force groupset for a new build, and the price difference between Force and 105 is absurd, with even Ultegra being lower than Force. I love SRAM, but am very tempted to go back to Shimano for price alone. |
Originally Posted by caloso
(Post 15503219)
I see some pretty good deals on complete bikes with Rival and was wondering if any Rival users could comment.
SRAM has taken care of me on the warrantee issue; the early brifter's little folded piece o' sheet metal (crap) that carries the interleaved pawls breaks - eventually. The right/rear has been replaced twice. Last Fall, SRAM replaced the set; the carrier is much beefier now. All that said, although the brifters can be taken apart, cleaned, and properly lubed (Dow #41), they're not really made to be taken apart, much less rebuilt, and spare parts aren't available. |
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 15502120)
The 9070 cogs are now razor sharp, tinny flakes of ruinously expensive metal that will probably wear out every 3-4K miles.
|
I made a switch to SRAM ( 9 bikes ) from early Campy Record, Delta brakes 1991 year (and still museum quality) to Shimano XT, Ultegra, Dura-Ace, XTR, lower end Alfine hub, 105. SRAM Force was the ticket, liked the somewhat heavy ka-clank shifting, Dura-ace like brakes, aesthetics, quality and precision.
Force isn't cheap and uber light but every future bike I will get will have the latest greatest Force Group. |
Just launched - as promised. On tax day.
|
|
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15511993)
Also: Conehead levers. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15503095)
Meh...gotta disagree there. 1x11 for cross is the future. It's the only use I can currently see for 11. The SRAM xx1 driver and chainring setup make it an ideal cross setup. You get to ditch a front d, shifter, chain guard, and still maintain a wide range on the cassette. Less things to freeze up in the mud.
After being in the pits at natz and at worlds.....it has its use in cross..... ....but this isn't cross. On the road it is just not needed and is a "me too" product. Why is that? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15500985)
SRAM seems to have been raising prices substantially with each revision as though they have gained enough market share to feel comfortable moving up from where they had to come in at to gain market share.
I'm not sure they fully realize that if they get too close to Shimano pricing there will be a substantial exodus back. I see some pretty good deals on complete bikes with Rival and was wondering if any Rival users could comment. As for the Rival |
Originally Posted by WhyFi
(Post 15512322)
The hydraulic rim brakes were a surprise to me, but I guess if it gets more people in to the group.
Also: Conehead levers. Honestly, I figured the would realize they really aren't worth the hassle, like Magura did over a decade ago. |
Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
(Post 15512545)
The surprise should be that they actually released the hydraulic rim brakes. There have been SRAM released photos of the around for about 18 months, and I've seen them in person.
Honestly, I figured the would realize they really aren't worth the hassle, like Magura did over a decade ago. |
Originally Posted by Campag4life
(Post 15512439)
Rob...you mentioned in your earlier post you aren't much of a fan of 11s...or slow to embrace it.
Why is that? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15512679)
Magura came out with some again as recently as a year or so ago.
You would think SRAM would realize that there's no market for them worth fighting for. |
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15512689)
In general I believe that the bad of extra dishing outweighs the "good" of an extra cog.
|
Originally Posted by cyclezen
(Post 15512762)
but rear spacing hasn;t changed ? they're using a ZIPP wheel in the report, so other than maybe losing the 1 mm spacer on the inside, the cassette width fits current hubs (don;t see any special hubs in the report), why would dish change?
|
Originally Posted by Psimet2001
(Post 15504684)
11 spd has been in Mtb for a while now. Not really hard to set up a rear to work well. The problem in cross is front shifting. The usable rings up front are usually very close in size, the FD design allows the chain to jump when dismounting, and remounting if you bounce the bike/hit the deck - both of which can happen many times a lap.
Going 1x11 lightens the whole system -dropping the FD, cables, housings, lever internals while only increasing by 1 cog and reduces the chances of a mechanical greatly. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.