Who has the oldest Carbon Bike? How many miles have you clocked?
#26
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,077
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1341 Post(s)
Liked 506 Times
in
269 Posts
As for the collection of anecdotal evidence, my 2007 Giant TCR Team Advanced has about 25,000 miles on it now, has been crashed 3 times, and my friend I sold it to is still riding it, with no issues.
Another friend was riding an old lugged Giant Cadex frame, that was over 20 years old, until he snapped the non replaceable metal derailleur hanger.
Another friend was riding an old lugged Giant Cadex frame, that was over 20 years old, until he snapped the non replaceable metal derailleur hanger.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,706
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
1989 Kestrel 200sc. Unknown mileage, but not much, doctors garage queen. The Kestrels are heavy by today's standards but are a known high mileage bike. Ride's like a dream on chip seal. I make sure it's not stored in direct sunlight.
#29
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not sure how it translates in miles, but we know that a 1997 Trek OCLV will survive 200,000 fatigue cycles, subjected to a load that will kill a Columbus tubed steel frame in 56,000 cycles.
https://sheldonbrown.com/rinard/EFBe/...tigue_test.htm
The idea that CF bikes won't last as long as steel is simply wrong, and has been disproved in testing.
A well built carbon fiber bike will last for decades, if it's not destroyed in a crash. Of course, it's also possible to destroy frames made of other materials in crashes as well.
And if you do damage a CF frame, it can often be cost effectively repaired, where it's often not cost effect to repair a metal frame.
https://sheldonbrown.com/rinard/EFBe/...tigue_test.htm
The idea that CF bikes won't last as long as steel is simply wrong, and has been disproved in testing.
A well built carbon fiber bike will last for decades, if it's not destroyed in a crash. Of course, it's also possible to destroy frames made of other materials in crashes as well.
And if you do damage a CF frame, it can often be cost effectively repaired, where it's often not cost effect to repair a metal frame.
I think the idea of carbon not lasting as long is because carbon bikes can be built strong in some places, and weaker in others where under normal circumstances the extra beefiness is not needed. With a steel bike you just have steel tubes that are the same diameter and thickness from end to end, so the areas that are thinner on the carbon bike will actually be stronger. This shouldn't matter when you ride the bike, but when you crash you start to see the difference.
just a thought

My advice for anyone that wants their bike to last would be not to crash it.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,706
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
MY THEORY:
I think the idea of carbon not lasting as long is because carbon bikes can be built strong in some places, and weaker in others where under normal circumstances the extra beefiness is not needed. With a steel bike you just have steel tubes that are the same diameter and thickness from end to end, so the areas that are thinner on the carbon bike will actually be stronger. This shouldn't matter when you ride the bike, but when you crash you start to see the difference.
just a thought
My advice for anyone that wants their bike to last would be not to crash it.
I think the idea of carbon not lasting as long is because carbon bikes can be built strong in some places, and weaker in others where under normal circumstances the extra beefiness is not needed. With a steel bike you just have steel tubes that are the same diameter and thickness from end to end, so the areas that are thinner on the carbon bike will actually be stronger. This shouldn't matter when you ride the bike, but when you crash you start to see the difference.
just a thought

My advice for anyone that wants their bike to last would be not to crash it.
#31
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 31,348
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 317 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10583 Post(s)
Liked 4,791 Times
in
2,586 Posts
100 do I hear 100?
150,000 mi for me, baby.
150,000 mi for me, baby.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#32
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,077
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1341 Post(s)
Liked 506 Times
in
269 Posts
MY THEORY:
I think the idea of carbon not lasting as long is because carbon bikes can be built strong in some places, and weaker in others where under normal circumstances the extra beefiness is not needed. With a steel bike you just have steel tubes that are the same diameter and thickness from end to end, so the areas that are thinner on the carbon bike will actually be stronger. This shouldn't matter when you ride the bike, but when you crash you start to see the difference.
just a thought
My advice for anyone that wants their bike to last would be not to crash it.
I think the idea of carbon not lasting as long is because carbon bikes can be built strong in some places, and weaker in others where under normal circumstances the extra beefiness is not needed. With a steel bike you just have steel tubes that are the same diameter and thickness from end to end, so the areas that are thinner on the carbon bike will actually be stronger. This shouldn't matter when you ride the bike, but when you crash you start to see the difference.
just a thought

My advice for anyone that wants their bike to last would be not to crash it.
Press on the top tube on a modern light steel bike 8 inches or so behind the head tube. The tubing there is very thin, and you can feel it compressing under your fingers with not much effort.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#33
I like beans
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Meffa, MA
Posts: 3,353
Bikes: Tarmac Pro, Bianchi Zurigo, Raleigh Gran Sport, Fuji Del Rey, Ironman Centurion
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
A friend of mine is still riding his Cadex over 20 years. He rides about 3k a year on average, so that's about 60K miles on the bike. It certainly outlasted his hip, which was just replaced recently.
#34
Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your theory ignores the fact that higher end steel bikes are made with butted, oversized, shaped tubes.
Press on the top tube on a modern light steel bike 8 inches or so behind the head tube. The tubing there is very thin, and you can feel it compressing under your fingers with not much effort.
Press on the top tube on a modern light steel bike 8 inches or so behind the head tube. The tubing there is very thin, and you can feel it compressing under your fingers with not much effort.
#35
Bike rider
1995 trek 9900 oclv carbon pro issue mountain bike 2,400 miles used, i only had of about 11 months.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 4,915
Bikes: Click on the #YOLO
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
8 Posts
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC (originally from MA)
Posts: 331
Bikes: 2015 Niner RLT9 / 2006 Felt F5C / 2012 Stumpjumper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have a 2006 Felt F5C that I bought as new old stock in April 2009. 9,300 miles so far.
Got hit by a car yesterday afternoon in a nasty right-hook, and today three different bike shops insisted the frame and fork are still fine; the bike is currently at a fourth shop, a Felt dealer this time, for a final opinion. My old aluminum framed bike was in an accident not even half as bad as this and it was toast.
Got hit by a car yesterday afternoon in a nasty right-hook, and today three different bike shops insisted the frame and fork are still fine; the bike is currently at a fourth shop, a Felt dealer this time, for a final opinion. My old aluminum framed bike was in an accident not even half as bad as this and it was toast.