Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is "upgrading your wheels" overrated?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is "upgrading your wheels" overrated?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-13, 12:32 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,421

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by BigJeff
Haha... 40. Yeah, I'd prefer that too, but I couldn't sustain that kind of speed for any considerable distance.

By "prefer" meaning I ride as slow as my slowest friend... But if I'm up front, I prefer setting the pace minimally at 21. If we're going downhill, I pedal until spin out or coast to avoid dropping friends.

At this pace, I experience an improvement in comfort and reduction in road vibration. I don't have the "highest end" of wheels, but they are an improvement. If you don't see/experience a benefit to what you are buying, then don't buy it.

Would I buy new-er or high-er end wheels/hubs because they are "better" than what I currently have, no I wouldn't. The wheels I have I consider "more than adequate" and "more comfortable" and "more enjoyable" than the previous low end wheels, they are a huge improvement a worth while "upgrade"...

Since this thread is about "is it worth upgrading wheels"... from my experience, my answer is "yes". Although, I totally understand if others do not share my experience, we ride in different places, on different bikes and moving different amounts of weight at different speeds....

Your mileage may vary.

If you don't race, that would be a waste of talent. Even Contador couldn't set that pace, especially when the road pitches up (alpe d'huez).
hyhuu is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 12:41 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 28,682

Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build

Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6556 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 58 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by grolby
Everyone is so obsessed with numbers. If you think upgrading wheels will make you faster, yes, it's overrated. But that's not the point - with better, lighter wheels, the bike FEELS better. Nimbler, lighter, zippier. You can't quantify all benefits with a number for speed, or power, or weight.
This. Better wheels, and especially lighter wheels are a joy to ride. Your question is so similar to the one recently in which the poster was asking where the speed increase was now that he had a carbon frame. Same answer. There isn't necessarily a change in numbers. But the ride is so much sweeter. There is absolutely no bike improvement that can match better wheels, and if better also means much, much lighter, especially at the rim, so much the better. - Robert
rpenmanparker is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 12:44 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
There is absolutely no bike improvement that can match better wheels
Incorrect.

Fit, saddle, tires, off the top of my head.
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 12:51 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NoVA
Posts: 1,421

Bikes: Specialized Allez Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by canam73
Incorrect.

Fit, saddle, tires, off the top of my head.
Definitely tires. I don't know if fit and saddle would qualify as "bike improvement". They are more of a basic requirements.
hyhuu is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 12:56 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by hyhuu
Definitely tires. I don't know if fit and saddle would qualify as "bike improvement". They are more of a basic requirements.
I'd agree with that, yet so many people ride ill-fitting bikes with ass hatchet saddles while dreaming of better wheels that I had to include them.

But past that, how about decent brake pads?
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:13 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 661

Bikes: Trek 4300 Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a stock 2010 design Bontrager Race wheels at 1800 grams (thinner design). Looking into getting something slightly below 1500 grams - Boyd Vitesse with the 23mm outer rim. I assume that since it will only be a little less weight, it shouldn't be considered as an upgrade and falls under the category of overrated upgrade, correct?
gundom66 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:15 PM
  #32  
serious cyclist
 
Bah Humbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147

Bikes: S1, R2, P2

Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times in 2,026 Posts
Depending on how you feel, the wider rim and changed tire profile could be worthwhile. I like the wider rims, personally.
Bah Humbug is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:16 PM
  #33  
1337
 
FPSDavid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 858

Bikes: CAAD10

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by gundom66
I have a stock 2010 design Bontrager Race wheels at 1800 grams (thinner design). Looking into getting something slightly below 1500 grams - Boyd Vitesse with the 23mm outer rim. I assume that since it will only be a little less weight, it shouldn't be considered as an upgrade and falls under the category of overrated upgrade, correct?
Almost 3/4lb is only a "little less weight"?
FPSDavid is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:19 PM
  #34  
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Delaware shore
Posts: 13,558

Bikes: Cervelo C5, Guru Photon, Waterford, Specialized CX

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1106 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times in 1,464 Posts
you shouldn't notice much difference with the CXP30's. They are almost as aero as 101's but weigh a little more.

I can't tell from your post but did you just switch the rear? If so, you won't experience really anything since the front makes the most difference.
StanSeven is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:21 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
What if buying wheels gets you into the hot or not thread?

Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:24 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 661

Bikes: Trek 4300 Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FPSDavid
Almost 3/4lb is only a "little less weight"?
That's coming from a friend. He said less weight alone doesn't matter to him. Weight and material does. I like my other "OCD" friend who always talk about shaving weight. "Grams shaved is grams saved."

Last edited by gundom66; 05-15-13 at 01:28 PM.
gundom66 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:27 PM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by FPSDavid
Almost 3/4lb is only a "little less weight"?
Compared to combined bike and rider weight, yes.
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:37 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Posts: 6,407
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by gundom66
I have a stock 2010 design Bontrager Race wheels at 1800 grams (thinner design). Looking into getting something slightly below 1500 grams - Boyd Vitesse with the 23mm outer rim. I assume that since it will only be a little less weight, it shouldn't be considered as an upgrade and falls under the category of overrated upgrade, correct?
The weight alone, no.

The wider rims, maybe. I ride and like them, but before that I often rode 25mm tires on ~19-20mm rims. So much of the 'upgrade' goes back to tires in that I can run 23mm at the same pressures that I used to run the 25mm at and have the larger options available in 23mm.

Do I notice the better handling I am supposed to getting from the straighter sidewall profile? I like to think so, but I need to be taking a fast and hard corner to do so. And if somebody wanted 23mm wide rims, they have been available. Many touring bike wheels come with them. They just weren't sexy until HED said they were.
canam73 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:44 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,163
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 20 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Commodus
I don't understand why anyone would expect a 101 to be faster than the loaner wheel. They are virtually identical, except for a very small amount of weight.
What he said.
Cheers
cycledogg is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:46 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 661

Bikes: Trek 4300 Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by canam73
The weight alone, no.

The wider rims, maybe...
And that is actually my main purpose is to get wider rims and either stick with 23's or move up to 25's. The lesser weight is just a bonus.
gundom66 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:50 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
island rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FFLD CTY, CT
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hyhuu
If you don't race, that would be a waste of talent. Even Contador couldn't set that pace, especially when the road pitches up (alpe d'huez).
What are you talking about? Are you saying that a pace of 21mph is hard to sustain?
island rider is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 01:59 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Condor637's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Victorville
Posts: 167

Bikes: 2013 Cannondale SuperSix 3

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Since were talking wheels, which is the preferred: Zipp 101's or Boyd Vitessee for semi windy conditions. I'm leaning toward the Vitessee's as a 2mm depth difference (101 30mm vs 28mm Boyd's) isn't that much of a difference or is it and the extra 500 buck's pocketed is a major plus.
Condor637 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 02:24 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 548

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by island rider
What are you talking about? Are you saying that a pace of 21mph is hard to sustain?
I think he meant sustaining that while climbing.
cvall91 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 02:42 PM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
island rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: FFLD CTY, CT
Posts: 1,971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cvall91
I think he meant sustaining that while climbing.
Makes more sense, but even so, 21 is perfectly sustainable while climbing. Now, let's talk about how we define "sustain" and "climbing..."
island rider is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 02:51 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Seattle Forrest
What if buying wheels gets you into the hot or not thread?

Sorry, but that's a disc cover on a Mavic wheel, not a true disc wheel.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 03:10 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I value my aerodynamic seconds a lot as in the bike legs of my triathlons I'm usually close to the podium positions in my AG (missed 3rd by less than 2 minutes in a 5 hr race last time around) but for me:

Deep-rim carbon wheelsets: Totally worth it - for the LOOKS.

Totally NOT worth it for the SPEED or RIDE.

$2k to make a average looking Cervelo look friggin' amazing is worth it to me. $2k to gain 40 seconds on 60 minutes of racing for me is definitely not worth it, but I'll happily take it because it comes with the cosmetic upgrade. I think people are always hesitant to admit that comsetics count a lot.
hhnngg1 is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 03:20 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Seattle Forrest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times in 6,054 Posts
Originally Posted by island rider
Makes more sense, but even so, 21 is perfectly sustainable while climbing. Now, let's talk about how we define "sustain" and "climbing..."
Come to Washington, sustain 21 mph for RAMROD.
Seattle Forrest is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 03:24 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,739
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
In most cases the wheels that come from the factory on a production bike as about as good as the rest of the bike, frame included. Doing a high brow upgrade to the wheels is basically "putting lipstick on a pig", so to speak.
ksisler is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 03:39 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
BigJeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 563
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by hyhuu
If you don't race, that would be a waste of talent. Even Contador couldn't set that pace, especially when the road pitches up (alpe d'huez).
Haha... yeah that's an extreme example for "up".

Nah... I don't do drugs, I wouldn't fit in with the "pro's".

If the sport was broken into size categories, like boxing/wrestling, I'd consider competing. I'm 6'4" 225lbs... why would I race a 5'9" 136lbs person (like Contador)? I haven't been that small since 5th grade. There isn't any pride in winning against a person that stands as tall as your nipple. Maybe if he strapped an extra 90lbs to his bike/body, I'd race him. We'd have the same weight to haul "when the road pitches up".
BigJeff is offline  
Old 05-15-13, 04:17 PM
  #50  
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,494
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 24 Times in 14 Posts
I for one am convinced that for most riders, the differences are vastly overstated.

In terms of performance, higher-end wheels will be a little bit faster -- but the differences, however real they are, are likely below the threshold of what can be detected without strict protocols and high-end equipment. The normal variations between two wheels is smaller than most people's everyday variations due to wind, temperature, training status, and so forth.

I also toss a huge pile of salt over my shoulder when someone who invested hundreds of dollars into a new set of wheels proclaims the differences are HUGE, especially when the difference is down to a subjective quality like "ride feel" or "cornering." Expectations routinely influence our experiences like these.

I certainly haven't seen anything resembling objective data suggesting that Wheel X is smoother than Wheel Y.

For the few riders who genuinely are fighting for every last second, nice wheels are undoubtedly worth it. For everyone else, I have serious doubts.
Bacciagalupe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.