Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Who makes the sexiest road bike frame? (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/897480-who-makes-sexiest-road-bike-frame.html)

KraneXL 07-11-18 12:40 AM


Originally Posted by carlos danger (Post 20439982)
imo most carbon frames in this thread looks kinda off. non sexy imo. they have basically no soul.

Then you're missing something. Sexy inherently says curves, and no other bike material is better at producing curves than carbon.

Sy Reene 07-16-18 06:28 PM

Don't see these around much (Delta7) kinda interesting. Came across while browsing Robin William's bike collection that went to auction a couple years ago (BTW, good documentary on him running now on HBO):
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...77ae354769.jpg

kbarch 07-16-18 09:07 PM


Originally Posted by Kimmo (Post 20440307)
Okay, they come out of a mould, but have you considered how many hours of painstaking labour goes into laying them up?

Sure, the labour isn't anywhere near as skilled as that required to make a metal frame, but then there's all the knowledge and work that goes into actually designing them, not to mention the tooling, which absolutely dwarfs the design input into pretty much any metal frame, by orders of magnitude.

So if 'soul' is a consequence of how much effort, time, and hard-won knowledge that goes into a bike, modern high-end carbon wins the day hands down.

I occurs to me that while what you say seems true of the designs or drawings, the results are the opposite - metal frames themselves have the souls that the drawings lack, while with carbon frames, the soul is only in the drawings, so to speak. ;)

Wileyone 07-16-18 09:28 PM

Cinelli Supercorsa.https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...3c73d63669.jpg

GeneO 07-16-18 10:48 PM


Originally Posted by Drag (Post 20440655)

Drool

noodle soup 07-16-18 10:54 PM


Originally Posted by carlos danger (Post 20439982)
imo most carbon frames in this thread looks kinda off. non sexy imo. they have basically no soul.

I've seen your steel bikes, and your are the last person that should be talking about "soul".

;)

rgconner 07-16-18 11:17 PM


Originally Posted by KraneXL (Post 20440699)
Then you're missing something. Sexy inherently says curves, and no other bike material is better at producing curves than carbon.

I don't agree. These are some sexy curvy steel bikes out there.
These are real road bikes, just with the curves of a cruiser:

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...32216725d4.jpg
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...1e87eabd28.jpg
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...dbb27e9e94.jpg

As for soul? These bikes are hand made, soldered and/or TIG welded by hand.

MyTi 07-17-18 01:44 AM

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...c410e85ea7.jpg

kbarch 07-17-18 04:52 AM


Originally Posted by Kimmo (Post 20440315)

Yeah, that's sexy like platform stilettos, vinyl miniskirts, fishnet stockings and bedazzled halter tops.


Originally Posted by KraneXL (Post 20440699)
Then you're missing something. Sexy inherently says curves, and no other bike material is better at producing curves than carbon.

I think you're on to something.


Originally Posted by noodle soup (Post 20452249)
I've seen your steel bikes, and your are the last person that should be talking about "soul".

;)

You must be joking - that lugged steel thing was like a James Brown production: .

motosonic 07-17-18 05:14 AM

I'm sorry, but the Trek and Specialized are about as far from 'sexy' as you can get in cycling. Personally I just feel like those 2 brands specifically have about the most plain-jane, boring shapes and paint in the industry. They just don't do anything for me aesthetically. Giant, Fuji, Cannondale,Scott don't do much better, either. I look at a lot of the boutique brands, and those just look like though was put into the design to make you want to look at them.

KraneXL 07-17-18 07:43 AM


Originally Posted by motosonic (Post 20452480)
I'm sorry, but the Trek and Specialized are about as far from 'sexy' as you can get in cycling. Personally I just feel like those 2 brands specifically have about the most plain-jane, boring shapes and paint in the industry. They just don't do anything for me aesthetically. Giant, Fuji, Cannondale,Scott don't do much better, either. I look at a lot of the boutique brands, and those just look like though was put into the design to make you want to look at them.

Yep, they're part of the Big 4, so they have to be conservative. Similar to cars, only the boutique manufactures can afford to get really select with their styling.

Kimmo 07-17-18 07:33 PM


Originally Posted by kbarch (Post 20452451)
Yeah, that's sexy like platform stilettos, vinyl miniskirts, fishnet stockings and bedazzled halter tops.

I'm thinking more like this...

https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...57c66a8442.jpg

Not a fan of the seatpost though.

woodcraft 07-17-18 10:58 PM

https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...b47f7b8833.jpg

chainwhip 07-18-18 05:32 AM


Originally Posted by woodcraft (Post 20454533)

How's the handling? Looks like the steering feel might be a bit light.
Kind of scary on fast descents?

woodcraft 07-18-18 08:40 AM


Originally Posted by chainwhip (Post 20454726)
How's the handling? Looks like the steering feel might be a bit light.
Kind of scary on fast descents?



Could be, but folks that ride them heave a ball.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.