Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Road Cycling (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/)
-   -   Hanging with the group (https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycling/901645-hanging-group.html)

cyclezen 07-16-13 10:41 AM

1 Attachment(s)
sounds like a good learning experience
it's been mentioned to monitor riders in front of you, but I like to place myself where I can 'see' 3-4 ahead, at least. 'Learning' the gap distance between riders is important. Experience lets you develop an understanding of the visual distance between you and other riders - I like to use the head and shoulders. That allows you to 'see' ahead quite a bit and anticipate much better.
You can 'practice' this observational skill during slower warmup times, when riding is steady. Place your wheel the distance you wish from the rider in front, then look up to observe the distance - try to hold that distance. AT first it will take some concentration, but surprisingly quickly it'll become second nature, as does constant scanning of the surroundings. Soon you won;t even notice you;re making adjustments to your position based on this observing.
Additionally, unless there is a single paceline under high duress, I never ride directly behind the rider in front. I offset a few inches to one side. It allows for some natural accordianing of the group without causing disasters. Additionally, you'll easily be able to 'see' 3,4 or 5 layers ahead to anticipate much better, and you have the ability to see some road hazards. When you see a road hazard hand signal, that's the time fall in line with the wheel in front (hoping the rider in front is picking a good line...)
I try not to offset to the 'outside' of a rider unless I plan on advancing my position. If riders in front are 2 or more abreast, natural quick movements go to the outside. It almost never happens that riders abreast go towards each other (except in a crazy sprint...); so the safe place to be is between 'pairs'/3/4 upfront when in a large group - you have a guaranteed 3 ft of space between them that will keep your wheel clear.
As in here:
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=329501
each following rider is offset from the pair infront...
However, when the group is riding 2up in steady tempo, it's expected that you'll also follow suit and ride behind the wheel in front, and not hog the middle...
...lot to learn, but riding in a fast group is huge fun!

Campag4life 07-16-13 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15853708)
It's impossible to say. 22+, may mean the group cruises around 22-23mph. It also may mean, we average 22mph or better, and often get going in the high 20's or low 30's.

Those are two very different things.

It also may be a group that goes a pretty steady 23 mph, or it may be a group that has constant surges and attacks.

And there may be hills, and if there are hills, it may be a group that waits for everyone at the top, or at least does a rolling regroup, or it may be a group that eats its young.

The fitness and skill required will vary greatly depending on where this ride fits into the above referenced continuim.

As said above only one way to find out.

True. And OP...you could also do a trial run. You don't have to just dive into the deep end.
Rent an electric moped and pace the group you intend to ride with. If possible track speed with a Garmin and download it and then study the speed signature and elevation changes. Then compare that to your power production adjusting for the aero benefit of pacelining.
This will give you a better sense.

cafzali 07-16-13 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by caloso (Post 15855412)
This would be true where it's a steady speed. But many rides have a very mellow, neutral roll out and then you hit the start (which by the way will be a signpost or a guardrail or a tree or even a line where the pavement color changes) and then it's on like Donkey Kong. If you're not ready and able to match the surge and get in the draft, you'll be off the back before you know what's happened.

Which is why I recommend asking what's up at the start and being self-sufficient in any case.

Perhaps some clubs have this, but this scenario's a race more than a ride. I personally wouldn't think of this as a very enjoyable event; if I want this kind of thing, I'll do a Fondo, but to each his/her own.

cafzali 07-16-13 11:16 AM


Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy (Post 15856603)
Group rides are high stakes games. A few milliseconds of inattention can take you or someone else down. You shouldn't be allowing more than a wheel width gap to open. If you're having bike lengths open, you aren't paying anything like enough attention. You can't do that. If you were in the middle of the line, you'd be splitting the group. Keep your cadence up so you can respond, and watch what's happening.

I've never thought of them as such, really. If you're part of a racing club and going on a training ride, then sure. But to many people, there's nothing enjoyable about a normal recreational club ride that has a "high stakes game." Heck, we don't even have that much in the NYC area unless you want to do the all out races at Floyd Bennett Field or something similar.

merlinextraligh 07-16-13 11:17 AM


Originally Posted by cafzali (Post 15856862)
Perhaps some clubs have this, but this scenario's a race more than a ride. I personally wouldn't think of this as a very enjoyable event; if I want this kind of thing, I'll do a Fondo, but to each his/her own.

Here, we call that Tuesday night.

merlinextraligh 07-16-13 11:21 AM


Originally Posted by cafzali (Post 15856873)
I've never thought of them as such, really. If you're part of a racing club and going on a training ride, then sure. But to many people, there's nothing enjoyable about a normal recreational club ride that has a "high stakes game." Heck, we don't even have that much in the NYC area unless you want to do the all out races at Floyd Bennett Field or something similar.

I think the high stakes Carbon fiber boy is thinking of are not "winning the ride"

Rather it's the risk of serious injury or death that is on the line anytime you ride in a group. Obviously it's fairly rare for people to suffer severe injuries on group rides, and fourtunately exceedingly rare for people to die, but both happen.

The point being that bad stuff can happen if you mess up, even on a moderately paced, non competitive, ride, and you need to take care in your own riding, and be alert to trouble developing from others

Campag4life 07-16-13 11:21 AM


Originally Posted by pallen (Post 15856457)
Sounds like a good workout. The surges are what I was talking about. A group that goes a steady 23mph can be easier to hang with than a group that averages 18, but constantly surges, sprints and attacks. The latter will probably make you faster.

While surging can be an issue, in my experience, very few pacelines average 18mph unless that they are a C group. 23mph average is a fair average in a paceline for a decent cyclist.

Campag4life 07-16-13 11:24 AM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15856879)
Here, we call that Tuesday night.

Yeah...depends on the ride. OP..keep this in mind. Group ride dynamics are as variable as the day is long. Some eat their young and other rides are like a mild breeze. Pick the type of ride based upon your temperament and skill level and you don't know until you try. Worse case you get dropped and that maybe better afterall if you don't like to suffer.

caloso 07-16-13 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15856879)
Here, we call that Tuesday night.

+1

Coincidentally enough, I was thinking about our local Tuesday night ride.

RollCNY 07-16-13 11:39 AM


Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy (Post 15856603)
Group rides are high stakes games. A few milliseconds of inattention can take you or someone else down. You shouldn't be allowing more than a wheel width gap to open. If you're having bike lengths open, you aren't paying anything like enough attention. You can't do that. If you were in the middle of the line, you'd be splitting the group. Keep your cadence up so you can respond, and watch what's happening.

My wheels are 23mm wide. Are you telling someone who has never done a fast group ride to ride within 7/8" of everyone else?

gregf83 07-16-13 11:42 AM


Originally Posted by Campag4life (Post 15856905)
While surging can be an issue, in my experience, very few pacelines average 18mph unless that they are a C group. 23mph average is a fair average in a paceline for a decent cyclist.

He's likely talking about the average for the whole ride including stops regroups, warmup, cooldown etc. 23mph avg for a complete ride would be unusual.

gregf83 07-16-13 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by RollCNY (Post 15856986)
My wheels are 23mm wide. Are you telling someone who has never done a fast group ride to ride within 7/8" of everyone else?

Turn the wheel 90 degress and it's 26" wide. But I think you knew that :)

pallen 07-16-13 11:58 AM


Originally Posted by Campag4life (Post 15856905)
While surging can be an issue, in my experience, very few pacelines average 18mph unless that they are a C group. 23mph average is a fair average in a paceline for a decent cyclist.

I guess that gets down to what you mean by "average". I'm talking about the distance traveled divided by the time you were out. Yes, flat cruising without a headwind is often around 23 and up, but there's also points where we wait to regroup and slow spin a bit after a sprint, etc. that bring the total average down.

nahungry 07-16-13 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by pallen (Post 15857073)
I guess that gets down to what you mean by "average". I'm talking about the distance traveled divided by the time you were out. Yes, flat cruising without a headwind is often around 23 and up, but there's also points where we wait to regroup and slow spin a bit after a sprint, etc. that bring the total average down.

The ride definitely cruised around 22~24mph on flats. Very windy stretches, slow-down after surges and rolling re-group from time to time and slow stop and move all combined (Plus me having to stop for a minute to tighten my saddle that came lose for some reason), my bike computer averaged the complete ride at 18.3

AdelaaR 07-16-13 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15853821)
I've found not knowing my way back, is worth about 25 watts FTP from the fear of getting lost if you drop.

:lol:

Carbonfiberboy 07-16-13 12:29 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15856897)
I think the high stakes Carbon fiber boy is thinking of are not "winning the ride"

Rather it's the risk of serious injury or death that is on the line anytime you ride in a group. Obviously it's fairly rare for people to suffer severe injuries on group rides, and fourtunately exceedingly rare for people to die, but both happen.

The point being that bad stuff can happen if you mess up, even on a moderately paced, non competitive, ride, and you need to take care in your own riding, and be alert to trouble developing from others

In the past month, our club has had two riders abandon after going down from wheel touches. Two other riders abandoned after running into curbs. Two other riders went down when their tires were caught in pavement gaps. These were on relatively easy recreational group rides. The curb hits are especially interesting. It's easy to hit stuff that's hidden behind the riders in front of you if you aren't paying very close attention, or to make a small error and drift into a curb. And always cross a pavement cracks at a decent angle, but OTOH don't take someone down if you jerk the bike around. Which means you also need to know where the bikes behind you are.

Yes, the stakes are injuring yourself or others. One go-down can ruin your whole season or someone else's. Those are high stakes to me.

justkeepedaling 07-16-13 01:17 PM

I'm not a good climber since I am a lardass now, but on the flats, I'm always itching to go. Usually I'm the one who attacks at 30 mph. Over in Davis, the only elevation we had is the overpasses, but those are not very steep so it's still very easy to ride wheels and attack at 20+ mph.

I used to ride in the slow ride with my hybrid commuter bike. In the medium to fast ride, I love it when others try to attack. I always am able to latch on. It's more about keeping your senses aware. There's always a slight body movement and a change in sound when the guy goes. Immediately I go out of the saddle.

I used to do heads up sprints with the sprinter on the Davis collegiate team although he'd be on his fixed gear. Always a fun and close match

Campag4life 07-16-13 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by pallen (Post 15857073)
i guess that gets down to what you mean by "average". I'm talking about the distance traveled divided by the time you were out. Yes, flat cruising without a headwind is often around 23 and up, but there's also points where we wait to regroup and slow spin a bit after a sprint, etc. That bring the total average down.

ok.

merlinextraligh 07-16-13 02:31 PM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by pallen (Post 15857073)
I guess that gets down to what you mean by "average". I'm talking about the distance traveled divided by the time you were out. Yes, flat cruising without a headwind is often around 23 and up, but there's also points where we wait to regroup and slow spin a bit after a sprint, etc. that bring the total average down.

an example where average is not a very good metric:

http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=329531


The average for this group ride was 23mph. But the top speed was almost 34 mph, peak 5 minutes almost 29 mph, and peak 30 minutes 26mph.

The warm up and cool down distorts the average.

aztimm 07-16-13 05:41 PM

I've had a really tough time find a group that works for me. I've ridden with one that advertises, "18-20mph," got dropped, caught up because a guy got a flat, then ended up passing some of them on a hill.
Another group said 18-20 and it was unbearably slow. To the point that I told the SAG guy at the back that I'd go off on my own. He tried to talk me into hanging, but I took off. I ended up seeing the group later--after I had ridden a pretty big hill and done an extra 4-5 miles--and was really glad that I split off.

My best, "group rides," have been small rides with friends. Through Strava I've connected with a bunch of locals, and have some triathlete friends. We get together, do a nice ride, all agree on our start time, route, and stops ahead of time. These don't happen as often as I'd like, and I end up riding alone 90% of the time.
Of course when I'm out riding solo I sometimes latch onto other riders or groups. I'll ask if they mind if I join them. We'll usually talk about where we're going, etc. I usually ride in areas that are bicycle-friendly, so it is pretty rare that I'm all alone the whole time for any ride.

For most of my solo rides I hold 18-19mph, but when I do organized tours I'm able to hold 21-22 for 65-70 miles.

cafzali 07-16-13 07:31 PM


Originally Posted by merlinextraligh (Post 15856897)
I think the high stakes Carbon fiber boy is thinking of are not "winning the ride"

Rather it's the risk of serious injury or death that is on the line anytime you ride in a group. Obviously it's fairly rare for people to suffer severe injuries on group rides, and fourtunately exceedingly rare for people to die, but both happen.

The point being that bad stuff can happen if you mess up, even on a moderately paced, non competitive, ride, and you need to take care in your own riding, and be alert to trouble developing from others

I preface this by saying my experience is obviously entirely anecdotal, but while I've sadly known several who have been seriously injured in bike crashes over the last couple of years, none of those incidents occurred on a group ride. I actually think on the whole group riding can be safer than individual riding, chiefly because you're more visible to motorists and they're generally less likely to pull something stupid that can lead to serious injury, or even death, for you.

Also, it's tougher for a driver to flee an incident involving a group ride for a variety of reasons. I know someone who is currently recovering from serious injuries after being hit by a car on a training ride in the spring and if he hadn't been in a popular area and had a number of witnesses to the crash, the whole incident could have devolved into a "he said, she said" thing, making it much more difficult for him.

merlinextraligh 07-17-13 06:21 AM


Originally Posted by cafzali (Post 15858568)
. I actually think on the whole group riding can be safer than individual riding, chiefly because you're more visible to motorists and they're generally less likely to pull something stupid that can lead to serious injury, or even death, for you.

Also, it's tougher for a driver to flee an incident involving a group ride for a variety of reasons. I know someone who is currently recovering from serious injuries after being hit by a car on a training ride in the spring and if he hadn't been in a popular area and had a number of witnesses to the crash, the whole incident could have devolved into a "he said, she said" thing, making it much more difficult for him.

Without any data, my bet is that you're right that you're significantly less likely tobe hit by a car on a group ride.

However, the odds of bike on bike bike collisions goes way up, obviously. So the chance of getting killed on balance is likely lower, but the chance of serious injury from a fall, such as a broken collar bone, fractured pelvis, traumatic brain injury, goes up.

None of this is meant to say that I think group riding is unreasonably unsafe. The point is that in a group ride, your actions can affect the safety of others, and have very negative consequences. Hence, it's incumbent on every member of the group to ride safely.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.