Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Rainman's cogset choice vindicated!

Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Rainman's cogset choice vindicated!

Old 05-20-02, 09:41 AM
  #1  
Mr. Cellophane
Thread Starter
 
RainmanP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rainman's cogset choice vindicated!

I have mentioned before that my favorite cassette is a Shimano 9-speed 14-25, 14-15-16-17-18-19-21-23-25, because I can't even push 52/14 except with a serious tailwind. I'm just realistic and would rather have the 25 when I need it. In a first of a series of bike reviews in the current Pro Cycling, Chris Boardman is talking about his current personal bike and component choices. He uses Dura Ace 9-speed. In explaining why he did not feel the need for 10 speed cogset, he discusses the narrowness of the chain and cog spacing and the resulting extremely accurate adjustments leaving little room for error. He also mentions that he does not need an 11T cog and only ever used the 11 for downhill chasing and that he was able to hold Cipollini's wheel with the 12 at something like 73 kph (or maybe it was 78). He further states that most people don't even need a 13. Which brings us back to my 14! I just found his analysis interesting. Come to think of it, my young friend who is racing in Belgium considers it worthy of mentioning in his race descriptions when he has to use his 12.

Of course you have to weigh my choice against the fact that I'm just an old fat guy who believes in having lower gears than he thinks he needs rather than higher gears he cannot use.
Rainman
__________________
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
RainmanP is offline  
Old 05-20-02, 10:00 AM
  #2  
A Heart Needs a Home
 
Rich Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,387
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Heck, yes. I currently have a 12-34 on my commuter (with a 52-42-30 in front) and I'd rather have a 13-34. The only reason I don't is you can find a 12-34 9sp XT cassette for $40, and a 13-34 would have to be made up special and would cost a lot more.

I did once spin out a 52-11 combo going downhill. I was scared to death. I'll never do it again. I was imagining what it would be like to have a front-tire blowout right then. "Mommy, see the flying man in his spandex superhero suit! He must be Plastic Man, he's all bendy!"

At my age and condition downhills are a nice rest. I'm much more concerned about having low enough gears to get up the next inevitable climb.

RichC
Rich Clark is offline  
Old 05-20-02, 12:22 PM
  #3  
Mr. Cellophane
Thread Starter
 
RainmanP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 3,037
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I hear ya, RichC! Hey, man, don't settle for what the manufacturer's put together. You probably use just a couple of cogs most of the time. When those get worn, just get a 14-25 or 13-23, pull both apart and put together what you want. I do that all the time. Since you generally only wear out a couple of cogs at a time you can order individual ones from Harris Cyclery for about 8 bucks each.

When I know I am going someplace with steep spots I replace the 25T cog with a 34, put on an LX rear der and a 48-34 crankset. Takes about 10 minutes and gets me down to a 27 inch gear if I really need it.
Rainman
__________________
If it ain't broke, mess with it anyway!
RainmanP is offline  
Old 05-20-02, 01:42 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: mass
Posts: 942
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hi Rainman
I just finished a new touring bike, I've been riding an old Raleigh technium set up with shimano ultegra double crankset, front and rear derailure and botom bracket, Dura-Ace cassette, chain and STI shifters. I have two sets of wheels, one for riding with the bunch, a lightweight set of velocity arrrow head rims laced to real hubs, on that set of wheels I run an 11-23 cassette. I also have a set of heavy duty touring wheels built up with Mavic - 519 rims laced to ultegra hubs for commuting and short touring. On that wheel set I have been running a dura-ace 12 - 27, up front I have a 39 - 53, This has worked well for me for most riding, My max bike weight has been 55 pounds to this point. When I built my new bike I wanted to tool it up for heavy touring so I Installed the new shimano dura-ace tripple, 30 - 39 - 53 in the front and a shimano XTR, 12 - 34 in the rear, the cogs are as follows, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 23, 26, 30, 34. So far I put about 200 miles on the bike and I think I really like it, It seems to be geared correctly for most riding situations, It is quite different from the gearing I'm used to but, I'm finding great gears for most situations. I was worried about the 53 tooth ring being to big but I don't think is going to be. One positive thing that I have found is that when unloaded, it goes down the road like a road bike, not a touring bike, it's actually quite fast. and when loaded it climbs quite well. I chose that set up because I tried to build a more well rounded useful bike, one that would have the power gears for touring and long days in the hills and fast gears so I could tool around with the road riders in town and not have them wait for me. I think it's going to work.
mrfix is offline  
Old 05-20-02, 02:53 PM
  #5  
riding a Pinarello Prince
 
orguasch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Downtown Toronto,Canada
Posts: 2,409

Bikes: Pinarello, Prince and an FP5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have on my cogs 11x 21 and its 11,12,13,14,15,1617,19 and 21, and the most that I used is 14,15, and 16 I really seldom use 11, only when I am going down hill, it hard to push the 53 x 11, may be 53 x 14 then I can go places with that gearing...
__________________
"Racso", the well oiled machine;)

Last edited by orguasch; 05-20-02 at 09:22 PM.
orguasch is offline  
Old 05-20-02, 02:54 PM
  #6  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1390 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times in 835 Posts
Well into the 1970s, a top gear of 100 to 108 inches (52/14 or 52/13) was nearly ubiquitous in racing and in touring. A 104-inch top gear was plenty for me 30 years ago and it still is. I am pleased to know that a 14-tooth high is still an option!

My road bikes: 50/13 (104), 52/14 (100), 48/13 (100)
My mountain bike: 48/13 (96)
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.