Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Paceline strategy

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Paceline strategy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-13, 04:09 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Paceline strategy

My question is what is the best 2-man paceline strategy when one rider is stronger than the other?

In a large group it is key to have the entire line move at a steady pace. This reduces the harmonica effect of acceleration and breaking and keeps everything nice and smooth.

What I am wondering is, does this also hold for small groups? So e.g. if there are only 2 riders forming a paceline, the impact of the harmonica effect would be reduced and the fastest strategy could be one where the strongest rider also does faster pulls. Any thoughts?
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 04:11 AM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,843

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times in 612 Posts
The stronger rider should do longer pulls, not faster. The speed or effort, should stay steady.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 04:44 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,405

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 180 Times in 102 Posts
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
The stronger rider should do longer pulls, not faster. The speed or effort, should stay steady.
+1

With 2 riders a rule of thumb is that each rider should do about 30 second pulls, minimum, and closer to a minute, to give the other rider a chance to recover. You may want to reduce the length of the pull of the weaker rider to 15 seconds or so (20 revolutions?) and have the stronger rider do a minute or so. The key here is the recovery of the weaker rider - if the weaker rider can recover enough to pull at the agreed upon speed/effort then you're all good. If the weaker rider can't pull then the other rider needs to pull more. If the other rider needs to pull less because they're getting too fatigued then the two need to slow down.

When Greg Lemond led the Junior National Team to a bronze medal in the 70km Junior World Team Time Trial Championships he was by far the superior rider (Ron Kiefel, Greg Demegen, and one other rider was on the team). One rider crashed early on, leaving 3 riders (and the time is taken off the 3rd rider so the remaining riders had to finish). Another rider was unable to pull so sat at the back. One rider took about 30 second pulls. Lemond took 2-3 minute pulls and basically did the TTT by himself. I've never seen an article saying who crashed and who couldn't pull so I don't know that info. The TTT bronze against other countries' specialists, combined with his surprise silver on the track against a specialist (he'd raced on the track for something like 14 minutes in total before the Worlds), and the surprise gold (flat course, expected to be a big sprint, but he powered a two man break clear of the field to win the gold), marked him as a rider of the future.
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 05:55 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 429
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Is it important for the riders to signal to each other the end of a turn, e.g. by guy in front flicking elbow or guy behind shouting "spell" or "spell up"? Seems to me that without communication, the guy behind is going to have to accelerate to get to the front and so disrupt the smooth flow and even pace. With communication the lead rider can ease off slightly to allow the drafter to come through at the same steady pace.

BTW, OP, I think you meant to say "concertina effect" as harmonicas don't move much!
bobones is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 06:35 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 8,546
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Is this intended for a team time trial type effort, where you are trying to go as fast as possible, or are you just out for a ride?

If the former - essentially I agree with cdr - longer pulls for the stronger rider, at a pace that allows the weaker rider to recover, and it depends on the relative strength difference what the pace & timing should be to maximize the speed. You'll need to do some practice to figure it out.

Otherwise - there's only two of you - why don't you just talk to each other?
valygrl is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 06:50 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 429
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Might be 2 of you in a break or (more likely in my case) having been spat out the back of a fast group, but still trying to keep the pace high and get back on. When you're putting in a threshold effort, talking is pretty difficult. I was in this position last Saturday: 2 of us alone were taking turns but not talking and I was having to accelerate to take a turn. We picked up a few other stragglers and went "through and off" which is just a rotating pace line where you don't really pull for any length of time at the front. In retrospect, when it was just the two of us, it may have been better if we signalled the end of a spell to avoid the accelerations.
bobones is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 08:02 AM
  #7  
. . .
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ottawa ON, CA
Posts: 414

Bikes: '96 Wheeler 7980, 2013 SuperSix-4, 2013 Felt F75X, 2015 Apollo Giro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
This reduces the accordion effect ...
fify.

Edit:

Originally Posted by bobones
BTW, OP, I think you meant to say "concertina effect" as harmonicas don't move much!
Oops, didn't see this before posting.
evrythngsgngrn is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 08:23 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Looigi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 8,951
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 12 Posts
"harmonica effect"

ROTFL. Sorry. I just cracked me up.
Looigi is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 08:36 AM
  #9  
ka maté ka maté ka ora
 
pdedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423

Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Looigi
"harmonica effect".
That's just suck and blow. So 41
pdedes is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 08:50 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
It depends a bit on where your roots are for how you interpret harmonica:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonika


Anyhow, for the best strategy it seems obvious that the person in front must go slow enough such that the person behind is able to rest and do a pull at a speed faster than the solo speed of the stronger rider. Doing a quick rotation of 30-60 seconds also seems to be preferable in order to be able to consistently pull at a significant level above FTP.

I just don't see a reason why for just 2 people the effort up front needs to be the same for both riders. When there is a large pace line, you want the people that are resting in the middle to be able to rest at a constant pace while they wait their turn. But when there are only 2 people the two riders are always switching between high and low power anyway and they can react much faster than when there is a large pace line.

I might be over-thinking this and maybe I just need to try it out. The other day I was trying to go around a 30 minute loop as fast as possible with a friend and I was 2 minutes faster than my friend. So we were wondering if we could improve my best time by staying together or if the difference between us two is too big for a pace line to work.
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:02 AM
  #11  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by bobones
Is it important for the riders to signal to each other the end of a turn, e.g. by guy in front flicking elbow or guy behind shouting "spell" or "spell up"? Seems to me that without communication, the guy behind is going to have to accelerate to get to the front and so disrupt the smooth flow and even pace. With communication the lead rider can ease off slightly to allow the drafter to come through at the same steady pace.

BTW, OP, I think you meant to say "concertina effect" as harmonicas don't move much!
I've never heard 'spell' before. If you are going hard enough then the lead rider won't hear anything.

All that 'communication' is unnecessary. Everything that transpires should be non-verbal.

The lead riders simply needs to slide over a bike width into the wind with a flick off the fingers on the leeward side as they ease off slightly on the pedals. The following rider holds the same pace and the lead rider slips in behind as the other rider moves past him.

As for duration, with two riders switching every 30 seconds is far too quick as it isn't enough time to recover and you'd spend a huge percentage of time changing leads. I would pull for a minute or two and then switch off. That gives time for recovery and the amount of time spent side by side is a much smaller portion of the overall time.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:04 AM
  #12  
Stand and Deliver
 
FLvector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 3,340

Bikes: Cannondale R1000, Giant TCR Advanced, Giant TCR Advanced SL

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
The stronger rider should do longer pulls, not faster. The speed or effort, should stay steady.
Although I do agree that the stronger rider should do longer pulls, the speed can vary if the weaker rider is able to recover and hang on while drafting. The weaker rider may only be able to pull at 20 mph and for a shorter time interval, then after moving behind the faster rider pulling at 21-22 mph, can easily maintain 22 without too much struggle. The stronger rider should pay close attention to be sure the weaker one doesn't get dropped and this should easily be communicated with only two people.
FLvector is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:20 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
Originally Posted by mr_pedro
I just don't see a reason why for just 2 people the effort up front needs to be the same for both riders. When there is a large pace line, you want the people that are resting in the middle to be able to rest at a constant pace while they wait their turn. But when there are only 2 people the two riders are always switching between high and low power anyway and they can react much faster than when there is a large pace line.
Consider the two riders to be a single entity. For the fastest time over a given distance you should aim for the same conditions as a single rider which is constant power for flat windless course. Any time spent riding above the average speed is less efficient.

If the weaker rider has an FTP less than ~70% of the stronger rider they should just sit in as they won't be helping. If you want to try this with a 400W pro, you'll need an FTP above 280W.
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:34 AM
  #14  
Full Member
 
goose70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 433

Bikes: '19 Cannondale Evo, '12 Guru Flite; '10 CAAD9, Trek MTB

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 18 Posts
In addition to the other good advice here, nobody has mentioned race radios and a team car driven by a Directeur Sportif. Why would you attempt a two-person paceline without such support?
goose70 is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:52 AM
  #15  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by goose70
In addition to the other good advice here, nobody has mentioned race radios and a team car driven by a Directeur Sportif. Why would you attempt a two-person paceline without such support?
Race radios are how the organizer/officials communicate with the vehicles. Riders don't hear this. All races use these.

Rider radios are how the DS communicates with the riders. They are not allowed in some races. This is when the DS needs to scream at you over the PA or by hanging out of the car whilst banging on the outside of the door.

It really can be quite encouraging.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 09:58 AM
  #16  
well hello there
 
Nachoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430

Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times in 206 Posts
I guess it depends on how much stronger the one rider is.
If it's not a race type situation, it might be reasonable for the stronger cyclist the pull the entire time.
__________________
.
.

Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Nachoman is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 10:03 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by gregf83
Consider the two riders to be a single entity. For the fastest time over a given distance you should aim for the same conditions as a single rider which is constant power for flat windless course. Any time spent riding above the average speed is less efficient.
I see that for a single rider, any energy spent above average power level is better spent to increase speed at times that power was below average. Because of non-linear relationship between speed and power this will increase the average speed.

Just wondering if this also holds for two riders.
So the if the faster rider pulls a bit slower, the slower rider is able to pull a bit faster as he will be more rested? But will this always produce a faster average speed?
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 10:11 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 429
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
I've never heard 'spell' before.
Might just be a Scottish thing then. In a group riding two abreast, the second group shouts "spell up" to indicate that the lead pair should move over although the lead pair might move over anyway without anyone telling them to. Used if the lead pair has been on the front long enough or they are noticeably beginning to fade or riding too slowly for the bunch.
bobones is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 11:29 AM
  #19  
Full Member
 
goose70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 433

Bikes: '19 Cannondale Evo, '12 Guru Flite; '10 CAAD9, Trek MTB

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob Dopolina
Race radios are how the organizer/officials communicate with the vehicles. Riders don't hear this. All races use these.

Rider radios are how the DS communicates with the riders. They are not allowed in some races. This is when the DS needs to scream at you over the PA or by hanging out of the car whilst banging on the outside of the door.

It really can be quite encouraging.
It's always a good day when a smartass comment results in me learning something new. Thanks!
Unfortunately, I do not race in events where support vehicles or radios come into the picture. At best, we get an announcer who lets everyone know who won the $5.00 carwash giftcard prime.

Smartassness aside and admitting that I’m also guilty of overthinking bike stuff, if any thread screamed “just ride your bike!,” it’s this one.
goose70 is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 04:33 PM
  #20  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by bobones
Might just be a Scottish thing then. In a group riding two abreast, the second group shouts "spell up" to indicate that the lead pair should move over although the lead pair might move over anyway without anyone telling them to. Used if the lead pair has been on the front long enough or they are noticeably beginning to fade or riding too slowly for the bunch.
I thought it might be a regional thing.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 05:12 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wilmette, IL
Posts: 6,881
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 751 Post(s)
Liked 727 Times in 351 Posts
Google the Trofeo Baracchi of 1962. Rudy Altig and Jacques Anquetil. Epic. "Courage Jacques, courage."
It's on Youtube, woo-whoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQWN...Y&noredirect=1

And while you're at it "The Double" on Youtube.

Last edited by big chainring; 09-26-13 at 05:23 PM.
big chainring is offline  
Old 09-26-13, 08:20 PM
  #22  
Mr. Dopolina
 
Bob Dopolina's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 10,217

Bikes: KUUPAS, Simpson VR

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 149 Post(s)
Liked 117 Times in 41 Posts
Originally Posted by big chainring
Google the Trofeo Baracchi of 1962. Rudy Altig and Jacques Anquetil. Epic. "Courage Jacques, courage."
It's on Youtube, woo-whoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQWN...Y&noredirect=1

And while you're at it "The Double" on Youtube.
A two up break is a personal thing.
__________________
BDop Cycling Company Ltd.: bdopcycling.com, facebook, instagram



Bob Dopolina is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 03:01 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
mr_pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 645
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 75 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by goose70
Smartassness aside and admitting that I’m also guilty of overthinking bike stuff, if any thread screamed “just ride your bike!,” it’s this one.
I know, but this is as much the numbers geek in me as the cyclist talking.

Anyhow, I did some calculations and the conclusion is that the stronger rider pulling slightly more than the weaker rider makes the paceline faster, but the differences with both pulling the same are negligible.

I assumed:
-No wind on a flat
-a certain improvement from drafting
-a certain quadratic relationship between power and speed
-some FTP for rider1 and for rider2
-instantaneous switches from pulling to drafting
-Normalized power for both riders is equal to their FTP

I was then able to solve for the pulling power of both riders that accomplishes all of the above and maximizes the speed improvement relative to the stronger rider riding solo. The results were that a maximum speed improvement is obtained when the stronger rider pulls a bit faster than the weaker rider pulls.
With the numbers I choose I was getting 285W for the stronger rider 62% of the time and 277W for the weaker rider 38% of the time.

However the differences between 285 and 277 are small and imposing a constraint that speed remains constant, I get 282W with a 67%-33% split. The difference in speed improvement between these approaches is very small (1.1km/h vs 1.07 km/h).
mr_pedro is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 03:38 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 9,201
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1186 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 177 Posts
What FTPs were you assuming? How were you calculating NP?
gregf83 is offline  
Old 09-27-13, 03:55 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,805
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 501 Post(s)
Liked 626 Times in 370 Posts
Unless the difference in the riders is minimal, what will end up happening is one will pull and the other one will push.
wheelreason is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.