training to climb
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hercules CA
Posts: 80
Bikes: 12' Supersix 105 / some fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
training to climb
been wanting to improve my climbs wondering whats a good speed/cadence/watt to have as a goal for an X% climb.. as for the grade feel free to fill in what you want to suggest, itll give me an idea of how fast i should be going at different climbs. thanks in advance
btw im a 175lb-ish rider about 5"8 planning to drop 10lbs to be at 165lbs... if that makes any difference
btw im a 175lb-ish rider about 5"8 planning to drop 10lbs to be at 165lbs... if that makes any difference
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
How fast can you climb now?
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hercules CA
Posts: 80
Bikes: 12' Supersix 105 / some fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 412
Bikes: raleigh sport (thank god i got rid of it), current: cannondale systemsix w/ultegra 10, 2009 cannondale scalpel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We'll....there are no magic numbers to hit. It's just what you can do at that current fitness level. You will always improve and get faster the more you ride. But a hill of 10% that we both climb at the same speed! my wattage will be lower because of my 135 lbs. I could potentially still put out less watts and ride faster. It's all individual.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
That's not bad. Have you ever done Mt. Diablo?
#6
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,528
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 1,938 Times
in
1,383 Posts
There are a few good posts in a similar thread over on T&N:
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...proving-climbs
Be sure to click on Greg's link.
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...proving-climbs
Be sure to click on Greg's link.
#7
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
145 is probably a good target. Not ideal but you wont get hassled too much about being anorexic and you should see a nice bump in hill speed.
#8
Rubber side down
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Teh Quickie Mart
Posts: 1,769
Bikes: are fun! :-)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked 225 Times
in
105 Posts
Seriously though, find a group ride that suits you. Riding with others will make you faster as long as those you ride with (at least some of them) are faster than you.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hercules CA
Posts: 80
Bikes: 12' Supersix 105 / some fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We'll....there are no magic numbers to hit. It's just what you can do at that current fitness level. You will always improve and get faster the more you ride. But a hill of 10% that we both climb at the same speed! my wattage will be lower because of my 135 lbs. I could potentially still put out less watts and ride faster. It's all individual.
Thanks, before I got serious in to road biking I used to ride a fixed gear everywhere, so cadence and some strength is there just want to know how and when to use it. Mt. Diablo is actually on my list of hills to climb, hoping this summer I can do it since WC isnt far from where I live.
yeah a group definitely helps. I used to have a few riding buddies but they got busy with life and eventually stopped riding, I actually just recently started riding again after a 2 year hiatus..
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 412
Bikes: raleigh sport (thank god i got rid of it), current: cannondale systemsix w/ultegra 10, 2009 cannondale scalpel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wow sorry for the extreme typos! Lol damn spell check
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Walnut Creek, CA
Posts: 2,668
Bikes: 2023 Canyon Aeoroad CF SL, 2015 Trek Emonda SLR, 2002 Litespeed Classic, 2005 Bianchi Pista, Some BikesDirect MTB I never ride.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 647 Post(s)
Liked 136 Times
in
89 Posts
been wanting to improve my climbs wondering whats a good speed/cadence/watt to have as a goal for an X% climb.. as for the grade feel free to fill in what you want to suggest, itll give me an idea of how fast i should be going at different climbs. thanks in advance
btw im a 175lb-ish rider about 5"8 planning to drop 10lbs to be at 165lbs... if that makes any difference
btw im a 175lb-ish rider about 5"8 planning to drop 10lbs to be at 165lbs... if that makes any difference
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Above ground, Walnut Creek, Ca
Posts: 6,681
Bikes: 8 ss bikes, 1 5-speed touring bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
OP, regarding weight.
i'm same height, or at least used to be! about 150-155. i THINK i could get to 140, but i've already got some flak about being too thin, but only from non-riding friends. (i think they are jealous, hehe).
you will find some improvement from 10 lbs for sure. whether or not it's even possible to get to "not too fat for this sport" weight, as mentioned above, may or may not be possible. if you have an average bone/weight body-style, morphology, or whatever it's called, i'd consider 145 doable. but remember, as i have just found out after being forced to a non-ambulatory state due to a recent crash for 16 days, that your body, i should say MY body, will pile on the LBSs (and i'm not talking Local Bike Shop here) to the tune of 1/2 lb per day with ease.
i'm same height, or at least used to be! about 150-155. i THINK i could get to 140, but i've already got some flak about being too thin, but only from non-riding friends. (i think they are jealous, hehe).
you will find some improvement from 10 lbs for sure. whether or not it's even possible to get to "not too fat for this sport" weight, as mentioned above, may or may not be possible. if you have an average bone/weight body-style, morphology, or whatever it's called, i'd consider 145 doable. but remember, as i have just found out after being forced to a non-ambulatory state due to a recent crash for 16 days, that your body, i should say MY body, will pile on the LBSs (and i'm not talking Local Bike Shop here) to the tune of 1/2 lb per day with ease.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 550 Post(s)
Liked 325 Times
in
226 Posts
Speed: whatever results from that
Cadence: whatever it takes to minimize fatigue given your physiology unless your training plan requires something else (like climbing short hills in your big ring to build strength). You might need to make equipment changes as extreme as mountain bike cassettes and/or triple cranks.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Get a power meter! ! Learn to train with it and you'll know what you can maintain and for how long
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
Don't wait until the summer to do Diablo. It gets pretty hot during the summer so go now. (Maybe not this weekend, though.)
Ride to the top and note the time. That's your benchmark. Then start trying to knock a minute off every time up. If you can do it in an hour, you can win a t-shirt.
Ride to the top and note the time. That's your benchmark. Then start trying to knock a minute off every time up. If you can do it in an hour, you can win a t-shirt.
#16
ka maté ka maté ka ora
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wessex
Posts: 4,423
Bikes: breezer venturi - red novo bosberg - red, pedal force cg1 - red, neuvation f-100 - da, devinci phantom - xt, miele piste - miche/campy, bianchi reparto corse sbx, concorde squadra tsx - da, miele team issue sl - ultegra
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Get skinny, ride above your ftp for extended intervals, don't hit anyone with your vomit
#17
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
351 Posts
A method to track your climbing improvement?
VAM is the vertical meters per hour of elevation gain. So hills with different grades can be compared. At the extremes, steep hills tend to get higher scores, since you can only go some minimum speed before you fall over, and very shallow hills are fast enough that wind resistance is the biggest factor, so the VAM is reduced.
If you have a gps you can get the VAM score for the climb. Strava shows VAM for all big hill climbs automatically. Ridewithgps.com will show VAM on the Metrics tab whenever you drag to select a hill climb.
Or even just time the climb, then lookup it's elevation gain on ridewithgps.com or on strava.com. The VAM formula is: meters climbed / hours. That's (feet climbed / 3.28 feet per meter) / (minutes/60)
I had couple of previous posts on VAM scores, here and here.
I'm usually in the 550-650 VAM range when pushing hard on medium grade hills, or about 1800-2100 feet per hour. The top riders on Strava will typically show 1000 ot 1200 VAM scores, or even higher.
The hour goal to climb Mt Diablo is right near 1000 VAM score.
VAM is the vertical meters per hour of elevation gain. So hills with different grades can be compared. At the extremes, steep hills tend to get higher scores, since you can only go some minimum speed before you fall over, and very shallow hills are fast enough that wind resistance is the biggest factor, so the VAM is reduced.
If you have a gps you can get the VAM score for the climb. Strava shows VAM for all big hill climbs automatically. Ridewithgps.com will show VAM on the Metrics tab whenever you drag to select a hill climb.
Or even just time the climb, then lookup it's elevation gain on ridewithgps.com or on strava.com. The VAM formula is: meters climbed / hours. That's (feet climbed / 3.28 feet per meter) / (minutes/60)
I had couple of previous posts on VAM scores, here and here.
I'm usually in the 550-650 VAM range when pushing hard on medium grade hills, or about 1800-2100 feet per hour. The top riders on Strava will typically show 1000 ot 1200 VAM scores, or even higher.
The hour goal to climb Mt Diablo is right near 1000 VAM score.
Last edited by rm -rf; 02-13-14 at 08:15 PM.
#18
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times
in
351 Posts
Speed/cadence/watts? If you have a power meter, that's the best way to set a goal. I use heart rate to pace myself without a power meter.
It depends on how long the hill is, of course. On long hills, climbing for a half hour or more, I have a heart rate range that I try to keep. There's a much higher limit on short hills.
It depends on how long the hill is, of course. On long hills, climbing for a half hour or more, I have a heart rate range that I try to keep. There's a much higher limit on short hills.
#19
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Hercules CA
Posts: 80
Bikes: 12' Supersix 105 / some fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for all the advices guys! I'll def take them in to consideration !
#20
Senior Member
The nice thing about Mt. Diablo is that its basically a power meter. Since its almost all climbing you can calculate average power easily.
That and the best way to lose weight. The thing I love about climbing is that the hill has no mercy. You got to the top or you didn't.
That and the best way to lose weight. The thing I love about climbing is that the hill has no mercy. You got to the top or you didn't.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The nice thing about Mt. Diablo is that its basically a power meter. Since its almost all climbing you can calculate average power easily.
That and the best way to lose weight. The thing I love about climbing is that the hill has no mercy. You got to the top or you didn't.
That and the best way to lose weight. The thing I love about climbing is that the hill has no mercy. You got to the top or you didn't.
And yes, that makes it an 'average speed' situation, and it's legit for gauging improvement. Go all out on a repeatable course, and if you're getting faster times, you're improving.
Obviously without a powermeter it doesn't help you predict power ranges for training.
#22
Senior Member
A method to track your climbing improvement?
VAM is the vertical meters per hour of elevation gain. So hills with different grades can be compared. At the extremes, steep hills tend to get higher scores, since you can only go some minimum speed before you fall over, and very shallow hills are fast enough that wind resistance is the biggest factor, so the VAM is reduced.
If you have a gps you can get the VAM score for the climb. Strava shows VAM for all big hill climbs automatically. Ridewithgps.com will show VAM on the Metrics tab whenever you drag to select a hill climb.
Or even just time the climb, then lookup it's elevation gain on ridewithgps.com or on strava.com. The VAM formula is: meters climbed / hours. That's (feet climbed / 3.28 feet per meter) / (minutes/60)
I had couple of previous posts on VAM scores, here and here.
I'm usually in the 550-650 VAM range when pushing hard on medium grade hills, or about 1800-2100 feet per hour. The top riders on Strava will typically show 1000 ot 1200 VAM scores, or even higher.
The hour goal to climb Mt Diablo is right near 1000 VAM score.
VAM is the vertical meters per hour of elevation gain. So hills with different grades can be compared. At the extremes, steep hills tend to get higher scores, since you can only go some minimum speed before you fall over, and very shallow hills are fast enough that wind resistance is the biggest factor, so the VAM is reduced.
If you have a gps you can get the VAM score for the climb. Strava shows VAM for all big hill climbs automatically. Ridewithgps.com will show VAM on the Metrics tab whenever you drag to select a hill climb.
Or even just time the climb, then lookup it's elevation gain on ridewithgps.com or on strava.com. The VAM formula is: meters climbed / hours. That's (feet climbed / 3.28 feet per meter) / (minutes/60)
I had couple of previous posts on VAM scores, here and here.
I'm usually in the 550-650 VAM range when pushing hard on medium grade hills, or about 1800-2100 feet per hour. The top riders on Strava will typically show 1000 ot 1200 VAM scores, or even higher.
The hour goal to climb Mt Diablo is right near 1000 VAM score.
40' climb with some flats 4% avg grade - 880 VAM (a lot of wind resistance from 4% grade)
20' climb steady 8% - 1200 VAM
<4' climb at 11% - 1590 VAM (power is much higher for short durations)
#23
Senior Member
The other thing about Diablo is that since there's minimal aerodynamics you can get an good absolute measure of average power, not just relative improvement. The downside is that unless you're very strong, its going to take over an hour which is longer than a typical FTP test.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,456
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It's not sort of. It's you can ABSOLUTELY gauge improvement, on any repeated course, so long as you go all out, use the same course (and reasonably similar conditions), and there aren't stops on the way.
#25
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
Someone should create some sort of software application that you could upload your GPS data into to show your ride statistics or even segments of your ride so you can compare them over time. It could even tell you if you have a personal best on a segment of the ride. Also, and this is a stretch, it could show you how you rate against other riders on the same segments. That would be so cool. I would call it strive or starve or something like that...