Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Road Cycling It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle. -- Ernest Hemingway

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-12-14, 06:13 PM   #51
Smokehouse
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 636
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I finally got to road test my new Specialized CG-R seatpost...holy hell is that thing comfortable! It completely shut up my bike and silenced all of the vibrations I was normally getting through my arse due to crummy roads.

100% worth the $$ and instantly noticeable upgrade.

Of all the things I've bought...this has been the most useful thus far...followed by good tires...
Smokehouse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 06:24 PM   #52
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 26,132
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4623 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clones2 View Post
You're going to get a lot of "great" answers to this question... :-) hahaha. But I can give you my experience from equipment upgrades from my entry level aluminum, to entry level carbon, to upgraded carbon, and finally upgrade wheels over a 4 week time period.

10 mile square loop by my house... no stop lights... It was almost my daily ride.

After a year of riding a 20lb aluminum bike - I was at 18.15 mph avg as my best route time. Bought an entry level carbon, next ride was fastest ever at 18.56mph.... started racing the next week, decided to upgrade immediately and went from a Trek Madone 3.1 to 5.2 and immediately the next ride was 19.25mph, the next week I got upgraded wheels around 1500 grams, dropped a pound in wheel weight and rode my 10 mile loop under 30:00 for the first time ever at 20.05 mph.

So I road this loop for 6 months...and went from a 17.5 to 18.15mph...just gains from riding... dropped the bike and wheel weight, added stiffness, and a little aero etc... and gained almost 2 mph in 4 weeks.

After gaining almost 2 mph in equipment... the gains then were much slower over the next year from strictly training...but got it up to about 21.5mph.

going from an aluminum 20lb bike to a very good racing bike with racing wheels at 16lbs was a huge difference to me. Someone above mentions ~4 minutes over a 33 minute ride... That's about what I experienced as well going from entry level aluminum to racing carbon. YOUR MILEAGE MAY VARY
Good for you, but my experience does not agree with yours. Going from 19 lb steel to 14 lb carbon with 1,270 g wheels I see absolutely no effect on my performance. Zero, zilch, nada, zippee-do-da. Riding your loop on a given day on both bikes would be a telling experiment. Maybe two days in a row, new bike first one day and second the next day. Average the results for each bike over the two days and compare. Personally I don't believe it.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 07:10 PM   #53
clones2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midwest
Bikes:
Posts: 159
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
After riding and time trialing the same loop for 6 months and never being above 18.15 mph - and all of a sudden I gain 2 mph - never under 20mph avg again.... Well..... it wasn't the kale chips...
clones2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 07:17 PM   #54
rpenmanparker 
Senior Member
 
rpenmanparker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes: 1990 Romic Reynolds 531 custom build, Merlin Works CR Ti custom build, super light Workswell 066 custom build
Posts: 26,132
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4623 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clones2 View Post
After riding and time trialing the same loop for 6 months and never being above 18.15 mph - and all of a sudden I gain 2 mph - never under 20mph avg again.... Well..... it wasn't the kale chips...
Until you make the head-to-head comparison, you can never know. Also if you have downhills and tight corners, it could be handling.
__________________
Robert

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAJ View Post
No matter where I go, here I am...
rpenmanparker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 07:22 PM   #55
canam73
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Haunchyville
Bikes:
Posts: 6,382
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clones2 View Post
After riding and time trialing the same loop for 6 months and never being above 18.15 mph - and all of a sudden I gain 2 mph - never under 20mph avg again.... Well..... it wasn't the kale chips...
I won't dispute your times, but I think you are allocating to much improvement to weight and stiffness and not enough to "a little aero". And I'm mostly thinking the aero improvement was lower bars and other position and fit improvements.
canam73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 07:41 PM   #56
Bandera 
Ding!
 
Bandera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Texas Hill Country
Bikes:
Posts: 4,800
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulboushead View Post
I'm curious what performance gains you have noticed when you bought a race style bike.
The only meaningful performance of a "race style bike" comes when you pin on a number and compete, that's what they are for and gains are accurately measured in placing at the finish line. Did you expect some other metric?

-Bandera
__________________
'74 Raleigh International - '77 Trek TX900FG - '92 Vitus 979 - '10 Merckx EMX-3- '11 Soma Stanyan
Bandera is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 09:01 PM   #57
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 12,742
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 755 Post(s)
I have a 21 lb. aluminum rain bike and an 18 lb. carbon bike, identical drivetrains. I notice no difference between them other than the carbon is smoother and climbs nicer, but I don't think faster or at least not noticeably. However! Years ago I went from a 27 lb. 80-something 12 speed to that carbon bike and oh yes, I could tell the difference. I was very noticeably more competitive on my weekly group rides. Who wouldn't be if they dropped 9 lbs? More important than the weight was the stiffness. I've recently dropped 13 lbs. body weight and same thing, yes I sure can tell the difference. But a couple pounds, I don't think one would notice it if stiffness, wheels, and tires were the same. As others have pointed out, the bicycle industry will pay you $500 for every pound you lose off your body. That's a great ROI. Buy a decent bike and lose weight unless you already look like Wiggens.

All that said, I do notice a difference with aero wheels and spokes and with tires. I'm a tiny bit faster over long distances with better wheels and lower rolling and wind resistance tires. No power meter, but I can tell the difference. Most of this difference can be achieved with little or no additional cost when normally replacing stuff as it wears out. An alu aero rim is little more expensive than a box rim. Aero spokes are more expensive, but they last a long time. Not that big an outlay for modern low count wheels.

And as others have said, fit is a big deal. Being able to hold power levels for a long time is a function of fit. And if aero wheels make a small difference, it's dwarfed by fit. Just pedaling knees in is worth $2000 in aero wheels. Getting your back flatter is even bigger.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 09:26 PM   #58
Long Tom
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Go Ducks!
Bikes:
Posts: 1,539
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quantitative? Bah humbug. Let's talk qualitative. My good bike is light years ahead in that regard. What, my feelings don't matter?! Sheesh.
Long Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 09:58 PM   #59
gregf83 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
Bikes:
Posts: 8,116
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 531 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clones2 View Post
After riding and time trialing the same loop for 6 months and never being above 18.15 mph - and all of a sudden I gain 2 mph - never under 20mph avg again.... Well..... it wasn't the kale chips...
It also wasn't due to the bikes. Your position changed and you may have put out more power. More power alone would be unlikely to account for the difference so it has to be primarily based on your position and other aero effects. You mentioned you raced for the first time. Learning what it's like to suffer also helps.

Even the most optimistic marketing types wouldn't make a claim for 2mph improvement.
gregf83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-14, 11:57 PM   #60
MegaTom
Senior Member
 
MegaTom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Orlando, FL
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix SL3, Lynskey Cooper CX
Posts: 2,012
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
What quantitative performance gains did you get by upgrading your road bike?

Time on the saddle.

Then speed, power and fewer lbs to carry eventually followed.
MegaTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-14, 08:08 AM   #61
bonz50
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Antioch, IL
Bikes: 2013 Synapse 4
Posts: 2,327
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregf83 View Post
It also wasn't due to the bikes. Your position changed and you may have put out more power. More power alone would be unlikely to account for the difference so it has to be primarily based on your position and other aero effects. You mentioned you raced for the first time. Learning what it's like to suffer also helps.

Even the most optimistic marketing types wouldn't make a claim for 2mph improvement.
not saying I agree with a 2mph in 4wks because of equipment, but......... his position on the bike changed because of the new equipment, right? sure he could have got that aero position with a good fit from a reputable shop, but also, the geometry of the newer bikes may have been more optimal for his body type and allowed him to transfer more power. there are a lot of variables that could be attributed to the "equipment", but likely the old equipment was holding him back for many reasons, could have been poor wheels, poor fit, etc. but the newer bike "fixed" that problem so, while I tend to believe that all else being equal (fit and etc) changing bikes won't net a big gain like that, but if those variable are not the same then the new bike was responsible for his improvement even if it was because it was more suited to him.
bonz50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-14, 08:20 AM   #62
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 30,145
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cthenn View Post
You want numbers...wheelset upgrade alone, I'm consistently 1-2 minutes faster over a 6.5 mile, 6% hill climb.

Going from a 25 lb tank to a "real" road bike...who knows what you could do.
I highly doubt that. Lets say you go from a heavy set of wheels to a very light set of wheels and shave 500 grams (more than a pound)

Assume fairly average rider power, and rider and bike weight. The 500 gram lighter wheels make an 11.44 second difference over the 6.5 miles
Analytic Cycling, Interactive Methods for Estimating Cycling Performance Parameters. Tom Compton

Now there could be some other differences, but they wouldn't make a 2 minute difference, particulary climibing a 6% grade. (i.e. the new wheels could be a bit more aero, or have less hub friction)
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-14, 08:25 AM   #63
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 30,145
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by clones2 View Post
After riding and time trialing the same loop for 6 months and never being above 18.15 mph - and all of a sudden I gain 2 mph - never under 20mph avg again.... Well..... it wasn't the kale chips...
You got some small improvements from the weight decrease, more aero wheels, and possibly to a lesser degree from less mechanical friction in components and tire rolling resistance.

Then there's the plecebo effect of getting a new bike, and another possibility that your speedometer on the new wheels isn't calibrated to those wheels/tires.

To the extent you actually are 2 mph faster, dollars to donuts it's 90% or more due to the position on the new bike being more aero.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-14, 08:45 AM   #64
merlinextraligh
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Bikes: Wilier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Co-Motion Robusta; Schwinn Paramount; Motobecane Phantom Cross; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Calfee Dragonfly Tandem
Posts: 30,145
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 727 Post(s)
There actually is data available to figure all this out, and the answer is going from a 25 lb bike with entry level components to say a 17lb bike with better wheels, tires, components will make you faster but it's not the big change some people expect.

You can run all of theis for yourself at www.analyticcylcing.com or Bicycle Speed (Velocity) And Power Calculator

8lbs off the bike will make over a minute a mile difference on 6% climb. It will make a 2 second per mile difference on a flat road. (perhaps slightly more in a situation where you're accelerating and slowing, such as in a crit)

If you put more aerodynamic wheels on the bike, that will be worth a couple of seconds a mile (varying by which wheels we're talking about, and how fast you ride) The data is out there in various wind tunnel tests. Wheels like Zipp 404's are about a minute or two faster over 40K at 30mph compared to 32 spoke box rimmed wheels.

Better tires on the more expensive bike will have less rolling resistance. The differnece in speed here will be smaller than the difference from the aero wheels because rolling resistance is a smaller part of the total resistance to moving a bike forward.

Better components will have less friction, but the speed advantage here is truly deminimis. Velonews has done varying tests over the years of bottom brackets, hub bearing, derailleur pulleys, and the difference between the best and the worst is small, and a very small part of the overall resistance to moving a bike.

So if you pull all that together. The 17lb bike with aerowheels wheels will be a couple of seconds faster per mile on the flats ( around .1-2mph) than the 25lb bike with conventional wheels, with most of that difference coming form the wheels.

It will be about .4mph faster on 6% climb.

It will accellerate with slightly less effort out of turns, or from a stop.

These are measurable differences, but not nearly as big as sometimes claimed.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-14, 09:57 AM   #65
bikerjp
Beer >> Sanity
 
bikerjp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Colorado
Bikes: 2014 Evo DA2, 2010 Caad9-4, 2011 Synapse-4, 2013 CaadX-disc
Posts: 3,449
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wasn't there a video posted a while back with an ex-pro or something riding different bikes (like a hybrid, some cruiser with a basket, etc.) and the difference between the road bike and the hybrid wasn't that much. I think he was racing someone and only lost when on the worst bike.

I think the performance gains are going to be fairly minimal. The perceived gains (or qualitative gains) are where you will see the biggest difference. Like most things, a nicer version is just that - nicer. A $5K bike is going to shift nicer and ride better in various subjective ways that are perceptible compared to a low end bike but we are talking incremental changes not huge differences unless we are comparing to a wal-mart bike or something. The biggest performance changes will be due to any physical gains from riding more assuming a better bike gets you out more.
bikerjp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.
I HAVE A QUESTION