tire widths: 23 vs 25.
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tire widths: 23 vs 25.
what are the relative advantages and disadvantages to each? i am on the heavier side (225lbs) and ride on both pavement as light gravel roads. also if my current wheels fit a 23mm tire, would they also fit a 25 also?
thanks
AC
thanks
AC
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 97
Bikes: Bicycle!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Wider tires provide better traction and cornering. And yes, I think that your rim that can ride a 23 should be able to handle a 25.
#3
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 626
Bikes: Fiori Roma, Currently building a Bianchi, Trek 330, formerly Monshee Nomad, Favorit, Bianchi Sport SX, Frankenbike
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm about the same weight and my Frankenbike had a 23 rear and 25 front. I just got a flat, and so I switched out the rear to a 25, and feels better. Still not wide enough for gravel, if my experience holds.
The tire will very likely fit on the same rim.
The tire will very likely fit on the same rim.
#4
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2453 Post(s)
Liked 1,540 Times
in
940 Posts
You can ride either, though the 25 can be run at slightly lower PSI for adding comfort ober roughnroads without increasing pinch flat susceptibility.
Depending on rim width, you may sacrifice a little of the positive feel of 23s when running 25s, but it also depends on how aggressively you ride.
In all, I'd say the two will perform very similarly all else equal, so it's really just a matter of whether you want the extra, protective and comforting tire volume.
Depending on rim width, you may sacrifice a little of the positive feel of 23s when running 25s, but it also depends on how aggressively you ride.
In all, I'd say the two will perform very similarly all else equal, so it's really just a matter of whether you want the extra, protective and comforting tire volume.
#5
Senior Member
My experience is that everybody says there is little difference between the 23 and 25 width tires. However, I swapped out 23s for 25s on my bike a couple different times two years ago, and there is definitely a difference in speed. The 25s do everything that is said above...they smooth things out a bit, the lower pressure takes some of the harsh out of the pavement, etc...but they will also slow you down. It may only be 0.5-1 mph, but slower is slower. If you care more about ride quality than speed, try the 25s. If speed is your goal, you will notice a difference.
#6
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2453 Post(s)
Liked 1,540 Times
in
940 Posts
My experience is that everybody says there is little difference between the 23 and 25 width tires. However, I swapped out 23s for 25s on my bike a couple different times two years ago, and there is definitely a difference in speed. The 25s do everything that is said above...they smooth things out a bit, the lower pressure takes some of the harsh out of the pavement, etc...but they will also slow you down. It may only be 0.5-1 mph, but slower is slower. If you care more about ride quality than speed, try the 25s. If speed is your goal, you will notice a difference.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,447
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4014 Post(s)
Liked 2,772 Times
in
1,674 Posts
how much clearance do you have now with your brakes? My front brake is very tight with a 23 and I doubt I'd fit a 25. Had I realized that, I probably would have gone another way because it'd just take one small pebble and I'll be doing an endo.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#9
SpIn SpIn SuGaR!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 2,078
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
honestly, it all depends on how you ride. if you're looking to get as much speed as you can out of your bike, than stick to the 23's. if you looking to get a much comfort as you can out of your bike, than switch to 25's, but expect to use a bit more energy to keep the same pace you kept with the 23's.
just know a few things about good 25's. first being that you're not going to find the same color choices with 25's that you find with 23's, if that matters to you, the only real color choice is going to be black. second is that it's much harder finding a deal on 25's than it is on 23's. i don't know why that's the case, but it is, the cheapest good 25's you'll find will be in the $90 price range for the pair...
and yes, your current wheel should fit a 25, and your tubes will most likely fit 25's also, but just check the size range on the side of the tube to be sure...
me personally, i'm 230#'s and i still use 23's. i've thought about switching to 25's this summer, but to me the $100 that it would cost me just doesn't warrant the change...
just know a few things about good 25's. first being that you're not going to find the same color choices with 25's that you find with 23's, if that matters to you, the only real color choice is going to be black. second is that it's much harder finding a deal on 25's than it is on 23's. i don't know why that's the case, but it is, the cheapest good 25's you'll find will be in the $90 price range for the pair...
and yes, your current wheel should fit a 25, and your tubes will most likely fit 25's also, but just check the size range on the side of the tube to be sure...
me personally, i'm 230#'s and i still use 23's. i've thought about switching to 25's this summer, but to me the $100 that it would cost me just doesn't warrant the change...
#10
don't try this at home.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,737
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 894 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times
in
245 Posts
My experience is that everybody says there is little difference between the 23 and 25 width tires. However, I swapped out 23s for 25s on my bike a couple different times two years ago, and there is definitely a difference in speed. The 25s do everything that is said above...they smooth things out a bit, the lower pressure takes some of the harsh out of the pavement, etc...but they will also slow you down. It may only be 0.5-1 mph, but slower is slower. If you care more about ride quality than speed, try the 25s. If speed is your goal, you will notice a difference.
The same high quality tires in 25c can be considerably better than their 23c in rolling resistance.
I posted this in another 25c thread.
From slowtwitch.com
Continental's rolling resistance chart is interesting. The 25c rolling resistance is almost 20% worse (.49) at 80 psi than at 116 psi (.41) What units are they using in the chart? It appears to be Crr x 50 kg?
But: the 25c rolling resistance at 87 psi is equivalent to their 23c at about 112 psi. So larger tires can run at lower pressure and still be efficient.
Continental's rolling resistance chart is interesting. The 25c rolling resistance is almost 20% worse (.49) at 80 psi than at 116 psi (.41) What units are they using in the chart? It appears to be Crr x 50 kg?
But: the 25c rolling resistance at 87 psi is equivalent to their 23c at about 112 psi. So larger tires can run at lower pressure and still be efficient.

I've been running my 25c rear at 100-105, when I used to have my 23c at 110. So I'm effectively running the 25 at a higher equivalent pressure, and they are still very comfortable.
I don't think my 25c GP4000 tires are any slower than the 23c GP4000. And rough pavement would favor the 25c size. I'm at least a mile per hour faster on fresh smooth pavement than on rough chip-and-seal (gravel on tar) roads. So tires that can lessen the bouncing of bike and rider on rough roads would save energy.
Last edited by rm -rf; 06-09-14 at 11:14 AM.
#11
Senior Member
Wider tires only improves handling if you also have wide rims. On a narrow rim (<18mm), a 25mm front tire tended to squirm at low pressures under hard braking. When I tried 25mm tires on my commuter bike, I found that I needed to run them at exactly the same pressure as a 23mm tire or the handling really suffered. If you're running at the same pressure, there's no benefit to comfort, so there isn't much point. If you run 25mm tires >100 psi its probably not an issue.
On the newer 23mm width rims, I'm sure you wouldn't encounter this problem. So the advantages really depend on exactly what wheels you have.
On the newer 23mm width rims, I'm sure you wouldn't encounter this problem. So the advantages really depend on exactly what wheels you have.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 489
Bikes: 80s Rodriguez handmade lugged steel road, 1996 Bianchi Reparto Corse cyclocross, 1982 Cyclepro mountain bike, Xtracycle
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think I'm going very far out on a limb to say you should definitely choose 25 over 23mm tires. At your weight and considering that you ride gravel roads part of the time it seems like a no-brainer. They will be more comfortable and provide you better traction. There is new evidence that they are actually faster than 23mm tires. No-brainer. If your bike cannot fit 25mm tires I think that is unfortunate and short-sighted on the part of the brand to make a frame so tightly constricted. I've actually moved up to 28mm tires for most of my riding and I appreciate the added cushion on mixed urban / suburban roads and do not notice any loss in performance.
#13
Senior Member
Wider tires only improves handling if you also have wide rims. On a narrow rim (<18mm), a 25mm front tire tended to squirm at low pressures under hard braking. When I tried 25mm tires on my commuter bike, I found that I needed to run them at exactly the same pressure as a 23mm tire or the handling really suffered. If you're running at the same pressure, there's no benefit to comfort, so there isn't much point. If you run 25mm tires >100 psi its probably not an issue.
On the newer 23mm width rims, I'm sure you wouldn't encounter this problem. So the advantages really depend on exactly what wheels you have.
On the newer 23mm width rims, I'm sure you wouldn't encounter this problem. So the advantages really depend on exactly what wheels you have.
#14
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,742
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
Ride the highest pressure your frame can smooth out. Depends on frame, wheels, tubes, and most of all pavement. I have absolutely no problem with 23s at 100-105 psi on some very rough pavement on my carbon bike, while on my steel bike the same is practically unrideable. I run 25s on the steel bike for this reason. Speed is also a factor; what's really rough at 16-17 can sometimes smooth out at 20-21 on my carbon frame. (The steelie on the other hand just gets progressively worse.)
#15
commu*ist spy
I run 23 front 25 rear, and I'm happy with that decision. I think your weight is distributed somewhere between 70/30 and 60/40 in the rear/front tires, so it makes sense to go 1up on the rear tire and compensate for that difference. the difference in weight is 25 g per tire, which is nowhere near enough to make any noticeable difference imo.
0.5-1 mph is way way exaggerated
0.5-1 mph is way way exaggerated
#16
OMC
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 6,960
Bikes: Specialized Allez Sprint, Look 585, Specialized Allez Comp Race
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 461 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times
in
49 Posts
Not much evidence to support the idea of 25mm tires being slower, as long as you're comparing the same tires in different sizes. Pro teams have been switching to 25s in the last few years, and they're not going to do anything that'll slow their riders down. I ride 25s on my bikes, and have raced them in races that include a good bit (20+ miles) of gravel with no problems.
__________________
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
Regards,
Chuck
Demain, on roule!
#17
Senior Member
According to a number of articles that I have seen, the wider tire has lower rolling resistance
Tech FAQ: Seriously, wider tires have lower rolling resistance than their narrower brethren - VeloNews.com
Tech FAQ: Seriously, wider tires have lower rolling resistance than their narrower brethren - VeloNews.com
#18
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,241
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2453 Post(s)
Liked 1,540 Times
in
940 Posts
According to a number of articles that I have seen, the wider tire has lower rolling resistance
Tech FAQ: Seriously, wider tires have lower rolling resistance than their narrower brethren - VeloNews.com
Tech FAQ: Seriously, wider tires have lower rolling resistance than their narrower brethren - VeloNews.com
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,335
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2431 Post(s)
Liked 633 Times
in
390 Posts
I went from many years on 23's to 25's and I've never looked back. If all my roads were as smooth as glass then 23's would be fine, but that's not the case by any means. In no, way, shape or form am I any slower.
#20
Senior Member
Yes and no. See the above GP4000SII plot. Rolling resistance of 25mm@94 psi is still less than 23mm@116psi. That's a 20 psi drop, and still coming out ahead. Most formula's don't recommend you drop pressure that much when going up in width.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 6,517
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 276 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
3 Posts
I can't feel much difference between 23 and 25. I also don't think 25 will improve traction on gravel. If the 23 and 25 are both road tires traction will suck. I have 700x28 thickslicks on my ssfg bike and I have zero confidence riding on gravel or dirt paths.
I also can hardly tell the difference in comfort on rough city roads between my properly inflated 23 at 130 psi and my 28 at 90 psi or my 25 at 110-120
I also can hardly tell the difference in comfort on rough city roads between my properly inflated 23 at 130 psi and my 28 at 90 psi or my 25 at 110-120