Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Which is the better climber, Scott Addict vs Scott Foil?

Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Which is the better climber, Scott Addict vs Scott Foil?

Old 08-17-18, 03:51 PM
  #51  
asiantrick
Senior Member
 
asiantrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 153
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 46 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Don't forget, the foil rear brake is mounted under the bottom bracket. It was always a pain to clean all the dirt off the rear brake when I hit bad weather or gravel with the bike.
asiantrick is offline  
Old 08-17-18, 04:03 PM
  #52  
downhillmaster
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 662
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 391 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Originally Posted by Super D View Post
Not saying better climbing doesn't require proper training, hours, miles, fuel, etc...I realize you can't buy gear to magically do the work for you. The curiosity comes from planning to update my frame next year, and I'd like to know which frame transmits power on a climb more efficiently of the two mentioned (all other factors other than frame model being equal).

Just the same process I go through when choosing other gear, tools, etc. I try to determine which has the characteristics and benefits I'm seeking. I've changed running shoes and realized significant positive benefits. Same can happen with a bike choice.

If a pilot wants to upgrade from an F4 to an F16 so he can capitalize on certain performance benefits, he's still the same pilot, just using a different tool for the job. (I use this analogy because my Dad worked on developing the F16 and I watched the performance comparison films pre-debut, and it was eye-opening).
Wouldn't you then wonder if the frame that supposedly transmits more climbing power transmits less power on the flats?
downhillmaster is offline  
Old 08-17-18, 05:21 PM
  #53  
Dean V
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 781 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 13 Posts
This bike is more responsive, stiffer, transmits power better, yadayadayada.
Just show one proper test that shows frame x transmits more of the riders power to the rear wheel than frame y???
Dean V is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SonataInFSharp
Foo
18
08-02-12 07:50 PM
cs1
General Cycling Discussion
0
09-19-10 05:37 PM
carbonlife
Foo
25
08-09-08 10:41 AM
SugarPILL
Road Cycling
11
07-24-07 10:06 AM
Bernodu
Mountain Biking
0
01-27-05 09:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.