Lack of Reflectors an Issue?
#1
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lack of Reflectors an Issue?
I tried to search and found nothing specific to this... I ride with a bevy of lights on while on the road, HID and blinky up front, two bright blinky/steady lights to the rear. I know I'm plenty visible, but to make room for those lights, I took the stock reflectors off the bars and seatpost. My pedals are clipless, so they don't have the old school reflectors either.
So, if I get hit by a car at any point, I know that in actual fact I'm far more visible than someone with a reflector on the front and rear, but am I legally not considered to be compliant, and do I then lose my right to a claim from Disability insurance, or from the driver because I'm missing an ineffective (but legally mandated) piece of equipment? If I have to put a cursory DOT reflector on to ensure that I'm legally covered, I'll do it, but it would be a hassle, and I'd rather not... anyone with some familiarity with the legal framework here?
So, if I get hit by a car at any point, I know that in actual fact I'm far more visible than someone with a reflector on the front and rear, but am I legally not considered to be compliant, and do I then lose my right to a claim from Disability insurance, or from the driver because I'm missing an ineffective (but legally mandated) piece of equipment? If I have to put a cursory DOT reflector on to ensure that I'm legally covered, I'll do it, but it would be a hassle, and I'd rather not... anyone with some familiarity with the legal framework here?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 329
Bikes: '04 Cannondale T800, '00 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I'm not a lawyer but I can't imagine a cop or judge being so obtuse. If you're covered in lights I think common sense dictates that you count as being "visible," and well within the spirit of any reflector requiring law.
Of course when lawyers get involved, common sense gets checked at the door.
OT: BTW I have a 2004 T-800. Love it!
Of course when lawyers get involved, common sense gets checked at the door.
OT: BTW I have a 2004 T-800. Love it!
#3
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Agent Cooper
OT: BTW I have a 2004 T-800. Love it!
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: columbus, ohio
Posts: 895
Bikes: Soma Saga, 1980 Schwinn Voyageur 11.8, New Albion Privateer
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 76 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
7 Posts
You've got lights and blinkies that are more visible than simple reflectors. I think you are over-worrying the issue.
#6
Fahrradfahrer
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Posts: 367
Bikes: n+1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've asked myself the same question. While one would hope common sense would prevail, I'm a bit skeptical about the human race's ability to use logic and reason at times.
My solution to this problem. I slap a piece of white reflective tape on my head tube (or similar place) where a reflector would be mounted, and a piece of red reflective tape somewhere on the back of the bike where the rear reflector would be mounted.
My solution to this problem. I slap a piece of white reflective tape on my head tube (or similar place) where a reflector would be mounted, and a piece of red reflective tape somewhere on the back of the bike where the rear reflector would be mounted.
#7
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Chiefly, if I get seriously injured, am I going to have a kind, caring executive from my life insurance company (holders of my accidental death and dismemberment policy) that I'm not going to collect, even though I'm paralyzed, because I wasn't using legally mandated reflectors. I know that a sane human being would know that that was a stupid perspective, but someone who was trying to find a technical reason to avoid paying me out (that, or the liability insurance of a driver that did the hitting) would perhaps find that an EXCEEDINGLY interesting argument to waste a good deal of time on.
#8
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
NY only requires reflectors if you ride between 1/2 hour after sunset, or 1/2 hr before sunrise. Riding in daylight hours, there is no legal requirement to have reflectors. The only legal requirement I know of other than that is if you are a commercial enterprise selling a bicycle, it must have a yellow or white front wheel reflector, a red or white rear wheel reflector, and one stationary red rear.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada
Posts: 494
Bikes: various strays, mongrels, and old junk.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Insurance.
Insurance companies increase profit by lowering pay-outs. Do you really want to give some insurance adjuster an excuse to disallow a claim, or reduce the pay-out?
Ever seen the kind of place insurance companies put up to house their headquarters? And manpower is way expensive. Ever notice how many people work there for a wage something more than minimum? There is a lot of profit to be had in insurance, and it don't come from being excessively generous.
Insurance companies increase profit by lowering pay-outs. Do you really want to give some insurance adjuster an excuse to disallow a claim, or reduce the pay-out?
Ever seen the kind of place insurance companies put up to house their headquarters? And manpower is way expensive. Ever notice how many people work there for a wage something more than minimum? There is a lot of profit to be had in insurance, and it don't come from being excessively generous.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Black Lodge
Posts: 329
Bikes: '04 Cannondale T800, '00 Raleigh M80
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I've gotten a second set of wheels that I use for on-road shenanigans, swapped out the crank (weird asymmetry) and the shifters (tiagra right shifter pooped out on me), but otherwise it's been a great bike... it's my everything-but-the-beater bike, and has done yeoman's work... I think mine's around the same year as yours, perhaps... close enough, at least. Shame they don't make them any longer, and I was also glad to wind up with one of the ones they made with STIs, as much as bar-ends have their advantages, I love the convenience of brifters.
**Apologies for getting off topic***
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,700
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
4 Posts
Would you rather have your lawyer saying "Well, no, Mr. Schlatte was NOT in compliance with the law, but he did have all these lights." or "Mr. Schlatte was not only in compliance with the law, he ALSO had all these lights."
One's an argument that you're special and the law doesn't apply to YOU, the other is an argument that you went above and beyond what the law requires. Which one do you think is going to go over better?
Just get a light that's also a reflector.
#13
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by achoo
If local law requires reflectors - it requires REFLECTORS.
Would you rather have your lawyer saying "Well, no, Mr. Schlatte was NOT in compliance with the law, but he did have all these lights." or "Mr. Schlatte was not only in compliance with the law, he ALSO had all these lights."
Would you rather have your lawyer saying "Well, no, Mr. Schlatte was NOT in compliance with the law, but he did have all these lights." or "Mr. Schlatte was not only in compliance with the law, he ALSO had all these lights."
Small consequence of the fashion of removing reflectors all over the place.
Are they required on wheels (white) as well as on the front and rear (white/red)?
Now, I just need to figure out where I put the damned reflectors when I took them off... obviously I AM riding between a half hour after sunset and a half hour before sunrise, otherwise I wouldn't bother with the maniacal array of lights... I'm careful, not utterly paste-eatingly insane
Bummer.
UPDATE: talked to the local PD, they confirmed that while reflectors are required on NEW bicycles, they aren't required any longer if you have effective lighting, and are suitably replaced by the same. Thank god
Last edited by superslomo; 09-17-14 at 01:20 PM. Reason: UPDATE!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Boone, North Carolina
Posts: 5,094
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAAD9-6 2014 Trek Domaine 5.9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If local law requires reflectors - it requires REFLECTORS.
Would you rather have your lawyer saying "Well, no, Mr. Schlatte was NOT in compliance with the law, but he did have all these lights." or "Mr. Schlatte was not only in compliance with the law, he ALSO had all these lights."
One's an argument that you're special and the law doesn't apply to YOU, the other is an argument that you went above and beyond what the law requires. Which one do you think is going to go over better?
Just get a light that's also a reflector.
Would you rather have your lawyer saying "Well, no, Mr. Schlatte was NOT in compliance with the law, but he did have all these lights." or "Mr. Schlatte was not only in compliance with the law, he ALSO had all these lights."
One's an argument that you're special and the law doesn't apply to YOU, the other is an argument that you went above and beyond what the law requires. Which one do you think is going to go over better?
Just get a light that's also a reflector.
winning answer ^^^
#16
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
Are they required on wheels (white) as well as on the front and rear (white/red)?
Now, I just need to figure out where I put the damned reflectors when I took them off... obviously I AM riding between a half hour after sunset and a half hour before sunrise, otherwise I wouldn't bother with the maniacal array of lights... I'm careful, not utterly paste-eatingly insane
Bummer.
UPDATE: talked to the local PD, they confirmed that while reflectors are required on NEW bicycles, they aren't required any longer if you have effective lighting, and are suitably replaced by the same. Thank god
Now, I just need to figure out where I put the damned reflectors when I took them off... obviously I AM riding between a half hour after sunset and a half hour before sunrise, otherwise I wouldn't bother with the maniacal array of lights... I'm careful, not utterly paste-eatingly insane
Bummer.
UPDATE: talked to the local PD, they confirmed that while reflectors are required on NEW bicycles, they aren't required any longer if you have effective lighting, and are suitably replaced by the same. Thank god
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
If you read the law, it very specifically tells you exactly what you need. I do not recall wheel reflectors as a part of it, but it gives specific instructions for the red rear reflector. I also believe that a reflective light will not satisfy, as the law makes separate light and reflector fairly clear, at least as I recall.
A bicycle must be equipped with:
A brake which is capable of making the bike tires skid on dry level pavement.
A bell, horn or other device that can be heard at least a hundred feet away. Sirens and whistles are not permitted.
Bicycles driven between a half-hour after sunset and a half-hour before sunrise must be equipped with a white front headlight visible in darkness for at least 500 feet, and a red or amber taillight visible for at least 300 feet.
A bicycle, when purchased new and/or driven at night, must have reflective tires, or wide-angle, spoke-mounted reflectors. Reflectors must be colorless or amber for front wheels, and colorless or red for rear wheels.
A brake which is capable of making the bike tires skid on dry level pavement.
A bell, horn or other device that can be heard at least a hundred feet away. Sirens and whistles are not permitted.
Bicycles driven between a half-hour after sunset and a half-hour before sunrise must be equipped with a white front headlight visible in darkness for at least 500 feet, and a red or amber taillight visible for at least 300 feet.
A bicycle, when purchased new and/or driven at night, must have reflective tires, or wide-angle, spoke-mounted reflectors. Reflectors must be colorless or amber for front wheels, and colorless or red for rear wheels.
#19
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
If you read the law, it very specifically tells you exactly what you need. I do not recall wheel reflectors as a part of it, but it gives specific instructions for the red rear reflector. I also believe that a reflective light will not satisfy, as the law makes separate light and reflector fairly clear, at least as I recall.
All Reflective
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 972
Bikes: Cannondale Slate 105 and T2 tandem, 2008 Scott Addict R4, Raleigh SC drop bar tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Rear reflector check box for bicycle is on the PA State Police accident investigation form.
Under the Pedalcycles section: Passenger ?| Helmet? | Headlights? | Rear Reflectors?
They are quite effective but none of my bikes have them anymore. I do run a head and tail light.
Under the Pedalcycles section: Passenger ?| Helmet? | Headlights? | Rear Reflectors?
They are quite effective but none of my bikes have them anymore. I do run a head and tail light.
#22
Speechless
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Central NY
Posts: 8,842
Bikes: Felt Brougham, Lotus Prestige, Cinelli Xperience,
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 163 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
16 Posts
Bicycle and Wheel Sport Safety Index and Overview
I had to check with MN law - fortunately, lights (of a specific visibility or greater) satisfy the reflector requirements here.
I had to check with MN law - fortunately, lights (of a specific visibility or greater) satisfy the reflector requirements here.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 360
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting... in Ontario the time requirement is from a half hour before sunset to a half hour after sunrise... I guess dusk and dawn are safer in NY and MN.
#24
Solo Rider, always DFL
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Beacon, NY
Posts: 2,004
Bikes: Cannondale T800, Schwinn Voyageur
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While driving, I find the rear reflector on bicycles I pass to be completely, absurdly ineffective. Part of my indifference to keeping it on wasn't fashion but just function... a $10 blinkie will be visible on the back of a bike a long way off, while the reflector make be visible RIGHT before the impact. I'm seeing the NYS code, but it's slightly unclear, and could include a bit of a loophole:
Wait. What??
I'm not trying to get into some big A&S discussion, but I know that I see loads of road cyclists with the reflectors removed, akin to the ceremonial removal of the dork disc, it's part of the stylistic bris that happens when you don bib shorts... but if there's a token reflector that ensures that we are all covered legally in the event of an accident, that would be a good bit of knowledge to be armed with.
So, any of you smart folks know what the bare minimum is that I can get away with?
§ 1236. Lamps and other equipment on bicycles. (a) Every bicycle when
in use during the period from one-half hour after sunset to one-half
hour before sunrise shall be equipped with a lamp on the front which
shall emit a white light visible during hours of darkness from a
distance of at least five hundred feet to the front and with a red or
amber light visible to the rear for three hundred feet. Effective July
first, nineteen hundred seventy-six, at least one of these lights shall
be visible for two hundred feet from each side.
(b) No person shall operate a bicycle unless it is equipped with a
bell or other device capable of giving a signal audible for a distance
of at least one hundred feet, except that a bicycle shall not be
equipped with nor shall any person use upon a bicycle any siren or
whistle.
(c) Every bicycle shall be equipped with a brake which will enable the
operator to make the braked wheels skid on dry, level, clean pavement.
(d) Every new bicycle shall be equipped with reflective tires or,
alternately, a reflex reflector mounted on the spokes of each wheel,
said tires and reflectors to be of types approved by the commissioner.
The reflex reflector mounted on the front wheel shall be colorless or
amber, and the reflex reflector mounted on the rear wheel shall be
colorless or red.
(e) Every bicycle when in use during the period from one-half hour
after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise shall be equipped with
reflective devices or material meeting the standards established by
rules and regulations promulgated by the commissioner; provided,
however, that such standards shall not be inconsistent with or otherwise
conflict with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (d) of this
section.
in use during the period from one-half hour after sunset to one-half
hour before sunrise shall be equipped with a lamp on the front which
shall emit a white light visible during hours of darkness from a
distance of at least five hundred feet to the front and with a red or
amber light visible to the rear for three hundred feet. Effective July
first, nineteen hundred seventy-six, at least one of these lights shall
be visible for two hundred feet from each side.
(b) No person shall operate a bicycle unless it is equipped with a
bell or other device capable of giving a signal audible for a distance
of at least one hundred feet, except that a bicycle shall not be
equipped with nor shall any person use upon a bicycle any siren or
whistle.
(c) Every bicycle shall be equipped with a brake which will enable the
operator to make the braked wheels skid on dry, level, clean pavement.
(d) Every new bicycle shall be equipped with reflective tires or,
alternately, a reflex reflector mounted on the spokes of each wheel,
said tires and reflectors to be of types approved by the commissioner.
The reflex reflector mounted on the front wheel shall be colorless or
amber, and the reflex reflector mounted on the rear wheel shall be
colorless or red.
(e) Every bicycle when in use during the period from one-half hour
after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise shall be equipped with
reflective devices or material meeting the standards established by
rules and regulations promulgated by the commissioner; provided,
however, that such standards shall not be inconsistent with or otherwise
conflict with the requirements of subdivisions (a) and (d) of this
section.
I'm not trying to get into some big A&S discussion, but I know that I see loads of road cyclists with the reflectors removed, akin to the ceremonial removal of the dork disc, it's part of the stylistic bris that happens when you don bib shorts... but if there's a token reflector that ensures that we are all covered legally in the event of an accident, that would be a good bit of knowledge to be armed with.
So, any of you smart folks know what the bare minimum is that I can get away with?
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nanaimo, BC
Posts: 2,014
Bikes: 1997 Kona Hahana Race Light, 2010 Surly LHT(deceased), 1999 Rocky Mountain Turbo
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is what BC laws require. I see no mention of wheel or pedal reflectors. I cannot find what is Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (ICBC, public insurance) classifies as approved.
I have seen mention that reflectors on shoes satisfy some pedal reflector requirements. I like my old shoes with a lot of reflective silver and my shoe covers also. Not sure how good my new shoes are though. I have wheel reflectors on my LHT and I am about to get spoke reflectors.
Motor Vehicle Act
Section 183 Paragraph 6 (and 7):
(6) A cycle operated on a highway between 1/2 hour after sunset and 1/2 hour before sunrise must have the following equipment:
(a) a lighted lamp mounted on the front and under normal atmospheric conditions capable of displaying a white light visible at least 150 m in the direction the cycle is pointed;
(b) a red reflector of a make or design approved by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for the purposes of this section;
(c) a lighted lamp, mounted and visible to the rear, displaying a red light.
(7) Despite any other provision of this Act or the regulations, a cycle may be equipped with a flashing red light that is of a make or design approved by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for the purposes of this section.
I have seen mention that reflectors on shoes satisfy some pedal reflector requirements. I like my old shoes with a lot of reflective silver and my shoe covers also. Not sure how good my new shoes are though. I have wheel reflectors on my LHT and I am about to get spoke reflectors.
Motor Vehicle Act
Section 183 Paragraph 6 (and 7):
(6) A cycle operated on a highway between 1/2 hour after sunset and 1/2 hour before sunrise must have the following equipment:
(a) a lighted lamp mounted on the front and under normal atmospheric conditions capable of displaying a white light visible at least 150 m in the direction the cycle is pointed;
(b) a red reflector of a make or design approved by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for the purposes of this section;
(c) a lighted lamp, mounted and visible to the rear, displaying a red light.
(7) Despite any other provision of this Act or the regulations, a cycle may be equipped with a flashing red light that is of a make or design approved by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for the purposes of this section.