![]() |
Originally Posted by rpenmanparker
(Post 17463034)
Does the resistance mechanism attached to the rollers affect the easy of staying upright at all? I would think that low effort would be easier to apply smoothly than high effort. Is there any truth to that.
|
I have both and there are a couple of downsides to rollers to keep in mind that have been mentioned in some of the previous posts.
1) I find using rollers for hard intervals to be challenging. If you push yourself to the point where you feel a bit wobbly at the end of the interval rollers can be problematic. You have to keep pedaling at a reasonable pace to maintain your balance and if you push an interval to exhaustion you can run into problems (loose your balance). Given I have had this experience I tend to hold back a bit on my intervals on rollers for safety sake. 2) Rollers are not great it you want to watch a movie / sports during an extended low to moderate intensity ride. You need to maintain decent concentration while on the rollers (to remain centered) and if you get caught up in a movie or game it's easy to drift off to the side of the rollers and run into problems (fall off). Ideally having both is the way to go but if I had to choose one I would go with a fluid based trainer for overall versatility. |
Originally Posted by jwalther
(Post 17462372)
Not much to add here except to say learning to ride on rollers is not as daunting a task as you might suspect. I bought myself a cheap set of rollers from Bike Nashbar for Xmas, and was up and riding after about five minutes of trial and error. Can't make an omelette yet, but I'm working on it.
http://youtu.be/ybFvomdhW2Y |
Originally Posted by Grambo
(Post 17463922)
If you push yourself to the point where you feel a bit wobbly at the end of the interval rollers can be problematic. You have to keep pedaling at a reasonable pace to maintain your balance and if you push an interval to exhaustion you can run into problems (loose your balance).
|
Originally Posted by Wesley36
(Post 17464020)
Speak for yourself. FWIW, I tested my FTP last weekend on my rollers (w/ resistance). Being in control while deep in the red is a valuable thing to practice.
|
Rollers are cooler, of course, but that's a comparatively recent development. I used a set of RollTrac rollers (I'll be amazed if anyone remembers those) from 1974 until the RacerMate came out in the early '80s, then ditched them. Figured out that 45 minutes doing intervals is far more beneficial than spinning at moderate effort.
Also figured out that rollers train you how to spin smoothly on rollers but are about as useful as a unicycle for road smoothness. Hot flash: if you can ride 50 feet on a bike without falling over, you can ride as smoothly as any roller fanatic if you so choose. Learning "smoothness" equals learning pack etiquette, not pedaling technique. |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Grambo
(Post 17464053)
Do your research pal. If you are in control at the end of a FTP test your not doing it right. Seeing stars, dizzy, barely able to stand, ready to puke ... that's how a FTP test is done.
Lol, 41 it up |
Originally Posted by Wesley36
(Post 17464090)
|
Perhaps instead of absurd rhetorical overkill, you do that search and join the real world of training with power
|
Determining Functional Threshold Pace (FTP) | TrainingPeaks
NB Regardless, if an athlete has a one-off exceptional performance; it is generally not advisable to base training loads, and progress assessment on such unrealistic results. The athlete is being set up for failure.* Joe Friel's Blog: A Quick Guide to Setting Zones Alex's Cycle Blog: The Sins of Sins (Testing FTP #2) Alex's Cycle Blog: The seven deadly sins |
Originally Posted by Lazyass
(Post 17462457)
Incorrect. You can get out of the saddle on rollers and push a big gear, it actually helps you smooth your pedal stroke since obviously you can't throw the bike around.
|
I kind of amazes me at how fast some threads go down hill.
|
Originally Posted by Fox Farm
(Post 17465681)
I kind of amazes me at how fast some threads go down hill.
|
|
if you don't mind spending the money, inside ride rollers might likely be the best training purchase you ever make. The rollers move with your body and you can do just about anything on there, including out of the saddle sprints. The whole 'learn to spin' thing is utterly over rated anyway, and with the resistance unit on here you can simulate pretty much anything. I know I find being locked into a set position to be mentally and physically challenging. I do much better on rollers, and I find I can ride these for hours without some of the difficulties I have with other trainers.
|
Originally Posted by Manweiser
(Post 17465769)
This one had great potential... simple cost benefit question. Some thoughtful insight... and then, WHAM.
But back to the OP question(s), if he is not really sure which to get, look for something used on Ebay or similar to test them out before investing $200 - $400. I found a stationary Magura trainer at the Salvation Army. I took it home and tried it but liked my rollers more because they were much more challenging to master. Once comfortable on them, they are fun! I think that for big aerobic work outs, go to the gym for spinning classes. Whereas I do find them useful, the fit of the stationary spinning bikes is never as good as my own road bike. |
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy
(Post 17462042)
I use rollers with a fluid resistance unit. A VO2max interval on this set for me, seated, is about 25 mph. Other units may be different. A set of Sportcrafters magnetic rollers hits 350 watts at 25 mph and 800 watts at 40 mph. Anyway, I wouldn't buy rollers without resistance. Use is too limited. So for really cheap, I'd go for the insanely boring trainer. At least you can do some efforts on it. But for real, I can only recommend rollers with resistance. I have about 15,000 miles on my set, so I've been well compensated for whatever I paid for them.
https://www.sportcrafters.com/blog/t...ve-pro-rollers Bill |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Willbird
(Post 17466407)
I have a set, I have not graduated out of the hallway yet with a wall on each side however :-).
Bill http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=428263 |
ok, I'll bite...how do you fall off inside ride rollers?
|
Originally Posted by gsteinb
(Post 17466744)
ok, I'll bite...how do you fall off inside ride rollers?
|
Originally Posted by Fox Farm
(Post 17466331)
Exactly Manweiser. It turned into a "i know more than you do about max workout heart rates, etc." Where in Ct are you? I grew up in Newtown/Danbury in the 1960s/70s.
|
1 Attachment(s)
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=428304
So less talking about bikes and bike riding and more talking about central CT geography and your family history. Sorry for derailing that discussion... |
You live in LA… there are only a couple days a year we can’t ride outside.
That said, I bought a trainer for TV time. I try to get a workout while I watch. Rollers would be useless for me. |
My dog likes to lay next to or in front of my bike when I am on the trainer. Rollers really seem like a bad idea in my house.
|
Originally Posted by Grambo
(Post 17463922)
I have both and there are a couple of downsides to rollers to keep in mind that have been mentioned in some of the previous posts.
1) I find using rollers for hard intervals to be challenging. If you push yourself to the point where you feel a bit wobbly at the end of the interval rollers can be problematic. You have to keep pedaling at a reasonable pace to maintain your balance and if you push an interval to exhaustion you can run into problems (loose your balance). Given I have had this experience I tend to hold back a bit on my intervals on rollers for safety sake. 2) Rollers are not great it you want to watch a movie / sports during an extended low to moderate intensity ride. You need to maintain decent concentration while on the rollers (to remain centered) and if you get caught up in a movie or game it's easy to drift off to the side of the rollers and run into problems (fall off). Ideally having both is the way to go but if I had to choose one I would go with a fluid based trainer for overall versatility. I'm pretty safe on the rollers while watching tv, but during the last olympics I rode right off while watching the snowboard halfpipe competition. |
We have both. Trainers are used for warming up. Rollers are for riding better.
I've posted this before - but appropriate here. https://vimeo.com/109371142 |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 17467353)
We have both. Trainers are used for warming up. Rollers are for riding better.
I've posted this before - but appropriate here. https://vimeo.com/109371142 Reminds me of Einsteins gedankenexperiment: if a rider is spinning on rollers on board a train that is travelling at the speed of light, what is the speed of the spoke at the top of the wheel? |
Relative to the train - about 60mph. Relative to what you measured the train speed from - the same as the bottom spoke. But Strava would flag it.
We did get a Strava KOM for this. |
Originally Posted by Wesley36
(Post 17467127)
http://bikeforums.net/attachment.php...hmentid=428304
So less talking about bikes and bike riding and more talking about central CT geography and your family history. Sorry for derailing that discussion... |
Originally Posted by Doge
(Post 17467353)
We have both. Trainers are used for warming up. Rollers are for riding better.
I've posted this before - but appropriate here. https://vimeo.com/109371142 Train training or RV motion rollers! |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.