Dahon Mu Uno vs Dahon Speed Uno
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
Dahon Mu Uno vs Dahon Speed Uno
I've been wanting a Mu Uno due to its sleek and simplicity of a single speed. Now I found there will be a Dahon Speed Uno which is very similar, but much cheaper. Do any of you have any opinions on the two in comparison? Thanks
Dahon Mu Uno

Dahon Speed Uno
Dahon Mu Uno

Dahon Speed Uno
Last edited by dayday82; 12-17-10 at 08:56 AM. Reason: bigger picture
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 1
For one thing, it would be easier to U-lock the Speed through the rear triangle: Not easy with the Mu frame. For times when I don't want to bring it into a building.
The Speed at least, looks like it has that plastic chainguard that is attached to the chainring—breakable. Mu picture not big enough to tell (assuming the pictures are accurate representations of the bicycles).
Used to be that the Speed series was made of steel too, not sure about now. The frame is only a small part of the Dahon bicycles though.
The Speed at least, looks like it has that plastic chainguard that is attached to the chainring—breakable. Mu picture not big enough to tell (assuming the pictures are accurate representations of the bicycles).
Used to be that the Speed series was made of steel too, not sure about now. The frame is only a small part of the Dahon bicycles though.
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
I like the look of the Mu better but I may be biased because of the higher price (ya know the thought of higher cost = better bike). The Mu is $599 whereas the Speed is $379.
Whether it is made of steel of not, is one more durable than the other? Is there a benefit with having a steel frame or is it the other way around?
Whether it is made of steel of not, is one more durable than the other? Is there a benefit with having a steel frame or is it the other way around?
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
#6
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 8
From: San Rafael, California
If you were ever contemplating converting to belt drive, you could with the Mu, but not with the Speed as there would be no way to get the belt on and off of the Speed.. If you want to spend $400 on a Mu Uno, I've got one to sell. PM if interested..
#7
Velosopher
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
The Speed looks similar to my Downtube Nova in that the chainring is integrated to the crankarm, so if you want a bigger chainring you'll have to get a whole new crankset, whereas the Uno is swappable. Not too big of a deal, though, since I got a basically new Gossamer road crankset with external bottom bracket and 53t large chainring for $25 on ebay.
Even with that big of a chainring its hard to get a decent ratio if you want a freewheel, since most only go down to 16t. I got one of the crappy 15t BMX freewheels that are still around NOS but its not good quality, which puts the gear inches in the mid to upper 60's, which works pretty good. If you want any smaller than that, Nashbar has a single-speed cassette hub, which would take smaller cogs or else you can go fixed. I think the Sturmey-Archer 2-speed hub is a good alternative for these bikes to get a better crusing gear and separate startup gear, but that's another thread...
Even with that big of a chainring its hard to get a decent ratio if you want a freewheel, since most only go down to 16t. I got one of the crappy 15t BMX freewheels that are still around NOS but its not good quality, which puts the gear inches in the mid to upper 60's, which works pretty good. If you want any smaller than that, Nashbar has a single-speed cassette hub, which would take smaller cogs or else you can go fixed. I think the Sturmey-Archer 2-speed hub is a good alternative for these bikes to get a better crusing gear and separate startup gear, but that's another thread...
#8
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
How would you do a belt drive? What are the pros and cons of using a belt drive vs a typical change? I know grease is one of them.
Last edited by dayday82; 12-17-10 at 10:14 AM.
#11
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Vienna, VA
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
I agree the price of the Mu Uno is quite steep. For $600 range, there are so many choices out there that might steer me to go with "geared" bike. I wish it was priced at $399, and the speed at $299.
#12
me too ...lol
#13
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 922
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Bikes: Wheeler Mtn bike, Strida 5.0, Tern Link Uno, FSIR Spin 2.0, Dahon Mu P8
for me the mu uno does it with that nice curvy frame. Plus the mu is using the newer clamp technology while the speed is using the old vice grip tech that's on most of their frames.
#14
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 106
Likes: 1

By the way, look at the specs
https://www.nycewheels.com/dahon-fold...speed-uno.html
https://us.dahon.com/bikes/1646/mu-uno
The Speed has no seatpost pump. And has Dahon tyres c.f. Shwalbe. Different grips, and different saddle.
Single speed/fixed is not my thing, so no recommendation.
#15
i like both models.
as i said i would love to be able to seel them cheaper, but thats life I guess...
I love the ss bikes as there is a sense of simplicity and clean lines which is striking. Having said that the mu is much sexier than the speed.. but the speed is a good platform to mod later on ( you simply have more money to mod from the get go ..lol )
steel or alloy is NOT an issue since about 20 years ago.... but choices are good
what i wished for is a real ss flip flop hub on the mu and the coaster brake hub only on the speed...maybe next year.
maybe an automatik or 2 speed coaster hub as an option for both....
ss with folders ( which have long handleposts and seatposts) is somewhat a oxymoron as you now have to pull and push like crazy on the handlepost to keep momentum up .... while I usually suggest to sit down and spin on a regular folder ....keeping the cadence higher than usual ( in order not to experience some ofthe flex ) now with a single speed you are forced to mash the one gear to come up to speed...
its not a big problem as the speed frame and the mu especially is a pretty stiff platform .... but there are some newbie folder folks with a singlespeeds, which wish for gears and a more relaxed spinning bike later on.... a few .... actually not many at all, which let Dahon to offer a second ss bike after all...
thor
as i said i would love to be able to seel them cheaper, but thats life I guess...
I love the ss bikes as there is a sense of simplicity and clean lines which is striking. Having said that the mu is much sexier than the speed.. but the speed is a good platform to mod later on ( you simply have more money to mod from the get go ..lol )
steel or alloy is NOT an issue since about 20 years ago.... but choices are good
what i wished for is a real ss flip flop hub on the mu and the coaster brake hub only on the speed...maybe next year.
maybe an automatik or 2 speed coaster hub as an option for both....
ss with folders ( which have long handleposts and seatposts) is somewhat a oxymoron as you now have to pull and push like crazy on the handlepost to keep momentum up .... while I usually suggest to sit down and spin on a regular folder ....keeping the cadence higher than usual ( in order not to experience some ofthe flex ) now with a single speed you are forced to mash the one gear to come up to speed...
its not a big problem as the speed frame and the mu especially is a pretty stiff platform .... but there are some newbie folder folks with a singlespeeds, which wish for gears and a more relaxed spinning bike later on.... a few .... actually not many at all, which let Dahon to offer a second ss bike after all...
thor
#16
Palmer

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 2,261
From: Parts Unknown
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
#17
Palmer

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 2,261
From: Parts Unknown
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
#18
Palmer

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,151
Likes: 2,261
From: Parts Unknown
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
#19
transport, not sport.
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: indonesia
now comes the speed uno...
when the mu uno was about to appear, my friends and I were already fantasizing.
1. to fit a 3 speed IG coaster brake hub.
2. to make it fixed gear.
3. to fit a nexus/alfine 8 speed hub
4. to fit a rohloff hub.... just kidding...
now that the speed is also uno...
well.... simply one more option.
at a lower price....
when the mu uno was about to appear, my friends and I were already fantasizing.
1. to fit a 3 speed IG coaster brake hub.
2. to make it fixed gear.
3. to fit a nexus/alfine 8 speed hub
4. to fit a rohloff hub.... just kidding...
now that the speed is also uno...
well.... simply one more option.
at a lower price....
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 8
From: San Rafael, California
What's the OLD on these bikes?
#22
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: Germany, Bavaria
Bikes: Dahon mu uno; VSF T400 BA, Singlespeed bike

Greetings
#23
So would like to build up an Uno with a S2C + Gates Centerline...
#24
Human Powered Vehiclist
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Pacific Northwest
Interesting, I was told from a reliable source that the Mu Uno is too narrow to fit a Gates Belt drive. Are you confident that the Gates Belt drive will fit?
Last edited by Jay D; 12-22-10 at 11:33 PM. Reason: Typo





