Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Is there a problem with my Garmin 705?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Is there a problem with my Garmin 705?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-11 | 08:40 AM
  #1  
hodie21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sucking Wheel at the back
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, VA

Bikes: Lynskey Helix Sport, Lynskey M290, Cervelo S3

Is there a problem with my Garmin 705?

I was just looking at my ride from yesterday and noticed that if I turn the elevation correction on, (Which uses professional survey data instead of the altimiter in the 705), That my climbing numbers are WAY different.

Here's the ride.

https://connect.garmin.com/activity/77661566

According to my 705 I had 3389 feet of climbing.

If I turn on the elevation correction, which I think would be more reliable, I had 4615 feet of climbing.

This is my second 705. The first one I got from Garmin the altimeter didn't work brand new out of the box. Wondering if they are not very accurate for this.
Which one is right?
hodie21 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 08:53 AM
  #2  
MPress's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
The built in altimeter is not known for its accuracy.
MPress is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
RT's Avatar
RT
The Weird Beard
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,554
Likes: 3
From: COS
If this is any indication, my Edge 500 was equally as iffy with altitude. I sold it and use SportyPal for Android. Incredibly, for a free app, it is much better than Garmin with both altitude and calories.
RT is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 09:43 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA

Bikes: '09 Fuji Team Pro

I thought the altimeter would be more accurate than survey data. Survey data typically records a point every 30ish feet and interpolates the points in between. On the page for your ride, down in the Device Info section, there is a '?' next to Elevation Corrections. The note says that devices that contain an altimeter generally contain accurate elevation data so they disable elevation corrections by default.

One thing that could effect elevation data is drafting. Since an altimeter uses atmospheric pressure to determine altitude, drafting will affect it slightly because there is less air pressure in the draft than there is off the front. The difference is usually like 50-100 feet, though, in my experience.

neneboricua
neneboricua is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 11:02 AM
  #5  
rm -rf's Avatar
don't try this at home.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 704
From: N. KY
Are you using the 1-per-second recording setting? The older 705s could run out of memory, but the newer versions don't seem to have that problem. I always leave the 1-per-second turned on.

Garmins can calculate accurate elevations when you pick "Average" when saving a location. It usually takes at least 30 seconds for the displayed elevation to settle down. I save the location this way for commonly used starting points. Then the start elevation will be accurate. Otherwise, it's an estimate based on the air pressure only.

In general, my 705 seems to be correct within 50 feet or so. On a Blue Ridge Parkway ride last fall, I would often be within 20 feet of the elevation posted at the overlooks.

I save my rides on the free "My Tourbook". It has an option to correct the elevation data. I always keep the actual data instead of correcting it.

Here's the 705 recorded elevations, with a red line overlay of the SRTM satellite survey elevation data. It's pretty accurate for most of the ride. Each horizontal line is 50 feet. The red line actually shows more short, steep sections that don't actually exist on the Parkway. Since the road is along the side of a steep mountain, even a small shift in location off the road would make a big change in the elevation.

Even the fast downhills, with the extra wind pressure, are accurate.



Zoomed:


Last edited by rm -rf; 04-07-11 at 11:24 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 11:52 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,606
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
My Garmin is regularly off +/- 20 feet which I think is within the margin of error of the GPS data. I wish it was better but its good enough. GL
kleinboogie is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 11:56 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,701
Likes: 1
From: Moraga, CA

Bikes: 2008 Cervelo RS, 2011 Scott CR1 Elite, 2014 Volagi Liscio

The ascent gained on my 705 is always about 10-11% less than what's calculated by Garmin Connect or Strava after I've uploaded the ride data. I have more confidence in the 705's altimeter based estimate since I've actually tested it versus USGS topo maps. I usually start and finish the ride at the same point so I also correct the ascent nos. based on the different altimeter readings before and after the ride.
RoboCheme is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 12:09 PM
  #8  
hodie21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sucking Wheel at the back
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, VA

Bikes: Lynskey Helix Sport, Lynskey M290, Cervelo S3

My problem is that I am talking about almost 1300 foot difference.
hodie21 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-07-11 | 12:36 PM
  #9  
pallen's Avatar
Descends like a rock
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,034
Likes: 16
From: Fort Worth, TX

Bikes: Scott Foil, Surly Pacer

Originally Posted by hodie21
My problem is that I am talking about almost 1300 foot difference.
That sounds more inline what what people describe on the units that do not have the barometric altimeter and rely only on GPS.
pallen is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-11 | 07:29 AM
  #10  
rm -rf's Avatar
don't try this at home.
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,220
Likes: 704
From: N. KY
Originally Posted by hodie21
My problem is that I am talking about almost 1300 foot difference.
I think your GPS is correct, not Garmin Connect. Edit-- the ride has a 1500 foot climb at mile 15, and a 800 foot climb at mile 29. Add a half dozen 200 foot climbs, and the rough total is about 3500. So the 4600 number seems high.

That looks like a great route.

I downloaded your tcx track from Garmin Connect, and imported it to My Tourbook.

Here's the elevation graph with a red line elevation correction. Each of those small red "hills" adds up, 30,50,80 feet at a time. My Tourbook shows 3156 feet of climbing, counting 3 foot differences. Garmin Connect probably uses a different set of elevation and mapping data, so it doesn't compare exactly.





Here are the track points in the middle of the big climb. Each dot is a track point, the uphill ones are close together, of course. The dot color is speed, green is fast, blue slower. See how the track drifts off the road. This would be one of the red spikes on the downhill. Even though the uphill dots follow the road, the road's exact elevation at any spot is calculated from the nearest elevation data points, and can't be perfectly accurate.





Mile 15.5 to 16.5 is Hayter's Gap Rd between N Fork Rd and Brumley Gap Rd. It looks flat on Google Terrain View, but shows a phantom 100 foot hill on the red track adjustment.



L is the 15.5 mile mark, R is 16.5


Last edited by rm -rf; 04-08-11 at 09:51 AM.
rm -rf is offline  
Reply
Old 04-08-11 | 11:22 AM
  #11  
hodie21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Sucking Wheel at the back
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 779
Likes: 1
From: Bristol, VA

Bikes: Lynskey Helix Sport, Lynskey M290, Cervelo S3

Very cool graphing work.
hodie21 is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hobkirk
Road Cycling
47
01-13-22 10:40 AM
TrojanHorse
Road Cycling
7
08-30-13 11:20 PM
TromboneAl
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
5
06-03-13 10:53 AM
trek330
Road Cycling
17
02-01-13 09:06 AM
CBuff
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
22
08-08-12 02:17 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.