Cygolite Hotshot 2W rechargable taillight
#1
Cygolite Hotshot 2W rechargable taillight
Being the crazy early-adopter that I am, I ordered one up. Still trying to figure out what I did with my digital camera, but here's a little video:
On flashing modes, the right button gradually adjusts flash rate up or down, alternately, when held down. On steady mode, it adjusts the intensity. If you have a commute that's a mix of MUP and roads, you can set the steady-burn mode to a low intensity for the MUP section, then switch to a flashing full-power mode for the road. From my time at BikeForums, I know excessively-powerful lights aren't always welcome on the MUP, so that could come in handy.
Weight is 56 grams with a mount, which is about the same as a SuperFlash with NiMH cells. The two halves of the light are held together with three screws, so you won't get home to find only half a taillight left.
Beam pattern is similar to a SuperFlash: pretty focused. If you get one, make sure you aim it straight & level or you're wasting a lot of its potential.
Beam intensity at the center of the beam is higher than my DiNotte 300R. MUCH higher. Once I find my stupid camera, I'll get you guys some beamshots.
Summary: it looks pretty solid, and a very good buy for what they cost ($40 with USB cable, $50 with cable and wall charger).

runtime chart on box
Beamshots
The best way to view these is to right-click the links and open each one in a new browser tab. Then you can switch from tab to tab to compare them.
SuperFlash: right-click and open in new tab
Hotshot: right-click and open in new tab
DiNotte 300R: right-click and open in new tab
On flashing modes, the right button gradually adjusts flash rate up or down, alternately, when held down. On steady mode, it adjusts the intensity. If you have a commute that's a mix of MUP and roads, you can set the steady-burn mode to a low intensity for the MUP section, then switch to a flashing full-power mode for the road. From my time at BikeForums, I know excessively-powerful lights aren't always welcome on the MUP, so that could come in handy.
Weight is 56 grams with a mount, which is about the same as a SuperFlash with NiMH cells. The two halves of the light are held together with three screws, so you won't get home to find only half a taillight left.
Beam pattern is similar to a SuperFlash: pretty focused. If you get one, make sure you aim it straight & level or you're wasting a lot of its potential.
Beam intensity at the center of the beam is higher than my DiNotte 300R. MUCH higher. Once I find my stupid camera, I'll get you guys some beamshots.
Summary: it looks pretty solid, and a very good buy for what they cost ($40 with USB cable, $50 with cable and wall charger).

runtime chart on box
Beamshots
The best way to view these is to right-click the links and open each one in a new browser tab. Then you can switch from tab to tab to compare them.
SuperFlash: right-click and open in new tab
Hotshot: right-click and open in new tab
DiNotte 300R: right-click and open in new tab
Last edited by mechBgon; 08-10-11 at 09:42 AM.
#2
You gonna eat that?
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 14,917
Likes: 543
From: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS
#3
$40 with just a USB cable to charge from a computer port, or $50 with the wall charger. I thought I ordered the one with just a USB cable, but there's a charger in the box, so maybe I got the wrong SKU when I was placing my order. Anyway, for something up in the DiNotte intensity range, at a price just a little higher than some AAA-powered blinkies, it appears to be a good value as long as it proves reliable, which will take some time to establish.
#4
I bought it for $40 with charger including free delivery from modernbike.com. It's brighter than Superflash & Radbot combined. I do not see any reason why anyone would buy those lights anymore, if only for backup. Unfortunately, it can not use the Superflash bracket
. Also, I am perplexed with the run time ranges. Does anyone know what they mean?
. Also, I am perplexed with the run time ranges. Does anyone know what they mean?
Last edited by rfomenko; 08-09-11 at 06:02 PM.
#5
I bought it for $40 with charger including free delivery from modernbike.com. It's brighter than Superflash & Radbot combined. I do not see any reason why anyone would buy those lights anymore, if only for backup. Unfortunately, it can not use the Superflash bracket
. Also, I am perplexed with the run time ranges. Does anyone know what they mean?
. Also, I am perplexed with the run time ranges. Does anyone know what they mean?You brought up a good point about the bracket. I don't see the Hotshot listed at Cygo's spare-parts page yet, but hopefully it will get added so people can buy extra brackets for their other bikes.
#6
According to my box, the runtime varies with the flash rate we choose (or the intensity level, in the steady mode).
You brought up a good point about the bracket. I don't see the Hotshot listed at Cygo's spare-parts page yet, but hopefully it will get added so people can buy extra brackets for their other bikes.
You brought up a good point about the bracket. I don't see the Hotshot listed at Cygo's spare-parts page yet, but hopefully it will get added so people can buy extra brackets for their other bikes.
Steady: 4.5 ~ 500 hrs
500 hours? Even 50 would be a bit too much... Or, Zoom 29 ~ 12 hrs. What sort of range is that? 29 to 120 perhaps? Yep, I believe the zero moved one row up
#8
Randomhead
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 25,930
Likes: 4,825
From: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
I went to their site, and see no mention of this light. I was hoping to find a manual
Last edited by unterhausen; 08-09-11 at 10:24 PM.
#9
I'm not an MUP type of guy, but if I had a mixed MUP-and-streets commute, I'd dial the steady mode down to about 10% and use that for the MUP, then switch to a flashing mode when I hit the streets. Of the flashing modes, I like the "single" and "random" modes best... the "triple" seems to have lower intensity, and the "zoom" doesn't have the sudden punch I want.
Last edited by mechBgon; 08-09-11 at 11:08 PM.
#10
As long as the 50 is on low. Considering that the single mode is 120 on low, the number seems to be legit. I played with the light today and it looks like the answer to my prayers for a daytime light for the city. I'd rather have two of them than one Dinotte 300R if only for redundancy. But one can get six of them for $200 from moderbike.com.
#13
And I'm not paying $200 for a blinkie period, especially now when this light is available. But then again, I am not riding on the highway during heavy traffic...
#15
#17
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,065
Likes: 69
From: Rural Missouri - mostly central and southeastern
Bikes: 2003 LeMond -various other junk bikes
Yes - this looks to be a great light. However, your test photos appear to confirm that falls far short of a three-watt light. The Dinotte was way brighter -yes?
And I guess the price is good too - considering the battery being on board. But again, what is the "life" if repeated run till failure? This looks like it could be a "need a new one" every year light..... can you replace the battery(s)...?
And I guess the price is good too - considering the battery being on board. But again, what is the "life" if repeated run till failure? This looks like it could be a "need a new one" every year light..... can you replace the battery(s)...?
#18
And I guess the price is good too - considering the battery being on board. But again, what is the "life" if repeated run till failure? This looks like it could be a "need a new one" every year light..... can you replace the battery(s)...?
#19
Yes - this looks to be a great light. However, your test photos appear to confirm that falls far short of a three-watt light. The Dinotte was way brighter -yes?
And I guess the price is good too - considering the battery being on board. But again, what is the "life" if repeated run till failure? This looks like it could be a "need a new one" every year light..... can you replace the battery(s)...?
And I guess the price is good too - considering the battery being on board. But again, what is the "life" if repeated run till failure? This looks like it could be a "need a new one" every year light..... can you replace the battery(s)...?
Last edited by rfomenko; 08-11-11 at 11:11 AM.
#20
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
MechBgon; How well does this new Cygolite project to the sides? Or perhaps I should say, how well could a another person see the light if they were coming from your side? The side visibility is the reason why I purchased the Mars4, but it seems like perhaps the Cygolite is not very good in that area like the PBSF.
#21
MechBgon; How well does this new Cygolite project to the sides? Or perhaps I should say, how well could a another person see the light if they were coming from your side? The side visibility is the reason why I purchased the Mars4, but it seems like perhaps the Cygolite is not very good in that area like the PBSF.
#22
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
#23
With all due respect, I believe that the side visibility in tail lights is a totally bogus issue. Just look at Dinottes: they have none and one would think it would be included considering the price. The way I see things, it's important that drivers see you while at the intersections or before pulling out of parking lots. That's the function of the front light. Strap something like Fenix LD20 to you helmet and that will get their attention much faster than two secondary lights pointing in the middle of nowhere. Believe me, I've had that setup for years
#24
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,954
Likes: 388
From: NE Indiana
Bikes: 2020 Masi Giramondo 700c; 2013 Lynskey Peloton; 1992 Giant Rincon; 1989 Dawes needs parts; 1985 Trek 660; 1985 Fuji Club; 1984 Schwinn Voyager; 1984 Miyata 612; 1977 Raleigh Competition GS
With all due respect, I believe that the side visibility in tail lights is a totally bogus issue. Just look at Dinottes: they have none and one would think it would be included considering the price. The way I see things, it's important that drivers see you while at the intersections or before pulling out of parking lots. That's the function of the front light. Strap something like Fenix LD20 to you helmet and that will get their attention much faster than two secondary lights pointing in the middle of nowhere. Believe me, I've had that setup for years 

#25
That's ok you disagree, but I disagree with you too. If a car is coming from your side and could be considering running a stop or simply doesn't see you, a little added protection could save your bacon (no political meaning here, huh?). Anywho, I too wear a helmet headlight and use it in the same fashion as you, so I agree with you on that.




