Anyone riding rigid no suspension fork? nada?
#26
K2ProFlex baby!
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: My response would have been something along the lines of: "Does your bike have computer controlled suspension? Then shut your piehole, this baby is from the future!"
Posts: 6,133
Bikes: to many to list
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Liked 56 Times
in
31 Posts
Last edited by ilikebikes; 04-28-20 at 06:43 PM.
#27
glorified 5954
Yeah, drops and off-road do not go together. The weight is just too far forward. Gravel bikes are more for smooth gravel paths which I could see being pretty fun for going fast in an aero position.
I love rigid bikes ever since my 1995 GT Tempest
With that Tempest I rode a 37 mile loop last year in central Switzerland with 2 miles of elevation gain/loss. The rim-brakes just murdered my rather well-endowed hands and so I decided to build a new disc brake rigid.
Rigids are king if you take advantage of new technologies that allow you to run next to no tire pressure. Otherwise they're still lots of fun but speed and comfort are sacrificed.
I love rigid bikes ever since my 1995 GT Tempest
With that Tempest I rode a 37 mile loop last year in central Switzerland with 2 miles of elevation gain/loss. The rim-brakes just murdered my rather well-endowed hands and so I decided to build a new disc brake rigid.
Rigids are king if you take advantage of new technologies that allow you to run next to no tire pressure. Otherwise they're still lots of fun but speed and comfort are sacrificed.
Likes For pressed001:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
I still ride rigid bikes and drop bars off road. I used to ride a Cross Check with 35mm tires on every trail around here, jumps, drops, rock gardens, no problems. I ride different lines now than I used to and different than the guys on suspension. I am going to have to give in to the dark side soon though if I want to keep riding much. A motorcycle wreck a couple years ago made me old and my recovery time between rides is much longer than it used to be and sometimes my lower back starts to spasm mid ride. I am only 42, and I don't think the situation will improve over the years.
#29
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
Yeah, drops and off-road do not go together. The weight is just too far forward. Gravel bikes are more for smooth gravel paths which I could see being pretty fun for going fast in an aero position.
I love rigid bikes ever since my 1995 GT Tempest
With that Tempest I rode a 37 mile loop last year in central Switzerland with 2 miles of elevation gain/loss. The rim-brakes just murdered my rather well-endowed hands and so I decided to build a new disc brake rigid.
Rigids are king if you take advantage of new technologies that allow you to run next to no tire pressure. Otherwise they're still lots of fun but speed and comfort are sacrificed.
I love rigid bikes ever since my 1995 GT Tempest
With that Tempest I rode a 37 mile loop last year in central Switzerland with 2 miles of elevation gain/loss. The rim-brakes just murdered my rather well-endowed hands and so I decided to build a new disc brake rigid.
Rigids are king if you take advantage of new technologies that allow you to run next to no tire pressure. Otherwise they're still lots of fun but speed and comfort are sacrificed.
#30
glorified 5954
I would love to get some wider tires and run lower pressure, but exactly because of the weights keeps me right where I am.
#31
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
Hey my man. I love the rigid but dayum those tires are heavy @ 1300g per tire. The 29x3" weigh slightly less, which is weird. But they use a different compound. Anyway. Still looks like a fun bike to romp around on. I just wouldn't be pulling any centennials on it!
I would love to get some wider tires and run lower pressure, but exactly because of the weights keeps me right where I am.
I would love to get some wider tires and run lower pressure, but exactly because of the weights keeps me right where I am.
One of my stretch goals is getting carbon rims, that will help quite a bit too. The whole set up is just south of 35lbs as-pictured but honestly man, I only feel it when I lift it on to the workstand and I swear, I roll over stuff easier than my bro-in-law on his 26" full squish (nothing against him or his bike, neat setup but I like the big tires, and I am of the belief that suspension only works for big hits, doesn't help with any of the trail chatter or rocks)
Last edited by davei1980; 04-15-20 at 05:16 PM.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
Posts: 878
Bikes: Too, too many....
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 126 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 130 Times
in
57 Posts
Lots of them around here, too, especially for older riders who can't afford Chinese bikes...
Here's three of mine:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
Likes For c_m_shooter:
#35
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,655
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1130 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times
in
521 Posts
I rode the White Rim in a day on this bike about this time last year. It worked. It certainly wasn't in 5:45 though (add 5 hours).
A couple years ago, I got a dirt cheap nashbar 29er SS with no suspension. Rode pretty well due to modern geometry, even at 30lbs. 2.2 maxed out my tire size and I like really long climbing. Sold it and didn't look back.
Lately I've been interested in getting a little more aggressive than my cross bike can handle. Still stuck on the rigid idea. Heavy seems to be the name of the game. I guess that's ok, I'm slow and I don't race.
For the last day I've been having a hard time talking myself out of ordering a Krampus. Through axles, 29+, full rigid, aggressive geometry beyond it's paygrade, 1x12 and hydro brakes this year. $1550. I could have it by Tuesday. Seems hard to say no to.
I've never liked Surly but considering my application, it's a bike I'd ride out of the box. The only thing to change would be removing the inner tubes.
A couple years ago, I got a dirt cheap nashbar 29er SS with no suspension. Rode pretty well due to modern geometry, even at 30lbs. 2.2 maxed out my tire size and I like really long climbing. Sold it and didn't look back.
Lately I've been interested in getting a little more aggressive than my cross bike can handle. Still stuck on the rigid idea. Heavy seems to be the name of the game. I guess that's ok, I'm slow and I don't race.
For the last day I've been having a hard time talking myself out of ordering a Krampus. Through axles, 29+, full rigid, aggressive geometry beyond it's paygrade, 1x12 and hydro brakes this year. $1550. I could have it by Tuesday. Seems hard to say no to.
I've never liked Surly but considering my application, it's a bike I'd ride out of the box. The only thing to change would be removing the inner tubes.
#36
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
I rode the White Rim in a day on this bike about this time last year. It worked. It certainly wasn't in 5:45 though (add 5 hours).
A couple years ago, I got a dirt cheap nashbar 29er SS with no suspension. Rode pretty well due to modern geometry, even at 30lbs. 2.2 maxed out my tire size and I like really long climbing. Sold it and didn't look back.
Lately I've been interested in getting a little more aggressive than my cross bike can handle. Still stuck on the rigid idea. Heavy seems to be the name of the game. I guess that's ok, I'm slow and I don't race.
For the last day I've been having a hard time talking myself out of ordering a Krampus. Through axles, 29+, full rigid, aggressive geometry beyond it's paygrade, 1x12 and hydro brakes this year. $1550. I could have it by Tuesday. Seems hard to say no to.
I've never liked Surly but considering my application, it's a bike I'd ride out of the box. The only thing to change would be removing the inner tubes.
A couple years ago, I got a dirt cheap nashbar 29er SS with no suspension. Rode pretty well due to modern geometry, even at 30lbs. 2.2 maxed out my tire size and I like really long climbing. Sold it and didn't look back.
Lately I've been interested in getting a little more aggressive than my cross bike can handle. Still stuck on the rigid idea. Heavy seems to be the name of the game. I guess that's ok, I'm slow and I don't race.
For the last day I've been having a hard time talking myself out of ordering a Krampus. Through axles, 29+, full rigid, aggressive geometry beyond it's paygrade, 1x12 and hydro brakes this year. $1550. I could have it by Tuesday. Seems hard to say no to.
I've never liked Surly but considering my application, it's a bike I'd ride out of the box. The only thing to change would be removing the inner tubes.
I have friends who ride Surlys and I tell them that I ride a Jones because their Surlys need heroes too! LOL all good fun.
Also, my LBS is a Bombtrack dealer - they have some really nifty 29+ rigid-specific models which may interest you. Krampus is really cool and has the geo to add a suspension fork down the road if you wish too.....
#37
glorified 5954
Your Fargo looks great BTW.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
Those mid 90s bikes are easier to convert because they used loooooooong stems for those flat bars. A modern short stem with a set of dirt drops fits them well. My Monocog was set up that way for the first 10 years I had it. It is a back up/loaner bike now, so flat bars are on it to keep from scaring the young-ins. I use the drops for technical riding because your arms are better suspension in that position (elbows in, counter to what the dirt jumpers tell you), and cruise on the hoods on smooth sections.
#39
glorified 5954
Those mid 90s bikes are easier to convert because they used loooooooong stems for those flat bars. A modern short stem with a set of dirt drops fits them well. My Monocog was set up that way for the first 10 years I had it. It is a back up/loaner bike now, so flat bars are on it to keep from scaring the young-ins. I use the drops for technical riding because your arms are better suspension in that position (elbows in, counter to what the dirt jumpers tell you), and cruise on the hoods on smooth sections.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,126
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2236 Post(s)
Liked 1,314 Times
in
707 Posts
I haven't met a technical mountain bike trail I could ride better with drop bars than flats.
Older drop bar mtb's have a place as great low cost gravel grinders and can do flowy trails ok but there is a point where flats and proper body position/geometry handle technical downhill better. If it didn't, people would be riding drops while mtbing. There is a difference between a cyclocross rider taking his bike down a mtb trail in one piece and intentionally building a bike to suit those conditions.
It's akin to arguing rigid frames are better than full suspension for mountain biking just because you happen to own a rigid.
Older drop bar mtb's have a place as great low cost gravel grinders and can do flowy trails ok but there is a point where flats and proper body position/geometry handle technical downhill better. If it didn't, people would be riding drops while mtbing. There is a difference between a cyclocross rider taking his bike down a mtb trail in one piece and intentionally building a bike to suit those conditions.
It's akin to arguing rigid frames are better than full suspension for mountain biking just because you happen to own a rigid.
#42
With a mighty wind
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 2,655
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1130 Post(s)
Liked 922 Times
in
521 Posts
The simplicity of a rigid bike that isn't going to go obsolete after new developments (it's already obsolete) is the attraction. It's slow and usually heavy. In the mind of people riding these bikes, that's all fine. I also need a built in excuse for my utter lack of speed. I'm pretty sure I'd still be slow on a $6000 rig, but how could I justify that? With the exception of a few amazing expensive beasts, these are also something to ride through a buffalo stampede with.
Fast? No. Better ride? Not in any objective way.
Yet, there is still a market for them.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
It is like comparing modern compound bows to longbows and barebow recurves. All have a purpose. One requires much less skill to show satisfactory results. Some people enjoy the process, and some want to skip ahead to the results. To each their own.
#44
Very Slow Rider
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: E Wa
Posts: 1,274
Bikes: Jones Plus LWB, 1983 Centurion Japanese CrMo bike
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times
in
101 Posts
If so, I am loving the process of teaching myself super duper technical riding on my rigid bike! I am glad for "modern" advances in geometry, handlebars, dropper posts and super wide 3" tires. Not sure how that fits in with your analogy.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Paradise, TX
Posts: 2,087
Bikes: Soma Pescadero, Surly Pugsley, Salsa Fargo, Schwinn Klunker, Gravity SS 27.5, Monocog 29er
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 186 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times
in
166 Posts
I rode all the trails around here years before suspension bikes took over. In the last 5 or 10 years, the trails have mostly only gotten smoother with the increased traffic. Why would I need a suspension bike? I go the demos every year and take a few bikes out that would cost more than any of my motorcycles. Trails that are interesting on my old bikes, I never have to get out of the saddle on the new ones. Turning a trail ride into a road ride makes it less fun for me. I like my dropper seatpost and wide tires also. I am not totally against technology, just selective. If I were decending actual mountains for miles at a time with big jumps and sketchy landings the big bikes make sense. I only ride those trails when I travel, and ride more carefully then, because I don't know exactly where I am, and nobody else does either.
Likes For c_m_shooter: