A lot of the recent "innovation" is a bad bargain for anyone not pushing a competitiv
#502
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That wasn't a challenge. You're already far enough into the weeds. This thread specifically was NOT about racing so how does your question have anything to do with the thread? Don't answer that, I went beyond caring about your weird little side-argument about 20 posts ago..
#503
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,416
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10659 Post(s)
Liked 12,331 Times
in
6,310 Posts
That wasn't a challenge. You're already far enough into the weeds. This thread specifically was NOT about racing so how does your question have anything to do with the thread? Don't answer that, I went beyond caring about your weird little side-argument about 20 posts ago..
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#504
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
#505
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,228
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2769 Post(s)
Liked 2,556 Times
in
1,440 Posts
But yours is a moot point, anyway. Have you ever seen a cost index (housing, cars, groceries, gas...) that uses the most expensive option as the metric? NO. Because it is a silly, stupid metric to use. They all use some variation of average or median. Why should bikes be any different?
And it is even MORE irrelevant because you are talking about the very thing the OP specifically says he is NOT talking about.
Last edited by Kapusta; 06-17-22 at 10:25 AM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#506
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I get the notion of thread drift, but this exchange about the costs of halo bikes through the decades is so not entertaining that I will invoke pretty much anything at this point to make it go away. I was surprised that I was getting entertained when the thread got bumped, but now it's getting to be a completely tedious series of put-downs over a WGAF side-issue.
Likes For livedarklions:
#507
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,876
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4644 Post(s)
Liked 5,178 Times
in
3,200 Posts
My experience is in motorsport and guess what? F1 cars of today cost a s*** load more money than they did in 1986. But apart from having 4 wheels and driving around a track, there is very little comparison.
Last edited by PeteHski; 06-17-22 at 04:46 PM.
Likes For PeteHski:
#509
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,876
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4644 Post(s)
Liked 5,178 Times
in
3,200 Posts
If there was no innovation, the whole industry would become stagnant and that would not be good news for anyone really - except for those who obviously wish to be stuck in some arbitrary time. An old conservative guy might prefer everything to be exactly how it was 40 years ago. But I doubt many 20 something year olds would agree on that. No doubt in 2060 there will be a bunch of old guys wishing bikes were exactly the same as they were in 2022. I just find it more interesting in life to look forward rather than backward.
#510
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mississauga/Toronto, Ontario canada
Posts: 8,721
Bikes: I have 3 singlespeed/fixed gear bikes
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4227 Post(s)
Liked 2,491 Times
in
1,286 Posts
By 2060 bicycles will will be so complex and sophisticated that it will be impossible for a home mechanic to do any type of service or maintenance...Nothing wrong with looking forward into the future, life is definitely better now than it was 300 years ago.
#511
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yamaguchi City, Japan
Posts: 1,095
Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 SL 2007, Look KG386, R022 Re-framed Azzurri Primo, Felt Z5, Trek F7.3 FX
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
73 Posts
I am stuck in about 2007 when the last not-really-expensive horizontal (non-compact) carbon frames were made.
The not-under-the-bar-tape gear cables of the Ultegra ten speed FD6600 worked really well and were not surpassed by 105 until 11s FD5800 and then not by much in terms of click-niceness.
I think that "aggressive" frames (which were once commonplace) e.g. with less than 14cm head tubes. are still made today but they tend to be extremely expensive.
As I have written elsewhere, more than once, the super-duper aero frames that are available these days tend to come in a comparatively relaxed geometry encouraging riders to slice their super-duper frame through the air, while their chest acts as a drag parachute. It is pretty bizarre.
It makes sense to pros riding in big groups, and amateurs riding on their own with big bellies.
The not-under-the-bar-tape gear cables of the Ultegra ten speed FD6600 worked really well and were not surpassed by 105 until 11s FD5800 and then not by much in terms of click-niceness.
I think that "aggressive" frames (which were once commonplace) e.g. with less than 14cm head tubes. are still made today but they tend to be extremely expensive.
As I have written elsewhere, more than once, the super-duper aero frames that are available these days tend to come in a comparatively relaxed geometry encouraging riders to slice their super-duper frame through the air, while their chest acts as a drag parachute. It is pretty bizarre.
It makes sense to pros riding in big groups, and amateurs riding on their own with big bellies.
#512
Senior Member
There's significantly less intrinsic disadvantage to old road bikes than most cyclists imagine. Aerodynamically they do generally take a hit to a modern aero-oriented build, and of course there are a variety of factors that tend to make them heavier than modern road bikes. But weight isn't quite as impactful as folks tend to guess, and there are plenty of modern road bikes that avoid similar scrutiny despite not being very aero. Most other disadvantages are pretty circumstantial or conditional.
The trouble is, those "circumstantial or conditional" issues very often apply.
An obvious example being gearing. Especially common is for a vintage bicycle to lack low ratios that are adequate for their terrain and rider. There's not a very good technological reason for the severity of this problem: there have always been derailleur systems available that can comfortably handle significantly wider gearing ranges than the contemporary racing-bike norm, and even professional racers used to routinely bottom out their gearing on climbs, so this problem has always been both visible and solvable. But fashion dictated avoiding low gears, and the bicycle drivetrain industry has always been obnoxiously incremental with gearing arrangements. So, reasonable or otherwise, for a lot of folks on vintage road bikes in hilly areas, you either make drastic drivetrain modifications or you frequently bottom out your gearing. Depending on how bad it is, the hit to climbing performance and rate of fatigue can be very tangible.
Cockpit fit is another area where a lot frequently can and does go wrong with vintage road bikes.
The most common issue is probably that people try to fit them like modern road bikes. If you fit the hoods as a primary performance cruising posture, a lot of problems can arise: the thenar region of the hand can get uncomfortable because the "main" riding position isn't a good handrest, braking is hard because the lever has to be pushed down by the fingers, the drops are too low to be useful, etc. In most cases, a vintage steel road bike used for spirited riding should be fit to use the drops as a major position, with the hoods thought of more as grip nubs than as handrests. Most handlebars from those days were shaped to optimize the utility of the drops*, including forming them into a pretty decent handrest shape (resulting in a nice arms-outstretched posture that's comfortable, has optimal brake access, and enjoys maximal hand security). This sort of fit does tend to make the aero-hoods position less aero than on a modern road fit, although there are still highly-aero postures available at the cost of a bit more upper body tension.
One issue, specific to vintage bikes that place the shifters on the downtube, is that the location of the downtube adds an extra fitting constraint. Specifically, the downtube shifters need to be in a position pretty close to where the hand ends up when the rider swings their arm inward. If they aren't, and especially if the downtube is too far away, you get problems of the "reaching to shift" variety. If this issue exists on a given bicycle+rider combination, it can be difficult to solve.
And in some riding circumstances, modern interfaces have a modest advantage that's not really circumventable on vintage equipment. For instance, sometimes it's beneficial to be able to shift easily while pedaling hard out of the saddle, and that's something that wasn't really feasible until brifters were introduced.
Another factor is that a lot of people only put much effort or money into a bicycle if it has high market value, and that often isn't the case for vintage steel. There are many things where this doesn't make a big difference (like cable housing on a friction-shifted drivetrain), but there are also things like tires, where the decision to go with some $15 500g thick stiff gumwall can have an enormous performance impact compared to a GP5000.
When a lot of factors are acting all at once, the costs can get quite high.
*In my experience, modern road setups tend to feel worse in the drops than their vintage counterparts. I think there are two causes. One, modern brake lever shapes and pivot points are optimized for actuation from the hoods. Two, the drops themselves have to make room for this alternate lever shape, and for the additional presence of shift levers attached to the underside of the brake levers. The required shaping does end up making the drops "more usable" than if modern hood placement were used with traditional drop bars, but for the drops in and of themselves, I think it makes for funky grip ergonomics and creates some positional redundancy with the hoods.
Last edited by HTupolev; 06-24-22 at 12:22 AM.
#513
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 506
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 628 Times
in
377 Posts
Maybe we'll have fully cordless shifting/brakes with self adjustment and 10 year batter lives, tyres that are truly puncture proof with self adjusting pressures.
Maybe we'll still have essentially what we have now with super strong super lightweight components.
All we know is that in 2060, some people will still be saying that bike design peaked in (year they got their last good bike), and that everything made after (arbitrary date most people can't remember) aren't real bikes for some reason.
#514
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,876
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4644 Post(s)
Liked 5,178 Times
in
3,200 Posts
I am stuck in about 2007 when the last not-really-expensive horizontal (non-compact) carbon frames were made.
The not-under-the-bar-tape gear cables of the Ultegra ten speed FD6600 worked really well and were not surpassed by 105 until 11s FD5800 and then not by much in terms of click-niceness.
I think that "aggressive" frames (which were once commonplace) e.g. with less than 14cm head tubes. are still made today but they tend to be extremely expensive.
As I have written elsewhere, more than once, the super-duper aero frames that are available these days tend to come in a comparatively relaxed geometry encouraging riders to slice their super-duper frame through the air, while their chest acts as a drag parachute. It is pretty bizarre.
It makes sense to pros riding in big groups, and amateurs riding on their own with big bellies.
The not-under-the-bar-tape gear cables of the Ultegra ten speed FD6600 worked really well and were not surpassed by 105 until 11s FD5800 and then not by much in terms of click-niceness.
I think that "aggressive" frames (which were once commonplace) e.g. with less than 14cm head tubes. are still made today but they tend to be extremely expensive.
As I have written elsewhere, more than once, the super-duper aero frames that are available these days tend to come in a comparatively relaxed geometry encouraging riders to slice their super-duper frame through the air, while their chest acts as a drag parachute. It is pretty bizarre.
It makes sense to pros riding in big groups, and amateurs riding on their own with big bellies.
#515
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,876
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4644 Post(s)
Liked 5,178 Times
in
3,200 Posts
Yep, this is the reality and farce.
#516
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yamaguchi City, Japan
Posts: 1,095
Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 SL 2007, Look KG386, R022 Re-framed Azzurri Primo, Felt Z5, Trek F7.3 FX
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
73 Posts
Riders prior to about 2000 were stuck with the non-relaxed, non-compact frame bikes for decades.
But perhaps, they rode that way because they did not know better. They were not crackpot but simply underdeveloped. Crackpots are those that deny the truth that the modern riding/pedalling style is better.
I am 57 years old. Today I rode 25km to work in my faster ever time of 45 minutes, using a recumbent perched on top of a road bike style of pedalling.
Tim
But perhaps, they rode that way because they did not know better. They were not crackpot but simply underdeveloped. Crackpots are those that deny the truth that the modern riding/pedalling style is better.
I am 57 years old. Today I rode 25km to work in my faster ever time of 45 minutes, using a recumbent perched on top of a road bike style of pedalling.
Tim
Last edited by timtak; 06-24-22 at 06:15 AM.
#517
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Scotland
Posts: 506
Bikes: Way too many
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 977 Post(s)
Liked 628 Times
in
377 Posts
So I'm not surprised that there's less demand for more aggressive frames.
#518
Senior Member
I'm not sure about that. People have been putting motors on bicycles ever since there were bicycles. The only innovation I see for e-bikes with the passing years is how much they try to disguise the fact they are e-bikes.
While I'm being snide in the remark, I also see the use for them. I've tried to talk my wife into getting an e-bike hoping maybe she'd enjoy riding the rolling terrain around us.
While I'm being snide in the remark, I also see the use for them. I've tried to talk my wife into getting an e-bike hoping maybe she'd enjoy riding the rolling terrain around us.
Fairing/Pannier System gives bicycles motorcycle appearance
Yes, people seem to choose ebikes that are disguised as bicycles. Meanwhile our Fairing/Pannier System makes the bicycle look like a motorcycle. Everyone asks if my bicycle has a motor. Early versions were fiberglass but polypropylene is used now due to thefts and rioting.
Design can be optimized for either aerodynamic advantage or cargo capacity, cargo version has 6x the capacity of the streamlined version.
But my frames are all 30 year old chrome molybdenum.
#519
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
#520
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,195
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1839 Post(s)
Liked 1,724 Times
in
983 Posts
I'm still waiting for Di2 Wireless pedals & AXS remote brakes.
When that happens, we'll know bicycle design has peaked & we can throw all the worthless prototypes away.
When that happens, we'll know bicycle design has peaked & we can throw all the worthless prototypes away.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#521
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,612
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'm waiting for bikes to go full drone. You could pedal from the safety of your living room and your effort and control inputs will be transmitted wirelessly to the bike.
#522
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yamaguchi City, Japan
Posts: 1,095
Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 SL 2007, Look KG386, R022 Re-framed Azzurri Primo, Felt Z5, Trek F7.3 FX
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
73 Posts
I am sorry. I was being sartorial. I don't think it is the truth either. But from the prevalence of comfortable frames even in the pro teams, one might think that comfortable is better/faster, when as you say, it varies.
Likes For timtak:
#523
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,876
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4644 Post(s)
Liked 5,178 Times
in
3,200 Posts
Riders prior to about 2000 were stuck with the non-relaxed, non-compact frame bikes for decades.
But perhaps, they rode that way because they did not know better. They were not crackpot but simply underdeveloped. Crackpots are those that deny the truth that the modern riding/pedalling style is better.
I am 57 years old. Today I rode 25km to work in my faster ever time of 45 minutes, using a recumbent perched on top of a road bike style of pedalling.
Tim
But perhaps, they rode that way because they did not know better. They were not crackpot but simply underdeveloped. Crackpots are those that deny the truth that the modern riding/pedalling style is better.
I am 57 years old. Today I rode 25km to work in my faster ever time of 45 minutes, using a recumbent perched on top of a road bike style of pedalling.
Tim
Modern road race bikes certainly appear to be getting slightly less agressive with stack height, but sometimes the pros may have an additional choice of more aggressive frame geometry with lower stack height (e.g. Specilaized Roubaix) or size down several frames to achieve the aggressive fit they may prefer.
As an average and not very flexible rider I'm certainly not complaining about this trend!
#524
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yamaguchi City, Japan
Posts: 1,095
Bikes: Trek Madone 5.2 SL 2007, Look KG386, R022 Re-framed Azzurri Primo, Felt Z5, Trek F7.3 FX
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 405 Post(s)
Liked 85 Times
in
73 Posts
The Roubaix Pro
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ro...ext=94422-1054
says it has a short head tube at 12.5 cm in the 54 (which is about 1cm shorter than my Look or Trek from 15 years ago) but the drops are a long way above the wheels. It is also very expensive. My students -- thin young Japanese guys -- go to bike shops and get fitted up with bikes at a lower price point in the Trek/Specialized range with their chests facing the wind.
I try to get the drops nearer to wheel top height since most drag is rider drag and I guess the biggest part of that is my chest. I ride alone so I am not drafting anyone. As I say on this or a similar thread, a lot of the innovation of aero frames can shave a percent or two off total but one can be a lot more aero by getting into a time trial (or pros back in the day when breakaways were more popular) type position.
I have just set up my Madone a little too low (I bought the +- 45 degree stem for a relaxed bike). I'll be getting a minus 20 or so stem. The aim is to be in a time trial position since I only ride time trials.
A Little too Low by Timothy Takemoto, on Flickr
The 60mm at 17 degrees looks about right @ $11.54.
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005002335257888.html
Or in aluminium and carbon for $18USD in a variety of sizes and angles including -35 for those who want to go low.
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005003276252495.html
My guess is that 1cm of back lowering is equivalent to (a few?) 1000 dollars of aero frame "innovations."
On second thoughts, the above stem is okay as it is, for the time being.
Last edited by timtak; 06-27-22 at 04:21 AM.
#525
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,722
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4822 Post(s)
Liked 1,557 Times
in
1,021 Posts
Getting a smaller size and using a long stem is definitely an option.
The Roubaix Pro
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ro...ext=94422-1054
says it has a short head tube at 12.5 cm in the 54 (which is about 1cm shorter than my Look or Trek from 15 years ago) but the drops are a long way above the wheels. It is also very expensive. .
The Roubaix Pro
https://www.specialized.com/us/en/ro...ext=94422-1054
says it has a short head tube at 12.5 cm in the 54 (which is about 1cm shorter than my Look or Trek from 15 years ago) but the drops are a long way above the wheels. It is also very expensive. .