Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Hybrid Bicycles
Reload this Page >

Official Trek FX Thread

Search
Notices
Hybrid Bicycles Where else would you go to discuss these fun, versatile bikes?

Official Trek FX Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-16, 04:17 PM
  #701  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 13

Bikes: Trek FX 7.3 ... Green ��

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks Shook
zimtrek is offline  
Old 09-16-16, 07:35 AM
  #702  
Senior Member
 
sh00k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947

Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
i've been enjoying my 7.4 since my last post on this thread. only change i made was the addition of bontrager aw2 tires. i went from a 32c (stock) tire/tube to 25c tires. my usual route is a bit hilly but very smooth so i risked going for the smallest size that would fit on my rim and i am happy with the results. folks said the 25c would be too jarring of a ride and to go with 28s but i opted for the 25c. i inflated the tires to 115 in the back, 110 in the front. 120psi is max.

took a 10-mile ride yesterday (two rounds around my neighborhood) and i am very pleased with the results. average mph went from 12 to 14 and i was definitely faster on several portions of my route. as many others have noted, i definitely felt the 'sail' effect on these tires (25c) as opposed to the 32c tires. as you go faster, since you're upright, the air slows you down. i honestly never felt this on my 32c tires but maybe im also being more critical of it now...? anyway, im loving the ride and plan to put a few hundred miles on these new tires before the season is up. time will tell if these tires will hold up like the bullet proof 32c tires but im happy with the results thus far.

i like pictures so here are some pictures. edit: sorry the pics are a little blurry, i have no idea why! they look fine on my phone... or maybe it's my eyes?!






Last edited by sh00k; 09-16-16 at 07:52 AM.
sh00k is offline  
Old 09-16-16, 08:51 AM
  #703  
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388

Bikes: Yep

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I like that gray, tried to find one last year but ended up with white. I recently went from 32 to 27 Vittoria Open Pave, big improvement.
sail is offline  
Old 09-16-16, 10:02 AM
  #704  
Senior Member
 
sh00k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947

Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Originally Posted by sail
I like that gray, tried to find one last year but ended up with white. I recently went from 32 to 27 Vittoria Open Pave, big improvement.
for the last few years, i've only owned white cars and bikes! my 7.7 was white, my (now wifes) 7.3 is white and i wish i got this 7.4 in white too! the finish is nice but the color just seems so.... drab. trek's white 'glows' and that's what i love about it.

this bike was on the dealer floor as an end-of-season sale, and i bought it for ~$200 off msrp so i said why not and got it in this color. in fact, i am still more in love with my white 7.3 although this is my main fitness bike haha

as for the tires, im excited to finish this season off with these as they make the bike ride so much more differently. now i know why the higher up you go in the fx line, the thinner the tires get

Last edited by sh00k; 09-16-16 at 11:35 AM.
sh00k is offline  
Old 09-16-16, 04:50 PM
  #705  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Posts: 13

Bikes: Trek FX 7.3 ... Green ��

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bar ends

Hi really want to put bar ends on my 7.3 please could I have some recommendations 🤓
zimtrek is offline  
Old 09-16-16, 07:36 PM
  #706  
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388

Bikes: Yep

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
If you have the Isozone bars and want to put bar ends on the end of the bar you need these:Bontrager Satellite+ Isozone Bar End Adapter - trekbikestore.com
All they do is make the end of the bar round.

I like these: Bontrager Race Bar Ends | Trek Bikes although mine are inside the brakes.

Lots of options out there and if your riding any kind of distance you'll really appreciate having them.
sail is offline  
Old 09-17-16, 09:57 AM
  #707  
Velominatus
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Lincolnshire Wolds, England
Posts: 375

Bikes: 1986 SBDU Raleigh, 1984 Raleigh Corsa, 1980 Allin Stan Butler Special, 2 x late 1960s Roberts, 1978 Philbook, 1964 Allin Belgique, 1959 Allin Stan Butler Special, 1951 Higgins Plus Parfait, 1951 Hobbs of Barbican, 1913 Centaur Featherweight.

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 37 Times in 23 Posts
Trek Navigator 200.

Hi guys,

hope I've posted this in the correct place, I'm not a Trekpert. This is my Navigator 200, I bought this from the original owner but it is in as-new condition. I've added Continental Town and Country tyres (tires) since the photo - it's my utility bicycle, and I recently took it to France for the opening days of the Tour de France as it has mudguards (fenders) and a carrier.

Not certain how old it is, any thoughts?

Great.

John.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Trek Navigator 2.jpg (51.4 KB, 433 views)

Last edited by hobbs1951; 09-18-16 at 11:08 PM.
hobbs1951 is offline  
Old 09-19-16, 01:25 PM
  #708  
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388

Bikes: Yep

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by hobbs1951
Hi guys,

hope I've posted this in the correct place, I'm not a Trekpert. This is my Navigator 200, I bought this from the original owner but it is in as-new condition. I've added Continental Town and Country tyres (tires) since the photo - it's my utility bicycle, and I recently took it to France for the opening days of the Tour de France as it has mudguards (fenders) and a carrier.

Not certain how old it is, any thoughts?

Great.

John.
Try the archives, lots of info.

2016 Bike Archive - Trek Bicycle
sail is offline  
Old 09-26-16, 03:40 PM
  #709  
Senior Member
 
Greggster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 57

Bikes: 80/90's Specialized Crossroads (3), '91 Miyata Triplecross, '91 Bianchi Boardwalk, 2002 Schwinn Frontier, 2002 Gary Fisher Tarpon, 2009 Trek FX 7.2, 2014 Motobecane 400 HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
How difficult would it be to switch the FX brakes to cantilever? I think v-brakes on FX's look ugly.

Last edited by Greggster; 09-26-16 at 03:51 PM.
Greggster is offline  
Old 09-27-16, 08:16 AM
  #710  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
took an 16 mile ride with family last weekend & had to borrow son's FX. worked great on the old paved path & the long gravel section. was fun riding something not so twitchy & on wide tires for a change. I just might be shopping for an N+1

Last edited by rumrunn6; 10-05-16 at 07:59 AM.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 07:35 AM
  #711  
Senior Member
 
sh00k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 947

Bikes: 2011 Trek FX 7.3 | 2015 Trek FX 7.4 | Lotus Classique

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 171 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
just checking back in from my post above 2 weeks ago. i've put maybe 100 miles on my 25c tires now. i went from the stock 32c to 25c - the narrowest tire that will fit on this rim.

all i have to say is that i wish the bike came like this! peddling now is so much easier and when i really stomp on the pedals, the bike goes and i dont feel like im about to blow out one (or both) of my knees

my avg mpg is a steady 14mph now, up from 12mph. i dont think the speed is the biggest benefit from the thinner tires. for people trying to lose weight, the weight is bad enough for your knees but so are the stock 32c that came with the bike. i had maybe 300 miles on the 32c tires before swapping them and i literally feel like it's a night and day difference. it rides like a different bike and reminds me of the ride i had on my old 7.7 fx (although not as light )

i did a 13 mile ride yesterday and did not stop for a minute. i would peddle hard on downhills and flats and, towards the end of my ride, my knees still felt 100% fine. on the old tires, they would definitely start feeling sore.

downside: the bike is definitely more twitchy now. sometimes when i sit up while riding, and gently hold the right or left grips with a couple fingers, i will hit a road imperfection and the bike turns in some random direction. this is not so serious but this is the same feeling i get on my road bike. also, i have hit some potholes (not many on my path, easily avoidable) and i definitely think i should be avoiding them more lol unlike when i had on the 32c tires. i ride the same loop over and over for cardio so i know the roads very well so this is not a big deal to avoid the few spots.

the bike definitely 'lurches' forward now when you peddle hard after a stop. i am so happy i spent the $ to swap out the tires and cant wait to put more miles on it!

Last edited by sh00k; 09-28-16 at 08:03 AM.
sh00k is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 09:11 AM
  #712  
Senior Member
 
gemini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 109

Bikes: Trek Allant 7.2, Trek Soho S

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sh00k
peddle
(Off-topic, but see pedal (verb) versus peddle. Pedal gets misspelled so much in this context, though, that I guess they might as well combine the entries in the dictionary.)
gemini is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 12:43 PM
  #713  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
re: sizing I'm 5' 11 3/4" & wear a 32"-34" length pants
rode my son's 17.5" Trek FX this weekend and it felt small
according to Trek's chart
Sizing Charts | Trek Bikes
I should be looking for a 20" Trek FX
any chance a 22.5 would work as well?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 01:17 PM
  #714  
Senior Member
 
gemini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Turku, Finland
Posts: 109

Bikes: Trek Allant 7.2, Trek Soho S

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
re: sizing I'm 5' 11 3/4" & wear a 32"-34" length pants
rode my son's 17.5" Trek FX this weekend and it felt small
according to Trek's chart
Sizing Charts | Trek Bikes
I should be looking for a 20" Trek FX
any chance a 22.5 would work as well?
Can you get to a shop to try one out? I'm 6'1'' (1.85 m) and I have the 22.5-inch frame, and it's a very good fit for me. I have long arms, though (borderline orangutan).
gemini is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 01:29 PM
  #715  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
Originally Posted by gemini
Can you get to a shop to try one out? I'm 6'1'' (1.85 m) and I have the 22.5-inch frame, and it's a very good fit for me. I have long arms, though (borderline orangutan)
good reference point thank you.

I can sit on a bike in a store (or take a quick spin around the block) but that's not the same as spending a cpl hrs on one
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-28-16, 09:45 PM
  #716  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
re: sizing I'm 5' 11 3/4" & wear a 32"-34" length pants
rode my son's 17.5" Trek FX this weekend and it felt small
according to Trek's chart
Sizing Charts | Trek Bikes
I should be looking for a 20" Trek FX
any chance a 22.5 would work as well?

Check this thread out, you sound about my size:

https://www.bikeforums.net/hybrid-bic...-fx-7-4-a.html
RedRockRider is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 06:54 AM
  #717  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
Originally Posted by RedRockRider
Check this thread out, you sound about my size:https://www.bikeforums.net/hybrid-bic...-fx-7-4-a.html
we do indeed sound similarly sized. thanks for that perspective & I saw you wrote: "The bike was fine until I started riding more than 20 or 30 miles, and actually figured out proper seat placement/height. This left the overall fit very aggressive with a drop to the bars - not what I wanted on a hybrid. I now ride a 22.5 FX 7.9"

may I ask how old are you? is this your main bike? at those miles do you ride mostly roads?

I'm looking at some 20"s & there's a decent 22.5" not too far from me with what looks like slightly raised bars, so it's good to know not to rule it out. I'm almost 60 and now like a more relaxed fit. I have rd bikes (w raised bars) for racking up mileage. I'm looking at the FX for leisurely tooling w Wifey in the 15 mile range, family vacation rides w/ adult kids & solo rides on hard packed smooth flat trails. I'll be putting wider tires on it, thinking maybe 32s & maybe seasonal fenders.

one thing is for sure, the 17.5" is too small for me
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 07:18 AM
  #718  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
anyone look at a Giant Escape when shopping? or a Fuji Absolute?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 10:12 AM
  #719  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
we do indeed sound similarly sized. thanks for that perspective & I saw you wrote: "The bike was fine until I started riding more than 20 or 30 miles, and actually figured out proper seat placement/height. This left the overall fit very aggressive with a drop to the bars - not what I wanted on a hybrid. I now ride a 22.5 FX 7.9"

may I ask how old are you? is this your main bike? at those miles do you ride mostly roads?

I'm looking at some 20"s & there's a decent 22.5" not too far from me with what looks like slightly raised bars, so it's good to know not to rule it out. I'm almost 60 and now like a more relaxed fit. I have rd bikes (w raised bars) for racking up mileage. I'm looking at the FX for leisurely tooling w Wifey in the 15 mile range, family vacation rides w/ adult kids & solo rides on hard packed smooth flat trails. I'll be putting wider tires on it, thinking maybe 32s & maybe seasonal fenders.

one thing is for sure, the 17.5" is too small for me
I'm 49, mostly ride between 10 and 25 miles at a time, averaging usually 13 mph, fairly hilly where I live. Always ride on roads, and on paved bike paths.

I have several "main bikes" lol. Have mostly gotten away from anything with an aggressive geometry, as I value comfort over aerodynamics or efficiency (heck I'm riding to burn calories anyways, and to have fun!).

Based on your posts, I'm thinking you also will enjoy riding the 22.5 FX more than the 20. Just be sure to make sure you don't find the stand over height to be off-putting. You can make either size fit by changing stem length and angle, also. One of the nice things about the FX series is the mini-V brakes allow much wider tires than those using cantilever brakes - I've got a set of 35c Schwalbe Kojak's on mine. Very comfortable, and love the look too!
RedRockRider is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 11:22 AM
  #720  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
Originally Posted by RedRockRider
I have several "main bikes" // you will enjoy riding the 22.5 FX more than the 20 // stand over height // mini-V brakes allow much wider tires
n+1 eh? been there, sold 5 bikes last spring I think it was & thank you! I bought Wifey & 2 adult kids all Trek FX(s) & I like everything about them cuz I'm the one maintaining & adjusting them. standover height has always been a deal breaker tho and 1" or 2" has been my rule of thumb over the years. when you are flat footed do you touch?

according to this standover chart
https://www.cyclescience.com.au/artic...ndover-heights
the 20" has a standover of 30.315"

aside from trek sizing chart, these ppl also suggest a 20" for me
https://www.winecountrybikes.com/bike...s/bike-sizing/

Last edited by rumrunn6; 09-29-16 at 11:36 AM.
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 01:09 PM
  #721  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
^^^the top bar is sloped, so if I am close to the front I touch, in the middle and back by the saddle no touch, or just my clothes.

I honestly don't find alot of occasions where I will be standing over my bike, though. I usually keep my right foot clipped in when coming to a stop, and just put my left foot down.

We are both exactly right in the middle of the "range" for both sizes, so it really is a personal preference thing. Because I had the 20" and put a couple of thousand miles on it, I know that I prefer the 22.5. YMMV.
RedRockRider is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 01:18 PM
  #722  
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,593

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5234 Post(s)
Liked 3,609 Times in 2,357 Posts
Originally Posted by RedRockRider
^^^the top bar is sloped, so if I am close to the front I touch, in the middle and back by the saddle no touch, or just my clothes.

I honestly don't find alot of occasions where I will be standing over my bike, though. I usually keep my right foot clipped in when coming to a stop, and just put my left foot down.

We are both exactly right in the middle of the "range" for both sizes, so it really is a personal preference thing. Because I had the 20" and put a couple of thousand miles on it, I know that I prefer the 22.5. YMMV.
ok, perfect, thank you very much. I have to take each for a spin then
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 09-29-16, 09:46 PM
  #723  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,223

Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 583 Post(s)
Liked 1,030 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by Greggster
How difficult would it be to switch the FX brakes to cantilever? I think v-brakes on FX's look ugly.
Not too difficult. You will need to swap the levers to short pull, add cable hangers to the front and rear, and of course cantilevers. For the rear, there are seat post clamp models, and for the front I'd go with a fork mounted model instead of a steerer tube model. Or go with Tektro power hangers: https://www.sjscycles.co.uk/brakes/t...rakes/?geoc=US

+1 on the opinion that cantis look better than V's in general.
DorkDisk is offline  
Old 10-03-16, 05:08 AM
  #724  
Senior Member
 
sail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: iOWA
Posts: 388

Bikes: Yep

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 50 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Greggster
How difficult would it be to switch the FX brakes to cantilever? I think v-brakes on FX's look ugly.
+2 on the cheesy v brakes on my FX. I'm looking at adding Tektro 720's but haven't settled on what 3 by 9 shifters to use, brake levers are easier. If you make the change let us know.
sail is offline  
Old 10-05-16, 07:34 AM
  #725  
Old guy on a Bike
 
LouB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 495

Bikes: Trek 7.4, Gitane Super Corsa '71, Raleigh Lenton Grand Prix, Charrel '78, Tommasini Diamante, Trek Verve+

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 162 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 7 Posts
Loven my 7.4! I've had it for about 6 months and ride it pretty much daily. Glad I spent the $$. Dialed in so she "fits like a glove." One of the best investments I've made (in myself.)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
TREX & C10.jpg (99.2 KB, 240 views)
LouB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.