Show us your half-step gearing!
#126
Banned.
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: DFW TX
Posts: 51
Bikes: Jamis Dakar XC bike 26", GMC walmart 10speed with touring stem and Power Grips, various low-buck treking and fishing bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
low-normal rear derailleur?
Thank you for the information, Ruffinit!
I understand the concept now, and I like it. My first couple of road bicycles had very high 2x cranksets (53/42 example) with road racing clusters. I liked the close ratios, but they were terrible for anything but racing, since there was no way to just chug up hills or carry packages.
Duplicate gears don't really annoy me too much. I usually drive my bicycles in whatever chainring they are in, plus the cog I want, though I do shift strategically for hills or mountain bike obstacles.
Re DOWN TUBE SHIFTERS. Those things are awesome for townie bikes and ultralight set ups, but I tired of them long ago when I started mountain biking. I have since customized mountain bike "pods" for the drops on my road bike, like this. I like the XT style ones better though, they have a thumb trigger and a index finger trigger, instead of 2 thumb buttons.
Have you guys ever tried Low-Normal rear derailleurs? If you can find a Shimano XT Low-Normal 8 or 9 speed rear derailleur, it should work with 5,6,7,8,9 speeds using compatible shifter and cogs! It will go toward the "granniest" cassette/freewheel gear when you shift. They take a while to get used to, but are very nice, as they shift automatically, as soon as the optimal ramped surface meets the chain.
I understand the concept now, and I like it. My first couple of road bicycles had very high 2x cranksets (53/42 example) with road racing clusters. I liked the close ratios, but they were terrible for anything but racing, since there was no way to just chug up hills or carry packages.
Duplicate gears don't really annoy me too much. I usually drive my bicycles in whatever chainring they are in, plus the cog I want, though I do shift strategically for hills or mountain bike obstacles.
Re DOWN TUBE SHIFTERS. Those things are awesome for townie bikes and ultralight set ups, but I tired of them long ago when I started mountain biking. I have since customized mountain bike "pods" for the drops on my road bike, like this. I like the XT style ones better though, they have a thumb trigger and a index finger trigger, instead of 2 thumb buttons.
Have you guys ever tried Low-Normal rear derailleurs? If you can find a Shimano XT Low-Normal 8 or 9 speed rear derailleur, it should work with 5,6,7,8,9 speeds using compatible shifter and cogs! It will go toward the "granniest" cassette/freewheel gear when you shift. They take a while to get used to, but are very nice, as they shift automatically, as soon as the optimal ramped surface meets the chain.
Half step is basically like having a high/low for each of your cogs on your freewheel. The number of teeth between each of the freewheel cogs is determined by your chainrings and given the total package you would have (on a 6 speed freewheel) 12 distinct non-duplicated gears which are evenly spaced. This gives you not just efficiency in your geartrain but a very smooth transition between gears. The "+Granny" or "+Alpine" equates to your third chainring which is small enought to give you a whole separate set of gears below the normal 12 (in this case). When completed you have 18 distinct gears.
Last edited by happycheapskate; 11-02-10 at 06:46 AM.
#127
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
I found this forum looking for stuff related to "corncob cassettes" to go along with a discussion about the new Sram group (definitely not a cob.)
It has 2 front rings and a big-gap but even 11-32 10x cluster.
I like the classic stuff on here a lot. It was a real treat to see the Sturmey/Shimano custom bike. My first road bike had 52/42 and 12-25 6x. I hated it till I put a 39t on the front.
After that I've been a fan of closely geared triple cranks and 11-26 rear.
So is the aim of the half-step style group to avoid duplicate ratios, or to facilitate small changes to a driving ratio for slight grades? (a shift down and up with the front once on a light grade, instead of clicking a bunch of rear gears)
It has 2 front rings and a big-gap but even 11-32 10x cluster.
I like the classic stuff on here a lot. It was a real treat to see the Sturmey/Shimano custom bike. My first road bike had 52/42 and 12-25 6x. I hated it till I put a 39t on the front.
After that I've been a fan of closely geared triple cranks and 11-26 rear.
So is the aim of the half-step style group to avoid duplicate ratios, or to facilitate small changes to a driving ratio for slight grades? (a shift down and up with the front once on a light grade, instead of clicking a bunch of rear gears)
I have a 46 & 38 130 bcd Sram Cyclocross crank. If I was to install a 43 as the small chainring, I could have very good half-step gearing across a broad range. I think TA makes a 43 chainring that accepts a 10 speed chain.
It would be helpfull in windy conditions to stay on cadence. 15% jumps in cadence with a 11-32 Ten speed cassette can be annoying, the half step provides a 7% change in cadence, much better.
Michael
Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-21-11 at 06:42 PM.
#128
"Chooch"
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Prairieville, Louisiana
Posts: 1,659
Bikes: Late 1990s Ciocc Titan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Frank Berto's great articles in Bicycling magazine became my gearing "bible". I frequently referred to his "Build Your Own Super Tourer" and "All About Twelve Speeds" articles, the later becoming the basis for my current "crossover" (no double-shift) gearing on my Ciocc.
#129
Senior Member
I have a 1984 Univega Gran Turismo which I thought had half step gearing, but after reading this thread and putting the numbers through Sheldon Brown Gear Calculator, I discovered that really isn't the case at all:
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
#130
Have bike, will travel
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Lake Geneva, WI
Posts: 12,284
Bikes: Ridley Helium SLX, Canyon Endurance SL, De Rosa Professional, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Schwinn Paramount (1 painted, 1 chrome), Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Raleigh Roker, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 910 Post(s)
Liked 288 Times
in
158 Posts
I have a 1984 Univega Gran Turismo which I thought had half step gearing, but after reading this thread and putting the numbers through Sheldon Brown Gear Calculator, I discovered that really isn't the case at all:
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-18-11 at 05:11 AM.
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
28/24=1.17
24/21=1.14
21/18=1.17
18/16=1.13
16/14=1.14
That's fairly consistent with an average difference of 1.15. The rings should be half that difference, 1.075. Keeping the 46 you'd want a 49.45 (46x1.075). Rounding to the nearest integer gives you a 49, though a 50 is pretty close.
24/21=1.14
21/18=1.17
18/16=1.13
16/14=1.14
That's fairly consistent with an average difference of 1.15. The rings should be half that difference, 1.075. Keeping the 46 you'd want a 49.45 (46x1.075). Rounding to the nearest integer gives you a 49, though a 50 is pretty close.
#132
Senior Moment
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It seems to me that your riding preference is to ride on a middle chainring as much as possible, and shift down when you get on a steeper grade, and maybe shift up on a big downhill. Half step plus granny gearing isn't suited for that gearing/riding preference. With half step plus granny gearing you would be shifting up and down on the middle and large chainrings in combo with the freewheel, in order to use the right gear for your regular riding (plus shift down to the small chainring for steeper hills). Your riding preference can be effected with double chainrings of 28-48. Maybe you don't "need" a triple and would prefer to save some weight and simplify? If you change your triple to half step plus granny gear, you "should" be front shifting a lot to utilize your gears, but if your preference is to leave it on one front chainring as much as possible, then maybe you don't want a triple?
#133
likes to ride an old bike
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Madison
Posts: 669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've been planning out a half-step plus granny for the Atala (I know, I know, that's so wrong for an Italian bike). Shimano makes a 11-30 8-speed cassette with nearly perfect 15% spacing.
With something like a 24/42/45 triple, that goes down to 22 gear inches with perfect 7% spacing from 38 to 110 gear inches. With brifters I don't think the extra shifting will be a problem at all. Can't wait to get it built up.
With something like a 24/42/45 triple, that goes down to 22 gear inches with perfect 7% spacing from 38 to 110 gear inches. With brifters I don't think the extra shifting will be a problem at all. Can't wait to get it built up.
#134
Senior Member
It seems to me that your riding preference is to ride on a middle chainring as much as possible, and shift down when you get on a steeper grade, and maybe shift up on a big downhill. Half step plus granny gearing isn't suited for that gearing/riding preference. With half step plus granny gearing you would be shifting up and down on the middle and large chainrings in combo with the freewheel, in order to use the right gear for your regular riding (plus shift down to the small chainring for steeper hills). Your riding preference can be effected with double chainrings of 28-48. Maybe you don't "need" a triple and would prefer to save some weight and simplify? If you change your triple to half step plus granny gear, you "should" be front shifting a lot to utilize your gears, but if your preference is to leave it on one front chainring as much as possible, then maybe you don't want a triple?
-Eric
#135
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
I just swapped the wheels on my touring bike to a more original set of Sansin high flange hubs and Araya rims and am using a 7 speed mega range with a 28/36/48 up front.
I had a half step ready to go but when I ran the numbers I saw that I have a 19/21 speed bike with one gear overlapping 3 times and in two places it is a gearing I would never select, and the mega ranges offers a tighter 6 speed with 2 step changes from 14-24 and that 34 tooth bailout.
Will play with this for a while as it looks ideal... will probably spend most of my time cruising with the 48 and the 14/16/18, can climb most things with the 36 and have full range across the block whileI will reserve the 28 for extreme climbs and could make that smaller without creating any more serious overlap.
If I find I am spinning out my 85 gear inches I will swap in a 50 tooth ring and still won't have any grievous overlap.
I had a half step ready to go but when I ran the numbers I saw that I have a 19/21 speed bike with one gear overlapping 3 times and in two places it is a gearing I would never select, and the mega ranges offers a tighter 6 speed with 2 step changes from 14-24 and that 34 tooth bailout.
Will play with this for a while as it looks ideal... will probably spend most of my time cruising with the 48 and the 14/16/18, can climb most things with the 36 and have full range across the block whileI will reserve the 28 for extreme climbs and could make that smaller without creating any more serious overlap.
If I find I am spinning out my 85 gear inches I will swap in a 50 tooth ring and still won't have any grievous overlap.
#136
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
I have a 1984 Univega Gran Turismo which I thought had half step gearing, but after reading this thread and putting the numbers through Sheldon Brown Gear Calculator, I discovered that really isn't the case at all:
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
I had tried using it as a half step but it didn't feel like the steps were anywhere near equal, and now I see that's because they aren't! Does anyone have any recommendations on the best course to make this gearing more usable, either half step or not. I tend to stay on the middle chain ring, occasionally use the smaller chain ring, and pretty much never use the larger one, so I've even considered replacing the outer one with a chain guard :-P I'd rather not do that though.
-Eric
It is an easy upgrade to move from 6 to 7 and I am a big fan of these m-range freewheels and cassettes.
#137
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,809
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 585 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 575 Times
in
340 Posts
'58 Lenton Grand Prix with Cyclo Benelux derailleurs.
46-49 chain rings shifted with the lever operated derailleur.
original 14-16-18-20 freewheel has been replaced with a 14-28 freewheel for various reasons. The Benelux derailleur won't shift to the smallest cog, which is no surprise and, really, no great loss.
46-49 chain rings shifted with the lever operated derailleur.
original 14-16-18-20 freewheel has been replaced with a 14-28 freewheel for various reasons. The Benelux derailleur won't shift to the smallest cog, which is no surprise and, really, no great loss.
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Well, here's my shot at this game. It's a Williams/Raleigh 46/49 crank with a 36 32 28 24 21 18 16 14 12 cassette. The ratios aren't as close as I'd like but they're not bad. I've also got a 34 30 26 23 20 17 15 13 11 cassette and I think I can do a little better if I mix and match cogs but I need to think that over some more.
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 2,470
Bikes: -1973 Motobecane Mirage -197? Velosolex L'Etoile -'71 Raleigh Super Course
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
that crank is Beeeeeeyooooootiful! Why doesn't Shimano make next year's Ultegra look like that? Why? WHYYYY?!?!?!
<<Here's what I got: 46/50 with 30/24/21/19/17/15/13 for 14 unduplicated gears. Strongly considering ditching the Mighty Tour crankset for something I can set up with a bailout ring, no matter how pretty the Sugino is.
And it will never be as pretty as the Williams, no; not if it were ever so.
<<Here's what I got: 46/50 with 30/24/21/19/17/15/13 for 14 unduplicated gears. Strongly considering ditching the Mighty Tour crankset for something I can set up with a bailout ring, no matter how pretty the Sugino is.
And it will never be as pretty as the Williams, no; not if it were ever so.
#140
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 28,007
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2978 Post(s)
Liked 3,091 Times
in
1,575 Posts
I am sure this has been explained in the previous pages but I have a few questions. I am seriously considering building a bike with a realish 1/2 step gearing. on most of normal road bikes I run a 42/52-3 and a cassette/FW something like 12-21/23ish. I normally use the 42 most of the time.
would a 42/48 ctrank and 12-25 be acceptable or should I use something like a 48/52 and a 13-30 cassette? i doubt I will really get to use this bike as an actual long distance/Randonneurer bike but I want to atleast try and build a true half step.
and one of the great things about bikes is I can easily change back to a normal 42/52 bike
would a 42/48 ctrank and 12-25 be acceptable or should I use something like a 48/52 and a 13-30 cassette? i doubt I will really get to use this bike as an actual long distance/Randonneurer bike but I want to atleast try and build a true half step.
and one of the great things about bikes is I can easily change back to a normal 42/52 bike
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Try the online gear calculator. Punch in both gear combo options and then punch in your current set up and see how the new sets compare to the gears you use most on your current set.
https://sheldonbrown.com/gears/
How many cogs are on your freewheel? 42/48 seems like a big jump but if the numbers are good then they are good.
https://sheldonbrown.com/gears/
How many cogs are on your freewheel? 42/48 seems like a big jump but if the numbers are good then they are good.
#142
Bianchi Goddess
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Shady Pines Retirement Fort Wayne, In
Posts: 28,007
Bikes: Too many to list here check my signature.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2978 Post(s)
Liked 3,091 Times
in
1,575 Posts
I am going to use a a 7spd. 42/48 is only 6teeth is a half step much closer? 45/48 maybe?
I'll try the calculator. the bike is currently a blank slate, so this is still in the hypothetical arena
I'll try the calculator. the bike is currently a blank slate, so this is still in the hypothetical arena
__________________
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
“One morning you wake up, the girl is gone, the bikes are gone, all that's left behind is a pair of old tires and a tube of tubular glue, all squeezed out"
Sugar "Kane" Kowalczyk
#143
Bicycle Repair Man !!!
Well, here's my shot at this game. It's a Williams/Raleigh 46/49 crank with a 36 32 28 24 21 18 16 14 12 cassette. The ratios aren't as close as I'd like but they're not bad. I've also got a 34 30 26 23 20 17 15 13 11 cassette and I think I can do a little better if I mix and match cogs but I need to think that over some more.
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
I should send you a Shimano 14-34 5 speed so that you can fully appreciate what half step gearing is supposed to accomplish
Half step gearing works best with wide range 4-6 speed freewheels and is almost redundant with wide range 8-9 speed cassettes and impractical with a close range 8-9 speed as the gearing steps in the rear are already so very close.
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Your chain is far too short...
Yeah. I've got the extra links. It's just that these 9 speed pins aren't reusable and this chain is really supposed to be on this other bike I've got.
I should send you a Shimano 14-34 5 speed so that you can fully appreciate what half step gearing is supposed to accomplish
I've got one of those on my Trek now. The thing came stock with a 45/50 and this 6 speed freewheel that had nothing to do with half stepping. I don't know why Trek bothered with that thing. The rest of the bike seems so well thought out. I haven't had a chance to try it out since the weather cleared but this afternoon I'll be on it for a while.
Half step gearing works best with wide range 4-6 speed freewheels and is almost redundant with wide range 8-9 speed cassettes and impractical with a close range 8-9 speed as the gearing steps in the rear are already so very close.
Turns out the steps on this cassette are about the same as for a 14-24 5 speed which is what the crankset was designed for. So I can stay in the middle gears and it's the same but I can keep downshifting when I get to a hill.
Yeah. I've got the extra links. It's just that these 9 speed pins aren't reusable and this chain is really supposed to be on this other bike I've got.
I should send you a Shimano 14-34 5 speed so that you can fully appreciate what half step gearing is supposed to accomplish
I've got one of those on my Trek now. The thing came stock with a 45/50 and this 6 speed freewheel that had nothing to do with half stepping. I don't know why Trek bothered with that thing. The rest of the bike seems so well thought out. I haven't had a chance to try it out since the weather cleared but this afternoon I'll be on it for a while.
Half step gearing works best with wide range 4-6 speed freewheels and is almost redundant with wide range 8-9 speed cassettes and impractical with a close range 8-9 speed as the gearing steps in the rear are already so very close.
Turns out the steps on this cassette are about the same as for a 14-24 5 speed which is what the crankset was designed for. So I can stay in the middle gears and it's the same but I can keep downshifting when I get to a hill.
#148
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,856
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 154 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3620 Post(s)
Liked 3,460 Times
in
1,964 Posts
Well, here's my shot at this game. It's a Williams/Raleigh 46/49 crank with a 36 32 28 24 21 18 16 14 12 cassette. The ratios aren't as close as I'd like but they're not bad. I've also got a 34 30 26 23 20 17 15 13 11 cassette and I think I can do a little better if I mix and match cogs but I need to think that over some more.
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
I did a little more wright up on this thing here;https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...n-a-531-Falcon!
#149
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Oh, like this.
While the steps seem close on the 9 speed, they average a 14.75% difference so they're actually a little wide for the 46/49 with a 6.5% difference.
It does seem a little finicky for the rolling hills around here. I'm always fiddling with the shifters. But I'd be doing the same with the old freewheel, I'd just run out of gears sooner.
While the steps seem close on the 9 speed, they average a 14.75% difference so they're actually a little wide for the 46/49 with a 6.5% difference.
It does seem a little finicky for the rolling hills around here. I'm always fiddling with the shifters. But I'd be doing the same with the old freewheel, I'd just run out of gears sooner.
Last edited by sailorbenjamin; 12-02-11 at 08:42 PM.
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island (an obscure suburb of Connecticut)
Posts: 5,630
Bikes: one of each
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
So, I finally got around to getting My Trek out today. It's an '82 612 (or 614, I forget). This is the freewheel the brochure says it came with from the factory but it doesn't make any sense to me.
I replaced it with this Suntour Perfect that's just about perfect for it;
The 45/50 seems a lot less fussy than the 46/49. I'm still monkeying with it a lot but that might just be cause I'm new to this half step thing. Then again, maybe the terrain around here is just not right for half stepping.
Hey, Sixty Fiver, what are the other gears on that 14-34?
I replaced it with this Suntour Perfect that's just about perfect for it;
The 45/50 seems a lot less fussy than the 46/49. I'm still monkeying with it a lot but that might just be cause I'm new to this half step thing. Then again, maybe the terrain around here is just not right for half stepping.
Hey, Sixty Fiver, what are the other gears on that 14-34?