Why do some dislike Trek bicycles / corporation?
#176
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,625
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7703 Post(s)
Liked 3,615 Times
in
1,906 Posts
Lots of Win here ... glad I found this thread.
Who needs Larrysellerz when we have lance and Locktite?
Who needs Larrysellerz when we have lance and Locktite?
#177
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,588
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18564 Post(s)
Liked 15,991 Times
in
7,511 Posts
#178
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 967
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 612 Post(s)
Liked 891 Times
in
447 Posts
I was watching the old TT up Huez this weekend... the announcers (Paul) was talking about how Indurain taught Lance how to use a high cadence to generate power vs grinding.
According to Lemond - one can't naturally generate that level of power at high cadence. It's one of the methods Lemond uses to identify cheaters.
Lance was introduced to Ferrari by none other than Eddie Merckx.
So, a lil logic will tell you that Lance's was mentored and helped along by the prior 5x champs - who were guiding him into the world of doping.
IMHO - and I'm not really a "Lance fanboy" - rather just being realistic - that the Lance phenom was not of his own doing, but took on a life of its own. It took a village to build that empire.
#179
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,606
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2619 Post(s)
Liked 3,153 Times
in
1,797 Posts
I was watching the old TT up Huez this weekend... the announcers (Paul) was talking about how Indurain taught Lance how to use a high cadence to generate power vs grinding.
According to Lemond - one can't naturally generate that level of power at high cadence. It's one of the methods Lemond uses to identify cheaters.
According to Lemond - one can't naturally generate that level of power at high cadence. It's one of the methods Lemond uses to identify cheaters.
Likes For Trakhak:
Likes For BTinNYC:
#181
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,187
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5066 Post(s)
Liked 8,357 Times
in
3,948 Posts
Despite his tremendous flaws, Armstrong brought a lot of visibility and money into the sport, and the sport is still benefiting from that shift. You want Trek removed from pro cycling? Nonsense. What happened with Lemond, etc. is now a bygone era. You're welcome to ***** and moan about history, but you can't change it. These days, Trek puts a lot into the sport, from top WT teams, all the way down to the grassroots level, in lots of different arenas.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Last edited by Eric F; 01-24-24 at 10:35 AM.
#182
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,716
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1282 Post(s)
Liked 1,382 Times
in
702 Posts
How long was cycling clean before Lance and Trek? How long after? And are you really 100% sure it's clean now?
I was watching the old TT up Huez this weekend... the announcers (Paul) was talking about how Indurain taught Lance how to use a high cadence to generate power vs grinding.
According to Lemond - one can't naturally generate that level of power at high cadence. It's one of the methods Lemond uses to identify cheaters.
Lance was introduced to Ferrari by none other than Eddie Merckx.
So, a lil logic will tell you that Lance's was mentored and helped along by the prior 5x champs - who were guiding him into the world of doping.
IMHO - and I'm not really a "Lance fanboy" - rather just being realistic - that the Lance phenom was not of his own doing, but took on a life of its own. It took a village to build that empire.
I was watching the old TT up Huez this weekend... the announcers (Paul) was talking about how Indurain taught Lance how to use a high cadence to generate power vs grinding.
According to Lemond - one can't naturally generate that level of power at high cadence. It's one of the methods Lemond uses to identify cheaters.
Lance was introduced to Ferrari by none other than Eddie Merckx.
So, a lil logic will tell you that Lance's was mentored and helped along by the prior 5x champs - who were guiding him into the world of doping.
IMHO - and I'm not really a "Lance fanboy" - rather just being realistic - that the Lance phenom was not of his own doing, but took on a life of its own. It took a village to build that empire.
#183
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,625
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7703 Post(s)
Liked 3,615 Times
in
1,906 Posts
The question is not whether Lemond or anyone else doped----most likely Everyone doped Always, by whatever method was popular at the time, because nobody even bothered to check for a long time ....
Lemond was not upset that others were faster, he was upset that he was getting dissed and financially ruined by a person who was not only the figurehead for maximized doping programs, but also a total dick about that and everything else he did.
What happened in "the doping era" was that a carefully calculated, high-tech doping program became the defining factor in cycling success---winning was no longer about riding, but about having the best pharmaceuticals and knowing how to use them better. Lance was the poster boy for US cycling, and also (unbeknownst to some) the poster boy for massive illegal performance enhancement .... and was a loudmouth dickhead about everything he did, ruining the careers of everybody who told the truth or even just disagreed with him.
Trek and everybody else inside pro cycling at the time knew that only cheaters won, and that only the best cheaters won regularly. So blaming Trek for all that is empty.
There is a personal aspect---Lemond surely hated lance because Lance stole his thunder, stole his fame, not by cycling ability but by doping --- and was a dick about it. Everybody forgot Lemond, but Lemond was likely a better rider---if only because he didn't have the huge dope advantage Lance had. Lemond was more on a level playing field, while Armstrong's winning teams won because they had by far the best drugs and the best delivery systems---better riding through science. But once Lance hit the scene Lemond was forgotten, and this probably in part motivated Lemond to make accusations---Valid accusations.
Picking sides is unnecessary ..... There is nothing in any way redeeming about Lance Armstrong or any of his actions. He is simply a bad person. That doesn't make me a Lemond supporter.
here's the deal with history---facts are facts. Distorting, ignoring, deliberately misinterpreting facts in order to support a particular position is the sort of nonsense that is screwing up the world today.
Liking or not liking Trek because of corporate decisions made by the company two decades ago ... whatever.
But hey ... I have also seen people in this thread claiming that everyone who rides Spec has a superior attitude ... so there is nonsense flowing strongly in every direction.
As for myself ... I buy bikes to ride and I ride bikes. I am not particularly interested in which corporation owns which holding company owns which other holding company, etc. if a bike has the features I want at a price point I find acceptable, .... but that is not how threads last a dozen pages or more .....
Lemond was not upset that others were faster, he was upset that he was getting dissed and financially ruined by a person who was not only the figurehead for maximized doping programs, but also a total dick about that and everything else he did.
What happened in "the doping era" was that a carefully calculated, high-tech doping program became the defining factor in cycling success---winning was no longer about riding, but about having the best pharmaceuticals and knowing how to use them better. Lance was the poster boy for US cycling, and also (unbeknownst to some) the poster boy for massive illegal performance enhancement .... and was a loudmouth dickhead about everything he did, ruining the careers of everybody who told the truth or even just disagreed with him.
Trek and everybody else inside pro cycling at the time knew that only cheaters won, and that only the best cheaters won regularly. So blaming Trek for all that is empty.
There is a personal aspect---Lemond surely hated lance because Lance stole his thunder, stole his fame, not by cycling ability but by doping --- and was a dick about it. Everybody forgot Lemond, but Lemond was likely a better rider---if only because he didn't have the huge dope advantage Lance had. Lemond was more on a level playing field, while Armstrong's winning teams won because they had by far the best drugs and the best delivery systems---better riding through science. But once Lance hit the scene Lemond was forgotten, and this probably in part motivated Lemond to make accusations---Valid accusations.
Picking sides is unnecessary ..... There is nothing in any way redeeming about Lance Armstrong or any of his actions. He is simply a bad person. That doesn't make me a Lemond supporter.
here's the deal with history---facts are facts. Distorting, ignoring, deliberately misinterpreting facts in order to support a particular position is the sort of nonsense that is screwing up the world today.
Liking or not liking Trek because of corporate decisions made by the company two decades ago ... whatever.
But hey ... I have also seen people in this thread claiming that everyone who rides Spec has a superior attitude ... so there is nonsense flowing strongly in every direction.
As for myself ... I buy bikes to ride and I ride bikes. I am not particularly interested in which corporation owns which holding company owns which other holding company, etc. if a bike has the features I want at a price point I find acceptable, .... but that is not how threads last a dozen pages or more .....
Likes For Maelochs:
#185
Junior Member
I was not aware that they “kicked out” all the dealers. Sounds like fake news to me but will leave that fight to others.
The fact they offered any discount at all to someone who had a water bottle bolt come loose is amazing. This is on the guy who doesn’t check his bike over once in a while. Rather than turn on Trek coach your friend on basic bike maintenance.
The fact they offered any discount at all to someone who had a water bottle bolt come loose is amazing. This is on the guy who doesn’t check his bike over once in a while. Rather than turn on Trek coach your friend on basic bike maintenance.
Trek opened at different times 2 other small Trek dealers here. Both did not last. (i wonder what kind of territorial clauses are written in old dealer agreements)
We have a new Scheels sporting goods super store which I see stocks Trek and may sell a few.
I am impressed with Trek requiring a bike be set up by a dealer before customer takes it home. We had good luck with Trek. (toured Waterloo plant with kids during Tour de France.. Did not see inside rag and glue assembly area. )
Likes For Camilo:
#187
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,878
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1153 Post(s)
Liked 1,262 Times
in
799 Posts
I choose our bikes according to a simple criterion: not TrekSpecializedGiant. Home to Felt, Jamis, Litespeed, Lynskey, Kona, Sannino,....Oops and a 30 year old Giant.
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,588
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18564 Post(s)
Liked 15,991 Times
in
7,511 Posts
Likes For indyfabz:
#189
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,231
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1450 Post(s)
Liked 2,041 Times
in
1,155 Posts
From my understanding in talking with people in the bike biz, Specialized has a history of being pretty crappy and demanding with their dealers. Trek, however, was really good to their dealers...until they started opening corporate shops in the same towns. There is a LBS in my area who has carried Trek as their primary line for many decades (since at least the '90s, possibly longer). Trek opened a corporate shop in the same city because they feel like there is more business to be squeezed from the area. It was a kick in the teeth to the loyal LBS.
first Specialized - then more recently Trek
Likes For t2p:
#190
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,566
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,534 Posts
For me it has to do with branding. I don't want proprietary parts on my bike. I also don't want parts made by another manufacturer but with in this case a Trek/Bontrager name on it. If the headset on that bike is made by Tange for example, then it needs to have the Tange logo on it or nothing at all. Not a Trek, or a Bontrager logo. I don't want something like a Giro helmet or pair of shoes that's labeled as a Trek/Bontrager. Same for other accessories. If a blinky light is "manufactured for Trek/Bontrager" by Cygolite, even if they come out of the same plant/on the same assembly line, I want Cygolite on that light. It's a bike light. Cygolite makes bike lights, not bicycles. The last thing I want is to be dependent on that/those stores/brands and their lack of choices for my purchasing needs. Don't get me started on Nike.
Last edited by seypat; 02-01-24 at 09:06 AM.
#191
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,276
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3572 Post(s)
Liked 3,752 Times
in
1,874 Posts
For me it has to do with branding. I don't want proprietary parts on my bike. I also don't want parts made by another manufacturer but with in this case a Trek/Bontrager name on it. If the headset on that bike is made by Tange for example, then it needs to have the Tange logo on it or nothing at all. Not a Trek, or a Bontrager logo. I don't want something like a Giro helmet or pair of shoes that's labeled as a Trek/Bontrager. Same for other accessories. If a blinky light is "manufactured for Trek/Bontrager" by Cygolite, even if they come out of the same plant/on the same assembly line, I want Cygolite on that light. It's a bike light. Cygolite makes bike lights, not bicycles. The last thing I want is to be dependent on that/those stores/brands and their lack of choices for my purchasing needs. Don't get me started on Nike.
Derailleur hangers are super proprietary, but there's a company that specializes in making compatible hangers. Problem solved.
If some vendor slaps their logo on a part made by another vendor, what's the problem? Now you have two sources to buy from when you need to replace a part.
#192
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,067
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4018 Post(s)
Liked 7,530 Times
in
3,031 Posts
I also don't want parts made by another manufacturer but with in this case a Trek/Bontrager name on it. If the headset on that bike is made by Tange for example, then it needs to have the Tange logo on it or nothing at all. Not a Trek, or a Bontrager logo. I don't want something like a Giro helmet or pair of shoes that's labeled as a Trek/Bontrager. Same for other accessories. If a blinky light is "manufactured for Trek/Bontrager" by Cygolite, even if they come out of the same plant/on the same assembly line, I want Cygolite on that light. It's a bike light. Cygolite makes bike lights, not bicycles. The last thing I want is to be dependent on that/those stores/brands and their lack of choices for my purchasing needs. Don't get me started on Nike.
Likes For tomato coupe:
#193
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,187
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5066 Post(s)
Liked 8,357 Times
in
3,948 Posts
There was also the Litespeed painted as a Caloi that Armstrong rode to his WC win. Tons of other examples, too.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#194
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: 757
Posts: 11,333
Bikes: Madone, Emonda, 5500, Ritchey Breakaway
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10301 Post(s)
Liked 5,273 Times
in
2,256 Posts
Personally because Trek financially massacred Lemond (and his Legacy) at Arm$trong's request.
It's a long story, but I lived through it. I still cherish my pre-Trek Lemond bike.
F-word every Lance fanboi who called Lemond a crybaby, or claimed Lemond ever doped. Lemond was the ONLY champion (in the history of professional cycling) who advocated for increased doping controls WHILE HE WAS WINNING.
I've seen dozens of Armstrong fanbois in this forum attack Lemond and claim "they're all dopers anyway". Eff them and eff the Treks they rode in on. Cycling was a better sport before Armstrong and Trek, and it will be a better sport once it's cleansed of both.
It's a long story, but I lived through it. I still cherish my pre-Trek Lemond bike.
F-word every Lance fanboi who called Lemond a crybaby, or claimed Lemond ever doped. Lemond was the ONLY champion (in the history of professional cycling) who advocated for increased doping controls WHILE HE WAS WINNING.
I've seen dozens of Armstrong fanbois in this forum attack Lemond and claim "they're all dopers anyway". Eff them and eff the Treks they rode in on. Cycling was a better sport before Armstrong and Trek, and it will be a better sport once it's cleansed of both.
At this point water under the bridge.
#195
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,566
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,534 Posts
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features...-giro-ditalia/
#196
Senior Member
The issue with me is not that I dislike Trek, I just want a decent bike with reasonably higher quality components. I also dislike using a bike with carbon fiber because I tend to ride my bike hard and do not want to keep up with maintaining something like that. Trek's bikes with the level of quality I want come with at least a carbon fork if not the entire frame hence why I went with a different brand.
#197
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Eastern Shore MD
Posts: 967
Bikes: Lemond Zurich/Trek ALR/Giant TCX/Sette CX1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 612 Post(s)
Liked 891 Times
in
447 Posts
For me it has to do with branding. I don't want proprietary parts on my bike. I also don't want parts made by another manufacturer but with in this case a Trek/Bontrager name on it. If the headset on that bike is made by Tange for example, then it needs to have the Tange logo on it or nothing at all. Not a Trek, or a Bontrager logo. I don't want something like a Giro helmet or pair of shoes that's labeled as a Trek/Bontrager. Same for other accessories. If a blinky light is "manufactured for Trek/Bontrager" by Cygolite, even if they come out of the same plant/on the same assembly line, I want Cygolite on that light. It's a bike light. Cygolite makes bike lights, not bicycles. The last thing I want is to be dependent on that/those stores/brands and their lack of choices for my purchasing needs. Don't get me started on Nike.
#198
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,187
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5066 Post(s)
Liked 8,357 Times
in
3,948 Posts
I wouldn't be actively looking for one. As Eric F said tons of examples out there. Those Zunow built IMs that Dave Scott stashed around the country and rode come to mind. Lots of brands with World Champion stripes were rebadged other brands. But, back to those Huffies. Are you sure they were made by Serotta?
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features...-giro-ditalia/
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features...-giro-ditalia/
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#199
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 8,187
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5066 Post(s)
Liked 8,357 Times
in
3,948 Posts
What maintenance do you think you have to do with a CF bike that you don't have to do with one built from other materials?
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,566
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,578 Times
in
1,534 Posts
I had to look those up. Those engines clearly have Mercedes/AMG stamped on them.(They also have some Pagani markings) Like my headset example, there better be a marking of the manufacturer on there somewhere.