Nashbar Fuji Track Pro
06-22-11, 01:50 PM
#326
Your cog is slipping.
Bung.
06-22-11, 02:46 PM
#328
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I have an All City Big Block Track Fork (white, 1+1/8", 30mm rake, drilled for brake). The steerer is cut. But, if you have a small or medium sized frame, it should be fine. I had 11cm of head tube + 1.5cm of stack + the stem when I used the fork. $50 shipped in the continental US.
https://allcitycycles.com/products/co...ck_track_fork/
Here it is:
It's new. I put it on to train on the road, never trained on the road, then took it off.
Last edited by carleton; 06-22-11 at 02:52 PM.
06-22-11, 04:11 PM
#330
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 30
Bikes: 1979 Bianchi Rekord 748, 2009 Fuji Track Pro, 2012 Leader 722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hello all, Tony from St. Louis here. First post. Bought the 61cm for 179 with 9 bucks for shipping, tried Omniums on it yesterday, with no luck. No problems fitting a 52 chainring on the frame, the problem is with the crankarms hitting the chainstays. Looks like I will be buying the FSA carbon cranks, or trying to crimp them by hand, or filing down some crankarms... Cane Creek integrated headset, Reynolds Ouzo Pro carbon fork, Easton stem and bars. Pics to come
06-22-11, 04:17 PM
#332
モㄥ工匕モ 爪モ爪乃モ尺
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LA San Gabriel, California
Posts: 2,135
Bikes: Custom frame
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
post 143: 
or mine with my visp fork, no hs tires or cranks, and uncut sterah un mast:
even though the blades are straight(looks right), the angle and position of the wheel just is funky. 1.5 cm is a noticeable difference of axel placement, like having the axel bolted right to the back of super long track ends. just looks wrong.
or mine with my visp fork, no hs tires or cranks, and uncut sterah un mast:
even though the blades are straight(looks right), the angle and position of the wheel just is funky. 1.5 cm is a noticeable difference of axel placement, like having the axel bolted right to the back of super long track ends. just looks wrong.
06-22-11, 04:19 PM
#333
Your cog is slipping.
Hello all, Tony from St. Louis here. First post. Bought the 61cm for 179 with 9 bucks for shipping, tried Omniums on it yesterday, with no luck. No problems fitting a 52 chainring on the frame, the problem is with the crankarms hitting the chainstays. Looks like I will be buying the FSA carbon cranks, or trying to crimp them by hand, or filing down some crankarms...
06-22-11, 05:53 PM
#335
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 30
Bikes: 1979 Bianchi Rekord 748, 2009 Fuji Track Pro, 2012 Leader 722
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ended up just getting the FSA Carbon Track crankset, and yes you are right, I probably would have ended up ruining the frame
06-22-11, 06:03 PM
#336
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
06-22-11, 06:11 PM
#337
i smell bacon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,574
Bikes: Geekhouse Deerfield, GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, TET Track, Ritchey P-650b, Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The frame with one crimp closer to the BB can clear larger chainrings but may have crank arm clearance issues.
The frame with the crimp close to the BB and over the J in the chainstay Fuji logo should be able to clear large rings and crank arms no problem.
The frame with the bendy seat stay with no or crimp is a newer version of the frame, I believe, and has plenty of clearance for both.
The frame with the crimp close to the BB and over the J in the chainstay Fuji logo should be able to clear large rings and crank arms no problem.
The frame with the bendy seat stay with no or crimp is a newer version of the frame, I believe, and has plenty of clearance for both.
06-22-11, 06:29 PM
#338
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
06-22-11, 07:03 PM
#339
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
fork rake is important with a 74 angle ht.
thanks for the bad advice though.
06-22-11, 07:10 PM
#340
i smell bacon
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,574
Bikes: Geekhouse Deerfield, GT Edge Ti, Spooky Skeletor, TET Track, Ritchey P-650b, Bridgestone MB-3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I will take said fork for free. Co-op could use it for scrap metal money.
06-22-11, 07:21 PM
#341
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
have fun pulling the hi ten steerer out of the aluminum blades.
Seriously. ****. That. Thing.
Seriously. ****. That. Thing.
06-22-11, 10:08 PM
#343
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I got a 58 with the revised stay with the etc sticker on it like the one in post 278. Installed omniums today without issue, mostly. They are 175s and fit fine in terms of drive side. Plenty of room. The non drive side crank is close to the stay, probably fine but might add a 1 or 2 mm spacer. put a oval concepts fork jetstream fork on it I had. 44mm rake, but am doing a pursuit build so should be ok. Thinking about a cervelo t3 pursuit bike down the line. The ftp has the same stack and reach as the 56.
06-22-11, 10:17 PM
#344
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: TX/HI
Posts: 291
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm wondering if the clamp slipping problem is because there is not enough seat tube above the bolts to "hold" its shape against the tension of the clamp. They may have remedied this with which I believe is the newer (and taller) seatclamp design (found on the '10 and '11 FTP). Geez, these things are heavy...
a 54 is pretty much perfect for me.
06-23-11, 08:21 AM
#347
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
inseam is like 31 3/4.
i'm a very proportionate 5' 7 1/2".
the FTP has a very low top tube in order to accomodate lower aero bars and keep the head tube small. we went over this in the first few pages of the thread.
also, YOU ALL SEEM TO GLOSS OVER THE FACT THAT I HAVE YET TO CUT MY SEAT MAST.
it's almost like you think "oh wow cc700 doesn't use cranks or tires!"
i'm a very proportionate 5' 7 1/2".
the FTP has a very low top tube in order to accomodate lower aero bars and keep the head tube small. we went over this in the first few pages of the thread.
also, YOU ALL SEEM TO GLOSS OVER THE FACT THAT I HAVE YET TO CUT MY SEAT MAST.
it's almost like you think "oh wow cc700 doesn't use cranks or tires!"
06-23-11, 08:26 AM
#348
Your cog is slipping.
Sick crankset too, bro.
06-23-11, 08:29 AM
#349
Ths Hipstr Kills Masheenz
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: seattle
Posts: 8,542
Bikes: tirove
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
my cranks are supposed to get here today but I may return them by the end of the week.
maybe next month it will be kinlin/novatec + omnium time.
maybe next month it will be kinlin/novatec + omnium time.
Last edited by cc700; 06-23-11 at 08:33 AM.
06-23-11, 08:39 AM
#350
Your cog is slipping.
Sweeet. I can order lower spoke count hubs if needed. Let me know.