Design for Building Frame
04-17-24, 07:38 PM
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 513
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
89 Posts
Dave Levy has been making custom bikes for a LONG time (35 years?) and will be able to coach you through the design process to fit oddly dimensioned bodies.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/54319503@N05/
https://www.draper-cycles.com
05-17-24, 08:58 AM
#27
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2024
Location: San Diego
Posts: 335
Bikes: Paramount Track Bike, Colnago Super, Santana Tandems (1995 & 2007), Gary Fisher Piranha, Trek Wahoo, Bianchi Track Bike, a couple of Honda mountain bikes
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 156 Post(s)
Liked 83 Times
in
60 Posts
I also use BikeCad. I will again suggest that the design method the OP starts playing with might be best if it is the same as what the class/instructor will use. less translation or getting up to speed when taking the class.
As to books- I can't say there's even one or two that offer a thorough and overall view of geometry for a wide range of bike types and intended use, or at least among those I've looked at. Here's a few that I have used in the past: The Paterek Manual, Touring Bikes (Tony Oliver), Bicycle Design (Hadland and Lessing), Bicycle Science (Wilson) and the CONI manual. There are others but these are what I have on my shelf. Most don't go into much depth about steering geometry however Bicycling Science is, perhaps, the most in depth here and has Jim Papadopoulos contributing (for those who don't know of Jim P he's, perhaps, the most knowledgeable person about the relationships between angles, diameters, and rakes/trail alive today. Do know that predicting the actual handling manor of a bike is hard to do for at least one reason, the rider's body and brain vary from rider to rider and even day to day. Andy
An interesting read but of little real world value is the Scientific American article on the unrideable bike. Andy
As to books- I can't say there's even one or two that offer a thorough and overall view of geometry for a wide range of bike types and intended use, or at least among those I've looked at. Here's a few that I have used in the past: The Paterek Manual, Touring Bikes (Tony Oliver), Bicycle Design (Hadland and Lessing), Bicycle Science (Wilson) and the CONI manual. There are others but these are what I have on my shelf. Most don't go into much depth about steering geometry however Bicycling Science is, perhaps, the most in depth here and has Jim Papadopoulos contributing (for those who don't know of Jim P he's, perhaps, the most knowledgeable person about the relationships between angles, diameters, and rakes/trail alive today. Do know that predicting the actual handling manor of a bike is hard to do for at least one reason, the rider's body and brain vary from rider to rider and even day to day. Andy
An interesting read but of little real world value is the Scientific American article on the unrideable bike. Andy
https://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/bicycle_mechanics/Pap&Olson88biketech.pdf
https://ruina.tam.cornell.edu/research/topics/bicycle_mechanics/papers.html
A bit hard to find as a lot of his work predates the interwebs and there is a lot of clutter from marketing type tech blogs.
__________________
Cheers, Mike
Cheers, Mike
05-17-24, 10:33 AM
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,133
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4230 Post(s)
Liked 3,930 Times
in
2,342 Posts
Being the age I am I still have a lot of paper books and have been drawn to the engineering side of things so I have a few publications with Jim P's writing on my shelf. IIRC it was in the earlier 1980s that I first heard of him (and I was trying to better understand bicycle steering/stability to have a more formulaic approach to steering geometry decisions). I had a subscription to BikeTech too and remember the shift in content and such before it went belly up (as I knew of). It was too bad as the earlier version had some pretty cool articles. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
