Paved bike path a mess I don't ride it
#26
Asleep at the bars
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA and Treasure Island, FL
Posts: 1,743
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 234 Post(s)
Liked 203 Times
in
135 Posts
MUPs are best avoided, unless obviously there is no other option for some stretch like a bridge or along a freeway where there is no other road. Apart from debris and people walking and running, and around here tourists wobbling around on rental bikes, they also have a 15mph speed limit. Road bikes and experienced cyclists just don't belong there.
Likes For sfrider:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
paved bike path a mess I don't ride it
But also as @berner posted elsewhere:
In our twin cities in Illinois we have a bike path that goes through the city and all around. Basically it is for running and cycling although I avoid it cycling because it gets crowded with dog walkers and not nearly as safe and going to the country roads...
So staying on the path is great lots of room but all the crap from the road gets kick onto the trail. It is full of small gravel and bits and pieces of road junk from the main highway. It is so bad that generally if no traffic I will go out onto the highway because I potentially see many opportunities for flats. It is worse than riding on chip seal even after they just were chipping.
It is funny the path they started building about 30 years ago and it been positive and gets a lot of use but for a real roadie it really is to be avoided....
So staying on the path is great lots of room but all the crap from the road gets kick onto the trail. It is full of small gravel and bits and pieces of road junk from the main highway. It is so bad that generally if no traffic I will go out onto the highway because I potentially see many opportunities for flats. It is worse than riding on chip seal even after they just were chipping.
It is funny the path they started building about 30 years ago and it been positive and gets a lot of use but for a real roadie it really is to be avoided....
Yup. That's why road bikes belong on the road.
Hang in there ladies and gentlemen. We are in a transition period where bike infrastructure is not yet properly developed and often gets the short end of the stick. It is getting better bit by bit with more people riding every year.
Our leaders are known to lead from the rear and there are real and conflicting budgetary restraints.
Our leaders are known to lead from the rear and there are real and conflicting budgetary restraints.
Last edited by Jim from Boston; 07-13-19 at 03:42 AM.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
oh yea they are always going to mix. I ride the burke 5 days a week on my commute and its not really ever a problem. I think people just need to properly calibrate their expectations. A gravel bike is nice also to keep the speeds down and being able to pass in the dirt and grass
#29
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4560 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Same. But all MUPs devolve the same way. Been that way since the first MUPs I saw in SoCal in the 1970s. Invariably they're poorly designed with inadequate consultation with actual users -- primarily, too narrow, basically a sidewalk through a park. Like painted lines with cyclist icons, it gives warm fuzzies to cities and lets them brag about being cycling friendly when they bid for deals with major employers and tourist businesses. It's mostly BS.
If you read enough cycling advocacy posts on social media and cussin'/discussin' forums, you'll see a pattern:
IOW, jerks are gonna jerk, no matter where they are and no matter what their mode of locomotion.
I suspect there are more collisions and injuries on MUPs than we realize, but because there's no mandatory liability insurance law the victims just suck up the expenses for equipment damage and injuries, or pass the expenses along to taxpayers by defaulting on ambulance and ER bills they can't pay. And most aren't fatal, although I know of some painful, serious and expensive injuries to friends on MUPs and "bike lanes", caused by other cyclists and irresponsible dog walkers.
If you read enough cycling advocacy posts on social media and cussin'/discussin' forums, you'll see a pattern:
- Cyclists who prefer to ride the road griping about motor vehicle drivers not giving them at least 3 feet of passing clearance;
- Wannabe roadies racing on the MUP, passing within mere inches of other cyclists and pedestrians, the sort of behavior that would provoke screams of outrage if it happened so routinely on public streets;
- Cyclists, joggers and pedestrians complaining about free-range dogs in cities, suburbs and rural areas;
- Passive-aggressive dog walkers with 50-yard retractable non-leash tripwires, basically causing the same hazard.
IOW, jerks are gonna jerk, no matter where they are and no matter what their mode of locomotion.
I suspect there are more collisions and injuries on MUPs than we realize, but because there's no mandatory liability insurance law the victims just suck up the expenses for equipment damage and injuries, or pass the expenses along to taxpayers by defaulting on ambulance and ER bills they can't pay. And most aren't fatal, although I know of some painful, serious and expensive injuries to friends on MUPs and "bike lanes", caused by other cyclists and irresponsible dog walkers.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,684
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2326 Post(s)
Liked 5,000 Times
in
1,781 Posts
Yeah, I won't ride our local path either. Too many hazards for me and for others if I'm riding at speed. I wish I could but I really do have to ride the roads and deal with 55 mph traffic passing me. Unfortunately, no real shoulders either so you just deal with it.
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#31
Senior Member
I wonder if a lot of the people complaining about MUPs are people doing the types of rides that MUPs are not and never were designed for. None of them support all out cycling, nor were they ever intended to in the first place. Some systems are surely better than others and some will support moderate rides better than others, but nobody really trying to go all out should be on an MUP to begin with.
If you're trying to get personal bests, 20+ mph averages, or whatever, MUPs were never the solution. *shrug*
If you're trying to get personal bests, 20+ mph averages, or whatever, MUPs were never the solution. *shrug*
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
And, to be clear, it's really just about relative speed, not effort. The paths are designed for 10-15 mph, hence the speed limits. The more your cruising speed exceeds that, the more it introduces and compounds a number problems. All of the sudden, the paths are a *lot* more crowded, because you're passing people instead of pacing them. When passing, approach/warning times are compressed. Intersections are also more frequent and you start out-pacing your lines of sight at those intersections, which means that you need to slow down much more (relative to slower-moving traffic) to safely navigate them... and then it's more effort to get back up to speed.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18380 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
Despite pedestrians, dogs, skateboards, etc, I find our local bike path system to be convenient. There are some places where it gets busy, but for the most part it isn't bad.
One of the issues that seems to come up is an issue of scale, so a bike path in a metro area of 100K to 200K may not be adequate in a metro area of 1M to 5M, or more, with people density going from pleasant to too much.
Cities that spend millions of dollars on building paths need to be encouraged to maintain them and keep them clean. How much would it cost to have a street sweeper scaled to the size of the path, and sweep once a month or so?
As a cyclist, I do ignore a lot of stuff... I can't stop for everything, but if I do find something really bad on the path, I'll stop and throw it to the side or remove it.
Sometimes I think I should bring a broom with me to sweep my favorite routes. But, those bottles above were just in a bad spot on the trail, so I stopped, parked my bike partly blocking the glass, and picked it up by hand.
One of the issues that seems to come up is an issue of scale, so a bike path in a metro area of 100K to 200K may not be adequate in a metro area of 1M to 5M, or more, with people density going from pleasant to too much.
Cities that spend millions of dollars on building paths need to be encouraged to maintain them and keep them clean. How much would it cost to have a street sweeper scaled to the size of the path, and sweep once a month or so?
As a cyclist, I do ignore a lot of stuff... I can't stop for everything, but if I do find something really bad on the path, I'll stop and throw it to the side or remove it.
Sometimes I think I should bring a broom with me to sweep my favorite routes. But, those bottles above were just in a bad spot on the trail, so I stopped, parked my bike partly blocking the glass, and picked it up by hand.
Likes For CliffordK:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,684
Bikes: Paletti,Pinarello Monviso,Duell Vienna,Giordana XL Super,Lemond Maillot Juane.& custom,PDG Paramount,Fuji Opus III,Davidson Impulse,Pashley Guv'nor,Evans,Fishlips,Y-Foil,Softride, Tetra Pro, CAAD8 Optimo,
Mentioned: 156 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2326 Post(s)
Liked 5,000 Times
in
1,781 Posts
I wonder if a lot of the people complaining about MUPs are people doing the types of rides that MUPs are not and never were designed for. None of them support all out cycling, nor were they ever intended to in the first place. Some systems are surely better than others and some will support moderate rides better than others, but nobody really trying to go all out should be on an MUP to begin with.
If you're trying to get personal bests, 20+ mph averages, or whatever, MUPs were never the solution. *shrug*
If you're trying to get personal bests, 20+ mph averages, or whatever, MUPs were never the solution. *shrug*
__________________
Steel is real...and comfy.
Steel is real...and comfy.
#35
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,002
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6198 Post(s)
Liked 4,814 Times
in
3,321 Posts
However I do agree that in the building of trails with the support of self-appointed bicycle advocacy groups giving a skewed view of the people that will ride them, then I think of all the money that could have made the road itself safer for me. Spending money on a separated bike path to appease those that fear cycling with motorists won't leave any funds to help those of us the paths weren't made for.
I was a little timid when I first start riding the roads around here. But I got over it. Just like I was a little timid the first time I drove a car on the road, but I got over that too.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Inpd
Advocacy & Safety
14
07-26-15 10:55 PM