Broken Frames on Tour
#26
Senior Member
That incident was 28 years ago KC, I don't remember the details. I spray painted the repair black to protect it for the remainder of the trip and the frame still hangs in my basement. I cleaned the paint off for a previous BF photo-op.
I took at least one subsequent trip on it through the Canadian Rockies after the TransAm. On the return, cycling home to NH from Montreal airport, I noticed a paint bubble with a rust crack growing on the top tube. I then retired the frame. The chainstay joint was still sound.
It was a hand built Reynolds 531 frame from Bill Vetter of Greensboro Bend VT with a custom rack, recently repainted by Tom Kellogg at Spectrum Cycles.
Back to statistics ... There were ten of us in that TransAm group. 10% of our frames failed on that trip. Mine!
I took at least one subsequent trip on it through the Canadian Rockies after the TransAm. On the return, cycling home to NH from Montreal airport, I noticed a paint bubble with a rust crack growing on the top tube. I then retired the frame. The chainstay joint was still sound.
It was a hand built Reynolds 531 frame from Bill Vetter of Greensboro Bend VT with a custom rack, recently repainted by Tom Kellogg at Spectrum Cycles.
Back to statistics ... There were ten of us in that TransAm group. 10% of our frames failed on that trip. Mine!
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,223
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3465 Post(s)
Liked 1,470 Times
in
1,147 Posts
I think so. That was four years ago, memory fads a bit on details on bikes owned by others.
He really liked that saddle, said he was going to use it on his cross country ride. I told him that he would regret it. I encouraged him to put his Brooks Pro that he had used for previous multi-month tours in a box so that when he asked his wife to ship it to him, it would be boxed and ready to go. Weeks later when I saw photos of him and his bike starting Northern Tier, his bike had the Brooks Pro on it.
I do not know if he bought it new, used, or what. And I do not recall him having a rain cover on it on the first few days of our five day tour when it was raining. I always put a rain cover on mine, even if it just threatens to rain.
He really liked that saddle, said he was going to use it on his cross country ride. I told him that he would regret it. I encouraged him to put his Brooks Pro that he had used for previous multi-month tours in a box so that when he asked his wife to ship it to him, it would be boxed and ready to go. Weeks later when I saw photos of him and his bike starting Northern Tier, his bike had the Brooks Pro on it.
I do not know if he bought it new, used, or what. And I do not recall him having a rain cover on it on the first few days of our five day tour when it was raining. I always put a rain cover on mine, even if it just threatens to rain.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
i broke a 531 steel frame on tour
could not get it fixed. replaced it
could not get it fixed. replaced it
#30
Senior Member
Does anyone really care if a frame breaks? It is one of many things that could break, but not one of the more likely things to break. You fix it or replace it. Same thing if you get a flat or break a cable. Deal with it and move on.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,875
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 601 Post(s)
Liked 285 Times
in
196 Posts
I understand what you're saying but a flat tire or a broken cable, I can probably fix on the side of a road in 15 minutes or less, but a broken frame (depending on the break) could be a game changer. With that said, I don't, won't and can't worry about everything that can go wrong, hence why most of my touring is on a titanium frame, as I'm definitely not getting that thing welded easily at Billy Bob's Welding shop.
#32
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I understand what you're saying but a flat tire or a broken cable, I can probably fix on the side of a road in 15 minutes or less, but a broken frame (depending on the break) could be a game changer. With that said, I don't, won't and can't worry about everything that can go wrong, hence why most of my touring is on a titanium frame, as I'm definitely not getting that thing welded easily at Billy Bob's Welding shop.
My reply was that if it broke down I't be way less stuck than if I had a newer car. I could hand someone the title. Buy another junker, rent a car, or hop on a bus. With a new car I'd be stuck until it was fixed. He didn't buy it. I closed with, "Well at least I never had to cancel my vacation because of my car" which shut him up but he never bought my theory.
Anyway, there is some similarity in bike touring. There is something to be said for having stuff that you can afford to lose fairly painlessly. A broken frame on a $600 Bikes Direct Windsor Touring, a converted older MTB, or any number of lower priced models would be easier to just junk the frame and replace it or even replace the whole bike. It usually isn't that hard to ship a bike or a bike frame home, but there is something to be said for having stuff that doesn't represent a huge investment and therefore is somewhat more expendable. Despite having a few fairly nice items my entire setup most likely cost less than a ti frame. I know that I feel a little more at ease in general knowing that my entire setup would be pretty painless to the wallet if I had to write a check to replace it all. This is probably more applicable to theft worries though.
There is one big hole in my theory. I tend to get emotionaly attached to some of my gear. My favorite sleeping bag and my 1990 Cannondale Crit bike would both be harder to part with than much more expensive items, but I just have to live with that.
I do lust after more expensive bikes at times and can afford one. I like the idea of a high end carbon gravel bike for touring, but really don't want the burden of worrying about one on tour. The next thing you know I'd be carrying 8 pounds of gear and 8 pounds of locks and chain and not sleeping at night
I do get the attraction to nice bikes though. I just see a plus to lower end stuff as well
Likes For staehpj1:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,921
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2609 Post(s)
Liked 1,946 Times
in
1,221 Posts
I think we are questioning frame lifetime and quality escapes during frame manufacture.
Perhaps we need to consider what kind of "tour" we're discussion? On Tourist's point, that remote place looks like the place you'd be happy to have an extra 3-10 pounds of weight on the bike to handle the stresses without breaking. Many of the "broke a frame" accounts I've read have been people on extended tours over remote roads for months on end. And like mev's and BobG's examples, it's possible the long desired frame life is frequently met or exceeded on that kind of long trip, typically with a heavy load. Perhaps a loaded touring frame has similar lifetime to an unloaded frame that's not designed, built, and used for loaded touring, but that's just speculation. And does a loaded touring bike use up some of its lifetime if used for commuting?
Quality escapes should include those cases where process variability exceeds minimum design thresholds; e.g., ordinary statistical variation in a weld or heat treatment for a dropout will occasionally result in a weld or a dropout that will fail in normal use, and manufacturing quality should be designed and implemented to catch those cases. But, as Capt. Murphy found, it doesn't always work that way. That leaves ordinary consumers and bike tourists to guess how we should plan for, or plan to ignore, the potential for our individual frame to break.
Speaking of statistics, I'm not sure whether I should believe this guy:
Or this guy:
Either way, my gut would need a Costco size bottle of Tums to be as calm as his gut is about the likelihood of a quality escape on a given bike frame on an extended ride.
Perhaps we need to consider what kind of "tour" we're discussion? On Tourist's point, that remote place looks like the place you'd be happy to have an extra 3-10 pounds of weight on the bike to handle the stresses without breaking. Many of the "broke a frame" accounts I've read have been people on extended tours over remote roads for months on end. And like mev's and BobG's examples, it's possible the long desired frame life is frequently met or exceeded on that kind of long trip, typically with a heavy load. Perhaps a loaded touring frame has similar lifetime to an unloaded frame that's not designed, built, and used for loaded touring, but that's just speculation. And does a loaded touring bike use up some of its lifetime if used for commuting?
Quality escapes should include those cases where process variability exceeds minimum design thresholds; e.g., ordinary statistical variation in a weld or heat treatment for a dropout will occasionally result in a weld or a dropout that will fail in normal use, and manufacturing quality should be designed and implemented to catch those cases. But, as Capt. Murphy found, it doesn't always work that way. That leaves ordinary consumers and bike tourists to guess how we should plan for, or plan to ignore, the potential for our individual frame to break.
Speaking of statistics, I'm not sure whether I should believe this guy:
That’s not how probability works. “one in X” where X can be any number is a statement of how common something is. Consider a coin toss. The chance of tossing heads is 1 in 2 chances. Each toss of the coin can be either of 2 results. But that doesn’t mean that you can’t toss heads 3 times in a row. Tossing 50 heads in a row has a far smaller probability but it could still happen.
Quit being so literal. “One in a million” is a conversational method of saying something is rare. I haven’t done any detailed analysis nor have I ever said I did. It’s a wild ass guess, nothing more.
...
Your 1% failure rate is just as mythical as my 0.0001% failure rate, although I think mine is probably closer to the true value. Bicycles can fail but not all bicycles fail.
...
Your 1% failure rate is just as mythical as my 0.0001% failure rate, although I think mine is probably closer to the true value. Bicycles can fail but not all bicycles fail.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,984
Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 855 Post(s)
Liked 150 Times
in
107 Posts
WRT frames, we should probably make a distinction between the (ultimate) probability of failure (which will always be 1) and the hazard rate (the instantaneous probability of failure).
Any frame will break with certainty if ridden for eternity. (somewhat like death, or taxes...) But no one cares about this. What we care about is the hazard rate, i.e. the probability of failure at a point in time. Note that in the toss of a coin example, events are presumed to be independent, meaning that every time you toss the coin, the probability of head = the probability of tail = 0.5. Not so with frames because of material fatigue, such that we expect that the hazard rate increases over time, and this rate depends on very many other circumstances, both associated with the frame itself (material, geometry and such) and the environment (load, type of road, weather, etc.). The problem is that because failures are rare, and because of a self-selection bias, it can be very difficult to come up with answers. [self-selection bias : most tourers planning for a difficult/remote trip will ride on a steel frame rather than, say, carbon or bamboo. If the type of riding has an impact on the hazard rate (which is very likely), we shouldn't be surprised to find more anecdotes of frame failure involving a steel frame.]
Hmmmm... many are probably familiar with the UCI rule stipulating a minimum weight for bikes (6.8kg) used in competition. Interestingly, as technology has improved, several production bikes ridden by Sunday amateurs weigh less than the regulation weight... Touring being are marginal sport, we do not have such guidelines. Yet it would be an interesting development.
Any frame will break with certainty if ridden for eternity. (somewhat like death, or taxes...) But no one cares about this. What we care about is the hazard rate, i.e. the probability of failure at a point in time. Note that in the toss of a coin example, events are presumed to be independent, meaning that every time you toss the coin, the probability of head = the probability of tail = 0.5. Not so with frames because of material fatigue, such that we expect that the hazard rate increases over time, and this rate depends on very many other circumstances, both associated with the frame itself (material, geometry and such) and the environment (load, type of road, weather, etc.). The problem is that because failures are rare, and because of a self-selection bias, it can be very difficult to come up with answers. [self-selection bias : most tourers planning for a difficult/remote trip will ride on a steel frame rather than, say, carbon or bamboo. If the type of riding has an impact on the hazard rate (which is very likely), we shouldn't be surprised to find more anecdotes of frame failure involving a steel frame.]
Hmmmm... many are probably familiar with the UCI rule stipulating a minimum weight for bikes (6.8kg) used in competition. Interestingly, as technology has improved, several production bikes ridden by Sunday amateurs weigh less than the regulation weight... Touring being are marginal sport, we do not have such guidelines. Yet it would be an interesting development.
Likes For gauvins:
#35
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,378
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6225 Post(s)
Liked 4,228 Times
in
2,372 Posts
Perhaps we need to consider what kind of "tour" we're discussion? On Tourist's point, that remote place looks like the place you'd be happy to have an extra 3-10 pounds of weight on the bike to handle the stresses without breaking. Many of the "broke a frame" accounts I've read have been people on extended tours over remote roads for months on end. And like mev's and BobG's examples, it's possible the long desired frame life is frequently met or exceeded on that kind of long trip, typically with a heavy load. Perhaps a loaded touring frame has similar lifetime to an unloaded frame that's not designed, built, and used for loaded touring, but that's just speculation. And does a loaded touring bike use up some of its lifetime if used for commuting?
To be fair, I did have a steel Specialized Rockhopper that replaced the Rock Combo that had 9800 hard off-road miles on it.
I don’t currently have any steel bikes. That’s not because I think they are weak but I do think that they are heavy. Aluminum has served me very well…as have some of my steel bikes. Aluminum is strong enough for my weight, size, and loads I carry on tour. I don’t need the extra weight of steel to avoid any breakage.
Quality escapes should include those cases where process variability exceeds minimum design thresholds; e.g., ordinary statistical variation in a weld or heat treatment for a dropout will occasionally result in a weld or a dropout that will fail in normal use, and manufacturing quality should be designed and implemented to catch those cases. But, as Capt. Murphy found, it doesn't always work that way. That leaves ordinary consumers and bike tourists to guess how we should plan for, or plan to ignore, the potential for our individual frame to break.
Speaking of statistics, I'm not sure whether I should believe this guy:
Or this guy:
Or this guy:
Either way, my gut would need a Costco size bottle of Tums to be as calm as his gut is about the likelihood of a quality escape on a given bike frame on an extended ride.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,921
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2609 Post(s)
Liked 1,946 Times
in
1,221 Posts
You seem to be assuming that there is a defined lifetime for a bicycle frame. What would you estimate is that “lifetime”? I have tracked mileage on my bicycles since 1989. I have yet to see a mileage that defines what a “lifetime” for all bicycles might be. Some individual bikes have had short lifetimes and others have yet to find the failure point.
You keep making mountains out of mole hills. Quality control in our age is far superior to what it was 40 years ago. Frame breakage from frames that have escaped quality control is still a very rare event. Frame breakage in general is a very rare event.
Breaking a frame is a rare event. Your 1% failure rate would mean that between 150,000 and 200,000 bicycles break per year (15 to 20 million bikes are sold each year). There would be far more reports of broken frames on the Bike Forums than there are. My 0.0001% failure rate is only 20 bikes fail per year. Mine estimate is probably too low but I would be very surprised if frame breakage per year topped 1000 across the world per year.
Years riding: 60
Rides per year: 200
Total rides: 12,000
Observed failures: 4
Average failure rate: 1 in 3,000 rides
Since I'm just guessing at those numbers, feel free to update with better numbers.
For comparison, my best estimate is about 1 in 2,500 rides for my personal bikes (I only reported the frame the broke on tour).
I wonder how many bicycles have been ridden more than even 1,000 times?
Likes For pdlamb:
#37
Full Member
I work in a shop that servicesthe hardest working bikes imaginable. They rarely break frames and are but are heavy entry or mid level bikes with atrocious maintenance schedules.. on the flip side I rode a 1983 Trek for 8 years until recently. Broke the frame 3 times and fixed it twice. Why did it break? Well I was asking a lot of it: loaded touring, blue MTB trails, commuting virtually every day, groceries, whatever. So I wasn't so bummed when the head tube developed a crack, would rather have been riding a light bike that whole time and then break it than a heavy bike that kept ticking. But most people wouldn't enjoy or understand that, and they buy appropriately heavy bikes, and the frames don't break.