Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Road Test/Bike Review (1983) CANNONDALE Touring Bike

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Road Test/Bike Review (1983) CANNONDALE Touring Bike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-20, 12:38 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Maryland
Posts: 52

Bikes: '73 Raleigh Competition, Guru Sidero, Soma Groove, Smolenski,

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedofLite
You described my experience with the 1988 SR800 very well. After riding a Fuji S10-S for 10 years, the SR800 felt like a rocket ship from the second I pushed the pedals. However, it also abused me on rough Michigan roads during the latter part of rides exceeding 50 miles. Even though the 1989 catalog indicated cantilever dropouts were used to decrease weight and make it easier to access the quick release, I've long wondered if it was also meant to address the developing harsh ride reputation.
Do you know if the cantilever design introduced in 1989 made a difference in ride or handling quality in the Criterium Series frames even though the chainstay length and wheelbase did not change from 1988?

I've never ridden the touring frame, but the passion of BF members for this bike is infectious and I'm starting to think I'm missing out on something sweet.
Right? There is even one for sale (This one actually looks like the touring version, lover chainstays, LX rear derailleur) https://washingtondc.craigslist.org/...195499743.html. looks a little later than 1983, but with the 27" wheels, it cant be that much later...
Splendidtutiona is offline  
Old 09-18-20, 12:47 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
SpeedofLite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central Florida, USA
Posts: 1,992

Bikes: Litespeed (9); Slingshot (9); Specialized (3); Kestrel (2); Cervelo (1); FELT (1); Trek (2)

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 436 Post(s)
Liked 3,475 Times in 1,000 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
I was told by our Cannondale rep back then that the cantilever dropout design was solely introduced as a workaround to circumvent one aspect of Gary Klein's absurdly broad patent claims.

Those Cannondale touring bikes were amazingly versatile. People would do loaded touring with them, enjoying the absence of the wallowing-down-the-road feel of loaded steel touring frames, and then race them successfully on weekends.
Thanks for the info. I guess I was correct in smelling a different reason for the dropout change, just not the right one.
Oh geez, N +1...here we go again.
__________________
WTB: Slingshot bicycle promotional documents (catalog, pamphlets, etc).
WTB: American Cycling May - Aug, Oct, Dec 1966.
WTB: Bicycle Guide issues 1984 (any); Jun 1987; Jul, Nov/Dec 1992; Apr 1994; 1996 -1998 (any)
WTB: Bike World issue Jun 1974.














SpeedofLite is offline  
Likes For SpeedofLite:
Old 09-23-20, 01:10 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
trailmix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 684

Bikes: 50+/-

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 63 Post(s)
Liked 81 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by SpeedofLite












Very cool, thanks for sharing.
trailmix is offline  
Old 05-22-22, 07:30 PM
  #29  
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hub size for a wheel set for this frame?

I have one of these frames, purchased from a now defunct bike shop in SF years ago. I'd like to rebuild it as a commuter, does anyone know the size hub that would fit the dropouts? I know that b/c it's aluminum, the fit needs to be exact, unlike with an older steel frame, where you can cram a modern sized wheel set in the dropouts. Any info much appreciated. Thanks.
Sman is offline  
Old 05-22-22, 08:21 PM
  #30  
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
 
bikingshearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,658

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1027 Post(s)
Liked 2,531 Times in 1,059 Posts
Originally Posted by Sman
I have one of these frames, purchased from a now defunct bike shop in SF years ago. I'd like to rebuild it as a commuter, does anyone know the size hub that would fit the dropouts? I know that b/c it's aluminum, the fit needs to be exact, unlike with an older steel frame, where you can cram a modern sized wheel set in the dropouts. Any info much appreciated. Thanks.
It looks like a six-speed in the photo (I can't believe they don't say on the text). That means it's probably 126mm. I say "probably" because there were sis-speed freewheels with narrower cogs and spacing to fit in the older 120mm standard. Bit is much mor elikely to be 126mm.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Old 05-22-22, 08:28 PM
  #31  
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,735
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,406 Times in 1,206 Posts
‘83-87 frames were all 126mm. During the ‘88 model year they started to make them 128m to accept either 126 or 130mm hubs. So it’s year-dependent.
But ultimately irrelevant since it’s perfectly OK to manually spread the dropouts with your thumbs to insert a 130 hub into a 126 rear. Done it dozens of times on dozens of Cannondales with nary a problem.
Trust me on this. My personal 88 ST has been ridden over 10,000 miles with a 130 hub in it, as just one example.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is online now  
Likes For rccardr:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.