Give Strava a break
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Likes For WhyFi:
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Posts: 878
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 528 Post(s)
Liked 230 Times
in
161 Posts
I currently use Wahoo Fitness on my Android phone, the power data between that and what Strava displays after I upload are minimal, maybe 2-3W. I think that is acceptable. 40W sounds like a lot, though.
On the thread, if you think 6/month is too much, great, but stop whining like a little *****. Also, makes you (general you) sound hypocritical, if you really don't care for the product, why so upset?
On the thread, if you think 6/month is too much, great, but stop whining like a little *****. Also, makes you (general you) sound hypocritical, if you really don't care for the product, why so upset?
#29
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
I wrote a really witty retort but then I realised you guys aren't paying me for my posts. Too bad for you.
Likes For znomit:
#30
Senior Member
Well I've used Strava the last 4 years or so and recently signed up for the 2 month free trial as a Subscriber. Whether I'll continue to pay for it is another thing but fun to attack starred segments etc for a while.
However, if Strava should fold and cease to be, it wouldn't bother me at all. I'll still ride, log my rides with RWGPS and in fact I'd probably give a wry smile at the thought of all the KOM chasers no longer having a reason to live. There's a couple around here who do 3 mile "rides" just to get a KOM.
However, if Strava should fold and cease to be, it wouldn't bother me at all. I'll still ride, log my rides with RWGPS and in fact I'd probably give a wry smile at the thought of all the KOM chasers no longer having a reason to live. There's a couple around here who do 3 mile "rides" just to get a KOM.
#31
nothing to see here
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Antioch, CA
Posts: 564
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 145 Times
in
78 Posts
I've been a paid user of Strava for the last few years. The $60 annual cost isn't significant enough to make me reconsider paying for their services. I think if they raise their annual fee I would certainly look for alternatives. I like the social aspect, and the leader boards are nice to gauge your own fitness levels but beyond that it is just boring analytics that you can get elsewhere for less.
Quite honestly I feel that most tech companies like this are looking to get bought out by a larger company. Get a large user base and enough revenue to make the company attractive enough to sell at a premium price. Simple business model really.
Quite honestly I feel that most tech companies like this are looking to get bought out by a larger company. Get a large user base and enough revenue to make the company attractive enough to sell at a premium price. Simple business model really.
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 8
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac (2019) & Specialized Roubaix (2018)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most likely your data is including zeroes.
I have less than 10 posts so I can't post the link from the Strava support forum but Strava manipulating bike computer data is a known phenomenon dating back to 2016 (and the thread continues to the present).
Here's an excerpt from the Strava forum:
Weighted Average Power is similar to - but NOT the same as - Garmin's Normalized Power.Both numbers attempt to capture the average effort of a workout by taking into account lactate accumulation and other types of fatigue. Strava uses an algorithm very similar to xPower for computing Weighted Average Power.
There will be differences between the Weighted Average Power and Normalize Power. How much and which direction will depend on the ride. Typically, for shorter rides, Weighted Average Power will be lower than Normalized Power. This is a result of the different types of smoothing used by the algorithms. Both numbers have been used successfully by professional coaches.
As to the question of why Strava can't simply copy values exactly from the Garmin file in regard to average power and normalized power: Well, our engineers have worked hard to process the raw data in the file, clean it up, and use algorithms that are standard across any file created by any compatible Strava device. It's just the way we have always approached activity data. We don't have plans to change or disable these core functions and algorithms in our data processing.
I have less than 10 posts so I can't post the link from the Strava support forum but Strava manipulating bike computer data is a known phenomenon dating back to 2016 (and the thread continues to the present).
Here's an excerpt from the Strava forum:
Weighted Average Power is similar to - but NOT the same as - Garmin's Normalized Power.Both numbers attempt to capture the average effort of a workout by taking into account lactate accumulation and other types of fatigue. Strava uses an algorithm very similar to xPower for computing Weighted Average Power.
There will be differences between the Weighted Average Power and Normalize Power. How much and which direction will depend on the ride. Typically, for shorter rides, Weighted Average Power will be lower than Normalized Power. This is a result of the different types of smoothing used by the algorithms. Both numbers have been used successfully by professional coaches.
As to the question of why Strava can't simply copy values exactly from the Garmin file in regard to average power and normalized power: Well, our engineers have worked hard to process the raw data in the file, clean it up, and use algorithms that are standard across any file created by any compatible Strava device. It's just the way we have always approached activity data. We don't have plans to change or disable these core functions and algorithms in our data processing.
Last edited by g321; 07-03-20 at 08:21 AM.
#33
Full Member
Thread Starter
I was about to delete strava at the end of the Muro di Sormano last year
reinstalled it just to have an odometer
really happy with the odometer function
reinstalled it just to have an odometer
really happy with the odometer function
Last edited by dr_max; 07-03-20 at 07:39 PM.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
I've always left zeros. Your power data isn't complete without them. I was able to sprint from the light because I had to stop for it, and caught my breath waiting for it to turn green. The numbers would be too high without those zeros.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
Even ignoring the pricing issue, Strava on Android became utterly unusable a month ago. Reviews are full of people experiencing the same issue of huge random diversions leading to 40 or 50% inflated mileage but no fix, not even an admission that there's an issue.
Other apps continue to track just fine on the same phone, so it's definitely an app bug introduced in recent updates coincident with the change in pricing.
One star... the, er, middle one, like they've given their long term customers.
Other apps continue to track just fine on the same phone, so it's definitely an app bug introduced in recent updates coincident with the change in pricing.
One star... the, er, middle one, like they've given their long term customers.
#36
Full Member
Thread Starter
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,680
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 980 Post(s)
Liked 776 Times
in
402 Posts
https://strava.app.link/vzFD9AOMN7
so much anger against strava for charging $5 monthly.
why people these days think they should not have to pay for other people’s work but if they don’t pay and have their data used scream scandal?
would people have preferred a British Analytica scandal like Facebook did with private users data?
so much anger against strava for charging $5 monthly.
why people these days think they should not have to pay for other people’s work but if they don’t pay and have their data used scream scandal?
would people have preferred a British Analytica scandal like Facebook did with private users data?
If you like the app, pay up.
If you don’t like the app, don’t pay.
It’s pretty damn simple and it doesn’t make a difference when, how, and why they charge a fee.
Of course people can instead act all incredulous and hurt like they were personally slighted and wonder why a company would want to continue to turn as big a profit as possible instead of trying to cater to their personal whims
#38
Full Member
Thread Starter
I agree.
If you like the app, pay up.
If you don’t like the app, don’t pay.
It’s pretty damn simple and it doesn’t make a difference when, how, and why they charge a fee.
Of course people can instead act all incredulous and hurt like they were personally slighted and wonder why a company would want to continue to turn as big a profit as possible instead of trying to cater to their personal whims
If you like the app, pay up.
If you don’t like the app, don’t pay.
It’s pretty damn simple and it doesn’t make a difference when, how, and why they charge a fee.
Of course people can instead act all incredulous and hurt like they were personally slighted and wonder why a company would want to continue to turn as big a profit as possible instead of trying to cater to their personal whims
#39
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
I'll check back in August to see if you've had any further thoughts.
#40
Full Member
Thread Starter
They couldn't make money with a smaller user base. They have little enough prospect of making money with this larger, more expensive user base that their VC sugar daddies (who know much more about their state than you or I) told them to shape up or ship out. They spent a large chunk of money trying to be a social media company, they spent a large chunk of money trying to attract yogis and dog-walkers, and in the end it seems their plans just won't actually make money.
I'll check back in August to see if you've had any further thoughts.
I'll check back in August to see if you've had any further thoughts.
#41
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times
in
366 Posts
I'd pay money to have the ability to hide my friends indoor pretend rides. Who want to see those in their feed?
Likes For znomit:
Likes For Tacoenthusiast:
#44
bill nyecycles
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 3,328
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 789 Post(s)
Liked 350 Times
in
190 Posts
I've been using the free version of strava to track all my rides for the last 5 years. I didn't have a need for any of the features that came with the paid subscription.
But then last month they made route creation pay-only. I use the route tool all the time to plan new rides for myself and group rides. So, now they forced me to pay for the service. The upside is I also now have access to global heatmaps.
It's a toss up.
I think most people are just tired of getting nickel and dimed for literally everything in life.
But then last month they made route creation pay-only. I use the route tool all the time to plan new rides for myself and group rides. So, now they forced me to pay for the service. The upside is I also now have access to global heatmaps.
It's a toss up.
I think most people are just tired of getting nickel and dimed for literally everything in life.
Likes For the sci guy:
#45
Member
It wasn't just to make it better, it was deliberately to get more users. Classic Internet startup business plan: Step 1) burn a lot of cash by giving something away for free to get lots of users, Step 2) ???, Step 3) Profit!
It's incredible that people defend Strava. The platform has value, but it's not like Strava started with the intention of being run as a charity. They were always trying to figure out how to convert their captive audience into cash. Do you go around shaming Uber users for not paying the full cost of their rides, which Uber's VC money subsidizes to the tune of losing billions every year? Or people who buy Black Friday doorbusters that are cheaper than what it cost stores to stock them?
It's incredible that people defend Strava. The platform has value, but it's not like Strava started with the intention of being run as a charity. They were always trying to figure out how to convert their captive audience into cash. Do you go around shaming Uber users for not paying the full cost of their rides, which Uber's VC money subsidizes to the tune of losing billions every year? Or people who buy Black Friday doorbusters that are cheaper than what it cost stores to stock them?
The Strava experience is very good, and not expensive.
Likes For ridinginjeans:
#46
Junior Member
Most likely your data is including zeroes.
I have less than 10 posts so I can't post the link from the Strava support forum but Strava manipulating bike computer data is a known phenomenon dating back to 2016 (and the thread continues to the present).
Here's an excerpt from the Strava forum:
Weighted Average Power is similar to - but NOT the same as - Garmin's Normalized Power.Both numbers attempt to capture the average effort of a workout by taking into account lactate accumulation and other types of fatigue. Strava uses an algorithm very similar to xPower for computing Weighted Average Power.
There will be differences between the Weighted Average Power and Normalize Power. How much and which direction will depend on the ride. Typically, for shorter rides, Weighted Average Power will be lower than Normalized Power. This is a result of the different types of smoothing used by the algorithms. Both numbers have been used successfully by professional coaches.
As to the question of why Strava can't simply copy values exactly from the Garmin file in regard to average power and normalized power: Well, our engineers have worked hard to process the raw data in the file, clean it up, and use algorithms that are standard across any file created by any compatible Strava device. It's just the way we have always approached activity data. We don't have plans to change or disable these core functions and algorithms in our data processing.
I have less than 10 posts so I can't post the link from the Strava support forum but Strava manipulating bike computer data is a known phenomenon dating back to 2016 (and the thread continues to the present).
Here's an excerpt from the Strava forum:
Weighted Average Power is similar to - but NOT the same as - Garmin's Normalized Power.Both numbers attempt to capture the average effort of a workout by taking into account lactate accumulation and other types of fatigue. Strava uses an algorithm very similar to xPower for computing Weighted Average Power.
There will be differences between the Weighted Average Power and Normalize Power. How much and which direction will depend on the ride. Typically, for shorter rides, Weighted Average Power will be lower than Normalized Power. This is a result of the different types of smoothing used by the algorithms. Both numbers have been used successfully by professional coaches.
As to the question of why Strava can't simply copy values exactly from the Garmin file in regard to average power and normalized power: Well, our engineers have worked hard to process the raw data in the file, clean it up, and use algorithms that are standard across any file created by any compatible Strava device. It's just the way we have always approached activity data. We don't have plans to change or disable these core functions and algorithms in our data processing.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 730 Times
in
438 Posts
What the Strava defense force doesn't want to admit is that a lot of the value in Strava diminishes as people leave the platform. Heat-maps? Segment leaderboards? Social network for athletes? All dependent on lots of usage and lots of their users data, which Strava has never paid anyone while turning around and attempting to monetize for years. So who should be paying whom?
Again, they purposely made it easy to get data into their system because that's the foundation upon which any possible business model they've yet to successfully land relies.
Likes For surak:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
Meh, it doesn't matter how "innovative" you think they are if their business model can't stand on its own, instead falling back on guilting people to use it.
What the Strava defense force doesn't want to admit is that a lot of the value in Strava diminishes as people leave the platform. Heat-maps? Segment leaderboards? Social network for athletes? All dependent on lots of usage and lots of their users data, which Strava has never paid anyone while turning around and attempting to monetize for years. So who should be paying whom?
Again, they purposely made it easy to get data into their system because that's the foundation upon which any possible business model they've yet to successfully land relies.
What the Strava defense force doesn't want to admit is that a lot of the value in Strava diminishes as people leave the platform. Heat-maps? Segment leaderboards? Social network for athletes? All dependent on lots of usage and lots of their users data, which Strava has never paid anyone while turning around and attempting to monetize for years. So who should be paying whom?
Again, they purposely made it easy to get data into their system because that's the foundation upon which any possible business model they've yet to successfully land relies.
Sure, more users makes their data more robust - are you insinuating that people are leaving in droves and it's endangering that robustness? I haven't seen it in my feed; I know of two people that have left the platform - one specifically because of the recent changes. I'm not sure of the motivations of the other, but he only uploaded rides sporadically, anyway.
And are you actually arguing that Strava should be paying users that upload rides? Lol.
Likes For WhyFi:
#49
serious cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 21,147
Bikes: S1, R2, P2
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9334 Post(s)
Liked 3,679 Times
in
2,026 Posts
Fundamentally, the only thing that matters is if people will pay enough (combined) to let Strava turn a profit. They've tried a number of approaches and have yet to achieve that. Maybe this latest one will, but if not, that's likely the end. Maybe the concept is an unprofitable one; maybe they're just bad at their jobs.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 884 Post(s)
Liked 730 Times
in
438 Posts
Lots of weird insinuations going on here, but not much is salient.
Sure, more users makes their data more robust - are you insinuating that people are leaving in droves and it's endangering that robustness? I haven't seen it in my feed; I know of two people that have left the platform - one specifically because of the recent changes. I'm not sure of the motivations of the other, but he only uploaded rides sporadically, anyway.
And are you actually arguing that Strava should be paying users that upload rides? Lol.
Sure, more users makes their data more robust - are you insinuating that people are leaving in droves and it's endangering that robustness? I haven't seen it in my feed; I know of two people that have left the platform - one specifically because of the recent changes. I'm not sure of the motivations of the other, but he only uploaded rides sporadically, anyway.
And are you actually arguing that Strava should be paying users that upload rides? Lol.
I stated facts as to why Strava doesn't deserve a "break" when their analogues get none. The defenders continue to use emotion-based arguments that Strava is "good" and anyone who doesn't pay is freeloading. Except it's more likely that if Strava ever turns a profit, it'll be off the back of those same non-paying users. Or maybe they will have invented how to make money out of thin air.