Trek 520
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2024
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek 520
Hi there! Looking for help in appraising a 2014 Trek 520 - I know that's not exactly classic but I'm new to this world and wasn't sure where to go on this. The bike itself was bought new in 2014 and barely ridden in that time, just sitting in a garage. Owner is looking for $600 for it but a bicycle blue book estimate comes in around $250. Would the lack of mileage on it change that valuation? I can't post pictures on here for some reason but it looks to be in very good condition with all stock parts.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Last edited by agrych; 04-12-24 at 10:54 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 418 Post(s)
Liked 983 Times
in
505 Posts
Tough to value as it’s not a classic, but a very capable bike (and Trek just discontinued the 520 this year). If it’s in as good of shape as described, I’d value it somewhere between the blue book and asking price. Depends on the market too - if somewhere with lots of demand, it might just go for the $600.
Likes For bboy314:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,461
Bikes: Cuevas Custom, Cimmaron, 1988 "Pinalized Rockma", 1984 Trek 510, Moulton custom touring, Raleigh Competition GS, Bridgestone Mb-2 & 3, 1980's Peugeot - US, City, & Canyon Express (6)
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1158 Post(s)
Liked 3,995 Times
in
1,946 Posts
Hard to tell without pics and more details but my guess is the right number is in between the 2. Blue book tends to be low, Bike market is slow so $600 is likely high.
#4
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
If it is in nearly new condition, you are paying $600 for a steel touring frame and fork, which by itself would be a reasonable deal, and the components are solid, though perhaps a bit dated. As long as you are ok with rim brakes, and the bike is rideable, I think it is a fair asking price. I had a 1990 520, and used it heavily and finally gave it to one of my grad students. It was still in fine condition.
Trek eventually moved to aluminum forks for the 520; I would not recommend that, even though they are newer. I'm guessing the 10 year old bike would hit the sweet spot for most people who want a good solid rim-brake touring bike.
Trek eventually moved to aluminum forks for the 520; I would not recommend that, even though they are newer. I'm guessing the 10 year old bike would hit the sweet spot for most people who want a good solid rim-brake touring bike.
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#5
Senior Member
If it is in nearly new condition, you are paying $600 for a steel touring frame and fork, which by itself would be a reasonable deal, and the components are solid, though perhaps a bit dated. As long as you are ok with rim brakes, and the bike is rideable, I think it is a fair asking price.
#6
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#7
Thrifty Bill
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mountains of Western NC
Posts: 23,547
Bikes: 86 Katakura Silk, 87 Prologue X2, 88 Cimarron LE, 1975 Sekai 4000 Professional, 73 Paramount, plus more
Mentioned: 96 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1247 Post(s)
Liked 992 Times
in
639 Posts
Bicycle Blue Book does not use data to support, it's just a formula. Most bikes come up low, really low. Look at sold Trek 520s on ebay, then discount it for local only sale.
Regardless, seller believes it is worth more, so if you are looking for one at $250, move on. Over time, you will know market values in your area, which is the best guide.
Regardless, seller believes it is worth more, so if you are looking for one at $250, move on. Over time, you will know market values in your area, which is the best guide.
Likes For wrk101:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,592
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2611 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times
in
1,790 Posts
The move to aluminum forks was interesting. My guess is that Trek was courting the European touring market, where aluminum forks are accepted better than they are here. For example, among the bikes in Koga-Miyata's extensive touring and (their term) "trekking" range, most have aluminum forks, one has a carbon fiber fork, and none have steel forks.
#9
Senior Member
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 418 Post(s)
Liked 983 Times
in
505 Posts
I think they probably meant that many buyers are wary of rim brakes these days, since the industry is pushing discs as necessary equipment. Personally I have no qualms with them.
#11
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
The rest of your off-point speculation is irrelevant, gratuitious, off-topic speculation.
If I say "as long as you are ok with a purple frame," it does not mean I have anything against purple frames.
Do you really think a "2014 Trek 520" is vintage?
Spring will be here any day now. Hang in there.
Last edited by Polaris OBark; 04-15-24 at 11:56 AM.
#12
Senior Member
I see. So your opinion on brakes are valid and on-point, but my opinion on brakes are off-point, irrelevant, gratuitious, off-topic speculation. My apologies for exposing the OP to an opinion different to yours.
I bought a Soma Saga disc frame because I wanted disc brakes.
The rest of your off-point speculation is irrelevant, gratuitious, off-topic speculation.
If I say "as long as you are ok with a purple frame," it does not mean I have anything against purple frames.
Do you really think a "2014 Trek 520" is vintage?
Spring will be here any day now. Hang in there.
The rest of your off-point speculation is irrelevant, gratuitious, off-topic speculation.
If I say "as long as you are ok with a purple frame," it does not mean I have anything against purple frames.
Do you really think a "2014 Trek 520" is vintage?
Spring will be here any day now. Hang in there.
#13
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
I'll put you on ignore if you will be kind enough to do the same for me.
#14
Junior Member
My local CL has one for $600ish,
https://boise.craigslist.org/bik/d/b...733745423.html
I believe it was first listed in an add from Ontario, OR with four wal mart bikes and a list price of $50 for all, that add was shortly revised to just the dept store rides and this appeared in Boise a few days latter. IIRC it was near stock and then updated to the build shown, same seller.
https://boise.craigslist.org/bik/d/b...733745423.html
I believe it was first listed in an add from Ontario, OR with four wal mart bikes and a list price of $50 for all, that add was shortly revised to just the dept store rides and this appeared in Boise a few days latter. IIRC it was near stock and then updated to the build shown, same seller.
#15
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
Wow, abdon is right, those brakes are FAR superior to hydraulic disc brakes. I take it all back.
#16
Harsh Adventurer
Hi there! Looking for help in appraising a 2014 Trek 520 - I know that's not exactly classic but I'm new to this world and wasn't sure where to go on this. The bike itself was bought new in 2014 and barely ridden in that time, just sitting in a garage. Owner is looking for $600 for it but a bicycle blue book estimate comes in around $250. Would the lack of mileage on it change that valuation? I can't post pictures on here for some reason but it looks to be in very good condition with all stock parts.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Likes For KFC:
#17
Junior Member
Agreed, I have a ‘98 520 I purchased in like new condition for $400 in 2018, worth every penny. But I was living in a middle eastern country where quality bicycles of any kind were not common, I certainly would have been willing to pay $600.
Last edited by Nwvlvtnr; 04-16-24 at 02:47 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,488
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 179 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5907 Post(s)
Liked 3,541 Times
in
2,110 Posts
If you have problems with rim brakes, you probably shouldn't be spending much time on C&V. Just 'sayin . . .
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,488
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 179 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5907 Post(s)
Liked 3,541 Times
in
2,110 Posts
Blue book is low and sometimes crazy low. $600 isn't bad for a quality steel touring bike. Offer $400-$500 for the bike. Maybe you can get a better deal if you're patient; maybe you won't. This is a top end steel touring bike. The bike was $1400 new. Plus the '014 model looks good (white with a blue panel like an old school Trek) and has quality components.
Likes For bikemig:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Pioneer Valley
Posts: 1,275
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 418 Post(s)
Liked 983 Times
in
505 Posts
Sure… but this was in reference to a comment directed at the OP, who is asking for opinions on a 10 year old bike, so who knows whether they have strong feelings about brake types.
Likes For bboy314:
#22
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,157
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2289 Post(s)
Liked 3,517 Times
in
1,849 Posts
To be honest, I didn't notice this 2014 bike was in the C&V subforum. All I meant by my comment was that unless one specifically wants a disc brake touring bike, this is pretty much as good as it gets. (Most other components you can change.)
Likes For Polaris OBark:
#23
Senior Member
I saw the comment and found it hilarious. I see he is still salty about somebody in a vintage bike forum daring to say rim brakes are fine. The way he kept doubling and tripling down was adorkable.
#24
Junior Member
Looks like the OP hasn’t been back, I suppose they could have read the replies without logging in.
I once loaned a bike to a young avid mountain biker who had a fairly entitled life and had never ridden anything old than 5 years or with an MSRP below $2500. He was initially terrified that the V brakes would barely even function, after a ride he couldn’t stop talking about how well they worked.
I once loaned a bike to a young avid mountain biker who had a fairly entitled life and had never ridden anything old than 5 years or with an MSRP below $2500. He was initially terrified that the V brakes would barely even function, after a ride he couldn’t stop talking about how well they worked.