Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Troll touring / bikepacking

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Troll touring / bikepacking

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-17, 04:05 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 99

Bikes: Jones Plus, Tern Verge Tour

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It will really make your tour more fun if you can get that load down a bit. Not even necessarily talking a full-on ultralight-bikepacking setup, but some different gear choices could make a large difference. I carry a few unnecessary "luxury" items myself, but 60 lbs is petty hefty. Maybe do a weeklong tour with that setup, and see what items never get used. Then look at some of your heavier gear (tent, sleeping bag, etc) and see if you can shave a few pounds there. Every little bit helps.
Mtroup is offline  
Old 07-06-17, 07:12 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
boomhauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 782
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times in 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Mtroup
It will really make your tour more fun if you can get that load down a bit.
No doubt about it...
Maybe if they stay in the confines of Arizona and the like, water is a real weight hog.
None the less, on my three or four excursions to the desert water wasn't a super serious concern....but it only takes once, I guess....
boomhauer is offline  
Old 07-06-17, 07:38 PM
  #28  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,225
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2741 Post(s)
Liked 974 Times in 797 Posts
Originally Posted by DropBarFan
If I'm not mistaken you're talking about max 60 lbs bike luggage + ~13 lbs trailer + <=70 lbs trailer luggage = 143 lbs, going up mountains? If one has stout legs I guess it's feasible.
with respect, suncruiser, thinking of taking 140 lbs of load on a bike trip is not really reasonable.
You may think it is ok on paper, but in reality it will be a whole mess of trouble.

I'd urge you to get out on some test trips with whatever bike you have and see how X lbs is, and go from there.
good luck with trying out touring.
djb is offline  
Old 07-07-17, 03:17 AM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936

Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.

Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times in 640 Posts
The term fork is sometimes also used to describe the part of a bicycle that holds the rear wheel, which on 19th Century ordinary or penny-farthing bicycles was also a bladed fork. On most modern bicycle designs the rear wheel is now attached to a rear triangle made up of multiple triangulated tubes, rather than an actual fork, but the rear fork usage persists

Just sayin'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_fork
Trevtassie is offline  
Old 07-07-17, 06:57 AM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevtassie
The term fork is sometimes also used to describe the part of a bicycle that holds the rear wheel, which on 19th Century ordinary or penny-farthing bicycles was also a bladed fork. On most modern bicycle designs the rear wheel is now attached to a rear triangle made up of multiple triangulated tubes, rather than an actual fork, but the rear fork usage persists

Just sayin'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_fork
I'll think about that as I take a "wet showers" after a ride.
alan s is offline  
Old 07-07-17, 08:50 AM
  #31  
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
suncruiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 363

Bikes: 2015 Trek District 8, 2017 Salsa Vaya Claris, 2012 SE Draft

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 92 Post(s)
Liked 14 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
with respect, suncruiser, thinking of taking 140 lbs of load on a bike trip is not really reasonable.
You may think it is ok on paper, but in reality it will be a whole mess of trouble.

I'd urge you to get out on some test trips with whatever bike you have and see how X lbs is, and go from there.
good luck with trying out touring.
Thank you. I feel like I'm going to pare the weight down, 60lb of gear was the maximum weight I was willing to hold on the bike, and I figure if I anticipate the stress/struggle of the heavier load, the lighter it gets means happiness to me. The trailer is likely going to start off fairly light and gain weight as the trip progresses, so by the time it gets too heavy hopefully I'm on the last leg of my tour
suncruiser is offline  
Old 07-07-17, 10:17 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Rob_E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 2,709

Bikes: Downtube 8H, Surly Troll

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 303 Post(s)
Liked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Originally Posted by suncruiser
that's exactly what I'm talking about, though looking at my tire choices for what I want (want to stay 26x2.5 with fenders on it) and decently quick on the road without losing the ability to head off the beaten path w/o walking... there isn't much. Surly' s extraterrestrial is about the best choice there.
Originally Posted by revcp
Check out Schwalbe Big Apple or Big Ben. No knobbies, but I've done a lot of singletrack on my Troll with both, and they're great on pavement.
I've commuted on my ETs a few times. I don't find them bad on pavement, but they definitely buzz, and I don't know how well the tread would hold over long road miles, but I'd be tempted to try them. The downsides to me are: they are too wide to fit in a standard bus rack and, according to the Amtrak bike specs, too wide to fit in an Amtrak bike rack. Also, when paired with wide rims, they don't fit in my S&S case for air travel. I'm considering a 2nd S&S case, so that I can split one bike into two cases and take my fat tires. So in any trip where mass transit might be called upon, the ETs can be a liability. Until recently my more frequently used wheelset was a pair of Big Ben 2.15"s. They are great for road and lite off-road. I wouldn't count on them to take you through any soft or wet stuff, as they don't have much grip, but they do fine on hard pack. I recently replaced them with an Almotion set because they were tubeless ready. Haven't decided yet if that's an improvement. Tubeless is nice. The Almotion might have marginally more grip, but maybe not. And the Almotion feel stiffer to me, in spite of being tubeless and running at a lower pressure.

I just did 400+ miles on the Almotions, with probably 2/3s of it being rail-trail and towpath trail. I would have taken the ETs in a heartbeat if not for the Amtrak issue and the S&S issue. The Almotions handled the trail fine, and I'm sure the Big Bens would have as well. But there were some wet days where the trail seemed to want to latch on to the tire. Even at 2.15" I feel like the tires were sinking in a bit, and I bet the ETs would have rolled over that without noticing. On the other hand, maybe the extra tread would have just grabbed more mud from the trail and thrown it on the underside of my bike. At any rate, I have plans to ride the GAP again, and this time without the need for Amtrak, and this time I will likely take my ETs.

I think, apart from the mass transit issue, I'd take ETs on any trip that was at least a third off pavement, and take a less grippy tire for anything with more pavement.
Rob_E is offline  
Old 07-07-17, 07:47 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150

Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times in 43 Posts
Originally Posted by suncruiser
that's exactly what I'm talking about, though looking at my tire choices for what I want (want to stay 26x2.5 with fenders on it) and decently quick on the road without losing the ability to head off the beaten path w/o walking... there isn't much. Surly' s extraterrestrial is about the best choice there.

I saw the Troll and I like the idea of it, and the strength of a 26 inch wheel is a nice benefit, but I'm also considering a few 700c bikes for this as well

Mostly the Salsa Marrakesh and the Trek 520 disc
I think one can buy sufficiently strong wheels in various diameters; I'd focus on finding a bike that can handle wider tires w/fenders yet still have front/rear rack mounts. Marrakesh & 520 are nice but a bit limited on tire width.
DropBarFan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kahrpistols
Touring
20
09-06-17 04:56 AM
HowSound
Touring
14
07-15-13 07:10 PM
GreenspeedGTS
Touring
8
06-12-12 12:18 PM
Aquakitty
Touring
48
10-24-10 03:22 PM
RaiderInBlue47
Touring
51
10-14-10 10:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.