Troll touring / bikepacking
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 99
Bikes: Jones Plus, Tern Verge Tour
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It will really make your tour more fun if you can get that load down a bit. Not even necessarily talking a full-on ultralight-bikepacking setup, but some different gear choices could make a large difference. I carry a few unnecessary "luxury" items myself, but 60 lbs is petty hefty. Maybe do a weeklong tour with that setup, and see what items never get used. Then look at some of your heavier gear (tent, sleeping bag, etc) and see if you can shave a few pounds there. Every little bit helps.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 782
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 226 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
32 Posts
Maybe if they stay in the confines of Arizona and the like, water is a real weight hog.
None the less, on my three or four excursions to the desert water wasn't a super serious concern....but it only takes once, I guess....
#28
Senior Member
You may think it is ok on paper, but in reality it will be a whole mess of trouble.
I'd urge you to get out on some test trips with whatever bike you have and see how X lbs is, and go from there.
good luck with trying out touring.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936
Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times
in
640 Posts
Just sayin'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_fork
#30
Senior Member
The term fork is sometimes also used to describe the part of a bicycle that holds the rear wheel, which on 19th Century ordinary or penny-farthing bicycles was also a bladed fork. On most modern bicycle designs the rear wheel is now attached to a rear triangle made up of multiple triangulated tubes, rather than an actual fork, but the rear fork usage persists
Just sayin'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_fork
Just sayin'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bicycle_fork
#31
Full Member
Thread Starter
with respect, suncruiser, thinking of taking 140 lbs of load on a bike trip is not really reasonable.
You may think it is ok on paper, but in reality it will be a whole mess of trouble.
I'd urge you to get out on some test trips with whatever bike you have and see how X lbs is, and go from there.
good luck with trying out touring.
You may think it is ok on paper, but in reality it will be a whole mess of trouble.
I'd urge you to get out on some test trips with whatever bike you have and see how X lbs is, and go from there.
good luck with trying out touring.
#32
Senior Member
that's exactly what I'm talking about, though looking at my tire choices for what I want (want to stay 26x2.5 with fenders on it) and decently quick on the road without losing the ability to head off the beaten path w/o walking... there isn't much. Surly' s extraterrestrial is about the best choice there.
I just did 400+ miles on the Almotions, with probably 2/3s of it being rail-trail and towpath trail. I would have taken the ETs in a heartbeat if not for the Amtrak issue and the S&S issue. The Almotions handled the trail fine, and I'm sure the Big Bens would have as well. But there were some wet days where the trail seemed to want to latch on to the tire. Even at 2.15" I feel like the tires were sinking in a bit, and I bet the ETs would have rolled over that without noticing. On the other hand, maybe the extra tread would have just grabbed more mud from the trail and thrown it on the underside of my bike. At any rate, I have plans to ride the GAP again, and this time without the need for Amtrak, and this time I will likely take my ETs.
I think, apart from the mass transit issue, I'd take ETs on any trip that was at least a third off pavement, and take a less grippy tire for anything with more pavement.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,150
Bikes: 2013 Surly Disc Trucker, 2004 Novara Randonee , old fixie , etc
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 671 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 49 Times
in
43 Posts
that's exactly what I'm talking about, though looking at my tire choices for what I want (want to stay 26x2.5 with fenders on it) and decently quick on the road without losing the ability to head off the beaten path w/o walking... there isn't much. Surly' s extraterrestrial is about the best choice there.
I saw the Troll and I like the idea of it, and the strength of a 26 inch wheel is a nice benefit, but I'm also considering a few 700c bikes for this as well
Mostly the Salsa Marrakesh and the Trek 520 disc
I saw the Troll and I like the idea of it, and the strength of a 26 inch wheel is a nice benefit, but I'm also considering a few 700c bikes for this as well
Mostly the Salsa Marrakesh and the Trek 520 disc
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GreenspeedGTS
Touring
8
06-12-12 12:18 PM