OPEN new U.P.: Quick Review (kind of)
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Longueuil, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 196
Bikes: 1973 Raleigh Super Course - 1981 Velo Sport Criterium - c.1988 Colnago Master Piu - 1991 Merlin Road - 1991 Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra - 1995 Pinarello Cromovan - c.1999 Lemond Maillot Jaune Team Saturn - 2002 Colnago C-40 - Also modern stuff
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times
in
22 Posts
As I recall, they have 2-3 versions of the Carbon frame. I'm guessing that the higher modulus is lighter and more responsive?
My problem is that I can't test ride one, and that is too much $$$ to gamble with.
I worry that you can't find anything negative. Everything is a tradeoff. Some bikes are too nimble, some are to stable, some are too racy, some are too upright. It depends on what you are looking for...
My problem is that I can't test ride one, and that is too much $$$ to gamble with.
I worry that you can't find anything negative. Everything is a tradeoff. Some bikes are too nimble, some are to stable, some are too racy, some are too upright. It depends on what you are looking for...
While you can use it as a road bike with 700cx28 or 25, it is heavier that a similarly priced road bike (My New UP with Force 21 and 3T carbon wheel is approx. 18 lbs. With the UPPER, it could be a different story). Also less nimble. But it descends like a bullet! Off road or on gravel, I can't compare since it is my first gravel bike. But it is really FUN with 650bx47. It feels rock solid (at least for a plastic bike trailangel ). During spring when the roads are crap, full of dirt and holes, I use my 650b wheels and it's a dream. The rolling resistance of these fatty tires is surprising low.
Basically a fun bike that I use also for soft single tracks. For pure speed, I have a Cervelo P3 (I do triathlons), for the rest, I am OPEN
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 7,085
Bikes: Cervelo Prodigy
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 478 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 87 Times
in
67 Posts
I'm really interested in these too. I've been mostly interested in steel bikes so far but this UP is so intriguing...and I can't find anything negative said about it.
Are they so expensive because of the size of the company or are there real benefits to the manufacturing versus similar carbon frames? $2.9K versus like $1.5K frames is hard for me to rationalize but I'm trying to convince myself.
Are they so expensive because of the size of the company or are there real benefits to the manufacturing versus similar carbon frames? $2.9K versus like $1.5K frames is hard for me to rationalize but I'm trying to convince myself.
Near where I live, is a bike shop that recently carries Cervelo. So I asked the manager about OPEN UP and he says he cannot offer both the Diverge and the UP as the Diverge is selling very well and the UP price is not competitive. Bike shops have to continue doing business and the consumers will think twice, thrice, before laying down that kind of money for a frameset alone.
So what makes the UP so special besides the engineering? I think Gerard Vroomen's experience in the industry. His knowledge of carbon layups, his friendship with the late Steve Hed, his relationship with Pon Holdings (Netherlands). There's a book about Cervelo, written by Phil White's wife, no doubt. That gives you the insight of the Vroomen-White experience at Cervelo.
Where do you get that kind of background in today's bike business?
#28
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
My use of the OPEN is similar to fraba's. If I want to go as fast as possible on good pavement, I pull out my BMC SLR01. For just about everything else, I ride my OPEN. It's less than 1 mph slower than the BMC on smooth pavement and it's excellent on broken pavement, chipseal, dirt, and gravel. Comfortable and fast at the same time. Handles great. If I'm going to be on unfamiliar roads on a casual ride, I always prefer to be on the OPEN. It takes roads comfortably that would make me wince if I were on the BMC. And in group ride settings, it's generally fast enough for anything.
#29
Let's Ride!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Triad, NC USA
Posts: 2,569
Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times
in
24 Posts
@FlashBazbo how do you like the Elwood tires?
I am doing the unpaved pennsylvannia ride and am considering putting them on my journeyman instead of the byways i use for commuting.
I am doing the unpaved pennsylvannia ride and am considering putting them on my journeyman instead of the byways i use for commuting.
#30
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
I like the Elwoods for the conditions I've used them for. The Open Range 200k includes a huge variety of surfaces, most of which don't require a 47mm wide tire. But a lot of the course this year involved very deep, very fine sand. The Elwoods made the sand tolerable. I suspect the volume would also make washboard surfaces more tolerable. At the same time, the Elwoods didn't seem to slow me down very much on the dirt, clay, or paved sections. If you don't know the course conditions and want to play it safe, the Elwoods are an excellent choice. Extremely versatile.
If not for the deep, fine sand, though, I would have gone with a 700c x 38mm (or 35mm) tire like a Challenge Gravel Grinder. The Gravel Grinder is a little faster on packed dirt, clay, and paved roads. But I suspect they would have been somewhat squirrely in the Open Range's deep sand.
If not for the deep, fine sand, though, I would have gone with a 700c x 38mm (or 35mm) tire like a Challenge Gravel Grinder. The Gravel Grinder is a little faster on packed dirt, clay, and paved roads. But I suspect they would have been somewhat squirrely in the Open Range's deep sand.
#32
Let's Ride!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Triad, NC USA
Posts: 2,569
Bikes: --2010 Jamis 650b1-- 2016 Cervelo R2-- 2018 Salsa Journeyman 650B
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 37 Times
in
24 Posts
I like the Elwoods for the conditions I've used them for. The Open Range 200k includes a huge variety of surfaces, most of which don't require a 47mm wide tire. But a lot of the course this year involved very deep, very fine sand. The Elwoods made the sand tolerable. I suspect the volume would also make washboard surfaces more tolerable. At the same time, the Elwoods didn't seem to slow me down very much on the dirt, clay, or paved sections. If you don't know the course conditions and want to play it safe, the Elwoods are an excellent choice. Extremely versatile.
If not for the deep, fine sand, though, I would have gone with a 700c x 38mm (or 35mm) tire like a Challenge Gravel Grinder. The Gravel Grinder is a little faster on packed dirt, clay, and paved roads. But I suspect they would have been somewhat squirrely in the Open Range's deep sand.
If not for the deep, fine sand, though, I would have gone with a 700c x 38mm (or 35mm) tire like a Challenge Gravel Grinder. The Gravel Grinder is a little faster on packed dirt, clay, and paved roads. But I suspect they would have been somewhat squirrely in the Open Range's deep sand.
#33
Chases Dogs for Sport
Thread Starter
QUICK UPDATE: After 8 months and thousands of mixed surface miles, the OPEN U.P. continues to impress. The quality holds up and the handling never grows old. I haven't found anything yet that I dislike about the bike. Okay, do I wish it had a T47 bottom bracket? Sure. But you can't have everything. Gerard Vroomen was never going to spec a T47 on one of his bikes.
Recent changes:
Recent changes:
- I ditched the Redshift Shockstop stem and replaced it with a Niner RDO. I guess I'm not a fan of flex. Actually, I notice flex even in the Niner RDO stem -- but it's an amount I can live with. And, if memory serves, the Niner stem weighs about half what the Redshift item does. Less weight and less flex? For me, it's a two-fer!
- My BMC TeamMachine Disc has been in the shop for two months under the BMC fork recall. This means the OPEN has seen a LOT more road duty. I have experimented with tubes, tubeless, and tire widths including 38mm, 32mm, 28mm, and 25mm for the road. Now, the OPEN wears the carbon wheels and 25mm tubeless tires from my BMC -- and it is very nearly as fast as the BMC on smooth roads. It makes an excellent "only bike." In group rides, I don't feel I give up anything by being on the OPEN rather than the BMC. The tinkerer in me wonders what would happen if I put a narrow road bar on the OPEN in place of the wide Salsa Cowchipper -- would that make the BMC obsolete for my purposes? I don't know. I will try to resist doing anything until after I get the BMC back (IF I get the BMC back). At this rate, I might decide the OPEN is the only bike I need.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,468
Bikes: Co-Motion Cappuccino Tandem,'88 Bob Jackson Touring, Co-Motion Cascadia Touring, Open U.P., Ritchie Titanium Breakaway, Frances Cycles SmallHaul cargo bike. Those are the permanent ones; others wander in and out of the stable occasionally as well.
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 339 Times
in
229 Posts
I ride an U.P also and in blue. I find the bike amazing. It is nimble at the right times and stable at other times, I thought it expensive as well but after riding I had no hesitation about shelling out the cash. It is well worth what I paid for it. Interestingly, it cured my constant interest in riding oother bikes; maybe I actually wound up spending less this way by not buying something else a year or two later. It don;t get no better'n dis! It accekerates like a scalded dog and I can ride it on long distance rides and be comfortable all day on it. On really rough roads you worder where all of the bumps go. There is definitely a reason you never read any negative reviews of it, the design and manufacture are impeecable. And on road riding I prefer it by far to a road bike.
I am pretty sure Open makes a good margin on the frames, but they certainly have earned that right.
I am pretty sure Open makes a good margin on the frames, but they certainly have earned that right.
Likes For dwmckee:
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 247
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
3 Posts
OPEN U.P owner checking in. I agree with what has been said here. It is by far the best bike I've owned and I've gone through quite a few over the years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mr_Crankypants
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
10
10-17-18 08:46 AM
chas58
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
4
05-10-18 08:30 PM
johngwheeler
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
35
01-21-18 01:57 PM
johngwheeler
Cyclocross and Gravelbiking (Recreational)
74
08-09-17 03:10 PM