Miyata 912 vs Centurion Ironman.
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,142
Bikes: 1983 Univega Super Strada, 1986 Panasonic DX5000, 1984 Fuji Team 85 Univega Gran Turismo, 1984 Lotus Unique, 1987 Centurion Expert, 1987 Centurion Ironman Master,
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 677 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
182 Posts
Miyata 912 vs Centurion Ironman.
I just picked up a 1986 Miyata 912 that is in excellent shape. Everything is stock including all Shimano 600 components.I am waiting for tires and bar tape to arrive before I can ride it. I also have a 1987 Centurion Ironman in very good shape.It is all original with Shimano 105 components. I've been riding it and love it. I'm wondering how the 912 will compare to the Ironman?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Seattle WA
Posts: 2,841
Bikes: 2009 Handsome Devil, 1987 Trek 520 Cirrus, 1978 Motobecane Grand Touring, 1987 Nishiki Cresta GT, 1989 Specialized Allez Former bikes; 1986 Miyata Trail Runner, 1979 Miyata 912, 2011 VO Rando, 1999 Cannondale R800, 1986 Schwinn Passage
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 796 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
367 Posts
sounds like a problem I would like to have, never had the pleasure, yet, of riding an IM but my 79 Miyata 912 rode great.
Likes For seedsbelize:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 655 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,039 Times
in
1,877 Posts
My preference would be the 912, as I like the added stiffness of the STB tubeset. There's not a not to distinguish between the components, though the New 105 brakeset on the Ironman should have a lighter feel, better modulation and aero cable routing.
#5
Death fork? Naaaah!!
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#6
Senior Member
My preference would be the Ironman. With better tubing for all day riding. However a better and fairer comparison would be the Master Ironman with 600 components and slightly different frame compared to the expert which has 105.
Last edited by texaspandj; 10-10-18 at 01:15 PM.
#7
Death fork? Naaaah!!
I was referring to the Master. Both the Miyata and IM Master are 600-level bikes.
Top
Top
__________________
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
You know it's going to be a good day when the stem and seatpost come right out.
(looking for a picture and not seeing it? Thank the Photobucket fiasco.PM me and I'll link it up.)
#8
smelling the roses
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tixkokob, Yucatán, México
Posts: 15,320
Bikes: 79 Trek 930, 80 Trek 414, 84 Schwinn Letour Luxe (coupled), 92 Schwinn Paramount PDG 5
Mentioned: 104 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7081 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
612 Posts
Well this is a good sign for my incoming Ironman. I tend to prefer a slightly less stiff frame. I have never ridden a Miyata.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,530
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3244 Post(s)
Liked 2,521 Times
in
1,516 Posts
I have both as well. It depends on what the rider likes. I like a hint of spring in my frames. I would give a slight edge to the IM because of that. The Miyata STB makes for a stiff frame. I have a 52 Team Miyata also. The Stiffness/Launch factor is high with that frame.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 1,142
Bikes: 1983 Univega Super Strada, 1986 Panasonic DX5000, 1984 Fuji Team 85 Univega Gran Turismo, 1984 Lotus Unique, 1987 Centurion Expert, 1987 Centurion Ironman Master,
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 677 Post(s)
Liked 460 Times
in
182 Posts
I was under the impression that Expert and Master used the exact same frame.
#11
Senior Member
#12
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times
in
910 Posts
1985, 1986 and 1987 Master shared a fork.
1988, 1989 and 1987 Expert shared a fork.
Scratch one, you get the other.
There are very subtle differences that are not consistent to models or years that people have noticed. It's more about the 80's than it is about any intentional differences.
Centurion specifically intended the frames to the same, with the only differences being the components. Other marques were doing the same thing, just differentiating with components.
Some just seem to ride different. Unless one uses identical components, down to the cable ends, and then tests them across a representative sampling, with everything the same, even the tire PSI, just no way to know.
Anecdotal evidence is out there that some difference exist. That's certainly true, but I'm just not convinced they are that different. I have an '87 Master and an '88 Master. I swear they are different bikes, as they just feel different.
Maybe it's the color.
#16
Senior Member
I can tell them apart. Bottom bracket shell, lugs, chain stays and seat bolt binder are different.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,710
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1954 Post(s)
Liked 2,018 Times
in
1,114 Posts
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,410 Times
in
910 Posts
Those were open market parts, bought and shipped to the factory to produce the frames. What showed up was used, generally with consistency, but I genuinely believe there was no intention to differentiate the frames.
#19
Full Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: mke
Posts: 256
Bikes: Some old steel, some new steel
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
i miss the 912 that i had. gave a friend who needed some wheels a nice deal, and it got stolen a couple months later. that was a really nice riding bike.
#20
Senior Member
True, but my point is you may well find those differences on bikes of the same model and year.
Those were open market parts, bought and shipped to the factory to produce the frames. What showed up was used, generally with consistency, but I genuinely believe there was no intention to differentiate the frames.
Those were open market parts, bought and shipped to the factory to produce the frames. What showed up was used, generally with consistency, but I genuinely believe there was no intention to differentiate the frames.
My theory is the Masters made in one factory and the Experts in another factory. Reportedly Miyata, panasonic etc were made at the same factory so,I theorize maybe ONE of the Ironman frames. The world may never know for sure and only 2 or 3 care.
#21
Senior Member
Scott Molina the winningest triathlete of all time raced on a Miyata 912 for a time. He won the biggest triathlon in the world the Ironman world championship in Hawaii on a Miyata. However it was a Miyata Carbon 5000.
#22
Senior Member
Here's a "t
riathlon" advertisement featuring former world champion Scott Molina, circa 1988.
riathlon" advertisement featuring former world champion Scott Molina, circa 1988.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 655 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,039 Times
in
1,877 Posts
The classic example of doubling up on a frame is the Peugeot AO8 and UO8. Adding a few brazed-on fittings created the AE8 and UE8, so you could even argue that the basic boom era Peugeot frame design performed quadruple duty.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 655 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,039 Times
in
1,877 Posts
Regarding the relationship between Miyata and M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a (the manufacturer of the Panasonic brand bicycles), the latter was the largest shareholder of Miyata stock for almost fifty years but both companies maintained independent manufacturing facilities.
#25
Senior Member
I have been collecting Centurion serial numbers for over a decade and have well over one hundred documented samples of the Ironman variants alone. All the Experts and Masters I've seen have used the same serial number format, indicating that they come from the same factory. The only Ironmen models I've seen that were manufactured by different sources are some first year Ironman and the Ironman Carbon.
Regarding the relationship between Miyata and M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a (the manufacturer of the Panasonic brand bicycles), the latter was the largest shareholder of Miyata stock for almost fifty years but both companies maintained independent manufacturing facilities.
Regarding the relationship between Miyata and M-a-t-s-u-s-h-i-t-a (the manufacturer of the Panasonic brand bicycles), the latter was the largest shareholder of Miyata stock for almost fifty years but both companies maintained independent manufacturing facilities.