Bike lanes and getting "door'd"
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18378 Post(s)
Liked 4,512 Times
in
3,354 Posts
That appears to be globally captured clips with some driving/riding to the right, and some to the left.
Several people being doored by taxis. It would seem like one would give wide berth to the bright yellow cars (unless that is all of the cars in NYC). This may be an issue in the future with Uber and unmarked ride-share vehicles. And, perhaps a reason to require them to install some kind of visible TAXI markings.
A good number of the people were riding between stopped cars and the curb, even between Taxis and the curb... sounds like a dangerous place to be. Likewise, doing close passes of double-parked cars.
Unfortunately a few bike-lane accidents would have been hard to predict.
#27
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 14
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say in my urban commute I'm riding in a situation for potentially getting doored only 5% of the time at most. My methods are all of the above but I also go slower than I would without cars there so I have at least some additional time to react.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
I frequently post this basic rule for me, ”Consider every stopped car like a weapon, loaded, with an occupant ready to exit, on either side." For example I think about that when filtering between cars stopped at a traffic light.
When I have had doors opened directly before me, I have found a scream causes the person to immediately retract back into the car like a turtle into its shell.
For a real vicarious thrill of dooring, see this video.
When I have had doors opened directly before me, I have found a scream causes the person to immediately retract back into the car like a turtle into its shell.
For a real vicarious thrill of dooring, see this video.
#30
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#31
Senior Member
It's equally dumb not to look in your side mirror when parallel parked before exciting your vehicle. That includes when you are parked so you get out on the sidewalk. Who knows what's coming.
Last edited by StarBiker; 03-05-18 at 10:45 AM.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,384
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 800 Post(s)
Liked 218 Times
in
171 Posts
I don’t carry an Air Zound because I’m not sure I could react quickly enough in a sudden event like a door opening. I have posted about my instantaneous reaction. .
I frequently post this basic rulefor me, ”Consider every stopped car like a weapon, loaded, with an occupantready to exit, on either side." For example I think about that when filtering between cars stopped at a traffic light.
When I have had doors opened directly before me, I have found a scream causes the person to immediately retract back into the car like a turtle into its shell.
For a real vicarious thrill of dooring, see this video.
When I have had doors opened directly before me, I have found a scream causes the person to immediately retract back into the car like a turtle into its shell.
For a real vicarious thrill of dooring, see this video.
I think Air Zounds are more useful for retaliation, especially when a shout (or expletive ) might be unintelligible in traffic.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947
Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times
in
936 Posts
I don't even think a horn would save the day, because the person getting out of the car would likely stop & look, but not close the door.
#34
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
- The ones who figure out not to even try to anticipate if someone is occupying every parked car they approach and, instead, just never ride closer than five feet to parked cars.
- The ones who ride in door zones trying to look ahead and anticipate, until they're doored.
15 mph is 22 feet per second. That's 1 1/2 car lengths per second. Are you Superman?
And what are you going to do if someone IS in the car, suddenly swerve left in front of overtaking traffic?
RIDE AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM PARKED CARS.
Period.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Central Io-way
Posts: 2,673
Bikes: LeMond Zurich, Giant Talon 29er
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1221 Post(s)
Liked 629 Times
in
472 Posts
I do appreciate the passionate responses of those that have relevant safety experience
#37
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I see no need to ALWAYS keep five feet from cars stopped in front of me (like at a red light), or ALWAYS five feet from moving cars on my left or right, though that's a nice buffer in those situations too.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
The biggest doors open up to 3.5 feet from the car. If you're tracking five feet from the parked cars, your elbow is about four feet from the parked cars, leaving only six inches of room for error (assuming the largest door, more for most doors), but it's better than nothing. That's why I say at least five feet. Six feet is even better. But if you're releasing faster traffic behind you, it's best to not track closer than five from the parked cars, if you really have to get even that close.
I see no need to ALWAYS keep five feet from cars stopped in front of me (like at a red light), or ALWAYS five feet from moving cars on my left or right, though that's a nice buffer in those situations too.
I see no need to ALWAYS keep five feet from cars stopped in front of me (like at a red light), or ALWAYS five feet from moving cars on my left or right, though that's a nice buffer in those situations too.
So, just double checking if I'm on a bicycle with 18" wide handlebars, and am passing a car doors that extend 36", can I safely pass tracking at 4 1/4 feet?
If you look at the video "above", you'll see LOTS of doorings by people NOT parked.
I don't get why your ALWAYS isn't always?
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 03-05-18 at 01:17 PM.
#39
Junior Member
Thread Starter
There are two kinds of cyclists.
15 mph is 22 feet per second. That's 1 1/2 car lengths per second. Are you Superman?
And what are you going to do if someone IS in the car, suddenly swerve left in front of overtaking traffic?
RIDE AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM PARKED CARS.
Period.
- The ones who figure out not to even try to anticipate if someone is occupying every parked car they approach and, instead, just never ride closer than five feet to parked cars.
- The ones who ride in door zones trying to look ahead and anticipate, until they're doored.
15 mph is 22 feet per second. That's 1 1/2 car lengths per second. Are you Superman?
And what are you going to do if someone IS in the car, suddenly swerve left in front of overtaking traffic?
RIDE AT LEAST FIVE FEET FROM PARKED CARS.
Period.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
I always try to imagine the widest likely door plus a little buffer.
#41
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sorry. I'm just frustrated with how many cyclists continue to ride in door zones, some believing they can notice and react fast enough, apparently unaware of the peril in doing so, despite all the information out there about it. I'm also frustrated by the apparent reluctance that exists within the cycling community to warn about the hazards of riding in door zones, present thread (mostly) excepted, thankfully. But this is the safety forum. Go to almost any other forum and you'll find cyclists who ride in door zones all the time, and aren't even aware not doing so is a reasonable option that many cyclists employ every day everywhere.
#42
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, typical bicycle handlebars are 18" wide, but SOME are 24" wide. Typical FULLY OPEN doors extend 36", but SOME are extend 45" (that's 3 3/4 feet).
So, just double checking if I'm on a bicycle with 18" wide handlebars, and am passing a car doors that extend 36", can I safely pass tracking at 4 1/4 feet?
If you look at the video "above", you'll see LOTS of doorings by people NOT parked.
I don't get why your ALWAYS isn't always?
-mr. bill
So, just double checking if I'm on a bicycle with 18" wide handlebars, and am passing a car doors that extend 36", can I safely pass tracking at 4 1/4 feet?
If you look at the video "above", you'll see LOTS of doorings by people NOT parked.
I don't get why your ALWAYS isn't always?
-mr. bill
#43
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
#44
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#45
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,852
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2135 Post(s)
Liked 1,647 Times
in
829 Posts
I did a quick google check and here's the first hit.
RCW 46.61.620: Opening and closing vehicle doors.
Based on my cursory examination of laws in the past, it normally doesn't apply unless the door is being opened into a travel lane.
Either way, most of the cyclists in the video were a case study in abject stupidity.
RCW 46.61.620: Opening and closing vehicle doors.
Based on my cursory examination of laws in the past, it normally doesn't apply unless the door is being opened into a travel lane.
Either way, most of the cyclists in the video were a case study in abject stupidity.
#46
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I did a quick google check and here's the first hit.
RCW 46.61.620: Opening and closing vehicle doors.
Based on my cursory examination of laws in the past, it normally doesn't apply unless the door is being opened into a travel lane.
Either way, most of the cyclists in the video were a case study in abject stupidity.
RCW 46.61.620: Opening and closing vehicle doors.
Based on my cursory examination of laws in the past, it normally doesn't apply unless the door is being opened into a travel lane.
Either way, most of the cyclists in the video were a case study in abject stupidity.
RCW 46.61.620
Opening and closing vehicle doors.
No person shall open the door of a motor vehicle on the side adjacent to moving traffic unless and until it is reasonably safe to do so, and can be done without interfering with the movement of other traffic, nor shall any person leave a door open on the side of a vehicle adjacent to moving traffic for a period of time longer than necessary to load or unload passengers.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
The main message is to avoid parked cars by at least 5 feet. The goal is to be far enough so that if a door suddenly opens, you don't even flinch. Once someone gets this, they should naturally develop similar precautionary practices with respect to stopped vehicles on their left, primary taxis and Ubers from which passengers and unexpected pop out any time they're stopped.
For what it's worth, five feet is not far enough away to not flinch. And death and destruction do not result at four and a quarter feet.
A simple rigid rule that ALWAYS applies SOMETIMES that doesn't solve the problem. Brilliant.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 03-05-18 at 02:33 PM.
#48
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most of the vehicles were NOT parked. Most of the vehicles were NOT taxis or Ubers (or Lyfts).
For what it's worth, five feet is not far enough away to not flinch. And death and destruction do not result at four and a quarter feet.
A simple rigid rule that ALWAYS applies SOMETIMES that doesn't solve the problem. Brilliant.
-mr. bill
For what it's worth, five feet is not far enough away to not flinch. And death and destruction do not result at four and a quarter feet.
A simple rigid rule that ALWAYS applies SOMETIMES that doesn't solve the problem. Brilliant.
-mr. bill
In my experience five feet is sufficient to not flinch, and most cyclists don't leave but 2 or 3 feet. If you need more, leave more. Of course.
The bottom line is nobody is exactly measuring the distance. The idea is to stay out of the door zone, and "five feet" seems to be a big enough value to cause most people to realize they have to ride further to be out of the door zone in order to be "five feet" from parked cars.
Not sure what your issue is. You seem to have a contentious attitude when you comment.
#49
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
I'm not talking about the video which I haven't even watched. Most doorings involved parked cars - that's what I'm talking about.
In my experience five feet is sufficient to not flinch, and most cyclists don't leave but 2 or 3 feet. If you need more, leave more. Of course.
In my experience five feet is sufficient to not flinch, and most cyclists don't leave but 2 or 3 feet. If you need more, leave more. Of course.
If I need less, do I have *YOUR* permission to leave less?
-mr. bill
#50
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,341
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 959 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Anyway, I don't want to get into a semantic argument about what constitutes a car being parked, but most of those cars looked parked to me, at least temporarily. In any case, they certainly qualify as parked cars I would ride at least five feet from. What you do and advise is up to you.
You don't need my permission to do anything, which should go without saying, Mr Argumentative.