Rohloff, yeah, nah, yeah, nah.
#101
This wrench fits...
Something I haven't seen remarked on here much, is the similarity between a Rohloff and a single-speed as regards not chainline, but chainring concentricity. I was fiddling with ratios today, and put the 42 on the front, in place of the 46. The 46 came from Universal Cycles mounted to the Sugino crank, and must have been carefully place, for the chain rain smoothly over the rear tensioner and cog. But with the 42, the chain was dancing around a bit and I could feel and hear the vibration. Which is fine for Sunday morning with my sweetie, but not great when just spinning the cranks. I pulled out my dial indicator, and sure enough, the new ring was off-center. Some persuasion and careful iterative retightening of the bolts brought it into near-perfect centeredness, and the tensioner calmed right down. Perfection!
Or, maybe I just need to back off the Surly tensioner! But better to have a smooth chainring than something trying to approximate a Shimano Biopace...
Or, maybe I just need to back off the Surly tensioner! But better to have a smooth chainring than something trying to approximate a Shimano Biopace...
#102
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,266
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3486 Post(s)
Liked 1,483 Times
in
1,157 Posts
Something I haven't seen remarked on here much, is the similarity between a Rohloff and a single-speed as regards not chainline, but chainring concentricity. I was fiddling with ratios today, and put the 42 on the front, in place of the 46. The 46 came from Universal Cycles mounted to the Sugino crank, and must have been carefully place, for the chain rain smoothly over the rear tensioner and cog. But with the 42, the chain was dancing around a bit and I could feel and hear the vibration. Which is fine for Sunday morning with my sweetie, but not great when just spinning the cranks. I pulled out my dial indicator, and sure enough, the new ring was off-center. Some persuasion and careful iterative retightening of the bolts brought it into near-perfect centeredness, and the tensioner calmed right down. Perfection!
Or, maybe I just need to back off the Surly tensioner! But better to have a smooth chainring than something trying to approximate a Shimano Biopace...
Or, maybe I just need to back off the Surly tensioner! But better to have a smooth chainring than something trying to approximate a Shimano Biopace...
I tour with a 36T chainring on my Rohloff bike, but around home use a 44T chainring, so changing chainrings is a regular, scheduled event. The bike has a cheap (Amazon) crankset, and I bought cheap no-name chainrings. And an eccentric bottom bracket for chain tension, not a sprung tensioner. Each time I change chain rings, I am fiddling it for about 10 minutes to try to get it close to perfect.
Likes For Tourist in MSN:
#103
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,462
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 631 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 407 Times
in
279 Posts
I suspect that some of the component manufacturers have gotten a bit lazy on quality control for chainrings and crank arm spiders with derailleur bikes, any non-concentric parts do not matter with a sprung derailleur cage.
I tour with a 36T chainring on my Rohloff bike, but around home use a 44T chainring, so changing chainrings is a regular, scheduled event. The bike has a cheap (Amazon) crankset, and I bought cheap no-name chainrings. And an eccentric bottom bracket for chain tension, not a sprung tensioner. Each time I change chain rings, I am fiddling it for about 10 minutes to try to get it close to perfect.
I tour with a 36T chainring on my Rohloff bike, but around home use a 44T chainring, so changing chainrings is a regular, scheduled event. The bike has a cheap (Amazon) crankset, and I bought cheap no-name chainrings. And an eccentric bottom bracket for chain tension, not a sprung tensioner. Each time I change chain rings, I am fiddling it for about 10 minutes to try to get it close to perfect.
#104
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,266
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3486 Post(s)
Liked 1,483 Times
in
1,157 Posts
My belt equipped Co-Motion with the Rohloff has to be near perfect on the alignment. I have a 50 tooth belt ring up front and a 20 tooth belt cog in the rear. This is a 2.5 to 1 ratio and the lowest ratio Rohloff allows for GVW more than 100 kilos. Gates has come out with a belt ring and belt cog with more contact on the belt. I think they are called expedition parts. A company named Ragina is making maintenance free motorcycle chains coated with industrial diamonds. If they made them for bicycles I would be interested in going to a chain on my bike.
I also have a chainline that is about 5mm off. I wanted a Q factor (pedal width) on my Rohloff bike to nearly match what I have on my derailleur bikes, so my bottom bracket spindle is about 10mm shorter than it should be for a perfect chainline. A chain can tolerate that where it is my understanding that belts do not tolerate that well.
Whenever I put a chain on my sprocket and chainrings, I am careful to always put the chain links with outer plates on the same teeth that have always had outer plate links. That is because the links with outer plates are the links that elongate with chain wear, and the sprocket teeth wear to match the chain wear.
Last year I finally flipped my rear sprocket after seven years of use. The above mentioned chainline error and the above mentioned variation in teeth wear from alternating chain link elongation were readily apparent in my sprocket wear. Photo is before I flipped the sprocket.
The tooth on the left always had chain links that had inner plates, the chainline error caused more wear on one side of those teeth, but the chainlinks with outer links did not rub on the sides of the chain teeth.
#106
This wrench fits...
Getting in the miles as I break in the Rohloffer, some observations:
0. The noises it makes while breaking in are weird. I guess people just get used to it?
1. If I shift across the 7-8 divide while stopped, there's a definite clunk getting going as it shifts both from high to low range and also onto the gear I selected. Not a BFD.
2. I tend to drop a deuce... er, shift across two ratios... when hitting a steeper slope, as a single ratio shift is often absorbed by the loss of forward momentum of shifting in the first place, since I have to relax the pressure on the pedals for a clean shift. But this is an @gugie frame, so dropping a deuce is all part of the gambit I signed on for, and no real issue, as it's easy to climb back up a notch as the gradient allows.
3. I am utterly enjoying the wide range of ratios! There's no local hill I cannot ascend while seated, nor have I found a descent I cannot pedal through at speed. It's what, 525%? So nice. If it were just an 7or 8 speed hub, with the same range, it might lighter, and I would love it all the more.
4. And... yes, it's heavy. Not really an issue on this heaving touring rig with diaga-tube, but my arms strain hefting onto the Park stand.
A pretty picture from today's ride through Oakland (bike waiting on big boxy front bag, and likely shift back to drop bars):
0. The noises it makes while breaking in are weird. I guess people just get used to it?
1. If I shift across the 7-8 divide while stopped, there's a definite clunk getting going as it shifts both from high to low range and also onto the gear I selected. Not a BFD.
2. I tend to drop a deuce... er, shift across two ratios... when hitting a steeper slope, as a single ratio shift is often absorbed by the loss of forward momentum of shifting in the first place, since I have to relax the pressure on the pedals for a clean shift. But this is an @gugie frame, so dropping a deuce is all part of the gambit I signed on for, and no real issue, as it's easy to climb back up a notch as the gradient allows.
3. I am utterly enjoying the wide range of ratios! There's no local hill I cannot ascend while seated, nor have I found a descent I cannot pedal through at speed. It's what, 525%? So nice. If it were just an 7or 8 speed hub, with the same range, it might lighter, and I would love it all the more.
4. And... yes, it's heavy. Not really an issue on this heaving touring rig with diaga-tube, but my arms strain hefting onto the Park stand.
A pretty picture from today's ride through Oakland (bike waiting on big boxy front bag, and likely shift back to drop bars):
Likes For BoltBreaker:
#107
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,266
Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3486 Post(s)
Liked 1,483 Times
in
1,157 Posts
Getting in the miles as I break in the Rohloffer, some observations:
0. The noises it makes while breaking in are weird. I guess people just get used to it?
1. If I shift across the 7-8 divide while stopped, there's a definite clunk getting going as it shifts both from high to low range and also onto the gear I selected. Not a BFD.
2. I tend to drop a deuce... er, shift across two ratios... when hitting a steeper slope, as a single ratio shift is often absorbed by the loss of forward momentum of shifting in the first place, since I have to relax the pressure on the pedals for a clean shift. But this is an @gugie frame, so dropping a deuce is all part of the gambit I signed on for, and no real issue, as it's easy to climb back up a notch as the gradient allows.
3. I am utterly enjoying the wide range of ratios! There's no local hill I cannot ascend while seated, nor have I found a descent I cannot pedal through at speed. It's what, 525%? So nice. If it were just an 7or 8 speed hub, with the same range, it might lighter, and I would love it all the more.
4. And... yes, it's heavy. Not really an issue on this heaving touring rig with diaga-tube, but my arms strain hefting onto the Park stand.
A pretty picture from today's ride through Oakland (bike waiting on big boxy front bag, and likely shift back to drop bars):
0. The noises it makes while breaking in are weird. I guess people just get used to it?
1. If I shift across the 7-8 divide while stopped, there's a definite clunk getting going as it shifts both from high to low range and also onto the gear I selected. Not a BFD.
2. I tend to drop a deuce... er, shift across two ratios... when hitting a steeper slope, as a single ratio shift is often absorbed by the loss of forward momentum of shifting in the first place, since I have to relax the pressure on the pedals for a clean shift. But this is an @gugie frame, so dropping a deuce is all part of the gambit I signed on for, and no real issue, as it's easy to climb back up a notch as the gradient allows.
3. I am utterly enjoying the wide range of ratios! There's no local hill I cannot ascend while seated, nor have I found a descent I cannot pedal through at speed. It's what, 525%? So nice. If it were just an 7or 8 speed hub, with the same range, it might lighter, and I would love it all the more.
4. And... yes, it's heavy. Not really an issue on this heaving touring rig with diaga-tube, but my arms strain hefting onto the Park stand.
A pretty picture from today's ride through Oakland (bike waiting on big boxy front bag, and likely shift back to drop bars):
1 - Gears 1-7 use the third planetary gear system that acts as a low range, but when in gears 8-14 that third planetary gear is direct drive. Think of it like driving a Jeep or a 4X4 truck that has a low range in the transfer case, when you put it in low range you really know you are in low range.
You have flat bars and are switching to drop bars? If so, this may help:
https://www.cyclingabout.com/rohloff...op-handlebars/
I use the Hubbub adapter, have the twist shifter on my bar end. That article has an incorrect photo of the Hubbub adapter. The article has some wooden home brew gizmo, the real Hubbub adapter is aluminum.
But be forewarned that drop bar bikes usually have shorter top tubes, you might find that a frame that fits great with flat bars might be too long with drop bars.
#108
This wrench fits...
You have flat bars and are switching to drop bars? If so, this may help:
https://www.cyclingabout.com/rohloff...op-handlebars/
I use the Hubbub adapter, have the twist shifter on my bar end. That article has an incorrect photo of the Hubbub adapter. The article has some wooden home brew gizmo, the real Hubbub adapter is aluminum.
But be forewarned that drop bar bikes usually have shorter top tubes, you might find that a frame that fits great with flat bars might be too long with drop bars.
Also, I have various Nitto stems to sort through any variations, but expect I'll be fine with my current 7 cm extension and wide (46 or 48 cm) Nitto Noodle bars.
#109
Senior Member
Boltbreaker, that is a particularly interesting frame. It also probably has the longest head tube that I've ever seen, what frame size is it?
The shifter position seems particularly awkward to use, but you clearly are comfortable with using it and will keep it there.
fascinating bike
have you ever considered those drivetrain covers, to keep everything nice and clean? I understand they do have some contact with the chain, and some people dislike the sound.
The shifter position seems particularly awkward to use, but you clearly are comfortable with using it and will keep it there.
fascinating bike
have you ever considered those drivetrain covers, to keep everything nice and clean? I understand they do have some contact with the chain, and some people dislike the sound.
#110
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,493
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1243 Post(s)
Liked 327 Times
in
251 Posts
I should show my bike too. Biggest hunk of metal and CF around. LOL. That's a tandem threaded fork.
This was on a 112 mile day ride. I left the folding lock at home, case behind the seatpost.
This pic was at Long Beach, WA. 18,150 miles now with the Rohloff, maybe 5,000 with my SA XL-RD5w. It easily floats along at 15 mph when not loaded. The front wheel has been downgraded to a new roadster Simcoe. Brand new SA / Dyad wheel the same now on this bike.
On the rack are plastic bike bins, formerly sold in UK by an independent guy. I have tailored cloth pullout bags inside, zero dirt worries. Works perfectly for me, as I don't camp. A few crashes didn't break them, because they are tight full. They each fit exactly half what I always put in my suitcase and it's all the same stuff.
This no grocery bag pic is at Camp18 on Oregon Hwy 26,
Here at Seaside Oregon.
This was on a 112 mile day ride. I left the folding lock at home, case behind the seatpost.
This pic was at Long Beach, WA. 18,150 miles now with the Rohloff, maybe 5,000 with my SA XL-RD5w. It easily floats along at 15 mph when not loaded. The front wheel has been downgraded to a new roadster Simcoe. Brand new SA / Dyad wheel the same now on this bike.
On the rack are plastic bike bins, formerly sold in UK by an independent guy. I have tailored cloth pullout bags inside, zero dirt worries. Works perfectly for me, as I don't camp. A few crashes didn't break them, because they are tight full. They each fit exactly half what I always put in my suitcase and it's all the same stuff.
This no grocery bag pic is at Camp18 on Oregon Hwy 26,
Here at Seaside Oregon.
Last edited by GamblerGORD53; 03-01-22 at 04:06 PM.
Likes For GamblerGORD53:
#111
Palmer
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 8,646
Bikes: Mike Melton custom, Alex Moulton AM, Dahon Curl
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1684 Post(s)
Liked 1,846 Times
in
1,071 Posts
So, Rohloff...or Kindernay XIV?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PatrickR400
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
23
07-23-15 09:55 AM
Philatio
Bicycle Mechanics
7
07-05-10 01:05 PM