How Much New is Too Much for You?
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Disc brakes
I have 10+ rim braked bikes and lots of expensive rim braked wheels. My newest Farsports Ventoux rim wheels stop shockingly well in the rain. So, discs (other than on my Mt bike which I have) are too far
I have 10+ rim braked bikes and lots of expensive rim braked wheels. My newest Farsports Ventoux rim wheels stop shockingly well in the rain. So, discs (other than on my Mt bike which I have) are too far
Likes For GhostRider62:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,257
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18424 Post(s)
Liked 15,582 Times
in
7,337 Posts
I still use PGS when out riding in unfamiliar areas.
Anyone else remember PGS? Kids these days take out everything. Sonar, radar, electric toothbrushes.
Anyone else remember PGS? Kids these days take out everything. Sonar, radar, electric toothbrushes.
#28
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
A fully enclosed/sealed drivetrain would be nice but the tech doesn't exist yet. I don't mean just IGH but also fully enclosed power transmissions. No more exposed chain / drive shaft, perhaps, not even a chain.
The mainstream drivetrain tech that is fully exposed to the elements is just ridiculous in the 21st century. It discourages all-weather riding and a major inconvenience to daily commuters.
I think the weight weenies are to blame in this messed up priorities when they only make up a tiny minority of the riding populace.
The mainstream drivetrain tech that is fully exposed to the elements is just ridiculous in the 21st century. It discourages all-weather riding and a major inconvenience to daily commuters.
I think the weight weenies are to blame in this messed up priorities when they only make up a tiny minority of the riding populace.
Also, I think the idea that sealing the drive train is suddenly going to make a lot more people want to ride in bad weather is just beyond absurd.
You're mixing cause and effect--the reason there's a lot of light-weight tech is because there's demand for light-weight tech, the reason there's basically little or no supply of sealed drive train bikes is that there's little or no demand for sealed drive trains. The two things have absolutely nothing to do with each other. If you want to make the case that well-informed consumers should learn to demand sealed drive trains, then do so, but why would you assign yourself the task of telling people they shouldn't want what they already want?
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
A belt driven Rohloff is nearly maintenance free. Don't see too many of them.
Chain and gears are light and very, very efficient. There is no problem needing solving there.
Chain and gears are light and very, very efficient. There is no problem needing solving there.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#30
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
OK, blaming the weight weenies is probably too much. Then it's certainly the cycling industry's fault.
Manufacturers have tried making fully enclosed drivetrains. But they always give it up. My guess is the tech has exceeded the "tolerable weights" acceptable to weight weenies.
But why not develop the product further to sell to the non-weight weenie market, particularly commuters, and to the rest of the riders who doesn't care about speed and just want a bike that is easy to maintain? One might argue traditional open-drive bikes are easy to maintain. But unless you work part time only, is retired with lots of disposable income and free time on your hand, then it's actually bothersome enough.
It's like the majority group of riders don't exist to the manufacturers so what they do is just make junk-quality version of their weight-weenie open derailleur drives.
Manufacturers have tried making fully enclosed drivetrains. But they always give it up. My guess is the tech has exceeded the "tolerable weights" acceptable to weight weenies.
But why not develop the product further to sell to the non-weight weenie market, particularly commuters, and to the rest of the riders who doesn't care about speed and just want a bike that is easy to maintain? One might argue traditional open-drive bikes are easy to maintain. But unless you work part time only, is retired with lots of disposable income and free time on your hand, then it's actually bothersome enough.
It's like the majority group of riders don't exist to the manufacturers so what they do is just make junk-quality version of their weight-weenie open derailleur drives.
That's a terrible guess as to why they give it up. Whenever I go into a LBS when they have stock, the lightweight bikes are a small portion of the stock. There's way more gravel, mountain and e-bikes than the "weight weenie" road bikes. And I'm pretty sure all of the sealed options are going to be way more expensive as well as more difficult to service.
They give it up because people who ride in weather already know how to deal with the exposed drive train which, basically, is a very simple system and people who aren't riding in the weather are not doing so for other reasons than the drive train. Sealing the drive train is scratching something that just isn't itching.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,995
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2700 Post(s)
Liked 486 Times
in
351 Posts
lucky, two of the bikes I ride have disc brakes (cheap mechanical ones) and they are hellish. Ive given up on avoiding wheel rub, which is one of my biggest pet peeves.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
When I commuted by bike, it wasn't my fancy one. It was my touring bike with fenders. The drive train would only get messing in really bad conditions and the only special action was application of WD-40 to clean road sand and debris. This took maybe 60 seconds when I got home. Most rain never impacted the drivetrain.
A Rohloff and belt drive would be the ultimate commuter setup but not for me. I am sold on chains and gears.
A Rohloff and belt drive would be the ultimate commuter setup but not for me. I am sold on chains and gears.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#33
Senior Member
I admit: I am a technology lagger. For me a bike has always and will always be a utility vehicle. Nothing more and nothing less. I don't care about racing, carbon, tubeless, electronic shifting, extreme light weight frames, Strava, watts and so on.
I commute by bike, run many errands by bike and try to live car free as much as possible. I have never owned a BMX bike, never a road bike and only one mountain bike which I sold some years ago. Most of my bikes are at last 20 years old and I always buy used. I prefer simple reliable technology which I can easily fix myself. Some of my bikes even have internal gear hubs. Heck yes I actually prefer internal gear hubs over derailleurs. If the Rohloff hub would not be that expensive I would have converted some of my bikes already. And I prefer steel frames over aluminum and carbon.
I just got my first bike with disc brakes and it is still too early to say if I like them or not.
The only major switch I made so far: I went from upright bikes to recumbent bikes because of back problems. And the only major mods I will be doing in the next months: I want to add electric assist to two of my bikes. One of them being a cargo bike.
Short: I am happy with the old technology bikes I have. They get me from point A to point B with a smile on my face.
I commute by bike, run many errands by bike and try to live car free as much as possible. I have never owned a BMX bike, never a road bike and only one mountain bike which I sold some years ago. Most of my bikes are at last 20 years old and I always buy used. I prefer simple reliable technology which I can easily fix myself. Some of my bikes even have internal gear hubs. Heck yes I actually prefer internal gear hubs over derailleurs. If the Rohloff hub would not be that expensive I would have converted some of my bikes already. And I prefer steel frames over aluminum and carbon.
I just got my first bike with disc brakes and it is still too early to say if I like them or not.
The only major switch I made so far: I went from upright bikes to recumbent bikes because of back problems. And the only major mods I will be doing in the next months: I want to add electric assist to two of my bikes. One of them being a cargo bike.
Short: I am happy with the old technology bikes I have. They get me from point A to point B with a smile on my face.
Likes For Harhir:
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Likes For LarrySellerz:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
#37
Dirty Heathen
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: MC-778, 6250 fsw
Posts: 2,182
Bikes: 1997 Cannondale, 1976 Bridgestone, 1998 SoftRide, 1989 Klein, 1989 Black Lightning #0033
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 889 Post(s)
Liked 906 Times
in
534 Posts
Sometimes I'm riding to achieve a specific goal, sometimes the ride itself is the goal.
Modern high-performance bikes, both road and MTB have become highly specialized, but they're not only bikes in the shop, as it were; you can find almost any combination of drivetrain, tire size and handlebar shape pretty much "off the rack"
Likes For Ironfish653:
#38
Senior Member
#39
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
#40
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
For my recreational / fitness riding (road/gravel rides and MTB) I don’t want electric/powered anything as part of the core functions of my bike (shifting, pedaling, braking, suspension, dropper post).
Accessories like lights and a phone/gps is a little different.
I am more open to all of that (including a motor) for a utility/commuter bike.
Accessories like lights and a phone/gps is a little different.
I am more open to all of that (including a motor) for a utility/commuter bike.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,601
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 427 Post(s)
Liked 700 Times
in
436 Posts
Not opposed to any more modern features. But I can do with older tech. I read lots more posts regarding replacing cables with internal routing, hydraulic brakes, does this scratch on my carbon (bike, wheel, etc) look dangerous to ride, how do I fix my electronic shifting, than I do with "older" tech. Give me what works, is fairly trouble free, and that I can work on. If you want the "latest and greatest" that's fine. I just want to ride, and if something needs adjusting or replacing, to be able to do it. Yeah, I"m a senior who grew up with "old tech". It works for me, when/if I buy a new bike with the tech that's forced on me, I'll learn to deal with it. It's not too much, but I can ride without it.
#42
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
The question wasn't what technology would you like to see? but rather, which new technologies do you embrace, and which do you reject?
Last edited by Rolla; 04-06-22 at 09:31 AM.
#43
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I think he had a point, but Petersen's book is nearing its 10th anniversary, and there's been all sorts of non-racer trends in the industry since then. He was also a bit incoherent in message in that his bikes are definitely way too expensive for mass appeal.
#44
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I'm a cheap bastard who finds riding '90s era brifter bikes fun.
Likes For livedarklions:
#45
Banned.
Your dissatisfaction with current drivetrains is duly noted, but regardless of the culprit, your ongoing complaint about the lack of enclosed drivetrains seems off topic.
The question wasn't what technology would you like to see? but rather, which new technologies do you embrace, and which do you reject?
The question wasn't what technology would you like to see? but rather, which new technologies do you embrace, and which do you reject?
I'm aware of belt drive + IGH drivetrain. I do LIKE that tech. The belt doesn't need lubricating and the IGH only needs to be topped or with very long intervals between oil changes in all weather conditions.
It's way better than chain + derailleur drivetrains in terms of ruggedness and maintenance but even belt drive can still experience accelerated wear because it's still exposed and mud and road grit can still get to it in wet rides. At least you eliminate the need to re-lube after a wet run but you still need to clean it.
#46
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,617
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10970 Post(s)
Liked 7,496 Times
in
4,192 Posts
If he just stopped there, I bet he would have a lot more support and interest. Instead, he then puts up videos of people swordfighting with a steel and carbon fork to show which is stronger, as if that actually has any bearing in reality. And then he pushes tweed and bars that are 4" above the saddle even if that isnt a comfortable position, and 54cm chainstays and the disconnect grows even wider.
#47
Guest
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
There has been quite few attempts by big manufacturers they just gave up on it.
I'm aware of belt drive + IGH drivetrain. I do LIKE that tech. The belt doesn't need lubricating and the IGH only needs to be topped or with very long intervals between oil changes in all weather conditions.
It's way better than chain + derailleur drivetrains in terms of ruggedness and maintenance but even belt drive can still experience accelerated wear because it's still exposed and mud and road grit can still get to it in wet rides. At least you eliminate the need to re-lube after a wet run but you still need to clean it.
I'm aware of belt drive + IGH drivetrain. I do LIKE that tech. The belt doesn't need lubricating and the IGH only needs to be topped or with very long intervals between oil changes in all weather conditions.
It's way better than chain + derailleur drivetrains in terms of ruggedness and maintenance but even belt drive can still experience accelerated wear because it's still exposed and mud and road grit can still get to it in wet rides. At least you eliminate the need to re-lube after a wet run but you still need to clean it.
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,807
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1944 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
I can't say I reject any modern technology. I'm in the marginal gain doesn't outweigh the cost camp.
I started to really ride in the 80's when I was in my 30's. After our twin boys discovered my old surfboards on the rafters, I spent most of my 50's in the water with them. My riding time was way down. Then they started to mountain bike, so I spent the first half of my 60's getting beat up on trails. Then they both moved out of state. After I retired I mixed my time between all three, and other hobbies.
Currently all of our bikes are 7/8/9 speed, all with index shifting. I recently turned 70 and I don't see a need for newer technology until I have extinguished my gearing options. Where we live nothing is flat and I foresee adding a little assist in the coming years. At that point I will probably go to a wide range 1x, hopefully with a weight in the low 20's. Now that Shimano has GRX wide range road compatibility, it makes things easier. No stupid RoadLink or capacity issues.
I've built my own bikes up from the frame and done a lot of mods, hopefully I'll learn hydraulic discs (can't be tougher than disc brakes on a car), electric shifting might be nice. Never got a lot of flats, but may go tubeless. By the time I go in that direction, all of the first generation issues will hopefully be ironed out.
John
I started to really ride in the 80's when I was in my 30's. After our twin boys discovered my old surfboards on the rafters, I spent most of my 50's in the water with them. My riding time was way down. Then they started to mountain bike, so I spent the first half of my 60's getting beat up on trails. Then they both moved out of state. After I retired I mixed my time between all three, and other hobbies.
Currently all of our bikes are 7/8/9 speed, all with index shifting. I recently turned 70 and I don't see a need for newer technology until I have extinguished my gearing options. Where we live nothing is flat and I foresee adding a little assist in the coming years. At that point I will probably go to a wide range 1x, hopefully with a weight in the low 20's. Now that Shimano has GRX wide range road compatibility, it makes things easier. No stupid RoadLink or capacity issues.
I've built my own bikes up from the frame and done a lot of mods, hopefully I'll learn hydraulic discs (can't be tougher than disc brakes on a car), electric shifting might be nice. Never got a lot of flats, but may go tubeless. By the time I go in that direction, all of the first generation issues will hopefully be ironed out.
John
#49
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
We had a thread a few years ago where I learned I wasn't the only one who felt this way, but all of us who did admitted it was completely irrational. I wouldn't want electronic shifting because I don't want any part of the drive train to be powered by anything other than my muscle (and maybe gravity, but that's unavoidable). And yes, I do use GPS, but that's not part of the drive train.
#50
Banned.
That's a terrible guess as to why they give it up. Whenever I go into a LBS when they have stock, the lightweight bikes are a small portion of the stock. There's way more gravel, mountain and e-bikes than the "weight weenie" road bikes. And I'm pretty sure all of the sealed options are going to be way more expensive as well as more difficult to service.
They give it up because people who ride in weather already know how to deal with the exposed drive train which, basically, is a very simple system and people who aren't riding in the weather are not doing so for other reasons than the drive train. Sealing the drive train is scratching something that just isn't itching.
They give it up because people who ride in weather already know how to deal with the exposed drive train which, basically, is a very simple system and people who aren't riding in the weather are not doing so for other reasons than the drive train. Sealing the drive train is scratching something that just isn't itching.
The cost have less to do with development cost and complexity but more to do with the configuration's share of the market and the weight. If the tech can be made mainstream with high volume production and if using inexpensive materials like unforged steel and aluminum, it can be made cheap. It will be heavy but remember, the tech is catered towards utility, commuters who cares a lot less about speed than maintenance.