crank length & saddle height with age
#26
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 15,062
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6233 Post(s)
Liked 4,837 Times
in
3,335 Posts
Now I need something to go with my coffee. I think the muffins my wife bought are a little stale. Thanks for the chit chat!
Likes For Iride01:
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,117
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1450 Post(s)
Liked 1,400 Times
in
766 Posts
Understood, but my knee will also be in greater flexion at the top of the pedal rotation. There is probably a happy middle somewhere.
Likes For smontanaro:
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,117
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1450 Post(s)
Liked 1,400 Times
in
766 Posts
No, however... If I'm going from a common 170mm crank length to 175, leaving the distance from the saddle to the pedal the same means that my foot will be 1cm higher at the top of the pedal circle. I will probably compromise a bit to start, raising my saddle a tad, then listening to see if my knees tell me I've got it wrong.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,332
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8308 Post(s)
Liked 9,102 Times
in
4,499 Posts
No, however... If I'm going from a common 170mm crank length to 175, leaving the distance from the saddle to the pedal the same means that my foot will be 1cm higher at the top of the pedal circle. I will probably compromise a bit to start, raising my saddle a tad, then listening to see if my knees tell me I've got it wrong.
I do move around on the saddle when riding which changes the relative position a bit, I'm sure. Like when on a flat section, I will slide back and try to get aero (which isn't very aero). Or I move around when climbing.
Good luck with the knee issue! I've been very fortunate with my knees and I attribute at least part of that to spinning instead of mashing years ago.
#30
Junior Member
I can't really help with that. I've relied on the saddle to pedal at the bottom and never considered where it ends up at the top. I've also never changed crank length and I'm almost 69.
I do move around on the saddle when riding which changes the relative position a bit, I'm sure. Like when on a flat section, I will slide back and try to get aero (which isn't very aero). Or I move around when climbing.
Good luck with the knee issue! I've been very fortunate with my knees and I attribute at least part of that to spinning instead of mashing years ago.
I do move around on the saddle when riding which changes the relative position a bit, I'm sure. Like when on a flat section, I will slide back and try to get aero (which isn't very aero). Or I move around when climbing.
Good luck with the knee issue! I've been very fortunate with my knees and I attribute at least part of that to spinning instead of mashing years ago.
hsea17
Last edited by hsea17; 02-27-23 at 04:24 AM.
Likes For hsea17:
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Another question is, which choice makes it easier to pull your foot back at bottom, and to (perhaps more affected) push your foot over the top for a little earlier start at the power stroke. I could see the longer arm and tightened knee angle affecting how the start of the downstroke works.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,488
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1757 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
744 Posts
I will be 77 on Juneteentth. I also have not changed anything since I began riding in my early 30's. FWIW people should be advised that you measure seat height from pedal spindle not BB.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Actually one can do it either way, but you hav to be careful to make corrections wo there isn't a 17 cm problem built in to you r new bike "fit."
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Maybe I'm not clear on what we are talking about. You can set and adjust saddle height on a given bike based on measuring from any fixed point on that bike. As long as you do the numbers consistently, it will work. If the crank is changed, one needs to think about how to compensate so your leg extension remains the same.
But I don't see how it can be true that measuring from the BB axis to the saddle top is the only valid way to address saddle height.
But I don't see how it can be true that measuring from the BB axis to the saddle top is the only valid way to address saddle height.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,488
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1757 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
744 Posts
Maybe I'm not clear on what we are talking about. You can set and adjust saddle height on a given bike based on measuring from any fixed point on that bike. As long as you do the numbers consistently, it will work. If the crank is changed, one needs to think about how to compensate so your leg extension remains the same.
But I don't see how it can be true that measuring from the BB axis to the saddle top is the only valid way to address saddle height.
But I don't see how it can be true that measuring from the BB axis to the saddle top is the only valid way to address saddle height.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,886
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1861 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
That is certainly true. I've changed from 170 to 172.5 and backwards several times, and I do adjust my saddle height to compensate. Once when I forgot to reset the height I had a lot of pain until I figured it out - the saddle was effectively higher than my butt wanted it to be.
Likes For Road Fan:
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,400
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2500 Post(s)
Liked 2,978 Times
in
1,689 Posts
Earlier in the thread I mentioned that I've dropped my saddle height as I aged from my 60s into my 70s. Someone responded that his height has changed but not his leg length.
Did a search. He was right. Evidently the majority of people lose height in the spine but not the legs. Now my saddles are feeling as though they're too low.
Did a search. He was right. Evidently the majority of people lose height in the spine but not the legs. Now my saddles are feeling as though they're too low.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,488
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1757 Post(s)
Liked 1,285 Times
in
744 Posts
Earlier in the thread I mentioned that I've dropped my saddle height as I aged from my 60s into my 70s. Someone responded that his height has changed but not his leg length.
Did a search. He was right. Evidently the majority of people lose height in the spine but not the legs. Now my saddles are feeling as though they're too low.
Did a search. He was right. Evidently the majority of people lose height in the spine but not the legs. Now my saddles are feeling as though they're too low.
#40
Junior Member
Well, at least I'm not the only one who shrinks. In military service as a 20-year-old I was measured at 5'77 now plus 40 years later I'm barely 5'65.
Btw, I've clearly been measuring seat height wrong my whole life, measuring from BB to the center of the saddle
hsea17
Btw, I've clearly been measuring seat height wrong my whole life, measuring from BB to the center of the saddle
hsea17
#41
Banned
The trend is toward shorter cranks on bikes with owners replacing 165mm with 155mm cranks. With adjustments of seat height I always take a tool and ride for at least 20 minutes before making an adjustment. I need to give my body time to warm up and my tendons and ligaments and muscles to stretch out.
#42
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3467 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
There is one caution to heed: if you do switch to shorter cranks, you will need to install lower gearing.
Likes For terrymorse:
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,685
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
412 Posts
Living with arthritis my knees give me all the data I need to stay on my bikes, my 165mm is not a fashion trend but a necessity.
#44
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3467 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,685
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
412 Posts
May not apply to anyone else as I am in my 70s but after experimenting with a couple of my bikes the results had me ask my Orthopedist. She believes that at my fit recommended saddle height (set at the bottom of the pedal stroke) the releaf I get is that at the top of the pedal stroke my leg is not as bent so my knees arenot seeing as much compression of the knee cap or the knee moving to the outside with the 7.2mm shorter crankset.
Likes For easyupbug:
#46
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,150
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3467 Post(s)
Liked 3,608 Times
in
1,810 Posts
May not apply to anyone else as I am in my 70s but after experimenting with a couple of my bikes the results had me ask my Orthopedist. She believes that at my fit recommended saddle height (set at the bottom of the pedal stroke) the releaf I get is that at the top of the pedal stroke my leg is not as bent so my knees arenot seeing as much compression of the knee cap or the knee moving to the outside with the 7.2mm shorter crankset.
#47
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 5,117
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 63 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1450 Post(s)
Liked 1,400 Times
in
766 Posts
That was my thinking when I originally started the thread. While fuller range of motion would be preferable, our knees will tell us what works.