View Poll Results: What would you do if you lost the feeling in you left hand?
carry on as normal hoping not to lock the rears up.
7
9.21%
relay on the front brake.
54
71.05%
swap the braking around, (rear braking with right hand)
7
9.21%
stop riding
8
10.53%
Voters: 76. You may not vote on this poll
What would you do if you could only use one brake?
#26
Newbie Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Just outside San Fransicsco
Posts: 556
Bikes: Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Olebiker
If you are using both brakes, you don't unload the rear wheel as much as when using only the front brake.
- Warren
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 262
Bikes: 2001 Litespeed Vortex - Shimano Ultegra, Jamis Dakar XC- Shimano XT, Diamond Back Axis TT- rigid with drop bars and bar end shifters
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You can link your brakes together to use only one lever, you could also easily set your brakes to give either the front or rear more braking force than the other if needed. For those who say braking only with front is dangerous or braking on a flat tire is a death sentence, then you should work on your braking skills. If you want to really learn what is possible while on the brakes, learn to ride a sportbike (motorcycle). Once you learn how to properly brake a motorcyle going into a corner at a high rate of speed, anything you do on a bicycle will seem like childs play.
#28
Resident Old Fart
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,295
Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chroot
The rear wheel becomes unloaded because the mass of the bike and rider has a tendency to rotate around the front wheel hub. It has nothing to do with which brakes you're using, and only depends upon the magnitude of the deceleration.
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Wag more, bark less
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Originally Posted by acathi_cyclist
I don't believe in this method of managing both brakes with one lever. There is still the issue of getting a flat and locking up the flat tire. With this option you double the probability of having to lock up the wheel that is flat from 50% to 100%. If you pull the lever managing both brakes the flat will certainly sieze up. A front brake is sufficient
#30
Too Much Crazy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 3,660
Bikes: Eriksen 29er, Gunnar Roadie, Niner RLT, Niner RIP 9
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 116 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Olebiker
This whole front-brake-only thing is one of those ideas that works well on paper but, having seen too many real life crashes in my 30 plus years of riding, I have learned to trust my experience.
Originally Posted by Olebiker
I brake with both brakes and have never been unable to stop when I need to. I have never lost control of my bike while braking with both brakes. I have, however, earned a dandy case of road rash years ago when using only a front brake on a fixed gear bike.
How did you earn your road rash using only a front brake?
you make using a front brake only sound like it is a death defying act for only the foolhardy when in fact it is pretty easy to learn how to do and, even with two brakes, 90% of your braking should be done with the front.
For the OP, using front brake only would be fine for the road. Just get used to the setup before attempting high speeds. I would be more concerned with the lasck of feeling for steering purposes.
#31
Newbie Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Just outside San Fransicsco
Posts: 556
Bikes: Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Olebiker
Take your argument to the extreme and you will see that it does not hold up. If you brake ONLY with the rear brake, there is no tendency to rotate around the front hub.
- Warren
#32
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,307
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1456 Post(s)
Liked 733 Times
in
375 Posts
You can set the brakes up so both calipers operate from one lever. Common tandem setup is both rim breaks on one brake lever, and a disc or drum brake on the other.
#33
Stoked
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: White Mountains of AZ
Posts: 268
Bikes: S-Works E5, Trek T2000 Tandem, Giant Warp DS/1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Depending on the environment:
Front brake alone.
Front brake and fixed.
Front brake and 3 speed coaster for the rear.
Front brake alone.
Front brake and fixed.
Front brake and 3 speed coaster for the rear.
#34
Resident Old Fart
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,295
Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't think the argument is that using two brakes would be detrimental. I think the argument is that riding with one brake is nearly or as effective.
How did you earn your road rash using only a front brake? [/QUOTE]
I fixed up my old Gitane Tour de France as a fixed gear bike. At first I used two brakes, but my old buddy Wallace Spradling convinced me that I only needed a front brake. The first time I applied the brake in a turn, the rear wheel unweighted enough to swing the rear end around. When the rear tire hit the pavement I did a flying high side dismount at Fifth and Main in Louisville, Kentucky.
Not death defying, but I see no advantage to doing it and numerous disadvantages to using only a front brake.
How did you earn your road rash using only a front brake? [/QUOTE]
I fixed up my old Gitane Tour de France as a fixed gear bike. At first I used two brakes, but my old buddy Wallace Spradling convinced me that I only needed a front brake. The first time I applied the brake in a turn, the rear wheel unweighted enough to swing the rear end around. When the rear tire hit the pavement I did a flying high side dismount at Fifth and Main in Louisville, Kentucky.
Originally Posted by unsuspended
you make using a front brake only sound like it is a death defying act for only the foolhardy when in fact it is pretty easy to learn how to do and, even with two brakes, 90% of your braking should be done with the front.
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Wag more, bark less
#35
Resident Old Fart
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,295
Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chroot
Of course there is. The rear wheel becomes unloaded the same way, regardless of which brake you use. The only difference is that, when using the rear brake, the loss of traction resulting from unloading the rear wheel (rotating around the front hub) also causes a concomittant reduction in braking force, thus providing negative feedback. This is the reason people tell you not to use the rear brake so heavily in the first place -- when you really need braking power, the rear brake cannot provide it. The rear brake may be safer in the sense that it won't send you over the handlebars, but it's less safe in the sense that it actually provides much less stopping power.
- Warren
- Warren
Once again, I don't deny that you get most of your braking force from the front brake and I am not advocating using only a rear brake. What I am saying is that you sacrifice too much control when not using a rear brake along with a front brake. The front brake provides most of the stopping power and the rear brake keeps the rest of the bike in line with the front wheel.
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Wag more, bark less
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 690
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Olebiker
The front brake provides most of the stopping power and the rear brake keeps the rest of the bike in line with the front wheel.
Brainstorming,
Dagna
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 880
Bikes: Surley LHT, Cannondale R1000, IBEX Ignition, Bianchi Boardwalk, KHS Milano Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jtree
since expert riders use the front brake almost exclusively anyway, all you need is the front brake,
#38
Newbie Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Just outside San Fransicsco
Posts: 556
Bikes: Trek 1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Olebiker
If you truly believe that, using the rear brake only, the bike will still tend to rotate around the front axle, I would like to see you do a nose wheelie using your back brake only. You can't do it.
The only difference is that, when using the rear brake, the loss of traction resulting from unloading the rear wheel (rotating around the front hub) also causes a concomittant reduction in braking force, thus providing negative feedback.
Please note that "unloading the rear wheel" and "rotating about the front hub" are, in fact, equivalent concepts.
- Warren
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Georgia Tech
Posts: 75
Bikes: scott speedster s3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Olebiker - dude, no offense but you are wrong, i may be a newb at the road bike bit, but uhh you see that green thing over there right under my name, yeah if i were to touch the rear brake oin that most likely i would end up on my head, when you are useing the front brake to its full potential then the rear brake is about useless, the only thing applying it will net is a nice tail hung out slide.
as for not being able to control the bike with thee front brake, again let me reference the motor cycle, there is a picture out there somewhere of a guy riding a race ducati, he is using all the front brakes, rear wheel in the air, and still turning in for the corner. its all a matter of control, when used with care the front brake by itself is very safe and has the ability to do all the work required to stop.
(i also have my road bike brakes set up to front in my right hand, and have to say the last time someone pulled out in front of me i tried useing the rear brake, locked instantly, and just fishtailed around, as i came to a stop on the front wheel, if you progressivly squeeze it it has huge amounts of stopping potential)
as for not being able to control the bike with thee front brake, again let me reference the motor cycle, there is a picture out there somewhere of a guy riding a race ducati, he is using all the front brakes, rear wheel in the air, and still turning in for the corner. its all a matter of control, when used with care the front brake by itself is very safe and has the ability to do all the work required to stop.
(i also have my road bike brakes set up to front in my right hand, and have to say the last time someone pulled out in front of me i tried useing the rear brake, locked instantly, and just fishtailed around, as i came to a stop on the front wheel, if you progressivly squeeze it it has huge amounts of stopping potential)
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 459
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The rear brake in my Schwinn didn't work properly for years. Never bothered doing anything about it because I normally use the front brake anyway. Both brakes work fine in my new bike, but I'm just used to using my front brake now, so...
#41
Hacker Maximus
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Berkeley california
Posts: 314
Bikes: less than I use to,, more than I need
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
this is not exactlly what you asking, but maybe it can be helpful
I did this conversion for my tandem so i can run Hydrolic and rim brakes at the same time..
i'm sure with some tinkering you can achive similar results,,
I think it works great, super secure and really easy to modulate.
Here is the whole gallery of picture i took and here are some examples so you can see how it works
rim brake Only
Hydrolic Only
the two of them at Unison..
this is how the tandem looks but i don't see why not you can connect one lever to the front brake and one for the rear
No matter what I hope the issue with your hand get better and also If i was to chose I take the Front brake anyday
get better soon.
Ricky
I did this conversion for my tandem so i can run Hydrolic and rim brakes at the same time..
i'm sure with some tinkering you can achive similar results,,
I think it works great, super secure and really easy to modulate.
Here is the whole gallery of picture i took and here are some examples so you can see how it works
rim brake Only
Hydrolic Only
the two of them at Unison..
this is how the tandem looks but i don't see why not you can connect one lever to the front brake and one for the rear
No matter what I hope the issue with your hand get better and also If i was to chose I take the Front brake anyday
get better soon.
Ricky
#42
Senior Member
I would set up front brake with my good hand. Maybe some kind of rear or detuned rear for the bad one in extreme circumstances.
btw, here is a link to a Sheldon Brown braking article that goes into detail on effects of the front brakes.
https://sheldonbrown.com/brakturn.html
btw, here is a link to a Sheldon Brown braking article that goes into detail on effects of the front brakes.
https://sheldonbrown.com/brakturn.html
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Quality makes a cable splitter you can use for your brakes.
Set up your brakes so the rear engages almost immediately, and the front soon thereafter.
That way, you can modulate how you use front/rear without going over the handlebars or skidding...
Set up your brakes so the rear engages almost immediately, and the front soon thereafter.
That way, you can modulate how you use front/rear without going over the handlebars or skidding...
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles/Aveyron France
Posts: 5,308
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
you're totally fine with a front brake only. the only reason i think you really need a back brake (on a freewheel bike) is in the unlikely event the front brake cable broke or came loose, say on a steep hill with a busy intersection at the bottom. highly unlikely but would suck nonetheless.
#45
UberClydesdale
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 194
Bikes: Klein,Panasonic
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As another motorcyclist guy I can not believe anyone would even think of only using the rear brake . The front brake gives you around 75% of your stopping power depending on weight distribution and center of gravity, that does not leave the rear brake very much braking power to stop you. Some motorcycles have linked brakes(both work on one lever) but most riders dont like them perfering to operate the brakes separately. If you can only use one hand permanently the photos of both of the levers close together might be a great option. The only time I use the rear brake on the bicycle or motorcycle is when going very slow to hold /control power at slower than a walking pace.
The problem I see in linking the brakes would be in getting the % right between the front/rear. You would not want them to be 50%50 that would be too much in the rear. With the wrong bias you could have a rear wheel skid when you would least want one(down hill with the weight transfer to the front or going around a corner).
The problem I see in linking the brakes would be in getting the % right between the front/rear. You would not want them to be 50%50 that would be too much in the rear. With the wrong bias you could have a rear wheel skid when you would least want one(down hill with the weight transfer to the front or going around a corner).
Last edited by Motophoto; 10-10-05 at 10:32 PM.
#46
Senior Member?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,977
Bikes: orbea onix, Cervelo SLC, Specialzed Allez, Cervelo P3 Alu
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
does anybody make those pedal-backwards brakes like the ones I used on my kmart bike when i was a kid?
#47
Resident Old Fart
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,295
Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by chroot
Since you appear to lack the reading comprehension of a schoolchild, I welcome you to read my previous post again. I'll even duplicate the relevant sentence:
The only difference is that, when using the rear brake, the loss of traction resulting from unloading the rear wheel (rotating around the front hub) also causes a concomittant reduction in braking force, thus providing negative feedback.
Please note that "unloading the rear wheel" and "rotating about the front hub" are, in fact, equivalent concepts.
- Warren
The only difference is that, when using the rear brake, the loss of traction resulting from unloading the rear wheel (rotating around the front hub) also causes a concomittant reduction in braking force, thus providing negative feedback.
Please note that "unloading the rear wheel" and "rotating about the front hub" are, in fact, equivalent concepts.
- Warren
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Wag more, bark less
#48
Resident Old Fart
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 1,295
Bikes: Douglas Precision Ti
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by btjzx6rr
Olebiker - dude, no offense but you are wrong, i may be a newb at the road bike bit, but uhh you see that green thing over there right under my name, yeah if i were to touch the rear brake oin that most likely i would end up on my head, when you are useing the front brake to its full potential then the rear brake is about useless, the only thing applying it will net is a nice tail hung out slide.
as for not being able to control the bike with thee front brake, again let me reference the motor cycle, there is a picture out there somewhere of a guy riding a race ducati, he is using all the front brakes, rear wheel in the air, and still turning in for the corner. its all a matter of control, when used with care the front brake by itself is very safe and has the ability to do all the work required to stop.
as for not being able to control the bike with thee front brake, again let me reference the motor cycle, there is a picture out there somewhere of a guy riding a race ducati, he is using all the front brakes, rear wheel in the air, and still turning in for the corner. its all a matter of control, when used with care the front brake by itself is very safe and has the ability to do all the work required to stop.
__________________
Wag more, bark less
Wag more, bark less
#49
That darn Yankee
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West West Fort Worth
Posts: 4,284
Bikes: Mongoose XR-100, Eros Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've witnessed somebody going head over hood and bike on top of them because they used the front-brake only several times. I literally never use the front brake at all because of this
__________________
Life is about hanging onto what you think is important and finding out what really is important.
"Stop Ruining my joke!", "No, a joke implies humor attached at no additional cost"
So many sayings, so little sig space.
Life is about hanging onto what you think is important and finding out what really is important.
"Stop Ruining my joke!", "No, a joke implies humor attached at no additional cost"
So many sayings, so little sig space.